臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：注意力抑制性機制之探討：Stroop叫色作業中干擾物預視對干擾效果的影響
作者：趙軒甫 引用關係
作者(外文)：Hsuan-Fu Chao
校院名稱：國立臺灣大學
系所名稱：心理學研究所
指導教授：葉怡玉
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2006
主題關鍵詞：注意力控制；抑制；Stroop；選擇注意力；top-down control；attentional inhibition；Stroop；selective attention
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:51
本研究旨在探討選擇注意力作業中進行注意力控制的歷程。本研究以Stroop色字唸名作業（Stroop, 1935）呈現人們的主動抑制的能力。實驗一到實驗三呈現了干擾物預視的效果。倘若預先呈現線索告知參與者（participants）後續的干擾字為何，參與者能夠利用此一由上而下（top-down）的知識預先抑制干擾字。透過此一主動抑制的歷程，Stroop作業中的干擾字有較弱的干擾效果，而使得參與者有較快的唸色表現。實驗四以中性組與不一致組的對比反映Stroop干擾效果的大小，並顯示干擾物預視確實可以減少Stroop干擾效果。實驗五到實驗十針對干擾物預視效果的可能解釋進行檢驗，這些可能解釋包括干擾字處理加速假說、注意部分干擾字假說、時間區隔假說、顏色數減少假說與可能目標準備假說、以及主動抑制假說。實驗五探討一致組加入對於干擾物預視效果的影響。結果顯示，不一致組仍有穩定的干擾物預視效果；而一致組同樣有干擾物預視效果，但此效果小於不一致組內之效果。實驗六到實驗八探討線索與干擾字間知覺改變的影響。結果顯示，知覺改變後仍然有干擾物預視效果，但其效果比知覺不變下之效果要小。實驗九則引入線索成為目標色而非干擾字的衝突線索組，而顯示衝突線索組的表現慢於中性線索組。實驗十移除線索的預測力，而發現線索不再影響唸色的速度。綜合實驗五到實驗十的實驗結果，注意力的主動抑制假說有最強的解釋力。實驗十一到實驗十六就被動抑制與主動抑制之特質進行比較。被動抑制的指標乃Stroop版本的負向促發效果。實驗十一到實驗十四的結果顯示被動抑制受到記憶需求的影響，而主動抑制則不受到記憶需求的影響。實驗十五與實驗十六則顯示被動抑制無法存續達6,500毫秒，而主動抑制則能夠存續達6,500毫秒。這些實驗顯示了被動抑制與主動抑制的差異。
The current study investigated the effect of intentional inhibition on selective attention. Using a Stroop color naming task, a previewed condition was designed that the distractor of the upcoming Stroop stimulus was presented in advance as a cue. With the foreknowledge of the upcoming distractor, participants were instructed to inhibit this previewed distractor. Experiments 1-3 indicated that participants can benefit from distractor previewing. Color naming was faster when the distractor was previewed than when no cue or no valid cue was presented. By estimating the Stroop interference effect as the difference between the incompatible condition and the neutral condition, Experiment 4 further demonstrated that distractor previewing can decrease the Stroop interference effect. Experiments 5-10 were designed to evaluate hypotheses of distractor previewing, including facilitation of distractor processing, attending part of the cue, temporal segregation, expecting possible targets, and intentional inhibition. Experiment 5 showed significant effect of distractor viewing when incompatible and compatible trials were used. However, the benefit of distractor previewing was decreased when compatible trials were presented. Experiments 6-8 demonstrated significant effect of distractor previewing when cues and distractors differed in forms. Moreover, the benefit of distractor previewing was less when cues and distractors were different in forms than when they were identical in forms. In Experiment 9, there were conflict trials that the previewed item cued the target color rather than the distractor word. In comparison to the neutral condition, a cost was obtained for these conflict trials. Finally, the cue validity was removed in Experiment 10, and no effect of distractor previewing was observed. These results from Experiments 5-10 support the hypothesis of intentional inhibition. Using Stroop negative priming as the index of passive inhibition, intentional inhibition was compared to passive inhibition in Experiments 11-16. Experiments 11-14 showed that while passive inhibition was sensitive to short-term memory load, intentional inhibition was less sensitive to the load of short-term memory. Experiments 15-16 indicated that while the effect of intentional inhibition could last at least 6,500 ms, the effect of passive inhibition could not last as long as intentional inhibition. These results demonstrate differences between passive and intentional inhibition.
孫心梅（2005）。「以事件相關電位探討負向促發作業中的大腦處理歷程」（未發表的碩士論文）。台北：國立陽明大學神經科學研究所。
葉怡玉、黃金蘭、及趙軒甫（2000）。選擇注意力的彈性：位置與本體的交互作用。「中華心理學刊」，42，217-231。new window
趙軒甫、葉怡玉、及楊婷媖（2003）。干擾訊息的干擾與被抑制。「中華心理學刊」，45，361-377。new window
Allport, D. A., Tipper, S. P., & Chmiel, N. R. J. (1985). Perceptual integration and postcategorical filtering. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Attention and performance Vol. 11 (pp. 107-132). Hilldale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Amso, D., & Johnson, S. P. (2005). Selection and inhibition in infancy: Evidence from the spatial negative priming paradigm. Cognition, 95, B27-B36.
Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1063-1087.
Anderson, M. C., Green, C., & McCulloch, K. C. (2000). Similarity and inhibition in long-term memory: Evidence for a two-factor theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1141-1159.
Anderson, M. C., & Spellman, B. A. (1995). On the status of inhibitory mechanisms in cognition: Memory retrieval as a model case. Psychological Review, 102, 68-100.
Awh, E., Sgarlata, A. M., & Kleistik, J. (2005). Resolving visual Interference during covert spatial orienting: Online attentional control through static records of prior visual experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 192-206.
Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation Vol. 8 (pp. 47–90). New York: Academic Press.
Beech, A., Baylis, G. C., Smithson, P., & Claridge, G. (1989). Individual differences in schizotypy as reflected in measures of cognitive inhibition. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 117-129.
Beech, A., Powell, T., McWilliam, J., & Claridge, G. (1989). Evidence of reduced ‘cognitive inhibition’ in schizophrenia. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 109-116.
Belopolsky, A. Theeuwes, J. & Kramer, A.F. (2005). Prioritization by transients in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 93-99.
Besner, D. (2001). The myth of ballistic processing: Evidence from Stroop''s paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 324-330.
Besner, D., & Stolz, J. A. (1999). What kind of attention modulates the Stroop effect? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 99-104.
Besner, D., Stolz, J. A., & Boutilier, C. (1997). The Stroop effect and the myth of automaticity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 221-225.
Bibi, U., Tzelgov, J., & Henik, A. (2000). Stroop effect in words that differ from color words in one letter only. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 678-683.
Bjork, R. A. (1972). Theoretical implications of directed forgetting. In A. W. Melton & E. Martin (Eds.), Coding processes in human memory (pp. 217-235). Washington, DC: Winston.
Bjork, R. A. (1989). Retrieval inhibition as an adaptive mechanism in human memory. In H. L. Roediger III & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 309-330). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bjork, E. L., Bjork, R. A., & Anderson, M. C. (1998). Varieties of goal-directed forgetting. In J. M. Golding & C. M. MacLeod (Eds.), Intentional forgetting: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 103-137). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Blaxton, T. A., & Neely, J. H. (1983). Inhibition from semantic related primes: Evidence of a category-specific inhibition. Memory & Cognition, 11, 500-510.
Brian, J. A., Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., & Bryson, S. E. (2003). Inhibitory mechanisms in autism spectrum disorders: Typical selective inhibition of locations versus facilitated perceptual processing. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44, 552-560
Broadbent, D. E. (1970). Stimulus set and response set: Two kinds of selective
attention. In D. I. Mostofsky (Ed.), Attention: Contemporary theory and analysis (pp. 51-60). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Buchner, A., & Mayr, S. (2004). Auditory negative priming in younger and older adults. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 769-787.
Buchner, A., Zabal, A., & Mayr, S. (2003). Auditory, visual, and cross-modal negative priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 917-923.
Buckolz, E., Boulougouris, A., O''Donnell, C., & Pratt, J. (2002). Disengaging the negative priming mechanism in location tasks. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14, 207-225.
Buckolz, E., Goldfarb, A., & Khan, M. (2004). The use of a distractor-assigned response slows later responding in a location negative priming task. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 837-845.
Burt, J. S. (1994). Identity primes produce facilitation in a colour naming task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 957-1000.
Burt, J. S. (2002). Why do non-color words interfere with color naming? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1019-1038.
Butler, K. M., Williams, C. C., Zacks, R. T., & Maki, R. H. (2001). A limit on retrieval-induced forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1314-1319.
Chao, H.-F., & Yang, T.-Y. (2005). Inhibition of novel distractors. Poster presented at the Fifth Annual Meeting of the Vision Sciences Society, Sarasota, Florida.
Chao, H.-F., & Yeh, Y.-Y. (2004). Distractors of low activation can produce negative priming. Memory & Cognition, 32, 979-989.
Chao, H.-F., & Yeh, Y.-Y. (2005a). Location negative priming in identity discrimination relies on location repetition. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 789-801.
Chao, H.-F., & Yeh, Y.-Y. (2005b). Attentional demand and memory retrieval in negative priming. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Chao, H.-F., & Yeh, Y.-Y. (2005c). Contextual similarity of symbolic cues can influence negative priming. Manuscript in preparation.
Chao, H.-F., & Yeh, Y.-Y. (in press). Inhibition of return at repeatedly stimulated locations lasts longer than at novel locations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
Cheal, M., Chastain, G., & Lyon, D. R. (1998). Inhibition of return in vision identification tasks. Visual Cognition, 5, 365-388.
Chiappe, D. L., & MacLeod, C. M. (1995). Negative priming is not task bound: A consistent pattern across naming and categorization tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 364-369.
Christ, S. E., McCrae, C. S., & Abrams, R. A. (2002). Inhibition of return in static and dynamic displays. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 80-85.
Clark, J. M. (1996). Contributions of inhibitory mechanisms to unified theory in neuroscience and psychology. Brain and Cognition, 30, 127-152.
Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A paralleled distributed processing model of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332-361.
Cohen, J. D., Usher, M., & McClelland, J. L. (1998). A PDP approach to set size effects within the Stroop task: Reply to Kanne, Balota, Spieler, and Faust (1998). Psychological Review, 105, 188-194.
Connelly, S. L., & Hasher, L. (1993). Aging and the inhibition of spatial location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1238-1250.
Conway, A. R. A. (1999). The time-course of negative priming: Little evidence for episodic trace retrieval. Memory & Cognition, 27, 575-583.
Conway, A. R. A., Tuholski, S. W., Shisler, R. J., & Engle, R. W. (1999). The effect of memory load on negative priming: An individual differences investigation. Memory & Cognition, 27, 1042-1050.
Dalrymple-Alford, E. C., & Budayr, D. (1966). Examination of some aspects of the Stroop color-word test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 23, 1211-1214.new window
Dark, V. J., & Schmidt, P. A. (2000). Conceptual activation of distractors during selection is not sufficient to produce negative priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 126-132.
Dempster, P., & Corkill, A. J. (1999). Interference and inhibition in cognition and behavior: Unifying themes for educational psychology. Educational Psychology Review, 11, 1-88.
DeSchepper, B., & Treisman A. (1996). Visual memory for novel shapes: Implicit coding without attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 27-47.
Di Lollo, V. (1980). Temporal integration in visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 75-97.
Dishon-Berkovits, M., & Algom, D. (2000). The Stroop effect: It is not the robust phenomenon that you have thought it to be. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1437-1449.
Donk, M. (2005). Prioritizing selection of new elements: On the time course of the preview effect. Visual Cognition, 12, 1373-1785.
Donk, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2001). Visual marking beside the mark: Prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 891-900.
Donk, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2003). Prioritizing selection of new elements: Bottom-up versus top-down control. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 1231-1242.
Dorahy, M. J., Middleton, W., & Irwin, H. J. (2005). The effect of emotional context on cognitive inhibition and attentional processing in dissociative identity disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 555-568.
Driver, J., & Tipper, S. P. (1989). On the nonselectivity of “selective” seeing: Contrasts between interference and priming in selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 304-314.
Dyer, F. N. (1971). The duration of word meaning responses: Stroop interference for different preexposures of the word. Psychonomic Science, 25, 229-231.
Dyer, F. N. (1974). Stroop interference with long preexposures of the word: Comparison of pure and mixed preexposure sequences. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 3, 8-10.
Engle, R. W., Conway, A. R. A., Tuholski, S. W., & Shisler, R. J. (1995). A resource account of inhibition. Psychological Science, 6, 122-125.
Enright, S. J., & Beech, A. R. (1990). Obsessional states: Anxiety disorders or schizotypes? An information processing and personality assessment. Psychological Medicine, 20, 621-627.
Enright, S. J., & Beech, A. R. (1993a). Further evidence of reduced inhibition in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 387-395.
Enright, S. J., & Beech, A. R. (1993b). Reduced cognitive inhibition in obsessive compulsive disorder. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32, 67-74.
Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
Folk, C. M., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030–1044.
Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116-124.
Fox, E. (1994). Interference and negative priming from ignored distractors: The role of selection difficulty. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 565-574.
Fox, E. (1995a). Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 145-173.
Fox, E. (1995b). Pre-cuing target location reduces interference but not negative priming from visual distractors. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 26-40.
Fox, E., & de Fockert, J. W. (1998). Negative priming depends on prime-probe similarity: Evidence for episodic retrieval. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 107-113.
Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 101-135.
Frings, C., & Wentura, D. (2005). Negative priming with masked distractor-only prime trials: Awareness moderates negative priming. Experimental Psychology, 52, 131-139.
Frings, C., & Wühr, P. (in press). On distractor-repetition benefits in the negative-priming paradigm. Visual Cognition.
Frith, C. D. (1979). Consciousness, information processing and schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 225-235.
Gamboz, N., Russo, R., & Fox, E. (2000). Task selection difficulty, negative priming, and aging. Psychology and Aging, 15, 542-550.
Gamboz, N., Russo, R., & Fox, E. (2002). Age differences and the identity negative priming effect: An updated meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 17, 525-530.
Gathercole, S. E., Pickering, S. J., Ambridge, B., & Wearing, H. (2004). The structure of working memory from 4 to 15 years of age. Developmental Psychology, 40, 177-190.
Geiselman, R. E., Bjork, R. A., & Fishman, D. (1983). Disrupted retrieval in directed forgetting: A link with posthypnotic amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 58-72.
Golden, C. J. (1974). Effect of differing number of colors on the Stroop Color and Word Test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 39, 550.
Goolkasian, P. (1981). Retinal locations and its effect on the processing of target and distractor information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 1247-1257.
Grison, S., & Strayer, D. L. (2001). Negative priming and perceptual fluency: More than what meets the eye. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1063-1071.
Grison, S., Tipper, S. P., & Hewitt, O. (2005). Long-term negative priming: Support for retrieval of prior attentional processes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 1199-1224.
Guy, S., Buckolz, E., & Pratt, J. (2004). The influence of distractor-only prime trials on the location negative priming mechanism. Experimental Psychology, 5, 4-14.
Hallett, P. E. (1978). Primary and secondary saccades to goals defined by instructions. Vision Research, 18, 1279-1296.
Harnishfeger, K. K. (1995.) The development of cognitive inhibition: Theories, definitions, and research evidence. In F. N. Dempster & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), New perspectives on interference and inhibition in cognition. San Diego: Academic Press.
Hasher, L., Stoltzfus, E. R., Zacks, R. T., & Rypma, B. (1991). Age and inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 163-169.
Hasher, L., Zacks, R. T., & May, C. P. (1999). Inhibitory control, circadian arousal, and age. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 653-675). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hasher, L., Zacks, R. T., Stoltzfus, E. R., Kane, M. J., & Connelly, S. L. (1996). On the time course of negative priming: Another look. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 231-237.
Hikosaka, O., Miyauchi, S., & Shimojo, S. (1993). Focal visual attention produces illusory temporal order and motion sensation. Vision Research, 33, 1219-1240.
Hommel, B., Ridderinkhof, K. R., & Theeuwes, J. (2002). Cognitive control of attention and action: Issues and trends. Psychological Research, 66, 215-219.
Houghton, G., & Tipper, S. P. (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 53-112). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Humphreys, G. W., Kyllingsbæk, S., Watson, D. G., Olivers, C. N. L., Law, I., & Paulson, O. F. (2004). Parieto-occipital areas involved in efficient filtering in visual search: A time course analysis of visual marking using behavioural and functional imaging procedures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 610-635.
Humphreys, G. W., Stalmann, B. J., & Olivers, C. (2004). An analysis of the time course of attention in preview search. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 713-730.
James, W. (1950). The principles of psychology. NY: Dover. (Original work published 1890)
Jiang, Y., Chun, M. M., & Marks, L. E. (2002a). Visual marking: Dissociating effects of new and old set size. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 293-302.
Jiang, Y., Chun, M. M., & Marks, L. E. (2002b). Visual marking: Selective attention to asynchronous temporal groups. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 717-730.
Jiang, Y., & Kumar, A. (2004). Visual Short-term Memory for Two Sequential Arrays: One integrated representation or two separate representations? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 495-500.
Johnson, H. M. (1994). Processes of successful intentional forgetting. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 274-292.
Jonides, J. (1981) . Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind’ s eye’ s movement. In J. B. Long & A. D. Baddeley (Eds), Attention and performance IX (pp. 187-203). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Kane, M. J., May, C. P., Hasher, L., Rahhal, T., & Stoltzfus, E. R. (1997). Dual mechanisms of negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 632-650.
Klein, R.M. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature, 334, 430-431
Klein, R. M., & MacInnes, W. J. (1999). Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science, 10, 346-352.
Klein, R. M., & Taylor, T. L. (1994.) Categories of cognitive inhibition, with reference to attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.) Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 113-150). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Koshino, H., Boese, G. A., & Ferraro, F. R. (2000). The relationship between cognitive ability and positive and negative priming in identity and spatial priming tasks. Journal of General Psychology, 127, 372-382.
Kramer, A. F., & Atchley, P. (2000). Age-related effects in the marking of old objects in visual search. Psychology and Aging, 15, 286-296.
Kramer, A. F., Gonzalez de Sather, J. C. M., & Cassavaugh, N. D. (2005). Development of attentional and oculomotor control. Developmental Psychology, 41, 760-772.
Kramer, A. F., & Strayer, D. L. (2001). Influence of stimulus repetition on negative priming. Psychology and Aging, 16, 580-587.
LaBerge, D. (2002). Attentional control: Brief and prolonged. Psychological Research, 66, 220-233.
LaBerge, D., & Brown, V. (1989). Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. Psychological Review, 96, 101-124.
La Heij, W., Kaptein, N. A., Kalff, A. C, & de Lange, L. (1995). Reducing color-color interference by optimizing selection-for-action. Psychological Research, 57, 119-130.
La Heij, W., van der Heijden, A. H. C., & Plooij, P. (2001). A paradoxical exposure-duration effect in the Stroop task: Temporal segregation between stimulus attributes facilitates selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 622-632.
Lammertyn, J., & Fias, W. (2005). Negative priming with numbers: No evidence for a semantic locus. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 1153-1172.
Laplante, L., Everett, J., & Thomas, J. (1992). Inhibition through negative priming with Stroop stimuli in schizophrenia. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 31, 307-326.
Lauwereyns, J. (1998). Exogenous/endogenous control of space-based/object-based attention: Four types of visual selection? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 10, 41-74.
Lijffijt, M., Kenemans, J. L., Verbaten, M. N., & van Engeland, H. (2005). A meta-analytic review of stopping performance in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Deficient inhibitory motor control? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 216-222.
Little, D. M., & Hartley, A. A. (2000). Further evidence that negative priming in the Stroop color-word task is equivalent in older and younger adults. Psychology and Aging, 15, 9-17.
Logan, G. D. (1980). Attention and automaticity in Stroop and priming tasks: Theory and data. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 523-553.
Logan, G. D. (1982). On the ability to inhibit complex movements: A stop-signal study of typewriting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 778-792.
Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527.
Logan, G. D. (1994). A user''s guide to the stop signal paradigm. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Cart (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 189-239). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review, 91, 295-327.
Long, D. L., & Prat, C. S. (2002). Working memory and Stroop interference: An individual differences investigation. Memory & Cognition, 30, 294-301.
Long, G. M., & Lyman, B. J. (1987). Foveal and parafoveal processing of asynchronous Stroop stimuli. British Journal of Psychology, 78, 151-162.
Lowe, D. G. (1979). Strategies, context and the mechanisms of response inhibition. Memory & Cognition, 7, 382-389.
Lupiáñez, J., Milan, E. G., Tornay, F. J., Madrid, E., & Tudela, P. (1997). Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1241-1254.
MacDonald, P. A., & Joordens, S. (2000). Investigating a memory-based account of negative priming: Support for selection-feature mismatch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1478-1496.
MacDonald, P. A., Joordens, S., & Seergobin, K. N. (1999). Negative priming effects that are bigger than a breadbox: Attending to distractors does not eliminate negative priming, it enhances it. Memory & Cognition, 27, 197-207.
MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrated review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
MacLeod, C. M., Dodd, M. D., Sheard, E. D., Wilson, D. E., & Bibi, U. (2003). In opposition to inhibition. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation Vol. 43 (pp. 163-214). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Macmillan, M. (1996). The concept of inhibition in some nineteenth century theories of thinking. Brain and Cognition, 30, 4-19.
Malley, G. B., & Strayer, D. L. (1995). Effect of stimulus repetition on positive and negative identity priming. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 657-667.
Mason, D., Humphreys, G. W. & Kent, L. S. (2004). Visual search, singleton capture and the control of attentional set in attentional deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, 661-687.
May, C. P., Kane, M. J., & Hasher, L. (1995). Determinants of negative priming. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 35-54.
McDowd, J. M., & Filion, D. L. (1995). Aging and negative priming in a location suppression task: The long and short of it. Psychology and Aging, 10, 34-47.
McClain, L. (1983). Effects of response type and set size on Stroop color-word interference. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 56, 643-651.
Milliken, B., Joordens, S., Merikle, P. M., & Seiffert, A. E. (1998). Selective attention: A reevaluation of the implications of negative priming. Psychological Review, 105, 203-229.
Milliken, B., Lupiáñez, J., Debner, J., & Abello, B. (1999). Automatic and controlled processing in Stroop negative priming: The role of attentional set. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1384-1402.
Milliken, B., Tipper, S. P., Houghton, G., & Lupiáñez, J. (2000). Attending, ignoring, and repetition: On the relation between negative priming and inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1280-1296.
Moore, C. M. (1994). Negative priming depends on probe-trial conflict: Where has all the inhibition gone? Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 133-147.
Moore, C. M. (1996). Does negative priming imply preselective identification of irrelevant stimuli? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 91-94.
Morton, J., & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Selective attention to words and colours. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 387-397.
Müller, H. J., & von Mühlenen, A. (2000). Probing distractor inhibition in visual search: Inhibition of return (IOR). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1591-1605.
Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
Neill, W. T. (1977). Inhibitory and facilitatory processes in selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 444-450.
Neill, W. T. (1978). Decision processes in selective attention: Response priming in the Stroop color-word task. Perception & Psychophysics, 23, 80-84.
Neill, W. T. (1997). Episodic retrieval in negative priming and repetition priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1291-1305.
Neill, W. T., Lissner, L. S., & Beck, J. L. (1990). Negative priming in same-different matching: Further evidence for a central locus of inhibition. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 398-400.
Neill, W. T., & Valdes, L. A. (1992). Persistence of negative priming: Steady state or decay? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 565-576.
Neill, W. T., & Valdes, L. A. (1996). Facilitatory and inhibitory aspects of attention. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 77-106). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Neill, W. T., Valdes, L. A., & Terry, K. M. (1995). Selective attention and the inhibitory control of cognition. In F. N. Dempster & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Interference and inhibition in cognition (pp. 207-261). New York: Academic Press.
Neill, W. T., Valdes, L. A., Terry, K. M., & Gorfein, D. S. (1992). Persistence of negative priming: II. Evidence for episodic trace retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 993-1000.
Neill, W. T., & Westberry, R. L. (1987). Selective attention and suppression of cognitive noise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 327-334.
Niemi, P., & Näätänen, R. (1981). Foreperiod and simple reaction time. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 133-162.
Nigg, J. T. (2000). On inhibition/disinhibiiton in developmental psychology: Views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 200-246.
Nigg, J. T. (2001). Is ADHD a disinhibitory disorder? Psychological Bulletin, 127, 571-598.
Olivers, C. N. L., & Humphreys, G. W. (2002). When visual marking meets the attentional blink: More evidence for top-down, limited capacity inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 22-42.
Olivers, C. N. L., & Humphreys, G. W. (2003). Visual marking and singleton capture: Fractionating the unitary nature of visual selection. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 1-42.
Olivers, C. N. L., Smith, S., Matthews, P., & Humphreys, G.. W. (2005). Prioritizing new over old: An fMRI study of the preview search task. Human Brain Mapping, 24, 69-78.
O’Riordan, M. (2000). Superior modulation of activation levels of stimulus representations does not underlie superior discrimination in autism. Cognition, 77, 81-96.
Ozonoff, S., & Strayer, D. L., (1997). Inhibitory function in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 27, 59-77.
Park, J., & Kanwisher, N. (1994). Negative priming for spatial locations: Identity mismatching, not distractor inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 613-623.
Perfect, T. J., Moulin, C. J. A., Conway, M. A., & Perry, E. (2002). Assessing the inhibitory account of retrieval-induced forgetting with implicit-memory tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 1111-1119.
Posner, M. I. (1978). Chronometric explorations of mind. Hilldales, NY: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Houma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and Performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531-556). Hilldale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pratt, J. & Abrams, R. A. (1999). Inhibition of return in discrimination tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 229-242.
Pratt, J., & McAuliffe, J. (2002). Inhibition of return in visual marking? The importance of the interstimulus interval and the type of search task. Visual Cognition, 9, 869-888.
Pritchard, V. E., & Neumann, E. (2004). Negative priming effects in children engaged in nonspatial tasks: Evidence for early development of an intact inhibitory mechanism. Developmental Psychology, 40, 191-203.
Roelofs, A. (2003). Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: Modeling attentional control in the Stroop task. Psychological Review, 110, 88-125.
Schooler, C., Neumann, E., Caplan, L. J., & Roberts, B. R. (1997). A time course analysis of Stroop interference and facilitation: Comparing normal individuals and individuals with schizophrenia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 19-36.
Simone, P. M., & McCormick. E. B. (1999). Effect of a defining feature on negative priming across the life span. Visual Cognition, 6, 587-606.
Stadler, M. A., & Hogan, M. E. (1996). Varieties of positive and negative priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 87-90.
Stelmach, L. B., & Herdman, C. M., (1991). Directed attention and perception of temporal order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 539-550.
Strayer, D. L., & Grison, S. (1999). Negative identity priming is contingent on stimulus repetition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 24-38.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
Stuss, D. T., Toth, J. P., Franchi, D., Alexander, M. P., Tipper, S., & Craik, F. I. M. (1999). Dissociation of attentional processes in patients with focal frontal and posterior lesions. Neuropsychologia, 37, 1005-1027.
Sugg, M. J., & McDonald, J. E. (1994). Time course of inhibition in color-response and word-response versions of the Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 647-675.
Takeda, Y., & Yagi, A. (2000). Inhibitory tagging to continuous visual stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 927-934.
Tanaka, Y., & Shimojo, S. (1996). Location vs. feature: Reaction time reveals dissociation between two visual functions. Vision Research, 36, 2125-2140.
Terry, K. M., Valdes, L. A., & Neill, W. T. (1994). Does “inhibition of return” occurs in discrimination tasks? Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 279-286.
Theeuwes, J. (1991). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 83-90.
Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 599-606.
Theeuwes, J. (1994). Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: Selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 799-806.
Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., & Atchley, P. (1998). Visual marking of old objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 130-134.
Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 571-590.
Tipper, S. P. (1991). Less attentional selectivity as a result of declaring inhibition in older adults. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29, 45-47.
Tipper, S. P. (2001). Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 321-343.
Tipper, S. P., Bourque, T. A., Anderson, S. H., & Brehaut, J. C. (1989). Mechanisms of attention: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 353-378.
Tipper, S. P., Brehaut, J. C., & Driver, J. (1990). Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 492-504.
Tipper, S. P., & Cranston, M. (1985). Selective attention and priming: Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of ignored primes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 591-611.
Tipper, S. P., & Driver, J. (1988). Negative priming between pictures and words in a selective attention task: Evidence for semantic processing of ignored stimuli. Memory & Cognition, 16, 64-70.
Tipper, S. P., Driver, J., & Weaver, B. (1991). Object-centred inhibition of return of visual attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 289-298.
Tipper, S. P., MacQueen, G. M., & Brehaut, J. C. (1988). Negative priming between response modalities: Evidence for the central locus of inhibition in selective attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 45-52.
Tipper, S. P., Meegan, D., & Howard, L. A. (2002). Action-centred negative priming: Evidence for reactive inhibition. Visual Cognition, 9, 591-614.
Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., Cameron, S., Brehaut, J. C., & Bastedo, J. (1991). Inhibitory mechanisms of attention in identification and localization tasks: Time course and disruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 681-692.
Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., & Houghton, G. (1994). Behavioural goals determine inhibitory mechanisms of selective attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 809-840.
Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., Jerreat, L., & Burak, A. (1994). Objectand environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 478-499.
Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., & Milliken, B. (1995). Spatial negative priming without mismatching: Comment on Park and Kanwisher (1994). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1220-1229.
Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
Tsal, Y., & Makovski, T. (2006). The attentional white bear phenomenon: The mandatory allocation of attention to expected distractor locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 351-363.
Turner, M. L. & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127-154.
Tzelgov, J., Henik, A., & Berger, J. (1992). Controlling Stroop effects by manipulating expectations for color words. Memory & Cognition, 20, 727-735.
Tzelgov, J., Henik, A., & Leiser, D. (1990). Controlling Stroop interference: Evidence from a bilingual task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 760-771.
Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549-586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Unsworth, N., Schrock, J. C., Engle, R. W. (2004). Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: Individual differences in voluntary saccade control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 1302-1321.
Van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1981). Short term visual information forgetting. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Veling, H., & van Knippenberg, A. (2004). Remembering can cause inhibition: Retrieval-induced inhibition as cue independent process. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 315-318.
Verhaeghen, P., & De Meersman, L. (1998). Aging and the negative priming effect: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 13, 435-444.
Vitkovitch, M., Bishop, S., Dancey, C., & Richards, A. (2002). Stroop interference and negative priming in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1570-1576.
Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (1997). Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review, 104, 90-122.
Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (1998). Visual marking of moving objects: A role for top-down feature based inhibition in selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 946–962.
Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (2000). Visual marking: Evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot detection paradigm. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 471–481.
Watson, D. G., Humphreys, G. W., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2003). Visual marking: using time in visual selection. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 180-186.
Watson, D. G., & Maylor, E. A. (2002). Aging and visual marking: Selective deficits for moving stimuli. Psychology and Aging, 17, 321-339.
Wegner, D. M. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review, 101, 34-52.
Wegner, D. M., & Erber, R. (1992). The hyperaccessibility of suppressed thoughts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 903-912.
Wegner, D. M., Erber, R., & Zanakos, S. (1993). Ironic processes in the mental control of mood and mood-related thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1093-1104.
Wegner, D. M., Schneider, D. J., Carter, S., & White, T. (1987). Paradoxical effects of thought suppression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 5-13.
Wenzlaff, R. M., & Wegner, D. M. (2000). Thought suppression. In S. T. Fiske (Ed.), Annual review of psychology Vol. 51 (pp. 59-91). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
Wilson, S. P., & Kipp, K. (1998).The development of efficient inhibition: Evidence from directed-forgetting tasks. Developmental Review, 18, 86-123.
Wolfe, J. M. & Pokorny, C. (1990) Inhibitory tagging in visual search: A failure to replicate. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 357-362
Wong, K. F. E. (2000). Dissociative prime-probe contextual similarity effects on negative priming and repetition priming: A challenge to episodic retrieval as a unified account of negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1411-1422.
Yang, T.-Y., Yeh, Y.-Y., & Chao, H.-F. (2004). The effect of contextual similarity on negative priming. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 46, 15-27.
Yantis, S., & Hillstrom, P. (1994). Stimulus-driven attentional capture: Evidence from equiluminant visual objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 95-107.
Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 601-621.
Yee, P. L. (1991). Semantic inhibition of ignored words during a figure classification task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 127-153.
Yeh, Y.-Y., & Chao, H.-F. (2004). Probe distractors can influence negative priming by perceptual grouping. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 208-218.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1137（臺灣：1116，外國：21） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1725833 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67544518
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上