:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:台灣地區中高齡受雇人員退休行為之動態規劃研究
作者:李勝榮 引用關係
作者(外文):Sheng-Jung Li
校院名稱:國立高雄第一科技大學
系所名稱:管理研究所
指導教授:周賢榮
蘇恩德
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2007
主題關鍵詞:受雇人員退休行為多元羅吉斯迴歸模型動態規劃模型勞動經濟dynamic programming modelmulti-nomial Logit regression modelretirement behavioremployeelabor economics
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:39
面對產業全球化的發展與衝擊,各國為了提昇國際競爭力,產業結構均作了必要的改革與調整,也導致國內產業結構與工作機會明顯轉變。這意謂著在全球化經濟型態下,勞動市場對於受雇人員的工作性質或個人特徵特性等需求,將產生明顯的變化。且在全球人口普遍老化的情況下,勞動人口的退休決策受到各國普遍的重視。因此,經濟全球化對勞動市場的影響,對於探討未來受雇人員退休行為的議題是值得深思的。本研究試以台灣地區中高齡受雇人員作為研究對象,就行政院主計處統計資料庫擷取「人力資源調查」暨「人力運用調查」原始資料,蒐集可能造成中高齡受雇人員退休決策之影響因素,並結合多元羅吉斯迴歸模型及修改Heyma (2004) 所提出的動態規劃模型進行實證研究,加以分析中高齡受雇人員於繼續工作、退休、傷病、失業及資遣等行為之影響因素。
實證結果顯示,於多元羅吉斯迴歸模型的估計結果中,行業、職業、教育年數及年資變數於退休、傷病、失業及資遣等行為對繼續工作之比較上皆具有顯著影響。於動態規劃模型的估計結果中,行業變數與年資變數於繼續工作、退休、傷病、失業及資遣等退休行為皆具有顯著影響。另外,於居住地區變數上,僅對資遣情況具有顯著影響,且非直轄市的受雇人員其被資遣的可能性大於直轄市的受雇人員。於性別變數上,女性選擇退休的可能性較高;男性發生傷病、失業及被資遣的機會高於女性。於行業變數上,顯示從事商業之受雇人員相對於從事士、農及工業的受雇人員,其選擇退休的可能性較高,而發生傷病、失業及資遣的可能性較低。於職業變數上,顯示職位較高之受雇人員相對於職位較低的受雇人員,其選擇退休的可能性較高,且發生傷病及失業的可能性較低,而被資遣的可能性較高。於受教育年數之變數上,顯示受教育年數愈低者,其選擇退休的可能性較高;受教育年數愈高之受雇人員,其發生傷病及失業的可能性較低,而被資遣的可能性相較於教育程度低者為高。於年資之變數上,顯示年資愈高者,其選擇退休的可能性較高,而發生傷病、失業及被資遣的可能性較低。於薪資所得之變數上,僅對退休情況具有顯著影響,顯示薪資所得較高的受雇人員其退休的可能性大於薪資所得較低的受雇人員。於工作時數之變數上,僅對繼續工作及失業情況具有顯著影響,顯示工作時數愈低者,其失業的可能性較高;反之,工作時數愈高者,其失業的可能性較低。於公司規模之變數上,僅對退休及失業情況具有顯著影響,顯示公司規模愈大者,其員工退休的可能性較高;另外,公司規模愈大者,其員工失業的可能性較低。
In face of the development and impact of globalization, almost every nation has made necessary reforms and adjustments of their industrial structures. Our domestic industrial structure and job opportunities have also undergone a significant transformation. This implies that in global economy, the work properties or personal characteristics of employees demanded by the labor market will be significantly changing. Moreover, as the aging of population has become a global problem, retirement decision of labor population is extensively paid attention gradually in every nation. Therefore, the impact of economic globalization on the labor market is a significant issue in the study of the future retirement behavior of employees. Focusing on middle aged and senior employees in Taiwan, this study extracted the primary data of “Survey on Human Resources” and “Survey on Manpower Utilization” from the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan to collect all the data of the factors that affect middle aged and senior employees’ retirement decision. By applying multi-nomial Logit regression model and modifying the dynamic programming model proposed by Heyma (2004), an empirical analysis is performed to analyze the factors if affecting middle aged and senior employees’ behaviors concerning the decision of continuation of employment, retirement, injury and illness, unemployment, or dismissal.
The empirical results of the multi-nomial Logit regression model indicated that line of business, occupation, years of education, and seniority have significant influence on the decision of retirement, injury, unemployment, or dismissal compared to that of continuation of employment. However, the results of the dynamic programming model indicated that just line of business and seniority have significant influence on the decision of continuation of employment, retirement, injury, unemployment, and dismissal. Besides, the factor of residential region only affects significantly on dismissal and employees in non-municipal cities are more likely to be laid off than those in municipal cities. As to line of business, employees in commercial businesses are more likely to choose to retire than those in the governmental, agricultural, and industrial businesses, but are less likely to suffer from injury, unemployment, and dismissal. However, the factor of corporate scale significantly affects only the decision of retirement and unemployment, indicating that employees in larger companies are more likely to choose to retire and less likely to suffer from unemployment.
In terms of gender, female employees are more likely to choose to retire and male employees are more likely to suffer from injury, unemployment, and dismissal. Higher-position employees are more likely to choose to retire than lower-position employees. Moreover, they are also less likely to suffer from injury and unemployment, but are more likely to be laid off. As to the factor of years of education, employees with fewer years of education are more likely to choose to retire but those with more years of education are less likely to suffer from injury and unemployment and so they are more likely to be laid off than those with fewer years of education. For seniority, higher seniority employees are more likely to choose to retire but less likely to suffer from injury, unemployment, and dismissal. Whereas, the factor of salary income significantly affects only decision of retirement, indicating that employees with a higher salary income are more likely to choose to retire than those with a lower salary income. Besides, the factor of working hours has more influence on the decision of continuation of employment and unemployment. This reveals that employees working fewer hours are more likely to suffer from unemployment and on the contrary, those working more hours are less likely to be jobless.
參考文獻
一、中文部份
1.內政部資訊統計服務網站,http://www.moi.gov.tw/。
2.行政院勞工委員會網站,http://www.cla.gov.tw/。
3.行政院主計處中華民國統計資訊網站,http://www.stat.gov.tw/。
4.行政院人事行政局全球資訊網站,http://www.cpa.gov.tw/。
5.李文智、蔡彥卿及簡雪芳,1998年,「退休金會計與盈餘操縱關聯性之研究」,管理與系統,第5卷,第2期,頁163-182。
6.李文智、陳安琳及劉錦花,2001年,「退休金公報中薪資水準增加率之決定因素」,交大管理學報,第21卷,第2期,頁27-49。new window
7.李政德,2005年,「貿易條件、內生性成長:跨期疊代模型」,商管科技季刊,第6卷,第1期,頁1-18。new window
8.林嬋娟及張文貞,1999年,「第十八號財務會計準則公報之股價效應研究」,中山管理評論,第7卷,第1期,頁35-56。
9.周國瑞,2005年,「台灣社會保險制度之實證研究—財富重分配效果分析」,台大管理論叢,第15卷,第2期,頁43-70。
10.張雅琳,2003年,「公私部門受雇人員的退休決策--兼論退休制度對退休行為的影響」,私立淡江大學產業經濟研究所碩士論文。
11.葉肅科,2003年 ,「福利與經濟的對辯:澳洲經驗」,社區發展季刊,第102期,頁72-85。new window
12.鄭文英、戚務君及王美珍,2001年,「退休金公報、薪酬政策與盈餘操縱關聯性之研究」,管理與系統,第8卷,第2期,頁185-202。new window
13.劉鶯釧,1994年,「台灣受雇者退休行為之經濟分析」,行政院國科會專題研究計劃成果報告。
14.劉克智及董安琪,2002年,「知識資本主義:台灣的新挑戰」,收錄於李誠主編,知識經濟的迷思與省思,台北:天下文化。
15.龐寶宏,2001年,「操縱精算假設對企業退休金成本及負債影響之個案研究」,東海管理評論,第3卷,第1期,頁129-154。new window
二、英文部分
1.Agresti, A., 1996, An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis, Wiley- Interscience, New York.
2.Ali, A., & Krishna, R. K., 1993, “Earnings Management under Pension Accounting Standards: SFAS 87 versus APB 8,” Journal of Accounting Auditing and Finance, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 427-446.
3.Ali, A., & Krishna, R. K., 1994, “The Magnitudes of Financial Statement Effects and Accounting Choice: the Case of the Adoption of SFAS 87,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 89-114.
4.Amir, E., 1993, “The Market Valuation of Accounting Information: The Case of Postretirement Benefits other than Pensions,” The Accounting Review, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 703-725.
5.Bartel, A. P. & Sicherman, N., 1993, “Technological Change and Retirement Decision of Older Workers,” Journal of Labor Economics, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 162-183.
6.Barth, M. & McNichols, M., 1994, “Estimation and Market Valuation of Environmental Liabilities Related to Superfund Sites,” Journal of Accounting Research, vol. 32, pp. 177-209.
7.Bellman, R., 1957, Dynamic Programming, Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.
8.Bentez-Silva, H., Buchinsky, M., Rust, J., & Cheidvasser, S., 2000, “Social Insurance at the End of the Life Cycle: a Structural Model of Retirement, Disability and Medicare Benefits,” Manuscript, Yale University, Brown University and SUNY-Stony Brook.
9.Berkovec, J. & Stern, S., 1991, “Job Exit Behavior of Older Men,” Econometrica, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 189–210.
10.Blau, D.M., 1994, “Labor Force Dynamics of Older Men,” Econometrica, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 117–156.
11.Blundell, R., Meghir, C., & Smith, S., 2002, “Pension Incentives and the Pattern of Early Retirement,” Economic Journal, vol. 112, no. 478, pp. 153-170.
12.Boskin, M. J. & Hurd, M. D., 1978, “The Effect of Social Security on Early Retirement,” Journal of Public Economics, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 361–377.
13.Bowen, W. & Finigan, T., 1969, The Economics of Labor Force Participation, Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.
14.Bratberg, E., Holmas, T. H., & Thogersen, O., 2004, “Assessing the Effects of An Early Retirement Program,” Journal of Population Economics, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 387-408.
15.Brent, R. P. & Mcmillan, E. M., 1980, “Some New Algorithms for High-Precision Computation of Euler''s constant,” Math. Comp., vol. 34, no. 149, pp. 305-312.
16.Burtless, G. & Moffitt, R., 1985, “The Joint Choice of Retirement Age and Postretirement Hours of Work,” Jourmal of Labor Economics, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 209-236.
17.Christensen, B. J. & Gupta, N. D., 1994, “A Dynamic Programming Model of the Retirement Behavior of Married Couples,” CAE Working Paper No. 94-02, Cornell University.
18.Cutler, N. E., 2001, “Money, Health, & Aging Consumer: Ongoing Challenges and New Opportunities for Retirement Planning,” Journal of Financial Service Professionals, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 52-59.
19.Dahl, S. A., Nilsen, O. A., & Vaage, K., 2000, “Work or Retirement? Exit Routes for Norwegian Elderly,” Applied Economics, vol. 32, no. 14, pp. 1865-1876.
20.Daniel, R., Mihir, D., & Joshua, R., 2006, “Earnings Manipulation, Pension Assumptions, and Managerial Investment Decisions,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 157-195.
21.Daula, T. & Moffitt, R., 1995, “Estimating Dynamic Models of Quit Behavior: the Case of Military Reenlistment,” Journal of Labor Economics, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 499–523.
22.Diamond, P. A., 1965, “National Debt in a Neoclassical Growth Model,” American Economic Review, vol. 55, pp. 1126-1150.
23.Feldstein, M., 1974, “Social Security, Induced Retirement, and Aggregate Capital Accumulation,” The Journal of Political Economy, vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 905–926.
24.French, E., 2005, “The Effects of Health, Wealth, and Wages on Labour Supply and Retirement Behaviour,” The Review of Economic Studies, vol. 72, no. 251, pp. 395-427.
25.Gopalakrishnan, V. & Timothy, F. S., 1992, “Economic Consequences of Pension Policy Deliberations (SFAS NO.87): An Empirical Assessment of Debt-Covenant Hypothesis,” Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 751-775.
26.Gujarathi, M. R. & Hoskin, R. E., 1992, “Evidence of Earnings Management by the Early Adopters of SFAS NO.96,” Accounting Horizons, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 18-31.
27.Gustman, A. L. & Steinmeier, L. T., 1986, “A Structural Retirement Model,” Econometrica, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 555-584.
28.Gustman, A. L. & Steinmeier, L. T., 2004, “Social Security, Pensions and Retirement Behaviour within the Family,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 723-737.
29.Hanoch, G. & Honing, M., 1983, “Retirement, Wage, and Labor Supply of the Elderly,” Journal of Labor Economics, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 131-151.
30.Harris, T. & Ohlson, J., 1987, “Accounting Disclosures and the Market''s Valuation of Oil and Gas Properties,” The Accounting Review, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 651-670.
31.Healy, P. M. & Wahlen, J. M., 1999, “A Review of the Earnings Management Literature and Its Implications for Standard Setting,” Accounting Horizons, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 365-383.
32.Heyma, A., 2004, “A Structural Dynamic Analysis of Retirement Behaviour in the Netherlands,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 739-759.
33.Hogarth, J. M., 1988, “Accepting an Early Retirement Bonus an Empirical Study,” The Journal of Human Resources, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 21-33.
34.Hurd, M. D., 1990, “Research on the Elderly: Economic Status, Retirement and Consumption and Saving,” Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 565–637.
35.Joss, P., 2005, “The Earnings Implications of Pension Expense: A Stochastic Analysis of Ten Canadian Companies,” North American Actuarial Journal, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 43-55.
36.Karlstrom, A., Palme, M., & Svensson, I., 2004, “A Dynamic Programming Approach to Model the Retirement Behaviour of Blue-Collar Workers in Sweden,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 795-807.
37.Kilty, K. M. & Behling, J. H., 1985, “Predicting the Retirement Intentions and Attitudes of Professional Workers,” Journal of Gerontology, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 219-227.
38.Klumpes, P. J. M., Whittington, M., & Forker, J., 2003, “Determinants of Actuarial Valuation Method Changes for Pension Funding and Reporting: Evidence from the UK,” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, vol. 30, no. 1/2, pp. 175-204.
39.Landsman, 1986, “An Empirical Investigation of Pension Fund Property Rights,” The Accounting Review, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 662-691.
40.Lazear, E. P., 1986, “Retirement from the Labour Force,” In Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. I, Ashenfelter O. and Layard R. (eds), Elsevier Science Publishers: Amsterdam.
41.Lumsdaine, R. L., Stock, J. H., & Wise, D. A., 1990, “Efficient Windows and Labor Force Reduction,” Journal of Public Economics, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 131–159.
42.Mastrogiacomo, M., Alessie, R., & Lindeboon, M., 2004, “Retirement Behaviour of Dutch Elderly Households,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 777-793.
43.Mitchell, O. S. & Luzadis, R. A., 1989, “Changes in Pension Incentives through Time,” Industrial & Labor Relations Review, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 100-108.
44.Muller, C. F. & Boaz, R. F., 1988, “Health as a Reason or Rationalization for Being Retire?” Research on Aging, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 37-55.
45.Nelson, M. W., Elliott, J. A., & Tarpley, R. L., 2002, “Evidence from Auditors about Managers’ and Auditors’ Earnings Management Decisions,” The Accounting Review, vol. 77, pp. 175-202.
46.Parsons, D. O., 1980, “The Decline in Male Labour Force Participation,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 117–134.
47.Quinn, J. F., 1977, “Microeconomic Determinants of Early Retirement: a Cross-Sectional View of White Married Men,” Journal of Human Resources, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 329–347.
48.Quinn, J. F. & Burkhauser, R. V., 1990, “Work and Retirement,” In Handbook of Ageing and the Social Sciences, Binstock R.H. and George L.K. (eds), Academic Press: San Diego.
49.Rust, J., 1989, “A Dynamic Programming Model of Retirement Behavior,” In The Economics of Ageing, Wise D. (ed), National Bureau of Economic Research/Chicago University Press: Chicago.
50.Rust, J. & Phelan, C., 1997, “How Social Security and Medicare Affect Retirement Behavior in a World of Incomplete Markets,” Econometrica, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 781–831.
51.Santos, S. R. & Cox, K., 2000, “Workplace Adjustment and Intergenerational Differences between Matures, Boomers, and Xers,” Nursing Economics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 7-13.
52.Samwick, A. A., 1998, “New Evidence on Pensions, Social Security, and the Timing of Retirement,” Journal of Public Economics, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 207-236.
53.Schipper, K., 1989, “Commentary on Earnings Management,” Accounting Horizons, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 91-102.
54.Siddiqui, S., 1997, “The Pension Incentive to Retire: Empirical Evidence for West Germany,” Journal of Population Economics, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 463-486.
55.Smola, R. W. & Sutton, C. D., 2002, “Generational Differences: Revisiting Generational Work Values for the New Millennium,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 363-382.

56.Stock, J. H. & Wise, D. A., 1990, “Pensions, the Option Value of Work, and Retirement,” Econometrica, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 1151–1180.
57.Tung, S. S. & Weygandt, J. J., 1994, “The Determinants of Timing in the Adoption of New Accounting Standards: A Study of SFAS No.87, Employers’ Accounting for Pensions,” Journal of Accounting and Finance, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 325-337.
58.Vandenberg, P., Sachdeva, K., & Singh, G., 2005, “Retirement Behaviors under a Defined Benefits Pension System: An Opportunity Cost Perspective,” Compensation and Benefits Review, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 57-64.
59.Wiedman, C. & Daniel, G., 2002, “Pension Accounting: Coming to light in a Bear Market,” Ivey Business Journal, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 38-41.
60.Williams, P. A., 2005, “The Effect of Pension Income on the Quality of Corporate Earnings: IBM, A Case Study,” Issues in Accounting Education, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 167-181.
61.Zmijewski, M. E., 1984, “Methodological Issues Related to the Estimation of Financial Distress Prediction Models,” Journal of Accounting Research, vol. 22, Supplement, pp. 59-80.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
QR Code
QRCODE