民法總則》制定過程中的"通則思維"危害極大,"民事權利章"是其典型表現。在民法典分則會對各項民事權利作詳盡規定的預設之下,沒有必要再設"民事權利章"。《民法總則》在人格利益保護方面,采行了人格利益保護一般條款加具體人格權之模式,個人信息保護則采行為規制模式,這均應予以肯定。"民事權利章"之中的現有財產權規定應予刪除,以免出現財產權規則分置于總則和分則的局面。榮譽權之規定也應當刪除。

In the process of making"General Rules of Civil Code",the"Tong Ze"thinking is of great harm,with Civil Rights Chapter as its typical manifestation.There is no need to set up the Civil Rights Chapter under the assumption that the civil code will stipulate the civil rights in detail.It should be affirmed that General provisions along with provisions for specific personal rights are adopted in order to protect personal interests,while the pattern of behavior regulation is adopted for the aim of protecting personal information.The provisions of property rights in the civil rights chapter should be deleted lest the rules of property rights be placed both in the general and specific part of the"Civil Code".In the end,the provisions for right of honor should be deleted as well.