:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺北市國中一年級學生環境保護認知與資源回收信念行為意圖之關係研究
書刊名:衛生教育學報
作者:葉國樑 引用關係柯惠珍
作者(外文):Yeh, Gwo-liangKu, Hui-jean
出版日期:1999
卷期:12
頁次:頁49-74
主題關鍵詞:資源回收行為意圖理性行動理論自我效能Behavioral intentions of resources recyclingThe theory of reasoned actionSelf-efficacy
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:35
     本研究之主要目的在於探討國中一年級學生,其資源回收信念及家中資源回收意 圖, 並運用 Ajzen 和 Fishbein ( 1980 )的理性行動理論( the Theory of Reasned Action )及 Bandura 的自我效能( Self-efficacy )為研究架構, 來預測並解釋研究對 象從事家中資源回收的行為意圖;同時瞭解理性行動理論與自我效能應用在資源回收行為上 的適切性。以臺北市的公立國中八十六學年度第一學期在學全體一年級學生為母群體,採分 層集束抽樣法( stratified clustr sampling )來選取調查樣本 2,502 人進行施測,共 得多 J2410 份有效問卷。本研究結果如下:( 1 )對從今以後從事家中資源回收,有意圖 者佔絕大部分( 74.6 %)," 其中又以寶特瓶的回收忘口最高( 73.2 %); ( 2 )家 中資源回收之自我效能方面, 真正有自信從事季中資源回收的比例只有 39.8%,而有 53.7 %沒有足夠的自信心從事資源回收; ( 3 )一般環境認知之平均答對率為 76.9 %,而有 關貨源回收的特殊環境認 75.7 %;( 4 )對家中資源回收持正向態度的比例,高達 88.0 %,而且對於家中資源回收的信念,也顯示出正向的表達; ( 5 )對從事家中資源回收的 態度、主觀規範和自我效能三者可以有效地解釋本研究對象的家中資源回收忘口,解釋量達 25.6 %;( 6 )對從事貨源回收的態度與行為信念、結果評價的交乘積和呈顯著正相關; 主觀規範與規範信念、依從動機的交乘積和也呈顯著正相關: (7) 有 / 無家中資源回收患 口者在行為信念、結果評價、規範信念、依從動機、自我效能及一般環境認知、特殊環境認 知上,均有整體性的顯著差異。
     The purpose of this study was to investigate the students' beliefs and behavioral intentions of resources recycling in their families. Also, the study was to predict and explain the students' behavioral intentions of resources recycling on the basis of the Theory of Reasoned Action and Self-efficacy of Bandura. The sample was selected from the first-year students of Junior High School in Taipei city in 1997. The method adopted in the study was questionnaire survey. The study acquired 2410 valid questionnaires. The mail findings of the study were: 1.Most of the subjects showed positively behavioral intentions of recycling in their families. 2.Around forty percent of the subjects had confidence in resources recycling, however, over fifty percent of the subjects hadn't. 3.The correct answering rates of general & specific cognition of environmental protection all were over seventy-five percent. 4.Most of the subjects had positive beliefs and attitude toward resources recycling. 5.The explanation power (R@) of the behavioral intentions by attitude, subjective norm, and self-efficacy toward resources recycling was 25.6%. 6.There were significantly positive correlation between attitude and the product of beliefs of outcomes weighted by evaluations of outcomes (Bi*Ei), and between subjective norms and the product of normative beliefs weighted by motivation. 7.There were differences among behavioral beliefs, evaluations of outcomes, normative beliefs, motivations of comply with, self-efficacy, and general & specific cognition of environmental protection for intender and non-intender of resources recycling.
期刊論文
1.Abelson, P. H.(1987)。Municipal Waste。Science,236,1409。  new window
2.De Young, Raymond(1986)。Some Psychological Aspects of Recycling: the Structure of Conservation Satisfactions。Environment and Behavior,18(4),435-449。  new window
3.Jacobs, H. E.、Bailey, J. S.(1982)。Evaluating Participation in a Residential Recycling Program。Journal of Environmental Systems,12(2),141-152。  new window
4.Reid, D. H.、Luyben, P. D.、Rawers, R. J.、Bailey, J. S.(1976)。Newspaper Recycling Behavior: the Effects of Prompting and Proximity of Containers。Environment and Behavior,8(3),471-481。  new window
5.Fredricks, A. J.、Dossett, D. L.(1983)。Attitude-behavior relations: A comparison of the Fishbein-Ajzen and the Bentler-Speckart models。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,45(3),501-512。  new window
6.Bentler, P. M.、Speckart, G.(1981)。Attitudes "cause" behaviors: A structural equation analysis。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,40(2),226-238。  new window
7.黃世孟、李永展(19921200)。辦公室資源回收行為之研究--以臺北巿為例。建築學報,7,115-125。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.晏涵文、劉潔心、陳富莉(1993)。台灣地區高職學生環境知識、態度、行為意向及需求調查。公共衛生,19(1),50-59。  延伸查詢new window
9.雲揚有限公司(1991)。使用過的飮料容器回收新趨勢。台灣包裝工業雜誌,32,66-73。  延伸查詢new window
10.Finnie, W. C.(1973)。Field experiment in litter control。Environment and Behavior,5(2),123-144。  new window
11.Humphrey, C. R.、Bord, R. J.、Hammond, M. M.、Mann, S. H.(1977)。Attitudes and conditions for cooperation in a paper recycling program。Environment and Behavior,9(1),107-124。  new window
12.Jacobs, H. E.、Bailey, J. S.、Crews, J. I.(1984)。Development and analysis of a community-based resource recovery program。Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,17,127-145。  new window
13.Simmons, D. A.、Widmar, R.(1990)。Motivations and barriers to recycling : Toward a strategy for public education。Journal of Environmental Education,22(1),13-18。  new window
14.De Vries, H.、Dijkstra, B.、Kuhlman, P.(1988)。Self-efficacy: the third factor besides attitude and subjective norm as a predictor of behavioral intentions。Health Education Research,3,273-282。  new window
15.李永展(1993)。辦公室資源回收之因果關係。都市與計劃,20(3),335-352。  延伸查詢new window
16.李永展(19940900)。臺北市家庭及工作場所資源回收再利用行為之研究。都市與計劃,21(2),149-172。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.車參賢、葉國樑(19961200)。臺北市國中生資源回收的知識、態度、行為相關研究。學校衛生,29,62-73。  延伸查詢new window
18.蔡佳伶、呂昌明(19960400)。理性行為理論在健康教育課程計畫上的應用(2)--以紙張回收為例。中等教育,47(2),28-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Geller, E. S.、Chaffee, J. L.、Ingram, R. E.(1975)。Program paper Recycling on a university campus。Journal of Environmental Systems,5(1),39-57。  new window
20.Sothern, C.(1972)。Vitalizing natural resources education。Journal of environmental Education,3,16。  new window
21.Stapp, W. B.(1985)。Some overall imperatives of the environmental education movement。Environmental Conservation,12(3),103-104。  new window
22.Witmer, J. F.、Geller, E. S.(1976)。Facilitation paper recycling: Effects of prompts, raffles, and contests。Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,9,315-322。  new window
23.葉國樑(19960500)。鹿谷地區國中學生紙張回收行為意圖之研究。衛生教育論文集刊,9,81-95。  延伸查詢new window
24.De Young, R.(1988)。Exploring the difference between recyclers and non-recyclers : The role of information。Journal of Environmental Systems,18(4),341-351。  new window
25.Ladd, A. E.(1990)。The solid waste crisis and support for recycling: A research note。Sociological Spectrum,10,469-484。  new window
26.Stapp, W. B.、Polumnin, N.(1991)。Global environmental education: Towards a way of thinking and acting。Environmental Conservation,18(1),13-18。  new window
27.葉國樑(19961100)。臺北市國中學生垃圾分類行為意圖研究。衛生教育雜誌,16,1-19。  延伸查詢new window
28.Sia, A. P.、Hungerford, H. R.、Tomera, A. N.(1985)。Selected predictors of responsible environmental behavior: An analysis。The Journal of Environmental Education,17(2),31-40。  new window
29.Hines, Jody M.、Hungerford, Harold R.、Tomera, Audrey N.(1987)。Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis。The Journal of Environmental Education,18(2),1-8。  new window
30.Cohen, Michael R.(1973)。Environmental information versus environmental attitudes。The Journal of Environmental Education,5(2),5-8。  new window
學位論文
1.林秀瞳(1996)。環境相關科系學生之環境典範、知識及行動意向調查研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳毓琦(1995)。某工專夜間部男生過量飲酒行為研究:理性行為理論與自我效能結合之驗證(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.Jones, R. E.(1990)。Understanding paper recycling(博士論文)。Washington State University。  new window
4.巫偉鈴(1989)。五專學生對環境問題的知識、信念及行動取向之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.邱昭蓉(1993)。都市家庭固體廢棄物的組成對減量分類回收角色之探討(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.歐曉蓁(1995)。臺北縣某國中男生嚼檳榔行為研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.鍾美雲(1994)。某國小六年級學童西式速食攝食行為之意圖研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.蔡佳伶(1994)。師範學院學生紙張回收行為意圖研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.劉志成(1993)。國民環保手冊。台北市:月旦出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.葉國樑(1997)。城鄉地區國中學生資源回收行為意圖比較研究。台北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
3.台北市環境保護局(1997)。台北市政府環境保護局年報(85年版)。  延伸查詢new window
4.行政院環境保護署(1997)。中華民國台灣地區環境保護統計年報。  延伸查詢new window
5.Ajzen, I.、Fishbein, M.(1980)。Understanding attitudes and prediction social behavior。Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:Prentice-Hall。  new window
6.Girardet, H.(1993)。The GAIA Atlas of CITIS: New Direction for Sustainable Urban Living。New York:Anchor Books。  new window
7.Bandura, Albert(1977)。Social Learning Theory。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
8.Bandura, Albert(1986)。Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE