臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：愛其所不能愛:柯慈對於人我關係的倫理觀
作者：賴惠雲
作者(外文)：Hui-yun Lai
校院名稱：國立成功大學
系所名稱：外國語文學系碩博士班
指導教授：柯克
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2009
主題關鍵詞：柯慈；倫理；自我；他者；關懷；同理心；神話；myth；care；sympathy；self；other；ethics；J.M. Coetzee
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:60
本篇論文旨在探討柯慈（1940-）對於人我關係的倫理觀點。主要研究的論點有叁點: 壹、某些後馬克斯主義評論家因柯慈的作品中沒有明確地以南非為故事的時空背景且無明確地處理南非的時代問題而責難柯慈有失作家對自己國家和人民應有的關懷。對此，本文試著提出不同的觀點，認為這種非寫實的寫作方式其實是柯慈刻意以寓言體方式呈現，其目的有二: 一是藉此規避並突顯當代南非政府對於出版品的檢查制度，二是將他的關注對象超越種族、國家進而提升到對所有人類。貳、柯慈藉由他的小說勾勒出一個充滿暴力與衝突的社會，藉此說明一個失去全民共享的神話、缺乏全民共有的期待、信念及價值觀的生活環境，造成人們因欠缺歸屬感而迷失恐懼，進而或以自我畏縮閃躲或以侵略宰制他人等方式尋求自我保護。於是一個無共有神話的社會造成人我關係的疏離和冷漠，暴力與衝突也就隨之產生。叁、除了指出一個無共有神話的社會的對其居民所造成的實質上及精神上的生存危機，藉由小說中主角的生命因其生活態度的轉變而得到某種程度的救贖，柯慈試著提出他對於人我關係的倫理觀點。透過主角與他者的互動的轉變:從拒絕、閃躲、被動到主動關懷，甚至自願奉獻犧牲去關愛自己不需要也不值的愛的對象，柯慈期待一個以關懷、同理心為基礎的人際關係能成為人類的共享神話及認同的價值觀。
This dissertation attempts to illustrate how J.M. Coetzee problematizes the modes of alienated human relationship in his works. He presents us with a violent world resulting from the conflicts that pervade his society: conflicts between races, between individuals, and between humans and non-humans. At the same time, through the nostalgia of his characters he also presents us with a bygone peaceful society in which people shared the same communal values and interacted with others and the outer world with understanding and sympathy. Juxtaposing these two aspects in his works, Coetzee seems to suggest that a chaotic environment has been formed due to the lack of “a collective myth” as a metaphysical home that can provide a sense of belonging and fulfill people’s need for continuity and stability in their lives. A mythless society causes the collapse of the foundation of values and morality and leads people to experience more dying than living, more hatred than love, more revenge than sympathy. This experience of polarized values causes people to see everything in terms of binary oppositions, to envision all human interactions as being based on power-relationships between the I and not-I. To survive in a living situation in which they are constantly confronted with death-in-life, Coetzee’s characters take two primary approaches to self-protection—self-withdrawal and aggression. Some of them retreat into their own world and refuse to socialize with other people or to have any involvement with their society. The others believe in “being a tough one” as their principle of survival and therefore fight for power and dominant positions. In fact, these are attitudes of self-imposed alienation because their practitioners have to emotionally and physically estrange themselves from people in order not to feel when they are trying to be disconnected or tough. After being self-alienated for too long, people stop feeling and eventually lose their ability to care and love. With this outcome, Coetzee intends to prove that a world of alienation is a world of non-love and death. As shown in most of his works, these two attitudes do not save their executants from their predicaments; instead, they cause these people even more distress, harm and death. While showing us the disadvantage of an alienated mode of human relationship, Coetzee also provides us with a more promising and peaceful way to live through the change that some of his characters undergo in their self-centered attitudes. Forced to encounter their unwanted guests and visitors, the characters involuntarily become more involved in social affairs and are eventually driven out of their self-confined world to really see the dark side of their society and experience the fear and pain that they have made an effort to avoid through their intentional ignorance and self-deception. After being forced to face the evil in their lives and their inner fears, they return changed, as though they had been reborn after descending to hell on earth. They learn to give up their willful alienation, to conquer their fear of love, and to love whatever is nearest to hand, especially those who do not deserve their love. Such a mode of self-other relationship is based on a sympathetic understanding free of egotism and it brings people hope and peace.
Arnold, Matthew. “Dover Beach.” 1867. The New Oxford Book of Victorian Verse. Ed. Christopher Ricks. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1987. 304-05.
Ashcroft, Bill. “Irony, Allegory and Empire: Waiting for the Barbarians and In the Heart of the Country.” Kossew, Critical Essays on J.M. Coetzee 100-16.
Attridge, Derek. Introduction. Coetzee, White Writing: On the Culture of Letters in South Africa ix-xiv.
---. J.M. Coetzee and the Ethics of Reading: Literature in the Event. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2004.
---. “Literary Form and the Demands of Politics: Otherness in J.M. Coetzee’s Age of Iron.” Kossew, Critical Essays on J.M. Coetzee 198-213.
---. “Oppressive Silence: J.M. Coetzee’s Foe and the Politics of the Canon.” Decolonizing Tradition: New Views of Twentieth-Century “British” Literary Canons. Ed. Karen R. Lawrence. Chicago: U of Illinois P, 1992: 212-38.
Attridge, Derek, and Rosemary Jolly, eds. Writing South Africa: Literature, Apartheid, and Democracy, 1970-1955. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998.
Attwell, David. “’Dialogue’ and ‘Fulfilment’ in J.M. Coetzee’s Age of Iron.” Attridge and Jolly 166-79.
Barnett, Clive. “Constructions of Apartheid in the International Reception of the Novels of J.M. Coetzee.” Journal of Southern African Studies 25.2 (1999):287-301.
Bevan, David, ed. Literature and Sickness. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1993.
Boyers, Robert. “Thinking about Evil.” Raritan 23.2 (2003): 1-23.
Brink, André. “Writing against Big Brother: Notes on Apocalyptic Fiction in South Africa.” World Literature Today 58.2 (1984): 189-94.
Brink, André and J.M. Coetzee eds. Introduction. A Land Apart: A Contemporary South African Reader. New York: Penguin, 1986. 7-15.
Buikema, Rosemarie. “Literature and the Production of Ambiguous Memory: Confession and Double Thoughts in Coetzee’s Disgrace.” European Journal of English Studies 10.2 (2006): 187-97.
Campbell, Joseph. The Hero with a Thousand Faces. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1949.
---. The Power of Myth. New York: Anchor Books, 1988.
Canepari-Labib, Michela. “Language and Identity in the Narrative of J.M. Coetzee.” English in Africa 27.1 (2000): 105-30.
Castillo, Debra A. “Coetzee’s Dusklands: The Mythic Punctum.” PMLA 105.5(1990): 1108-1122.
---. “The Composition of the Self in Coetzee’s Waiting for the Barbarians.” Critique(Winter 1986): 78-90.
Cirlot, J.E. A Dictionary of Symbols. N.p.: Philosophical Library, 1972.
Coetzee, J.M. Age of Iron. New York: Random House, Inc., 1990. New York: Vintage,1992.
---. Boyhood. London: Martin Secker & Warburg, 1997. New York: Vintage, 1998.
---. Disgrace. London: Martin Secker & Warburg, 1999. New York: Vintage, 2000.
---. Doubling the Point: Essays and Interviews. Ed. David Attwell. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1992
---. Dusklands. Johannesburg: Ravan Press, 1974. New York: Penguin, 1996.
---. Elizabeth Costello. London: Martin Secker & Warburg, 2003.
---. Foe. London: Martin Secker & Warburg, 1986.
---. Giving Offense: Essays on Censorship. Chicago: The U of Chicago P, 1996.
---. Inner Workings: Literary Essays 2000-2005. New York: Viking, 2007.
---. In the Heart of the Country. London: Martin Secker & Warburg, 1977. London: Vintage, 1999.
---. Life and Times of Michael K. London: Martin Secker & Warburg, 1983. New York: 1985.
---. The Lives of Animals. Ed. And trans. Amy Gutmann. Princeton: Princeton UP,1999.
---. The Master of Petersburg. London: Martin Secker & Warburg, 1994. New York: Vintage, 1999.
---. Slow Man. New York: Vintage, 2005.
---. Stranger Shores: Essays 1986-1999. London: Martin Secker & Warburg, 2001. London: Vintage, 2002.
---. Waiting for the Barbarians. London: Martin Secker & Warburg, 1980. London: Vintage, 2000.
---. White Writing: On the Culture of Letters in South Africa. New Haven: Yale UP, 1988.
---. Youth. London: Martin Secker & Warburg, 2002. New York: Vintage, 2003.
Colleran, Jeanne. “Position Papers: Reading J.M. Coetzee’s Fiction and Criticism.” Contemporary Literature 35.3 (1994): 578-92.
Craps, Stef. “J.M. Coetzee’s Waiting for the Barbarians and the Ethics of Testimony.” English Studies 88.1 (2007): 59-66.
De Dobay Rifelj, Carol. Reading the Other: Novels and the Problem of Other Minds. Ann Arbor: The U of Michigan P, 1992.
Donovan, Josephine. “’Miracles of Creation’: Animals in J.M. Coetzee’s Work.” Michigan Quarterly Review 43.1 (2004): 78-93.
Du Plessis, Menàn. “Towards a True Materialism: Review of Waiting for the Barbarian.” Kossew, Critical Essays on J.M. Coetzee 117-25.
Easton, T. Kai Norris. “Text and Hinterland: J.M. Coetzee and the South African Novel.” Journal of Southern African Studies 21.4 (1995): 585-99.
Eckstein, Barbara. “Iconicity, Immersion and Otherness: The Hegelian ‘Dive’ of J.M. Coetzee and Adrienne Rich.” Mosaic 29.1 (1996): 57-77.
---. “The Body, the Word, and the State: J.M. Coetzee’s ‘Waiting for the Barbarians.’” A Forum on Fiction 22.2 (1989): 175-98.
Eliot, T.S. “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock.” 1915. T.S. Eliot: The Complete Poems and Plays 1909-1950. New York: Harcourt, 1971. 3-7.
---. “The Waste Land.” 1922. T.S. Eliot: The Complete Poems and Plays 1909-1950. New York: Harcourt, 1971. 37-51.
Emerson, Ralph Waldo. “The American Scholar.” 1837. Ralph Waldo Emerson. Ed. Richard Poirier. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1990. 37-52.
Franssen, Paul. “Fleeing from the Burning City: Michael K, Vagrancy and Empire.” English Studies 5 (2003): 453-63.
Gallagher, Susan VanZanten. A Story of South Africa: J.M. Coetzee’s Fiction in Context. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1991.
Gaylard, Gerald. “Disgraceful Metafiction: Intertextuality in the Postcolony.” Journal of Literary Studies 21.3/4 (2005): 315-37.
Gelpi, Barbara Charlesworth, and Albert Gelpi, eds. Adrienne Rich’s Poetry and Prose. 1975. New York: Norton, 1993.
Goodheart, Eugene. Desire and Its Discontents. New York: Columbia UP, 1991.
Gordimer, Nadine. “The Idea of Gardening: Life and Times of Michael K by J.M. Coetzee {Review}.” Kossew, Critical Essays on J.M. Coetzee 139-44.
Greene, Graham. A Sense of Reality. 1963. London: Vintage, 1999.
Gunn, Giles. The Interpretation of Otherness: Literature, Religion, and the American Imagination. New York: Oxford UP, 1977.
Gunn, Robert Jingen. Journey into Emptiness: Dōgen, Merton, Jung and the Quest for Transformation. New York: Paulist Press, 2000.
Hamilton, Grant. “J.M. Coetzee’s Dusklands: The Meaning of Suffering.” Journal of Literary Studies 21.3/4 (2005): 296-314.
Head, Dominic. J.M. Coetzee. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1997.
Hewson, Kelly. “Making the ‘Revolutionary Gesture’: Nadine Gordimer, J.M. Coetzee and Some Variations on the Writer’s Responsibility.” Kossew, Critical Essays on J.M. Coetzee 145-56.
Himmelfarb, Gertrude. The New History and the Old. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1987.
JanMohamed, Abdul R. “The Economy of Manichean Allegory: The Function of Racial Difference in Colonialist Literature.” Critical Inquiry 12.1 (1985): 59-87.
Kerr, Douglas. “Three Ways of Going Wrong: Kipling, Conrad, Coetzee.” Modern Language Review 95.1 (2000): 18-27.
Korang, Kwaku Larbi. “All Allegory of Re-Reading: Post-colonialism, Resistance, and J.M. Coetzee’s Foe.” Kossew, Critical Essays on J.M. Coetzee 180-97.
Kossew, Sue, ed. Critical Essays on J.M. Coetzee. New York: G.K. Hall & Co., 1998.
Kossew, Sue. “’Women’s Words’: A Reading of J.M. Coetzee’s Women Narrators.” Kossew, Critical Essays on J.M. Coetzee 166-79.
Macaskill, Brian. “Charting J.M. Coetzee’s Middle Voice.” Contemporary Literature 35.3 (1994): 441-75
Marais, Mike. “Death and the Space of the Response to the Other in J.M. Coetzee’s The Master of Petersburg.” Poyner, J.M. Coetzee and the Idea of the Public Intellectual 83-99.
---. “’Little Enough, Less Than Little: Nothing’: Ethics, Engagement, and Change in the Fiction of J.M. Coetzee.” Modern Fiction Studies 46.1 (2000): 159-82.
---. “Place of Pigs: The Tension between Implication and Transcendence in J.M. Coetzee’s Age of Iron and The Master of Petersburg.” Kossew, Critical Essays on J.M. Coetzee 226-38.
---. “Writing with Eyes Shut: Ethics, Politics, and the Problem of the Other in the Fiction of J.M. Coetzee.” English in Africa 25.1 (1998): 43-59.
Massé, Michelle. “The Gothic’s Vile Bodies.” Gothic Studies 2.1 (2000): 157-72.
May, Rollo. The Cry for Myth. New York: Norton, 1991.
---. Love and Will. New York: Dell Publishing Co., Inc., 1969.
Moses, Michael Valdez. “The Mark of Empire: Writing, History, and Torture in Coetzee’s Waiting for the Barbarian.” The Kenyon Review 15.1 (1993): 115-27.
Newman, Judie. “Intertextuality, Power and Danger: Waiting for the Barbarians as a Dirty Story.” Kossew, Critical Essays on J.M. Coetzee 126-38.
Nietzsche, Friedrich. On the Advantage and Disadvantage of History for Life. Ed. Peter Preuss. Trans. Peter Preuss. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co. Inc., 1980.
Nnaemeka, Obioma. Introduction. The Politics of (M)Othering. Ed. Obioma Nnaemeka. London: Routledge, 1997.
Oates, Joyce Carol. The Faith of a Writer: Life, Craft, Art. New York: The Ontario Review Inc., 2003.
Ozick, Cynthia. “A Tale of Heroic Anonymity.” Rev. of Life and Times of Michael K, by J.M. Coetzee. New York Times Book Review 11 Dec. 1983, Late City ed., sec. 7, col., 1: 1.
Parry, Benita. “Speech and Silence in the Fictions of J.M. Coetzee.” Attridge and Jolly 149-65.
Pearson, Carol S. The Hero Within: Six Archetypes We Live By. 3rd ed. 1986. New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 1998.
Penner, Dick. Countries of the Mind: The Fiction of J.M. Coetzee. New York: Greenwood Press, 1989.
Perreault, Jeanne. Writing Selves: Contemporary Feminist Autography. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1995.
Poyner, Jane, ed. J.M. Coetzee and the Idea of the Public Intellectual. Athens: Ohio UP, 2006.
Plumwood, Val. “Decolonizing Relationships with Nature.” Decolonizing Nature: Strategies for Conservation in a Post-Colonial Era. Ed. William M. Adams and Martin Mulligan. London: Earthscan, 2003: 51-78.
Preuss, Peter. Introduction. Nietzsche, On the Advantage and Disadvantage of History for Life 1-3.
Probyn, Fiona. “Cancerous Bodies and Apartheid in J.M. Coetzee’s Age of Iron.” Kossew, Critical Essays on J.M. Coetzee 214-25.
---. “J.M. Coetzee: Writing with/out Authority.” Jouvert 7.1 (2002): 45 pars. 9 July 2003 .
Ramsey-Kurz, Helga. “The Illiterate Other in Greene, Achebe and Coetzee.” The Politics of English as a World Language. Ed. Christian Mair. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2003: 315-23.
Rich, Adrienne. “When We Dead Awaken: Writing as Re-Vision.” Gelpi 166-77.
---. “Split at the Root.” Gelpi 224-39.
Rushdie, Salman. Imaginary Homelands. London: Penguin, 1991.
Said, Edward W. Culture and Imperialism. 1993. London: Vintage, 1994.
Splendore, Paola. “’No more mothers and father’: The Family Sub-Text in J.M. Coetzee’s Novels.” Journal of Commonwealth Literature 38.3 (2003): 148-61.
Tanner, Tony. Scenes of Nature, Signs of Men. New York: Cambridge, 1987.
Tate, Allen. Reason in Madness: Critical Essays. Salem: Ayer Co. Publisher, Inc., 1968.
Vaughan, Michael. “Literature and Politics: Current in South African Writing in the Seventies.” Kossew, Critical Essays on J.M. Coetzee 50-65.
Van der Hoven, Anton. “The Triumph of Method: J.M. Coetzee, the Humanities, South Africa.” Pretexts: Literary and Cultural Studies 12.1 (2003): 85-96.
Viola, Andre. “Survival in J.M. Coetzee’s Novels.” Commonwealth Essays and Studies 9 (1986): 11-17.
Wright, Derek. “Black Earth, White Myth.” Modern Fiction Studies 38.2 (1992): 435-44.
Yeoh, Gilbert. “J.M. Coetzee and Samuel Beckett: Ethics, Truth-Telling, and Self-Deception.” Critique 44.4 (2003): 331-48.
Yuan, Yuan. “The Subject of Reading and the Colonial Unconscious: Countertransferrence in J.M. Coetzee’s Waiting for the Barbarians.” The American Journal of Psychoanalysis 60.1 (2000): 71-84.
Zamora, Lois Parkinson. “Allegories of Power in the Fiction of J.M. Coetzee.” Journal of Literary Studies 2.1 (1986): 1-14.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：765（臺灣：749，外國：16） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1855660 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67662820
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上