資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.128.78.63)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
跳級資優生之生活適應分析
書刊名:
特殊教育研究學刊
作者:
郭靜姿
/
蔡尚芳
/
王曼娜
作者(外文):
Kuo, Ching-chih
/
Tsai, Sun-fan
/
Wang, Mann-na
出版日期:
1998
卷期:
16
頁次:
頁379-400
主題關鍵詞:
資優
;
跳級
;
適應
;
Giftedness
;
Grade skipping
;
Adjustment
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
9
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
8
共同引用:
3
點閱:132
本研究旨在分析跳級學生之生活適應狀況。研究對象取自臺灣地區77∼84學年度 119 所辦理資優教育的學校。 第一年採問卷及測驗方式,總計蒐集到 233 位經由跳級管道 升學的學生資料。研究工具為「跳級經驗量表」及「賴氏人格測驗」。第二年訪談了 58 位 學生,以進一步了解及分析學生跳級後在學習與心理等方面之適應狀況。 第一年研究結果發現:經由跳級升學的學生,大多數就學情形頗佳,並不因為縮短教育年限 而有升學上的困難。而學生跳級後,七成以上表示在自我發展上有正面的影響,跳級未導致 過多的壓力,學校適應也大致良好。跳級學生之人格類型,在賴氏人格測驗結果中有八成傾 向適應良好型(指導型、鎮靜型及平均型),二成傾向適應困難型(孤僻型與暴力型)。七 成以上學生對於跳級制度傾向滿意,惟建議實施方式應加強對於跳級生的追蹤輔導及協助。 第二年研究結果分就十項訪談內容分析了跳級學生不同適應的原因。主要影響學生適應程度 的原因為:1.學校對跳級學生的輔導方式,2.老師關懷學生的程度,3.師長的期望與 教養態度,4.個人的學習能力狀況,5.自我期許的程度,6.個人壓力調適的能力,7 .個人適應新環境的能力,8.個人的人格特質,9.同儕對跳級生的態度,10.跳級的 時間及型態等。
以文找文
The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of grade skipping on the life adjustment. The sample included 233 students graduated from elementary and middle high schools during 1988 to 1995 through accelerated educational system. The study spent two years. In the first year, two instruments were used to collect the basic data: 1. The Life Adjustment Questionnaire of the Grade Skipping Students, and 2. The Lai's Personality Test. More than 70 percents of the subjects reported they had well adjustment in education, self development, life stress and school learning. It indicated that grade skipping brought more positive influences than negative influences upon the students. But, contrast with this, more than 70 percents of the students complained that after they accelerated to a higher educational period, they received very little assistance or guidance from their schools. The result of the personality test indicated 80 percents of the subjects had healthy personality traits, while 20 percents of the subjects belong to Eccentric and Black personality types. In the second year, the researchers interviewed 58 students to obtain more deeply and qualitative information. The researchers found the major factors which influence the life adjustment include: 1. The way of guidance offered by schools, 2. The degree of concern from teachers, 3. The degree of expectation and teaching attitude of parents and teachers, 4. The learning ability of student himself, 5. The degree of self expectation, 6. The ability of stress management, 7. The ability to adapt to a new environment, 8. The type of personality, 9. Attitudes come from the classmates, and 10. The type of grade skipping.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Rimm, S. B.、Lovance, K. J.(1992)。The use of subject and grade skipping for the prevention and reversal of underachievement。Gifted Child Quarterly,36(2),100-105。
2.
毛連塭(1986)。端正資優教育跳級制的觀念。資優教育季刊,21。
延伸查詢
3.
何榮桂(19810100)。國民小學資賦優異兒童縮短修業年限教育制度之研究。資優教育,1,21-28。
延伸查詢
4.
郭靜姿(19861200)。跳級制度面面觀。資優教育,21,3-6。
延伸查詢
5.
Brody, L.、Benbow, C. P.(1986)。Social and emotional adjustment of adolescents extremely talented in verbal or mathematical reasoning。Journal of Youth and Adolescence,15,1-18。
6.
Coleman, L. M.、Fults, B. A.(1985)。Special-class placement, level of intelligence,and the self-concepts of gifted children: A social comparison perspective。RASE,6,7-11。
7.
Compton, M. F.(1982)。The gifted underachiever in middle school。Roper Review,4,23-25。
8.
Cornell, D. G.、Callahan, C. M.、Loyd, B. H.(1991)。Personality growth of female early college entrants: A controlled,prospective study。Gifted Child Quarterly,35(3),135-143。
9.
Elkind, D.(1988)。Grade skipping。Young Children,43(4),2。
10.
Feldhusen, J. F.(1989)。Why the public schools will continue to neglect the gifted。Gifted Child Today,12,55-59。
11.
Gross, M. U. M.(1992)。The use of radical grade skipping in cases of extreme intellectual precocity。Gifted Child Quarterly,36(2),91-99。
12.
Janos, P. M.(1987)。A fifty-year follow-up of Terman's youngest college students and IQ-matched agemates。Gifted Child Quarterly,31,55-58。
13.
Janos, P. M.、Fung, H. C.、Robinson, N. M.(1985)。Self-concept, self-esteem, and peer relations among gifted children who feel "different"。Gifted Child Quarterly,29(2),78-82。
14.
Kolitch, E. R.、Brody, L. E.(1992)。Mathematics grade skipping of highly talented students: An evaluation。Gifted Child Quarterly,36(2),78-86。
15.
Kulik, J. A.、Kulik, C. C.(1984)。Synthesis of research on effects of accelerated instruction。Educational Leadership,42,84-89。
16.
Lupkowski, A. E.、Whitmore, M.、Ramsay, A.(1992)。The impact of early entrance to college on self-esteem: A preliminary study。Gifted Child Quarterly,36(2),87-90。
17.
Miller, G. D.(1980)。Who is gifted: A quick grasp of concepts is one clue。Independent School,39,12-16。
18.
Noble, K. D.、Drummond, J. E.(1992)。But what about the prom? Studentsperceptions of early college entrance。Gifted Child Quarterly,36(2),106-111。
19.
Paulus, P.(1984)。Grade skipping: More than grade skipping。Roper Review,7,98-100。
20.
Pressey, S. L.(1954)。That most misunderstood concept, grade skipping。School and Society,79,50-60。
21.
Pressey, S. L.(1967)。Fording accelerates ten years after。Journal of Counseling Psychology,14,73-80。
22.
Richardson, T. M.、Benbow, C. P.(1990)。Long-term effects of grade skipping on the social-emotional adjustment of mathematically precocious youths。Journal of Educational Psychology,82(3),464-470。
23.
Shunk, O. H.(1987)。Peer models and children's behavioral charge。Review of Educational Research,52(2),149-174。
24.
Smith, E.(1984)。Giftedness on demand in every classroom。Gifted Education International,2,142-144。
25.
Southern, W. T.、Jones, E. D.、Fiscus, E . D.(1989)。Practitioner objections to the academic grade skipping of gifted children。Gifted Child Quarterly,33,29-35。
26.
Uphoff, J. K.、Gilmore, J.(1985)。Pupil age and school entrance--How many are ready for success?。Educational Leadership,43,86-90。
27.
Van Tassel- Baska, J.(1989)。Appropriate curriculum for gifted learners。Educational Leadership,46,13-15。
28.
Van Tassel- Baska, J.(1992)。Educational decision making on grade skipping and grouping。Gifted Child Quarterly,36(2),68-72。
29.
吳武典(19881000)。資賦優異學生提早入學及縮短修業年限之探討。國教月刊,35(1/2),18-21。
延伸查詢
圖書
1.
郭靜姿(1996)。資優學生的輔導與追蹤。資優教育研討會會議手冊。
延伸查詢
2.
Clark, B.(1983)。Growing up gifted: developing the potential of children at home and at school。OColumbus, OH. L.:Merrill。
3.
Copley, F. O.(1961)。The American high school and the talented student。Ann Arbor, MI:University of Michigan Press。
4.
DeHaan, R.、Havighurst, R.(1957)。Educating gifted children。Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press。
5.
Gold, M. J.(1982)。Education of the gifted/talented。Ventura, C. A.:Ventura Country Superintendent of Schools Office。
6.
Hidreth, G. H.(1966)。Introduction to the gifted。New York:McGraw-Hill。
7.
Pressey, S. L.(1949)。Educational grade skipping: Appraisal of basic problems。Columbus:Ohio State University Press。
8.
Renzulli, J. S.(1977)。The enrichment triad model: A guide for development defensible programs for the gifted。Mansfield, CT:Creative Learning Press。
9.
Rogers, K. B.(1991)。The relationship of grouping practices to the education of the gifted and talented learners。Storrs, CT:National Research Center and Talented。
10.
Schneider, B. H.(1987)。The gifted child in peer group perspective。New York:Springer-Verlag。
11.
Subotnik, R. F.、Arnold, K. D.(1993)。Beyond Terman: Longitudinal studies: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent。Norwood,NJ:Ablex。
圖書論文
1.
Benbow, C. P.(1983)。Adolescence of the mathematically precocious: A five-year longitudinal study。Academic precocity: aspects of its development。Baltimore, M. D.:John Hopkins University Press。
2.
Benbow, C. P.(1991)。Meeting the needs of gifted students through use of grade skipping。Handbook of special education。New York:Pergamon。
3.
Brody, L. E.、Stanley, J. C.(1991)。Young college students: Assessing factors that contribute to success。Academic grade skipping of gifted children。New York:Teachers College Press。
4.
Daurio, S. P.(1979)。Educational enrichment versus grade skipping: A review of the literature。Educating the gifted: Grade skipping and enrichment。Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press。
5.
Janos, P. M.、Robinson, N. M.(1985)。Psychosocial development in intellectual gifted children。The gifted and talent: Development perspectives。Washington, D. C.:American Psychological Association。
6.
Jung, C. G.(1954)。The gifted child。The collected works of C. G. Jung (Vol.17): The development of personality。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。
7.
Passow. A. H.(1958)。Enrichment of education for the gifted。Education for the gifted: Fifty Seventh Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education。Chicago:University of Chicago Press。
8.
Rogers, K. B.、Kimpston, R. D.(1992)。Grade skipping: What we do vs. what we know。Educational Leadership。
9.
Southern, W. T.、Jones, E. D.(1991)。Academic grade skipping: Background and issues。The academic grade skipping of gifted children。New York:Teachers College Press。
10.
Southern, W. T.、Jones, E. D.、Stanley, J. C.(1993)。Grade skipping and enrichment: The context and development of program options。International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent。Oxford:Pergamon。
11.
Stanley, J. C.(1977)。Rationale of the study mathematically precocious youth (SMPY) during its first five years of promoting educational grade skipping。The gifted and the creative。Baltimore:John Hopkins University Press。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
高中藝術才能資優學生學習適應及課程滿意度之研究
2.
教師對提早入學資優兒童之教育理念與社會支持及優勢發展實踐
3.
高中科學班畢業生之追蹤研究:高中學習經驗探討
4.
美國進階安置及其對臺灣資優教育之啟示
5.
高雄市國中資優學生縮短修業年限方案實施現況之研究
6.
國小縮短修業年限學生家長對子女教育安置相關問題之個案研究
7.
多元智能模式融入提早入學學生認知與情意輔導課程設計之研究
8.
面具後的真相--談資優生的自我發展與輔導
9.
國小低年級提早入學資優兒童學習適應之調查研究
10.
我國參與國際科技展覽競賽學生的追蹤研究--參賽經驗對學生生涯發展的影響
11.
資優幼兒提早入學衡鑑之研究
12.
從行政分工談跳級生輔導之具體策略
13.
資賦優異學生提早入學及縮短修業年限之探討
無相關博士論文
無相關書籍
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code