臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：影響大學通識課程教師教學評鑑得分之因素探究--以慈濟大學為例
書刊名：教育行政論壇. 屏東教育大學
作者：潘靖瑛 引用關係
作者(外文)：Pan, Ching-ying
出版日期：2010
卷期：2:2
頁次：頁107-133
主題關鍵詞：學生評鑑教學；教師評鑑；通識課程；Student ratings；Instruction evaluation；General education courses
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:140
  • 點閱點閱:76
本研究的目的是藉由分析慈濟大學94 學年度學生評鑑通識課程教師教學的結果，以瞭解通識課程教師的教學品質，同時探究非教學實質因素對教學評鑑得分之影響，期望藉此提升教學評鑑結果的理解與應用效度。本研究發現慈濟大學學生對通識課程教師的教學表現相當肯定。同時亦發現兼任教師、男性教師，在教學評鑑上獲得明顯的肯定。教選修課的教師得分高於教必修課的教師。同時教授級教師及教授核心必修課程的教師，在教學評鑑的得分偏低。男學生、低年級的學生給通識教師的教學評鑑得分較高。就讀不同學系學生在教師教學評鑑的給分上有顯著差異。認真的學生比不認真的學生更肯定教師的教學表現。上述這些非教學品質的因素皆對教師教學評鑑的結果，產生明顯的影響，因此建議在對教師教學評鑑結果進行瞭解時，需將上述因素納入考量，同時參酌其他相關資訊，才能正確的理解教師教學的樣貌。
The purpose of this study was to analyze the results of Tzu Chi University student ratings of General Education course instruction to interpret the quality of general education course instruction. Meanwhile, we also explored how the non-substance factors of instruction have affected the instructional evaluation scores. This study found the Tzu Chi University students fairly approved the General Education teachers' effort on instruction. We also found part-time teachers and male teachers got higher scores on instruction evaluation. The teachers teaching elective courses had higher scores on instruction evaluation than the teachers teaching the required courses. However, the professors and the instructors who taught core required courses got the lower scores on instruction evaluation. Male students and lower grade students gave teachers higher scores. The students from different departments also gave teachers significantly different scores on instruction evaluation. Hard-working students give teachers higher scores, too. Based on the study results, we suggest take the above mentioned factors into account, when evaluate teachers' instruction quality and making the high-stake decisions.
期刊論文
1.Koushki, P. A.、Kuhn, H. A. J.(1982)。How reliable are student evaluations of teachers?。Engineering Education，72，362-367。  new window
2.計智豪、孫志麟(20091200)。大學教學卓越計畫執行之研究。教育行政與評鑑學刊，8，1-22。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.唐學明(19960600)。多管道教學評鑑方法之研究--以政治作戰學校為例。復興崗學報，57，167-188。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Elmore, P.B.、LaPointe, K. A.(1975)。Effects of teacher sex, student sex, and teacher warmth on the evaluation of college instructors。Journal of Educational Psychology，67(2)，368-374。  new window
5.Gage, N. L.(1961)。The appraisal of college teaching。Journal of Higher Education，32，17-32。  new window
6.Kaschak, E.(1978)。Sex bias in student evaluation of college professors。Psychology of Women Quarterly，3，235-243。  new window
7.Lombardo, J.、Tocci, M.(1979)。Attribution of positive and negative characteristics of instructors as a function of attractiveness and sex of instructor and sex of subject。Perceptual and Motor Skills，48，491-494。  new window
8.McKeachie, W. J.(1990)。Research on college teaching: The historical background。Journal of Educational Psychology，82(2)，189-200。  new window
9.Wachtel, H. K.(1998)。Student evaluation of college effectiveness: A brief review。Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education，23(2)，191-211。  new window
10.Ramsden, P.(1991)。A Performance Indicator of Teaching Quality in Higher Education: The Course Experience Questionnaire。Studies in Higher Education，16(2)，129-150。  new window
11.潘靖瑛(20040600)。通識教育課程學生評鑑教師教學問卷之發展--以慈濟大學為例。測驗學刊，51(1)，79-102。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Aleamoni, L. M.、Hexner, P. Z.(1980)。A review of research on student evaluation and a report on the effect of different sets of instructions on student course and instructor evaluation。Instructional Science，9，67-84。  new window
13.周祝瑛(20030600)。淺談「大學教學評鑑」。研習資訊，20(3)，49-57。  延伸查詢new window
14.Murray, H. G.、Rushton, J. P.、Paunonen, S. V.(1990)。Teacher Personality Traits and Student Instructional Ratings in Six Types of University Courses。Journal of Educational Psychology，82(2)，250-261。  new window
15.Abrami, P. C.、d'Apollonia, S.、Cohen, P. A.(1990)。Validity of student ratings of instruction: What we know and what we do not。Journal of Educational Psychology，82(2)，219-231。  new window
16.Aleamoni, L. M.(1987)。Student rating myths versus research facts。Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education，1，111-119。  new window
17.Follman, J.(1995)。Elementary public school pupil rating of teacher effectiveness。Child Study Journal，25(1)，57-58。  new window
18.Chang, T. S.(20001200)。Faculty and Student Attitudes toward Student Ratings of Instruction。Journal of National Hualien Teachers College，11，37-54。  new window
19.Cranton, P.、Smith, R. A.(1990)。Reconsidering the unit of analysis: A model of student ratings of instruction。Journal of Educational Psychology，82(2)，207-212。  new window
20.Tatro, C. N.(1995)。Gender effects on student evaluation of faculty。Journal of Research and Development in Education，28(3)，169-173。  new window
21.Marsh, H. W.(1984)。Students' Evaluations of University Teaching: Dimensionality, Reliability, Validity, Potential Biases, and Utility。Journal of Educational Psychology，76(5)，707-754。  new window
22.Kohlan, R. G.(1973)。A comparison of faculty evaluations early and late in the course。Journal of Higher Education，44，578-594。  new window
23.Feldman, K. A.(1983)。Seniority and experience of college teachers as related to evaluations they receive from students。Research in Higher Education，18，3-124。  new window
24.徐美惠、高熏芳(19960400)。重視教師評鑑落實「教評會」功能。臺灣教育，544，11-19。  延伸查詢new window
25.張德勝(19990600)。The Effect of Subject Area and Instructor Gender on Student Ratings of Instruction。花蓮師院學報，9，345-366。new window  new window
26.黃毅志、巫有鎰(20030600)。影響教學評鑑得分因素之探討--以臺東師院為例。臺東師院學報，14(上)，347-370。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.林珊如(19991200)。大學生評鑑教學量表：編製及效度考驗。教育與心理研究，22(下)，295-321。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.徐綺穗(2001)。教學評鑑制度之探討。初等教育學報（台南師院），14，189-213。  延伸查詢new window
29.Bryant, J.、Comisky, P.、Crane, J. S.、Zillmann, D.(1980)。Relationship between college teachers ‘use of humor in the classroom and students’ evaluations of their teachers。Journal of Educational Psychology，72，511-519。  new window
30.Feldman, K. A.(1978)。Course characteristics and college students’ ratings of their teachers: What we know and what we don’t know。Research in Higher Education，9，199-242。  new window
31.Feldman, K. A.(1993)。College students’ views of male and female college teachers: Part I –Evidence from the social laboratory and experiments。Research in Higher Education，33，317-375。  new window
32.Goebel, B. L.、Cashen, V. M.(1979)。Age, sex and attractiveness as a factor in student rating of teachers。Journal of Educational Psychology，71(4)，646-653。  new window
33.Goodhartz, A. S.(1948)。Student attitudes and opinions relating to teaching at Brooklyn College。School and Society，68，345-349。  new window
34.Jirovec, R.、Ramanathan, C.、Alvarez, A.(1998)。Course evaluations: What are social work students telling us about teaching effectiveness?。Journal of Social Work Education，34(2)，229-235。  new window
35.L’Hommedieu, R.、Menges, R. J.、Brinko, K. T.(1990)。Methodological explanation for the modest effects of feedback from student ratings。Journal of Educational Psychology，82，232-241。  new window
36.Mark, M. M.、Shotland, R. L.(1985)。Stakeholder-based evaluation and value judgements。Evaluation Review，9，605-626。  new window
37.Marsh, H, W.、Overall, J. U.、Kesler, S. P.(1979)。Class size, student’s evaluations, and instructional effectiveness。American Education Research Journal，16，57-69。  new window
38.McKeachie, W. J.(1979)。Student ratings of faculty。Academe，65，384-397。  new window
會議論文
1.張德勝(1999)。教師性別、職位、等級、學生年級對學生評鑑教學結果的影響。八十七學年度師範教育學術研討會。台北：台北市立師範學院。732-772。  延伸查詢new window
2.張德勝(1999)。教師、科目之特性對學生評鑑教師教學之影響--以花蓮師範學院為例。八十七學年度花蓮師範學院學術研討會。花蓮：國立花蓮師範學院。77-118。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Centra, J. A.(1977)。How universities evaluate faculty performance: A survey of department heads。Princeton, NJ：Educational Testing Service。  new window
學位論文
1.陳珮軒(2000)。大學學生評鑑教學之研究--以長庚大學管理學院為例(碩士論文)。長庚大學，台北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Centra, J. A.(1981)。Determining faculty effectiveness。San Francisco：Jossey-Bass。  new window
2.Miller, R. I.(1974)。Developing programs for faculty evaluation。San Francisco：Jossey-Bass Publisher。  new window
3.Carmines, E. G.、Zeller, R. A.(1979)。Reliability and Validity Assessment。Sage Publications。  new window
4.Centra, John A.(1993)。Reflective faculty evaluation: Enhancing teaching faculty and determining faculty effectiveness。San Francisco：Jossey-Bass Publishers。  new window
5.Peterson, Kenneth D.(1995)。Teacher Evaluation: A Comprehensive Guide to New Directions and Practices。Corwin Press, Inc.。  new window
6.張德勝(2000)。師範學院學生對「學生評鑑教師教學」態度之研究。台北：五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Schlenker, D. E.，Mckinnon, N. C.(1994)。Assessing faculty performance using the student evaluation of instruction，New Brunswich, Canada：Atlantic Baptic College。(ED371-667)。  new window
2.Brady, P. J.(1988)。The effects of couse demands and grades on anonymous verse nonanonymous evalution of professors(No. ED 293 900)。  new window
3.Hewett, L. and Others(1988)。Course Evaluations: Are Students Ratings Dictated by First Impressi Hewett et al.(1988)ons?(ERIC ED 296664)。(ERIC ED 296664)。  new window
圖書論文
1.張德銳(1992)。國民小學教師評鑑之研究。教育專業。臺北：師大師苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Marsh, H, W.、Dunkin, M. J.(1992)。Student’s evaluation of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective。Higher education: Handbook of theory and research。New York：Agathon Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：847（臺灣：846，外國：1） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2000451 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67798386
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上