臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：The Effect of Subject Area and Instructor Gender on Student Ratings of Instruction
書刊名：花蓮師院學報
作者：張德勝 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chang, Te-sheng
出版日期：1999
卷期：9
頁次：頁345-366
主題關鍵詞：學生評鑑教師教學；大學教師評鑑；大學教學；多變項變異數分析；Student ratings；Faculty evaluation；College teaching；Multivariate analysis
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:176
　　　　　本文旨在探討教學科目與教師性別對學生評鑑教師教學之影響。教學科目包含五 個領域：藝術、教育、語文、數理以及社會科。本研究以國立花蓮師範學院八十五學年度第 一學期開課班級為研究對象，共得有效樣本 437 班。 研究工具是花蓮師範學院教務處所編 製的教學反映意見調查表（ Student Ratings of Instruction Form，簡稱 SRI ）。 該量 表共分為四個層面：教學準備、教學內容、教學方法以及學習評量。 本研究採 5 X 2 多變項變異數分析來探討教學科目和教師性別對學生評鑑教師教學的影響 情形。研究結果如下： 一、就多變項分析而言，教學科目和教師性別對學生評鑑教師教學結果的影響有交互作用。 二、就單變項分析而言，教學科目和教師性別對學生評鑑教師在教學準備與學習評量兩個層 面上有交互作用。 三、就主要效果而言，教學科目在多變項分析上達到顯著水準，而教師性別沒有達到差異的 顯著水準。 四、就簡單主要效果而言，男教師在不同教學科目所得的評鑑分數有顯著差異，女教師亦然 。從教師性別來分析，則除了教育科目外，其他四個領域的科目，男教師和女教師均有顯著 的差異。
　　　　　The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of subject area and instructor gender on student ratings of teaching performance. Subject area consisted of five categories: arts, education, language and literature, mathematics and science, and social studies. The sample consisted of 437 courses taught by 132 instructors at National Hualien Teachers College during the fall semester of the 1996-1997 academic year. The Student Ratings of Instruction (SRI) form was used to measure students' perceptions of faculty performance. The rating form was composed of 13 questions and yielded four dimensions: Preparation/Planning, Material/Content, Method/Skill, and Assignment/Examination. A 5 X 2 multivariate technique was used to determine the interaction effect of subject area and instructor gender and how this effect varied for the different dimensions of student ratings of instruction. The results indicated that (a) the interaction between subject area and instructor gender was statistically significant (F=2.432,p=.001); (b) the main effect due to subject area was statistically significant (F=6.779, p=.000); and (c)the main effect due to instructor gender was not statistically significant (F=1.655.p=.160). To determine which variables contribute to the interaction effect, the univariate F tests for the interaction on each dimension were examined. Of the four dimensions, Preparation/Planning and Assignment/Examination were significant. The univariate F tests were also employed to test the main effect of subject area. All the four dimensions were significant. Although instructor gender seemed to have no influence on student ratings of teacher performance, the result was different when it was combined with subject area. The importance of the interaction of subject area by instructor gender in student ratings of teacher performance was discussed, and implications for future research were noted.
期刊論文
1.Cashin, W.(1992)。Student ratings: The need for comparative data。Instructional Evaluation and Faculty Development，12，146。  new window
2.Feldman, K. A.(1992)。College students' views of male and female college teachers: Part I--Evidence from the social laboratory and experiments。Research in Higher Education，33，317-375。  new window
3.Freeman, H.(1994)。Student Evaluations of college instructors: Effects of type of course taught, instructor gender and gender role, and student gender。Journal of Educational Psychology，86(4)，627-630。  new window
4.Marsh, H. W.、Overall, J. U.、Kesler, S. P.(1979)。Class size, students' evaluations, and instructional effectiveness。American Educational Research Journal，16(1)，57-69。  new window
5.Bennett, S. K.(1982)。Student perceptions of and expectations for male and female instructors: Evidence relating to the question of gender bias in teaching evaluation。Journal of Educational Psychology，74(2)，170-179。  new window
6.Basow, S. A.、Silberg, N. T.(1987)。Student evaluations of college professors: Are female and male professors rated differently?。Journal of Educational Psychology，79(2)，308-314。  new window
7.Ramsden, P.(1991)。A Performance Indicator of Teaching Quality in Higher Education: The Course Experience Questionnaire。Studies in Higher Education，16(2)，129-150。  new window
8.Feldman, K. A.(1976)。The superior college teacher from the students' view。Research in Higher Education，5(3)，243-288。  new window
9.Lovell, G. D.、Haner, C. F.(1955)。Forced-choice applied to college faculty rating。Educational and Psychological Measurement，15，291-304。  new window
10.Tatro, C. N.(1995)。Gender effects on student evaluation of faculty。Journal of Research and Development in Education，28(3)，169-173。  new window
11.Basow, S. A.(1995)。Student evaluations of college professors: When gender matters。Journal of Educational Psychology，87(4)，656-665。  new window
12.Basow, S. A.、Distenfeld, M. S.(1985)。Teacher expressiveness: More important for males than females。Journal of Educational Psychology，77(1)，308-314。  new window
13.Bejar, I. I.、Doyle, K. O.(1978)。Relationship of subject area and course format with student ratings of instruction。American Educational Research Journal，15(4)，483-487。  new window
14.Centra, J. A.(1973)。Self-ratings of college teacher: A comparison with student ratings。Journal of Educational Measurement，10，287-295。  new window
15.Downie, N. W.(1952)。Student evaluation of faculty。Journal of Higher Education，23，495-503。  new window
16.Etaugh, C.、Riley, S.(1983)。Evaluating competence of women and men: Effects of marital and parental status and occupational sex-typing。Sex Roles，9(6)，943-952。  new window
17.Elmore, P. B.、LaPointe, K. A.(1974)。Effects of teacher gender and student gender on the evaluation of college instructors。Journal of Educational Psychology，66(2)，386-389。  new window
18.Elmore, P. B.、LaPointe, K. A.(1975)。Effects of teacher gender, student gender, and teacher warmth on the evaluation of college instructors。Journal of Educational Psychology，67(2)，368-374。  new window
19.Feldman, K. A.(1993)。College students' views of male and female college teachers: Part II--Evidence from the students' evaluations of their classroom teaches。Research in Higher Education，34，151-211。  new window
20.Kaschak, E.(1978)。Gender bias in student evaluation of college professors。Psychology of Women Quartserly，3，235-243。  new window
21.Kierstead, D.、D'Agostino, P.、Dill, H.(1988)。Sex role stereotyping of college professors: Bias in students' ratings of instructors。Journal of Educational Psychology，80(3)，342-344。  new window
22.Jiobu, R. M.、Pollis, C. A.(1971)。Student evaluations of courses and instructors。The American Sociologist，6，317-321。  new window
23.Lombardo, J.、Tocci, M.(1979)。Attribution of positive and negative characteristics of instructors as a function of attractive evaluation method。American Educational Research Journal，17，238-245。  new window
24.Rutland, P.(1990)。Some considerations regarding teaching evaluations。Political Science Teacher，3，1-2。  new window
25.McKeachie, W. J.(1979)。Student ratings of faculty: A reprise。Academe，65，384-397。  new window
會議論文
1.Basow, S. A.(1994)。Student ratings of professors are not gender blind。the meetings of the Society of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education。Vancouver, British Columbia。  new window
2.Cashin, W. E.、Clegg, V. L.(1987)。Are student ratings of different academic fields different?。the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association。Washington, DC。  new window
圖書
1.Centra, John A.(1979)。Determining Faculty Effectiveness。San Francisco：Jossey-Bass。  new window
2.Asher, E. J.(1969)。Differential weighting of teacher evaluation criteria。Kalamazoo, MI：Western Michigan University Office of Institutional Research。  new window
3.Eckert, R. E.、Keller, R. J.(1954)。A university looks ar its program: Report of the University of Minnesota Bureau of Institutional Research。MN：University of Minnesota。  new window
4.McKeachi, W. J.(1986)。Teaching tips: A guidebook for the beginning college teacher。Toronto：D. C. Health and Company。  new window
5.Centra, John A.(1993)。Reflective faculty evaluation: Enhancing teaching faculty and determining faculty effectiveness。San Francisco：Jossey-Bass Publishers。  new window
單篇論文
1.Chang, T.(1997)。Student ratings of instruction at teachers college in Taiwan，Hualien, Taiwan：Graduate Institute of Compulsory Education, National Hualien Teachers College。(ED414798)。  new window
2.Marsh, H. W.，Overall, J. U.，Thomas, C. S.(1976)。The relationship between students' evaluations of instruction and expected grades(ED126140)。  new window
其他
1.Schlenker, D. E.，Mckinnon, N. C.(1994)。Assessing faculty performance using the student evaluation of instruction，New Brunswich, Canada：Atlantic Baptic College。(ED371-667)。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：443（臺灣：426，外國：17） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2178223 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67981029
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上