:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:K-3學童記憶力測驗發展之研究
書刊名:特殊教育研究學刊
作者:洪碧霞 引用關係邱上真
作者(外文):Hung, Pi-hsiaChiu Huang, Shang-cheng
出版日期:1998
卷期:16
頁次:頁65-86
主題關鍵詞:K-3學童記憶力測驗
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:12
  • 點閱點閱:30
     本研究旨在發展K-3學童適用之記憶力測驗,作為學習困難初步的診斷工具。測驗 內容包含(1)語詞記憶(立即與延宕);(2)數字序列記憶;(3)物體辨識(立即與 延宕)及(4)工作記憶等四部份。常模樣本包含 60 所學校 K-3 年級共 1,235 名學童, 另外以資源班 440 名及啟智班 339 名學童作為初步效度研究的對照討論樣本。一、三、四 子測驗的平均(點)二系列相關依序為.55,.61 和.41;內部一致性α為.75,.85 和.64。 語詞記憶有明顯的順序效應;物體辨識測驗中動物的獨特性和受試學童喜愛的程度有些微的 影響;工作記憶變異較大,因此它與其他子測驗的相關也較高(.34 至.46 )。各子測驗男 女學童的差異並不明顯,其中語詞記憶和數字記憶廣度,女學童比男學童略高,但解釋量低 於 1%。 各子測驗年級間的差異都是顯著的,由幼稚園到三年級平均得分逐年上揚,年級變 項對各子測驗變異的解釋量依序為 7.5%,7.8%,11.6% 和 15.4%。 大致看來作業內涵愈複 雜,年級的差異就愈明顯。常模、資源班和啟智班的差異幅度更大,班別對各子測驗變異的 解釋量依序為 19.3%,17.0%,17.8% 及 25.2%。 其中年級和班別的交互作用在物體辨識和 工作記憶測驗上是顯著的,即各類班別隨年級上揚的幅度並不平行,換言之各類學童成長的 速率有差異。研究中同時提出各子測驗疑似記憶薄弱的決斷分數,以為進一步協助必要性的 警示。 
     The purpose of this study is to develop a K-3 children memory test (CMT) to diagnose the characteristics of learning disable students. The facets of short term, long term and working memory are all included. There are 4 sub-scales in CMT: (1) vocabulary memory; (2) digit span; (3) animal identification; and (4)working memory. The norm is based on 1235 K-3 children selected from 60 schools. Another 440 learning disabled children and 339 mentally retarded children are also included as the contrast groups for the discussion of discriminatory validity. The psychometric information of each sub-scale is presented. Since some of the stimuli are meaningful and relevant to children's experience, the cognitive issues of sequential effect, familiarity, or preference effect are analyzed as part of the preliminary construct validity discussion. The gender differences are very minor (less than 1% variance accounted). The grade differences are substantially significant. The variances accounted by grades are 7.5%, 7.8%, 11.6% and 15.4% for the four sub-scales respectively. The differences among contrast groups (norm, LD and MR) are even larger. The variances accounted by groups for the sub-tests are 19%, 17%, 18% and 25% respectively. The interaction effects between grades and groups are significant for animal identification and working memory tests. The grade differences are not parallel for the three groups. In other words, the increasing sizes between neighboring grades are not the same for children of subtypes. The cut-off point of each sub-scale is also provided for the screen purpose.
期刊論文
1.吳裕益、邱上真、陳小娟、曾進興、陳振宇、謝淑蘭、成戎珠、黃朝慶、洪碧霞、櫻井正二郎(19970600)。兒童認知功能綜合測驗之編製。特殊教育研究學刊,15,63-81。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Swanson, H. L.(1994)。Short-term memory and working memory: do both contribute to our understanding of academic achievement in children and adults with learning disabilities?。Journal Of Learning Disabilities,27(1),34-50。  new window
3.Bisiacchi, P. S.、Cipolott, L.、Denes, G.(1989)。Impairment in processing meaningless verbal material in several phonological skills。The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,41,293-319。  new window
4.Bousfield, W. A.、Esterson, S.、Whitmarsh, G. A.(1958)。A study of developmental changes in perceptual associative clustering。Journal of Genetic Psychology,92,95-102。  new window
5.Eysenck, H. J.(1994)。The outcome problem in psychotherapy: What have we learned?。Behavior Research and Therapy,32,477-495。  new window
6.Hermelin, B.、O'Connor, N.(1964)。Short-term memory in normal and subnormal children。American Journal of Mental Deficiency,69,121-125。  new window
7.Maccoby, E. E.、Hagen, J. W.(1965)。Effects of distraction upon central versus incidental recail: developmental trends。Journal of Experimental child Psychology,2,280-289。  new window
8.Scott, K. G.、Scott, M. S.(1968)。Research and theory in short-term memory。International review of research in mental retardation,3,135-162。  new window
9.Torgesen, J. K.(1985)。Memory processes in reading disabilitied children。Journal of Learning Disabilities,18(6),350-357。  new window
會議論文
1.洪儷瑜(1997)。國小學生之漢字視知覺能力之研究。第五屆世界華語文教學研討會。臺北:世界華語文教育學會。437-450。  延伸查詢new window
2.曾世杰(1997)。國語文低成就學生之工作記憶與聲韻處理能力之研究。第五屆世界華語文教學研討會。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.中國行為科學社(1997)。魏氏兒童智力量表。臺北:中國行為科社。  延伸查詢new window
2.國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育系心理測驗研究小組(1996)。新編中華智力量表。臺北:國立師範大學特殊教育系。  延伸查詢new window
3.Golden, C. J.(1987)。The Luria-Nebraska neuropsychological battery: Children's revision。Los Angeles, CA:Western Psychological Services。  new window
4.Golden, C. J.(1991)。Luria-Nebraska neuropsychological battery: Form I and II。Los Angeles, CA:Western Psychological Services。  new window
5.James, W.(1890)。Pricipies of Psychology。New York:Holt。  new window
6.McAfee, O.、Loeng, D.(1994)。Assessing and Guiding young children's de­velopment and learning。Boston, MA:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
7.Murdock, B. B. Jr.(1974)。Human memory: Theory and data。New York:Wiley。  new window
8.Robinson, N. M.、Robinson, H. B.(1976)。The mentally retarded child。New York:MaCraw-Hill Book Co.。  new window
9.Ross, A. O.(1976)。Psychological aspects of learning disabilities and reading disorders。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
10.Shaffer, D. R.(1993)。Developmental Psychology: Childhood and adolescence。Books/Cole Publishing Company。  new window
11.Wechsler, D.(1945)。Wechsler Memory Scale--Revised: Manual。New York:The Psychological Corporation Harcourt srace Jovanovich, Inc.。  new window
12.Wingfield, A.、Byrnes, D. L.(1981)。The psychology of human memory。New York:Academic Press。  new window
13.教育部(1997)。特殊教育法。台北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
單篇論文
1.Brown, A. L.(1971)。Proactive interference in the keeping track performance of etardates。  new window
圖書論文
1.Atkinson, Richard C.、Shiffrin, R. M.(1968)。Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes。The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory。Academic Press。  new window
2.Ellis, N. R.(1963)。The Stimulus trace and behavioral inadequacy。Handbook of mental deficiency。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
3.Baddeley, A. D.、Hitch, G. J.(1974)。Working memory。Recent advances in learning and motivation。Academic Press。  new window
4.Goldman-Rakic, P. S.(1993)。Working memory and mind。Mind and brain。Freeman and Company。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top