:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:航空環境中情境意識的個體差異和任務難度差異檢測:眼動測量技術的優勢
書刊名:應用心理學
作者:劉志方蘇衡
出版日期:2016
卷期:22(1)
頁次:12-25
主題關鍵詞:情境意識主觀測量客觀測量眼動技術Situation awarenessSubjective techniquesObjective techniquesEye movements
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:4
研究包含兩項實驗分別探討情境意識眼動測量技術在檢驗個體差異和任務難度差異中的優勢。實驗一采用情境意識評價技術和整體情境整體評價技術,測驗新手、專家組飛行員特技飛行時的情境意識差異,實驗二同樣采用上述測驗方法檢驗專家組飛行員在不同難度特技飛行時的情境意識差異,兩項實驗同時都監測被試的眼動過程。結果發現,(1)情境意識評價技術結果不能反映個體差異,能反映任務難度差異;(2)情境整體評價技術結果能夠反映個體差異,不能反映任務難度差異;(3)經驗和任務難度都影響飛行員的視覺取樣策略和編碼信息加工。眼動數據結果與情境整體評價技術的結果相互印證,可以確定眼動測量技術可測驗情境意識,且相對于其他方法,眼動測量方法有更為廣泛的差異敏感性。
With two experiments,the present study examined the sensitive advantages of eye tracking situation awareness method compared with two other measures,such as Situational Awareness Rating Technique( SART),Situation Global Assessment Technique( SGAT).The first experiment checked the individual differences,and the second checked the task difficulty differences. Results are three-folded. First,SART was not sensitive in distinguishing SA differences between experts and novices,but sensitive to task difficulty. Second,SAGAT was sensitive to individual differences,but not sensitive to task difficulty.Third,there were group differences between experts and novices in both visual sampling strategy and coding information procession,and there were also task differences in both of visual sampling strategy and coding information procession. Given that,the results from eye movement and SAGAT confirmed each other,and it is reasoned to conclude that eye movement data can track the situation awareness in the aviation working environment.Thus,the results suggest that eye movement measurement of situation awareness is sensitive both to individual and task differences.
期刊論文
1.Endsley, Mica R.(1995)。Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems。Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society,37(1),32-64。  new window
2.Endsley, M. R.(1995)。Measurement of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems。Journal of Human Factors,37(1),65-84。  new window
3.Kowler, E.、Anderson, E.、Dosher, B.、Blaser, E.(1995)。The role of attention in the programming of saccades。Vision Research,35(13),1897-1916。  new window
4.Rayner, K.(2009)。Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search。The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,62(8),1457-1506。  new window
5.Borghini, G.、Astolfi, L.、Vecchiato, G.、Mattia, D.、Babiloni, F.(2014)。Measuring neurophysiological signals in aircraft pilots and car drivers for the assessment of mental workload, fatigue and drowsiness。Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews,44(1),58-75。  new window
6.Endsley, M. R.(2015)。Situation awareness misconceptions and misunderstandings。Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making,91(1),4-32。  new window
7.Endsley, M. R.(2015)。Final reflections: Situation awareness models and measures。Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making,9(1),101-111。  new window
8.Federico, P.(1995)。Expert and novice recognition of similar situations。Human Factors,37(1),105-122。  new window
9.Kaber, D. B.、Perry, C. M.、Segall, N.、McClernon, C. K.、Prinzel, L. J.(2006)。Situation awareness implications of adaptive automation for information processing in an air traffic control-related task。International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics,36(5),447-462。  new window
10.Klein, G.、Calderwood, R.、Clinton-Cirocco, A.(2010)。Rapid decision making on the fire ground: The original study plus a postscript。Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making,4(3),186-209。  new window
11.Kramer, A. F.、McCarley, J. S.(2003)。Oculomotor behavior as a reflection of attention and memory processes: Neural mechanisms and applications to human factors。Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science,4(1/2),21-55。  new window
12.Merwe, K. V. D.、Dijk, H. V.、Zon, R.(2012)。Eye movements as an indicator of situation awareness in a flight simulator experiment。International Journal of Aviation Psychology,22(1),78-95。  new window
13.Prinzel, L. G. III、Comstock, J. R.、Glaab, L. J.、Kramer, L. J.、Arthur, J. J.、Barry, J. S.(2004)。The efficacy of head-down and head-up synthetic vision display concepts for retro-and forward-fit of commercial aircraft。The International Journal of Aviation Psychology,14(1),53-77。  new window
14.Salmon, P. M.、Stanton, N. A.、Walker, G. H.、Jenkins, D.、Ladva, D.、Rafferty, L.、Young, M.(2009)。Measuring situation awareness in complex systems: Comparison of measures study。International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics,39(3),490-500。  new window
15.Salmon, P. M.、Stanton, N. A.、Walker, G. H.、Jenkins, D. P.、Baber, C.、McMaster, R.(2008)。Representing situation awareness in collaborative systems: A case study in the energy distribution domain。Ergonomics,51(3),367-384。  new window
16.Wickens, C. D.(2002)。Situation awareness and workload in aviation。Current Directions in Psychological Science,11(4),128-133。  new window
17.Shinar, D.(2008)。Looks are (almost) everything: Where drivers look to get information。Human Factors,50(3),380-384。  new window
會議論文
1.Ratwani, R. M.、McCurry, J. M.、Trafton, J. G.(2010)。Single operator, multiple robots: An eye movement based theoretic model of operator situation awareness。The Fifth ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction,235-242。  new window
圖書論文
1.Endsley, M. R.(2000)。Theoretical underpinnings of situation awareness: A critical review。Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement。Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
2.Endsley, M. R.(2013)。Situation awareness。Oxford handbook of cognitive engineering。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
3.Jones, D. G.(2000)。Subjective measures of situation awareness。Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement。Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
4.Selcon, S. J.、Taylor, R. M.(1990)。Evaluation of the situational awareness rating technique (SART) as a tool for aircrew systems design。Situational Awareness in Aerospace Operations。Neuilly Sur Seine:NATO-AGARD。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE