臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：圖示寫實性對飛機安全須知卡可理解性的影響
書刊名：應用心理學
作者：方天米／李胡傲／馬正／彭澤亞／謝怡萍／朱誠峰／王慈／宋超／高在峰
出版日期：2017
卷期：23(4)
頁次：318-326
主題關鍵詞：飛機安全須知；圖片寫實性；眼動；Aviation safety briefing；Pictorial realism；Eye tracking
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:5
本研究使用眼動技術及模擬操作任務考察了圖示寫實性對飛機安全須知卡可理解性的影響。三組被試分別閱讀寫實照片、卡通插畫、目標實物+其余圖畫的混合呈現等三種不同呈現形式的安全須知示意圖,隨后完成模擬操作任務。結果顯示,混合組較寫實組能更好地引導被試注意投放到與安全操作有關的關鍵區域上;混合組與寫實組的模擬操作績效均優于卡通組。基于上述結果,筆者建議使用"混合呈現方式"的飛機安全須知卡向乘客傳遞安全信息。
We investigated the influence of pictorial realism on the comprehension of safety briefing cardby combining the eye-tracking technique and a simulatedmanipulation task. Participants were divided into three groups according to the design of safety briefing card: The card was composed of real photos,cartoon pictures,or a mixture of real photos(for target stimuli) and cartoon pictures(for the irrdevant stimuli). They first read the safety briefing card while their eye movements were recorded,then fulfilled a simulated manipulation task which typically took place when the plane is in an emergent situation.We found that participants paid more attention to the target stimuli in the mixture design,and they demonstrated better manipulation performance for the mixture design and real-photo design. Overall,the current study recommends displaying real photos for target stimuli and cartoon picture for the left stimuli in the design of safety briefing card.
期刊論文
1.Dwyer, F. M.(1967)。Adapting visual illustrations for effective learning。Harvard Educational Review，37，250-263。  new window
2.Glenberg, A. M.、Langston, W. E.(1992)。Comprehension of illustrated text: Pictures help to build mental models。Journal of Memory and Language，31(2)，129-151。  new window
3.Goldberg, J. H.、Kotval, X. P.(1999)。Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: Methods and constructs。International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics，24(6)，631-645。  new window
4.王琦君、趙悅、劉玉麗(2013)。登機牌信息要素及其佈局研究。應用心理學，19(3)，248-255。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉志方、蘇衡(20160300)。航空環境中情境意識的個體差異和任務難度差異檢測：眼動測量技術的優勢。應用心理學，22(1)，12-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Jacob, R. J.、Karn, K. S.(2003)。Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: Ready to deliver the promises。Mind，2(3)，4。  new window
7.Hsu, Yueh-ling(20100300)。A Study on the Comprehensibility of Airline Safety Card Pictorials and Pictograms。Journal of Aeronautics, Astronautics and Aviation. Series A，42(1)，31-37。  new window
8.Molesworth, B. R. C.(2014)。Examining the effectiveness of pre-flight cabin safety announcements in commercial aviation。International Journal of Aviation Psychology，24(4)，300-314。  new window
9.Silver, N. C.、Perlotto, C. N.(1997)。Comprehension of aviation safety pictograms: Gender and prior safety card reading influences。Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting，41(2)，806-810。  new window
10.Schmidt, J. K.、Kysor, K. P.(1987)。Designing airline passenger safety cards。Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting，31(1)，51-55。  new window
11.Salthouse, T. A.、Ellis, C. L.(1980)。Determinants of eye-fixation duration。The American Journal of Psychology，207-234。  new window
12.Seneviratne, D.、Molesworth, B. R.(2015)。Employing humour and celebrities to manipulate passengers' attention to pre-flight safety briefing videos in commercial aviation。Safety Science，75，130-135。  new window
13.Just, M. A.、Carpenter, P. A.(1976)。Eye Fixations and Cognitive Processes。Cognitive Psychology，8(4)，441-480。  new window
14.Schnotz, W.(2002)。Towards an integrated view of learning from text and visual displays。Educational Psychology Review，14(1)，101-120。  new window
會議論文
1.Caird, J. K.、Wheat, B.、McIntosh, K. R.、Dewar, R. E.(1997)。The comprehensibility of airline safety card pictorials。The Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 41st Annual Meeting，801-805。  new window
2.Hsu, Y. L.、Li, W. C.、Tang, C. H.(2013)。The use of eye tracking in the study of airline cabin safety communication。International Conference on Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics，(會議日期: 2013, July)。Springer。134-143。  new window
3.Muir, H.、Thomas, L.(2004)。Passenger education: Past and future。The 4th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference，(會議日期: 2004, November)。  new window
4.Johnson, D. A.(1980)。The design of effective safety information displays。The symposium: Human Factors and Industrial Design in Consumer Products。Medford, MA：Tufts University。314-328。  new window
研究報告
1.National Transportation Safety Board(1983)。Safety Recommendation。  new window
圖書
1.Cohen, J.(1977)。Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences。N. Y.：Academic Press。  new window
2.Fennell, P. J.、Muir, H. C.(1992)。Passenger Attitudes Towards Airline Safety Information and Comprehension of Safety Briefings and Cards。London：Civil Aviation Authority。  new window
3.Federal Aviation Administration(2003)。AC121-24C。Washington, DC：Department of Transportation。  new window
4.Federal Aviation Administration(1992)。TSO-C13f。Washington, DC：Department of Transportation。  new window
5.Corbett, C. L.、McLean, G. A.、Cosper, D. K.(2008)。Effective presentation media for passenger safety I: Comprehension of briefing card pictorials and pictograms。Federal aviation administration Oklahoma City Ok Civil Aerospace Medical Inst。  new window
6.National Transportation Safety Board(1974)。Special Study: Safety Aspects of Emergency Evacuations from Air Carrier Aircraft。  new window
單篇論文
1.Australian Transport Safety Board(2006)。Public attitudes, perceptions and behaviors towards cabin safety communication(B2004/0238)。  new window
圖書論文
1.Yantis, S.(1998)。Control of visual attention。Attention。London：University College London Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：579（臺灣：577，外國：2） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1614293 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67410536
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上