:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:語言為倫理中的他者:唐‧迪立羅的三部曲
作者:張期敏
作者(外文):Chi-min Chang
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:英語學系
指導教授:梁孫傑
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2007
主題關鍵詞:列維納斯唐‧迪立羅倫理學他者語言自我LevinasDon DeLilloethicsthe Otherlanguagethe self
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:48
中文摘要
本論文旨要就迪立羅的三本小說: 《名字》(1982), 《白色雜音》(1985)和《毛II》(1991)探討語言在後現代中如何扮演他者的角色, 首先以列維納斯的倫理架構作為檢視的主軸,強調語言和一個不可化約的他者的關係,再審視唐‧迪立羅對語言的觀察如何呼應列維納斯倫理中所強調的感官性,使不再拘泥於文字聲音的呈現, 而以身體感官的感受作為和他者對話的首要機制。 語言為他者的討論共分為三個面向:第一個面向探討《名字》中感官和環境的深層對話,再與語言文字原本的神秘性相呼應,列維納斯的斷時性(diachrony)則被用來說明他者的捉摸不定及無法比較性,同時也顯示自我的絕對被動性。第二個部份以《白色雜音》中所呈現的死亡概念為主軸, 進一步討論直接和間接的身體語言, 直接的身體語言敘述自我對死亡不停歇的恐懼, 再加上科技對生活影響的觀察,產生一種間接的身體語言,將自我的無助描寫得更加透徹,自我不僅沒有任何主導權且一步步地被他者化(Othered)。第三個面向是對影像語言的探討,其呼應的是後現代中影像已取代語言文字成為更強勢語言的狀況, 但迪立羅有著不同於列維納斯的寫作企圖: 雖然同在一個突顯他著不可化約及不可統整的前提下, 自我似乎不只被質疑且幾乎消融殆盡,但迪立羅卻在倫理關係的耙梳中看到探討自我的必要,以列維納斯對他者的責任及回應概念出發, 證實自我的可能性如何一次一次出現在對他者的回應中,而這些新的可能性並非只是隨機的結果, 而是自我獨特性的顯現,其中蘊含了複雜的自我解讀, 證實了自我在回應他者的同時,仍存有某種自主性及自由。 李歐塔的異教徒的語言遊戲及事件的時間概念(event) 也被用來闡釋自我對他者的回應如何在倫理關係中被激發出來,也就是倫理關係中的自我並非單一面向。 整個倫理關係的探討回應到後現代最棘手的人文論述:在如此的倫理關係解讀中,自我的可能性及獨特性如何重新定義後現代中的人本主義(humanism) 和產生另一種對話的可能。
This dissertation aims to explore three of Don DeLillo’s novels, The Names (1982), White Noise (1985), and Mao II (1991) to see how language plays the role of the ethical Other in the postmodern age. The analysis, pivoted on Levinas’s ethics, would first stress the relation between language and the irreducible Other and go on to examine how DeLillo’s observation of language corresponds to Levinas’s ethical perspectives which are marked by sensibility. That is, DeLillo’s language in terms of ethics goes beyond the notion of language which is restricted to word-sound linkages. The empirical perception is the premier arena for the dialogue with the Other. The discussion on language as the ethical Other mainly falls on three distinct aspects. First, DeLillo in The Names presents the wor(l)d reading which comprises the profound conversation between the senses and the surroundings and imbricates the original mysteries of words. The discussion draws on Levinas's notion of diachrony, demonstrating how time accounts for the irreducibility and incommesurability of the elusive Other as well as the radical passivity of the self. Secondly, the discussion goes to the immediate and mediated corporeal language, hinging on the idea of death in White Noise. The immediate bodily language relates the self’s incessant fear of death. In addition, with DeLillo’s observation of how technology affects life, he makes an acute presentation of the self’s vulnerability and helplessness. In the ethical relation, death as the corporeal language is not merely overwhelming but self-othering. Thirdly, it is the exploration of the language of image. It echoes the phenomenon in the postmodern age in which images have become a more imposing and dominant language in communication and information circulation. With similar emphasis on the image as the irreducible and untotalizable Other, DeLillo makes a divergent attempt in writing from that of Levinas. As the self in the ethical relation is questioned, diminished and even dissolved, DeLillo particularly contends the importance to explore the self in such an Other-oriented ethical relation. Starting with Levinas’s notion of the responsibility for the Other, DeLillo demonstrates how the new possibilities of the self come out in his response to the Other. However, these new possibilities are not the contingent or provisional consequences but the presentation of one’s individuality. The individuality involves complicate reading of the ethical self, confirming there is certain kind of freedom in one’s responsibility for the Other. Lyotard’s idea of pagan language games and the notion of the event help shed light on how the self is spurred to make new moves in the ethical relation. That means the self is no longer single-dimensioned. A profound reading of the self is necessary to understand how the vulnerable and passive self is rendered the potentiality for new possibilities, a way to assert one’s individuality, in particular. In addition, such an exploration of the ethical relation makes a remarkable response to the discourse of humanism—to redefine humanism in the postmodern age in terms of the individuality in the language-pivoted ethical relation.
Primary sources
DeLillo, Don. 1989: The Names. New York: Vintage.
----. 1986: White Noise. New York: Penguin.
----. 1992: Mao II. New York: Penguin.

Secondary sources
Aaron, Daniel. 1991. “How to Read Don DeLillo.”
Introducing Don DeLillo. Ed. Frank Lentricchia.
Durham and London: Duke UP. 67-81
Abbinnett, Ross. 1998. “Postmodernity and the Ethics of
Care: Situating Bauman’s Social Theory.” Cultural
Values 2.1: 87-116.
Agamben, Giorgio. 1993. The Coming Community.
Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P.
Arnett, Ronald C. 2003. “The Responsive “I”: Levinas’s
Derivative Argument.” Argumentation & Advocacy 40.1:
39-50.
Barrett, Laura. 1999. “‘Here But Also There’:
Subjectivity and Postmodern Space in Mao II.” Modern
Fiction Studies 45.3: 788-810.
Barry Jr., James. 1991. “The Technical Body:
Incorporating Technology and Flesh.” Philosophy Today
35.4: 390-401.
Baudrillard, Jean. 1994. Simulacra and Simulation. Trans.
Sheila Faria Glaser. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P.
Bauman, Zygmunt. 1993. Postmodern Ethics. Cambridge:
Blackwell.
Benjamin, Walter. 1978. Reflections: Essays, Aphorisms,
Autobiographical Writings. . Ed. Peter Demetz. Trans.
Edmund Jephcott. New York: Schocken Books.
----. 1968. Illuminations. Ed. Hannah Arendt. Trans.
Harry Zohn. New York: Schochen Book.
Barrett, Laura. 2001-2002. “‘How the dead speak to the
living’: Intertextuality and the Postmodern Sublime in
White Noise.” Journal of Modern Literature 25.2: 97-
113.
----. 1999. “ ‘Here But Also There’: Subjectivity and
Postmodern Space in Mao II.” Modern Fiction Studies
45.3: 788-810.
Barthes, Roland. 1977. Image—Music—Text. Trans.
Stephen Heath. New York: Hill and Wang.
----. 1980. Camera Lucida. Trans. Richard Howard. New
York: Hill and Wang.
Baudrillard, Jean. 1994. Simulacra and Simulation.
Trans. Sheila Faria Glaser. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P.
Beck, Ulrich, Anthony Giddens and Scott Lash. 1994.
Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and
Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Cambridge:
Polity.
Bell, Daniel. 1973. The Coming of Post-industrial
Society: a Venture in Social Forecasting. New York:
Basic Books.
Best, Steven and Douglas Kellner. 2001. The Postmodern
Adventure: Science, Technology, and Cultural Studies at
the third Millennium. New York: Guilford.
Bizzini, Silvia Caporale. 1995. “Can the Intellectual
still Speak? The Example of Don DeLillo’s Mao II.”
Critical Quarterly 37.2: 104-17.
Blanchot, Maurice. 1999. The Infinite Conversation.
Trans. Susan Hanson. Minneapolis and London: U of
Minnesota P.
Bogue, Roland. 1989. Deleuze and Guattari. London:
Routledge.
Bonca, Cornel. 1996. “Don DeLillo’s White Noise: The
Natural Language of the Species.” College Literature
23.2: 25-44.
Brink, André. 1998. The Novel: Language and Narrative
from Cervantes and Calvino. Hampshire: MacMillan.
Bruns, Gerald L. 1996. “Blanchot/Levinas: Interrruption
(On the Conflict of Alterities).” Research in
Phenomenology 26: 132-54.
Bryant, Paula. 1987. “Discussing the Untellable: Don
DeLillo’s The Names.” Critique 29.1: 16-29.
Bull, Jeoffrey S. 1999. “‘What About a Problem That
doesn’t Have a Solution?’ Stone’s A Flag for
Sunrise, Don DeLillo’s Mao II, and the Politics of
Political Fiction.” Critique 40.3: 215-29.
Burggraeve, Roger. 1999. “Violence and the Vulnerable
Face of the Other: The Vision of Emmanuel Levinas on
Moral Evil and Our Responsibility.” Journal of
Social Philosophy 30.1: 29-45.
Campbell, David. 2003. “Representing Contemporary
War.” Ethics & International Affairs 17.2: 99-108.
Carmichael, Thomas. 1993. “Lee Harvey Oswald and the
Postmodern Subject: History and Intertextuality in Don
DeLillo’s Libra, The Names, and Mao II.”
Contemporary Literature 34.2: 204-18.
Caton, Lou F. 1997. “Romanticism and the Postmodern
Novel: Three Scenes From Don DeLillo’s White
Noise.” English Language Notes: 38-48.
Clark, Timothy. 1992. Derrida, Heidegger, Blanchot:
Sources of Derrida’s Notion and Practice of
Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Cohen, Richard A., ed. 1986. Face to Face with Levinas.
Albany: U of New York P.
Conroy, Mark. 1994. “From Tombstone to Tabloid: Authority
Figured in White Noise.” Critique 35.2: 97-110.
Crockett, Clayton. 2005. “Technology and the Time-image:
Deleuze and Postmodern Subjectivity.” South African
Journal of Philosophy 24.3: 176-88.
Crowther, Hal. 1994. “Cling to the Rock.” Introducing
Don DeLillo. Ed. Frank Lentricchia. Durham and
London: Duke UP. 83-98.
Dallmayr, Fred R. 1984. “Introduction.” Theunissen ix-
xxiv.
Darnell, Michelle. 2004. “Being-looked-at: Ontological
Grounding for an Ethics in Being and Nothingness.”
Sartre Studies International 10.1: 15-24.
De Boer, Theodore. 1986. “An Ethical Transcendental
Philosophy.” Face to Face with Levinas. 83-115.
Debord, Guy. 1995. The Society of the Spectacle. Trans.
Donald Nicholson-Smith. New York: Zone Books.
Deleuze, G. 1984. Kant’s Critical Philosophy. Trans. H.
Tomlinson and B. Habberjam. Minneapolis: U of
Minnesota P.
Don DeLillo. 2005a. “An Interview with Don DeLillo.”
Conversations with Don DeLillo. Ed. Thomas DePietro.
Jackson: UP of Mississippi. 3-15.
----. 2005b. “An Interview with Don DeLillo.”
Conversations with Don DeLillo. Ed. Thomas DePietro.
Jackson: UP of Mississippi. 25-39.
----. 1998. “Don DeLillo: The Art of Fiction.” Osteen
331-332.
----. 1993a. “An Interview with Don DeLillo.” Ed.
Thomas DePietro. Conversations with Don DeLillo.
Jackson: UP of Mississippi, 2005. 109-18.
----. 1993b. “The Image and the Crowd.” Creative
Camera: 72-73.
----. 1993c. “Don DeLillo: The Art of Fiction CXXXV.”
Paris Review 128: 275-306.
---. 1990. “‘An Outsider in This Society’: An
Interview with Don DeLillo.” The South Atlantic
Quarterly 89.2: 281-304.
Derrida, Jacques. 2003. “Difference.” From Modernism
to Postmodernism: An Anthology. Ed. L. Cahoone.
Oxford: Blackwell.
----. 1992. The Gift of Death. Trans. David Willis.
Chicago: U of Chicago P.
----. 1991. The Derrida Reader. Ed. Peggy Kamuf. New
York: Columbia UP.
----. 1982. Margins of Philosophy. Trans. Alan Bass.
New York: Harvester P.
----. 1978. Writing and Difference. Trans. A. Bass.
Chicago: U of Chicago P.
----. 1976. Of Grammatology. Trans. Gayatri Chakravorty
Spivak. Baltimore and London: John Hopkins.
Dussel, Enrique. 1999. “‘Sensibility’ and ‘Otherness’
in Emmanuel Levinas.” Philosophy Today 43.2: 126-34.
Duvall, John N. 1994. “The (Super)market of Images:
Television as Unmediaetd Mediation in DeLillo’s White
Noise.” Arizona Quarterly 50.3: 1127-53.
Edmund, Mark. 1995. “Not Flat, Not Round, Not There, Don
DeLillo’s Novel Characters.” Yale Review 83: 107-24.
Ferreira, M. Jamie. 2001. “‘Total Altruism’ in
Levinas’s ‘Ethics of the Welcome.’” Journal of
Religious Ethics 29.3: 443-70.
Ford, David. 1999. Self and Salvation: Being
Transformed. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Foster, Dennis A. 1990. “Alphabetic Pleasures: The
Names.” The South Atlantic Quarterly 89.2: 395-411.
Foucault, Michel. 1987. “Maurice Blanchot: The Thought
from Outside.” Trans. Brian Massumi.
Foucault/Blanchot. New York: Zone Books.
Gammelgaard, Judy. 2003. “Ego, self and otherness.”
Scandinavian Psychoanalysis 26.2: 96-108.
Gibson, Margaret. 2001. “Death Scenes: Ethics of the
Face and Cinematic Deaths.” Morality 6.3: 306-20.
Graham, Elaine. 2004. “Post/Human Conditions.”
Theology & Sexuality: Journal of the Institute for the
Study of Christianity & Sexuality 10.2: 10-32.
Guyer, Paul. 1993. Kant and the Experience of Freedom:
Essays on Aesthetics and Morality. New York:
Cambridge UP.
Hall, Sharon K., ed. 1985. Contemporary Literary
Criticism. Detroit: Gale Research.
Hand, Seán. 1989. “Introduction.” The Levinas Reader.
Ed. Seán Hand. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 1-8.
Hansen, James T. 2005. “Postmodernism and Humanism: A
Proposed Integration of Perspectives That Value Human
Meaning Systems.” Journal of Humanistic Counseling,
Education & Development 44.1: 3-15.
Hardack, Richard. 2004. “Two’s a Crowd: Mao II, Coke
II, and the Politics of Terrorism in Don DeLillo.”
Studies in the Novel 36.3: 374-92.
Hardin, Michael. 2002. “Postmodernism’s Desire for
Simulated Death: Andy Warhol’s Car Crashes, J. G.
Ballard’s Crash, and Don DeLillo’s White Noise.”
Literature Interpretation Theory 13: 21-50.
Heidegger, Martin. 1977. The Question Concerning
Technology. Trans. William Lovitt. New York: Harper
& Row.
----. 1971a. Poetry, Language, Thought. Trans. Albert
Hofstadter. New York: Harper & Row.
----. 1971b. On the Way to Language. Trans. Peter D.
Hertz. San Franscico: Happer & Row.
----. 1953. Being and Time. Trans. Joan Stambaugh.
Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
Hooft, Stan van. 2004. Book Review. “Emmanuel Levinas:
Humanism of the Other.” Journal of Moral Philosophy
1.2: 234-37.
Hoy, David Cousens. 1979. “Forgetting the Text:
Derrida’s Critique of Heidegger.” Boundary 8.1: 223-
35.
Hume, David. 1994. “The Long Search of the Origins of
Ethics.” Singer 37-38.
Huskinson, Lucy. 2002. “The Self as violent Other: the
problem of defining the self.” Journal of Analytical
Psychology 47: 437-58.
Iyer, Pico. 1998. “A Connoisseur of Fear.” Osteen 379-
84.
Junge, Matthias. 2001. “Zygmunt Bauman’s Poisoned Gift
of Morality.” British Journal of Sociology 52.1: 105-
19.
Kant, Immanuel. 1994. “The Nobel Descent of Duty.”
Singer 29-41.
----. 1952. The Critique of Judgement. Trans. James
Creed Meredith. Oxford: Clarendon.
Kearney, Richard. 1984. Dialogue with Contemporary
Continental Thinkers. Manchester: Manchester UP.
Keenan, Dennis King. 1999. Death and Responsibility.
Albany: U of New York P.
Keesy, Douglas. 1993. Don DeLillo. New York: Twayne.
Klinkowitz, Jerome. 1984. The Self-apparent Word.
Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP.
Kundera, Milan. 1988. The Art of the Novel. Trans. Linda
Asher. New York: Perennial Library.
large, william. 2005. Ethics and the Ambiguity of
Writing. Manchester: Clinamen.
----. 2002. “Impersonal Experience: a conceptual
genealogy of the ‘there is’ from Heidegger to
blanchot and levinas.” Angelaki: Journal of the
Theoretical Humanities 7.3: 131-42.
Lash, Scott. 1999. Another Rationality. Oxford:
Blackwell.
----. 1994. “Reflexivity and its Doubles: Structure,
Aesthetics, Community.” Beck 110-73.
Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Trans.
Catherine Porter. New York: Harvester.
LeBon, Gusatv. 1960. The Psychology of the Crowd. New
York: Viking.
LeClair, Tom. 1998. “Closing the Loop: White Noise.”
Osteen 387-411.
----. 1987. In the Loop: Don DeLillo and the Systems
Novel. Urbana: U of Illinois P.
Lentricchia, Frank, ed. 1994. Introducing Don DeLillo.
Durham: Duke UP.
----. 1990. “The American Writer as Bad Citizen—
Introducing Don DeLillo.” South Atlantic Quarterly
89.2: 239-80.
Levene, Nancy. 2004. “Levinas’s Beginnings: Ethics,
Politics, and Origins.” The European Legacy 9.1: 43-
54.
Levesque, Richard. 1998. “Telling Postmodern Tales:
Absent Authorities in Didion’s Democracy and
DeLillo’s Mao II.” Arizona Quarterly 54.3: 69-87.
Levinas, Emmanuel. 2003. Humanism of the Other. Trans.
Nidra Poller. Urbana and Chicago: U of Illinois P.
----. 2000a. God, Death and Time. Trans. Bettina Bergo.
Standford: Standford UP.
----. 2000b. Otherwise than Being. Trans. Alphonso
Lingis. Pittsburgh: Duquesne UP.
----. 1994. Outside the Subject. Eds. Werner Hamacher &
David E. Wellbery. Trans. Michael B. Smith.
Standford: Standfor UP.
----. 1990. Difficult Freedom. Trans. Seán Hand.
Baltimore: John Hopkins UP.
----. 1989. The Levinas Reader. Ed. Sean Hand. New
York: Blackwell.
----. 1988. “The Paradox of Morality: an Interview with
Emmanuel Levinas.” The Provocation of Levinas. Ed. Robert Bernasconi and David Wood. London and New York:
Routledge.
----. 1987b. Time and the Other. Trans. Richard A.
Cohen. Pittsburgh: Duquesne Up.
----. 1986. “Dialogue with Emmaneul Levinas.” With
Richard Kearney. Face to Face with Levinas. 13-33.
----. 1985. Ethics and Infinity: Conversation with
Philippe Nemo. Trans. Richard A. Cohen. Pittsburgh:
Duquesne UP.
----. 1979. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on
Exteriority. Trans. Alphonso Lingis. Hingham:
Martinus Nijhoff.
---. 1978. Existence and Existents. Trans. Alphonso
Ligis. The Hague: Martinus Hijhoff.
Levinas E. and Kearney Richard. 1986. “Dialogue with
Emmaneul Levinas.” Cohen 13-34.
Linstead, Stephen and John Mullarkey. 2003. “Time,
Creativity and Culture: Introducing Bergson.”
Culture and Organization 9.1: 3-13.
Llewelyn, John. 1988. “Levinas, Derrida and Others Vis-á-
vis.” The Provocation of Levinas. Ed. Robert
Bernasconi and David Wood. London and New York:
Routledge.
Longmuir, Anne. 2005. “The Language of History: Don
DeLillo’s The Names and the Iranian Hostage
Crisis.” Critique 46.2: 105-20.
Loughlin, Gerald. 2005. “Desiring Bodies.” Cross
Currents 54.4: 69-77.
Lumsden, Simon. 2000. “Absolute Difference and Social
Ontology: Levinas Face to Face with Buber and
Fichte.” Human Studies 23.2: 227-41.
Lyotard, Jean-François. 1991. The Inhuman: Reflection on
Time. Trans. Geoffrey Bennington and Rachel Bowley.
Cambridge: Polity.
Lyotard, Jean-François and Jean-Loup Thébaud. 1985. Just
Gaming. Trans. Wlad Godzich. Minneapolis: U of
Minnesota P.
Malpas, Simon. 2002. “Sublime Ascesis: Lyotard, Art
and the Event.” Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical
Humanities 7.1: 199-212.
Maltby, Paul. 2002. “The Romantic Metaphysics of Don
DeLillo.” The Visionary Moment. Albany: State
University of New York Press. 73-84.
Martins, Susana S. 2005. “White Noise and Everyday
Technologies.” American Studies 46.1: 87-113.
Mascaro, John. 1999. “Kant Touch This: Joseph Tabbi’s
Postmodern Sublime.” Studies in the Novel 31.4: 506-
15.
May, Todd. 1997. Reconsidering Difference: Nancy,
Derrida, Levinas and DeLeuze. University Park, Pa:
Pennsylvania State UP.
McClelland, J. S. 1989. The Crowd and the Mob: From Plato
to Canetti. London: Unwin Hyman.
McPhall, Clark. 1991. The Myth of the Madding Crowd. New
York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1960. L’Oeil et l’esprit.
Trans. James Barry Jr. Paris: Gallimard.
---. 1964. The Visible and the Invisible. Trans. James
Barry Jr. Paris: Gallimard.
Michaels, Walter Benn. 2003. “Empires of the Senseless:
(The Response to) Terror and (the End of) History.”
Radical History Review 85: 105-13.
Mirchandani, Rekha. 2005. “Postmodernism and Sociology:
From the Epistemological to the Empirical.”
Sociological Theory 23.1: 86-115.
Moran, Joe. 2000. “Don DeLillo and the Myth of the
Author—Recluse.” Journal of American Studies 34.1:
137-52.
Morris, Mathew J. 2001. “Murdering Words: Language in
Action in Don DeLillo’s The Names.” Contemporary
Literature 30.1: 113-27.
Nietzsche, Fredrick. 1983. Untimely Meditations. Trans.
R. J. Hollingdale. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
----. 1954. The Portable Nietzsche. Ed. and trans.
Walter Kaufmann. New York: Viking.
Nortvedt, Per. 2003. “Subjectivity and Vulnerability:
Reflections on the Foundation of Ethical
Sensibility.” Nursing Philosophy 4: 222-30.
Osteen, Mark, ed. 1999. “Becoming Incorporated:
Spectacular Authorship and DeLillo’s Mao II.” Modern
Fiction Studies 45.3: 643-74.
----. 1998. White Noise: Text and Criticism. New York:
Penguin.
Paik, Peter Yoonsuk. 1999. “Tarkovsky’s Apocalypse and
the Image of Time.” Religion & the Arts 31.1: 41-63.
Pearson, Keith Ansell. 1999. Germinal Life: The
Difference and Repetition of Deleuze. London:
Routledge.
Plato. 1994. “Morality as the Advantage of the
Stronger: A Debate between Socrates and
Thrasymachus.” Singer 21-26.
Popke, E. Jeffrey. 2003. “Poststructualist ethics:
subjectivity, responsibility and the space of
community.” Progress in Human Geography 27.3: 298-316.
Pynchon, Thomas. 1997. Vineland. New York: Penguin.
Quick, Andrew. 1998. “Time and the Event.” Culture
Values 21: 223-32.
Radloff, Bernhard. 2002. “Sublime Repetitions.”
University of Toronto Quarterly 71.2: 674-93.
Ricoeur, Paul. 1992. Oneself as Another. Trans. Kathleen
Blamey. Chicago: U of Chicago P.
Rosenthal, Sandra B. 2003. “A Time for Being Ethical:
Levinas and Pragmatism.” Journal of Speculative
Philosophy 17.3: 192-203.
Russo, John Paul. 2005. The Future without a Past: The
Humanities in a Technological Society. Columbia: U of
Missouri P.
Rychlak, Joseph F. 2003. The Human Image in Postmodern
America. Washington: American Psychological
Association.
Shaw, Rhonda. 2003. “‘Our Bodies, Ourselves’,
Technology, and the Question of Ethics: Cyberfeminism
and the Lived Body.” Australian Feminist Studies 18.
4: 45-55.
Silverstone, Roger. 1994. Television and Everyday Life.
London: Routledge.
Simmons, Ryan. 1999. “What Is a Terrorist? Contemporary
Authorship, the Unabomber, and Mao II.” Modern
Fiction Studies 45.3: 675-95.
Singer, Peter. 1994. “Introduction.” Ethics. Ed.
Peter Singer. New York: Oxford UP.
Sontag, Susan. 1990. On Photography. New York: Anchor
Books.
Taylor, Mark C, ed. 1986. Deconstruction in Context.
Chicago: U of Chicago P.
Tabbi, Joseph. 1995. Postmodern Sublime: Technology and
American Writing From Mailer to Cyberpunk. New York:
Cornell.
Theunissen, Michael. 1984. The Other. Trans. Christopher
Macann. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Wall, Thomas Carl. 1999. Radical Passivity. New York: U
of New York P.
Wallace, Kathleen. 2003. “Autonmous ‘I’ of an
Intersectional Self.” Journal of Speculative
Philosophy 17.3: 176-91.
William, Lincoln, and Vishanthie Sewpaul.
2004. “Modernism, Postmodernism and Global Standards
Setting.” Social Work Education 23.5: 555-65.
Wise, John Macgregor. 1997. Exploring Technology and
Social Space. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Yehnert, Curtis A. 2001. “‘Like Some Endless Sky Waking
Inside’: Subjectivity in Don DeLillo.” Crtique
42.4: 357-66.
Yurick, Sol. 1998. “Fleeing Death in a Word of Hyper-
babble.” Osteen 365-69.
Ziarek, Ewa Plonowska. 2001. “Rethinking Dispossession:
On Being in One’s Skin.” Parallax 7.2: 3-19.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE