:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:恆春地區觀光遊憩空間之演化-社會作用者與空間生產的關係
作者:蘇一志
作者(外文):Su, I-Jhy
校院名稱:國立台灣大學
系所名稱:地理學系研究所
指導教授:張長義
周素卿
學位類別:博士
出版日期:1997
主題關鍵詞:國家地方派系財團當地居民章魚模式變形蟲模式StateLocal FactionsCorporationLocal ResidentsOctopus modelAmorphous model
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(9) 博士論文(2) 專書(2) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:61
恆春是台灣地區觀光業發展最好的地區,每年的旅遊人次高居全台之冠。過去的
恆春地區,只是台灣工業發展過程中一個位居邊陲的農村地區,但是在1982年國
家公園成立之後,恆春地區的觀光發展卻一枝獨秀,身為全台灣最熱門的旅遊去
處,恆春地區已經成為各大利益團體必爭之地。本研究從空間政治經濟學的角度
出發,企圖分析恆春地區從一邊陲的農村,轉型成現在的主要觀光重鎮,其空間
結構的轉變為何?促成此一改變的作用者其彼此關係為何?
恆春地區在1982年(國家公園成立)之前是為觀光空間形成期,在本時期以「自
然資源再生產」為主,農業條件佳之處從事農業生產,農業條件差的地區則轉以
販賣自然景觀以謀求生計。在1982年之後進入觀光空間的轉化期,這個時期的特
色有別於過去單純以販賣自然資源為觀光利基,本時期主要利基來自於伴隨公部
門技術官僚所提出的空間計畫,許多利益團體把獲利目標放在土地利益的增值,
因此以「土地資源再生產」為主。
公部門在形成期具有觀光空間發展的主導權,進入轉化期之後不再是唯一的力量
;財團在轉化其成為空間轉型的主要力量,透過梯次動員介入國家公園內外發展
;地方派系在形成期主要以掌握公共造產的方式壟斷觀光資源,透過變形蟲模式
運作維持派系的力量,在轉化期則以政商關係和財團合作,共同謀求土地利益再
生產,在組織型態上也改以章魚模式來運作;當地居民在形成期是空間的主人,
在轉化期則藉由自主性團體的組成來對抗外來勢力。
本地區在進入觀光空間轉化期之後,頻頻出現社會衝突,這些衝突事件的出現主
要是由於各團體的空間行動邏輯差異極大,這些衝突主要可以分為三種屬性:公
部門之間的結構性衝突、各團體之間的經濟利益衝突、空間使用意識型態上的衝
突。
簡而言之,恆春地區觀光空間的演化是由國家、地方派系、財團、當地居民四個
作用者之間的互動中形成。而恆春地區觀光空間的發展軸線,在1958-1968年主要
以四重溪地區為主,在1969-1978年轉移到恆春街上,1979-1998年隨著國定風景
特定區計畫及國家公園計畫實施轉移到墾丁,未來在海洋生物博物館完成之後,
配合地方派系與財團的投資,觀光發展軸現將轉移到後灣地區。
With the highest annual number of tourists in Taiwan, the development
of tourism in Hengchun is by far the most successful one on this
island. In the past, however, when Taiwan focused on the development of
its industries, Hengchun was merely an insignificant agricultural
community located on the hinterland of national economy, but since the
establishment of Hengchun National Park in 1982, tourism has flourished
in Hengchun, and it soon emerged as the most popular scenic spot in
Taiwan. From then on, Hengchun has become the target of every major
interest group. Starting from the viewpoint of spatial political
economy, this research attempts to analyze the transformation of
Hengchun in spatial structures from an obscure agricultural community
to one major destination of tourists. It will also examine the factors
effecting such an alteration and the interrelations between these
factors.
The period before 1982(the year Kenting National Park was set up) is
called the stage of formation of the tourism space, during which the
major aim was to "reproduce natural resources," which meant that while
those areas ideal for cultivation were turning a profit by generating
agricultural products, those unsuitable for such uses would have to
"sell" their natural scenery so as to maintain a living for the
farmers. The stage of transformation of tourism space began in 1982.
Instead of merely "selling" natural scenery as a tourist niche, this
stage the niche in mainly came from the spatial plans brought up by
technical bureaucrats, and many interest groups depended upon the
appreciation of land interest for profits, so the "reproduction of land
resources" became their foremost task.
Although public sectors had the power to dominate the development of
tourism space during the stage of formation, corporations replaced them
as the major force in the stage of transformation. By means of
mobilization by echelon, these corporations intervened into both the
internal and the external development of the national park. In the
stage of formation, local factions monopolized the tourist resources
mainly by means of controlling public properties, and they maintained
their own power through amorphous model; in the stage of
transformation, they sought to cooperate with the corporations through
political and commercial relations so that together they might achieve
the reproduction of land interests. As for the pattern of organization,
the octopus model took the place of the amorphous model and started to
operate. Local residents were the owner of the spaces during the stage
of formation, while in the stage of transformation they resisted the
invasion of external forces by organizing autonomous groups.
Social conflicts took place frequently in this area during the stage
of the transformation of tourism space. These conflicts were mainly the
result of the disparity in the logic of spatial action among various
groups. These conflicts could roughly be divided into three major
categories: the structural conflicts among public sectors, the
conflicts of economic interests among different groups, and the
ideological conflicts of spatial utilization.
In brief, the evolution of the tourism space of Hengchun is the
consequence of the interactions of four factors: the state, local
factions, corporations, and local residents. From 1958 to 1968, the
center of the development of tourism space was on Shi-chong Steam; and
from 1969 to 1978 it was transferred to the streets of Hengchun; from
1979 to 1998 it was transferred again to Kenting with the realization
of the plans of national scenic areas and national parks. After the
construction of the Museum of marine life in the future, the center of
development is about to be transferred to Houwan in coordination with
the investments of local factions and corporations.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE