:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國際化技術發展策略群組的網路、資源與績效-以專利後引證資料分析台灣IC設計產業
作者:黃意丹
作者(外文):Yi-Dan Huang
校院名稱:臺灣大學
系所名稱:國際企業學研究所
指導教授:趙義隆
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2012
主題關鍵詞:專利後引證相似度技術發展策略群組群組結構績效Similarity of backward citationtechnology developmentstrategic groupgroup structureperformance
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:45
專利後引證是一種可以看出廠商想要追隨特定技術領域的意圖及可以劃出相鄰先進競爭者技術界限的觀察指標。本研究透過專利後引證資料進行台灣IC設計產業策略群組的技術追隨佈局,並分析這些策略群組的廠商能力及財務績效。研究發現以技術發展意圖形成的策略群組網路上,是以規模大的廠商為網路的中心。資源相對充裕的策略群組會較偏好國際化、獨特性及相對廣度較大的技術發展策略。策略群組偏好獨特性的技術發展,能獲取較高的資產報酬率。
Patent backward citation is an observant index that reveals the manufacturer’s intention of following specific technological domains and demarcates the technological boundaries of advanced competitors. This study uses the data on patent backward citation to determine the technology followership layout of strategic groups of IC design Industry in Taiwan, and analyze the capabilities and financial performances of these strategic groups. The results indicate that in the strategic group network formed by technological development strategies is centered on large-scale manufacturers. Large manufacturers with more sufficient resources prefer internationalized, unique, and broad technological development strategies. The strategic groups prefer unique technological development strategies that could acquire higher asset returns.
Abrahamson, E. & Fombrun, C. J. 1994. Macrocultures: Determinants and Consequences. The Academy of Management Review, 19(4): 728-55.
Alcácer, J. & Gittelman, M. 2006. Patent Citations as a Measure of Knowledge Flows: The Influence of Examiner Citations. Review of economics and statistics, 88(4): 774-79.
Alcácer, J., Gittelman, M., & Sampat, B. 2009. Applicant and examiner citations in U.S. patents: An overview and analysis. Research policy, 38(2): 415-27.
Aldrich, H. E. & Fiol, C. M. 1994. Fools Rush in? The Institutional Context of Industry Creation. The Academy of Management Review, 19(4): 645-70.
Amato, L. & Wilder, R. P. 1985. The Effects of Firm Size on Profit Rates in U. S. Manufacturing. Southern Economic Journal, 52(1): 181-90.
Amato, L. H. & Amato, C. H. 2004. Firm size, strategic advantage, and profit rates in US retailing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 11(3): 181-93.
Amit, R. & Schoemaker, P. J. 1993. Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent. Strategic Management Journal: 33-46.
Ancona, D. G. & Caldwell, D. F. 1992. Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4): 634-65.
Anselin, L., Varga, A., & Acs, Z. 1997. Local Geographic Spillovers between University Research and High Technology Innovations. Journal of Urban Economics, 42(3): 422-48.
Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management: 99-120.
Bartlett, C. A., Ghoshal, S., & Beamish. 2008. Transnational management-test, cases, and reading in cross-bordr management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural holes-the social structure of competition: Cambridge.
Chen, H. & Chen, T.-J. 1998. Network Linkages and Location Choice in Foreign Direct Investment. Journal of International Business studies, 29(3): 445-67.
Chen, S. H., Liu, M. C., Chen, J. Z., & Hsiao, C. 2004. The Strategy for Raising R&D Intensity of Taiwan. Paper presented at 2004 Industrial Technology Innovation-Growth Engines of the Innovation-Driven Economy.
Chen, T.-J., Chen, H., & Ku, Y.-H. 2004. Foreign direct investment and local linkages. Journal of International Business studies, 35(4): 320-33.
Cohen, W. M. & Klepper, S. 1992. The Anatomy of Industry R&D Intensity Distributions. The American Economic Review, 82(4): 773-99.
Cohen, W. M. & Levinthal, D. A. 1990. Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 128-52.
Cohen, W. M. & Levinthal, D. A. 1994. Fortune Favors the Prepared Firm. Management Science, 40(2): 227-51.
Criscuolo, P., Narula, R., & Verspagen, B. 2005. Role of Home and Host Country Innovation Systems in R&D Internationalisation: A Patent Citation Analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 14(5): 417-33.
Duguet, E. & MacGarvie, M. 2005. How Well Do Patent Citations Measure Flows of Technology? Evidence from French Innovation Surveys. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 14(5): 375-93.
Dunning, J. H. 2000. The eclectic paradigm as an envelope for economic and business theories of MNE activity. International Business Review, 9(2): 163-90.
Dunning, J. H. 1988. The eclectic paradigm of international production: a restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business studies, 19(1): 1-31.
Ettlie, J. E. & Rubenstein, A. H. 1987. Firm size and product innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 4(2): 89-108.
Foss, N. J., Knudsen, C., & Montgomery, C. A. 1995. An Exploration of Common Ground: Integrating Evolutionary and Strategic Theories of The Firm, Resource-Based and Evolutionary Theories of The Firm: Towards A Synthesis. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Gay, C. & Le Bas, C. 2005. Uses without too many abuses of patent citations or the simple economics of patent citations as a measure of value and flows of knowledge*. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 14(5): 333-38.
Gay, C., Le Bas, C., Patel, P., & Touach, K. 2005. The Determinants of Patent Citations: An Empirical Analysis of French and British Patents in the US. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 14(5): 339-50.
Gilbert, B. A., McDougall, P. P., & Audretsch, D. B. 2008. Clusters, knowledge spillovers and new venture performance: An empirical examination. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(4): 405-22.
Girvan, M. & Newman, M. E. J. 2002. Community structure in social and biological networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(12): 7821-26.
Grant, R. M. 1991. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implicaitons for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33: 114-35.
Hagedoorn, J. & Cloodt, M. 2003. Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? Research policy, 32(8): 1365-79.
Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. 2001. The NBER Patent Citation Data File: Lessons, Insight, Methodological Tools. NBER Working Paper, 8498.
Harhoff, D., Scherer, F. M., & Vopel, K. 2003. Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights. Research policy, 32(8): 1343-63.
Hegde, D. & Sampat, B. 2009. Examiner citations, applicant citations, and the private value of patents. Economics Letters, 105(3): 287-89.
Hemmert, M. 2004. The impact of internationalization on the technology sourcing performance of high-tech business units. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21(3): 149-74.
Henderson, R. M. & Clark, K. B. 1990. Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 9-30.
Hu, A. G. Z. & Jaffe, A. B. 2003. Patent citations and international knowledge flow: the cases of Korea and Taiwan. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(6): 849-80.
Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M., & Fogarty, M. S. 2000. Knowledge spillovers and patent citations : evidence from a survey of inventors. American Economic Review, 90(2): 215-18.
Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. 1993. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3): 577-98.
Jaffe, A. B. 1989. Real Effects of Academic Research. The American Economic Review, 79(5): 957-70.
Katila, R. & Ahuja, G. 2002. Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction. The Academy of Management Journal, 45(6): 1183-94.
Knott, A. M. 2003. Persistent heterogeneity and sustainable innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 24(8): 687-705.
Kogut, B. & Singh, H. 1988. The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode. Journal of International Business studies, 19(3): 411-32.
Laursen, K. & Salter, A. 2006. Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2): 131-50.
Levinthal, D. A. & March, J. G. 1993. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2): 95-112.
Mahoney, J. T. & Pandian, R. J. 1992. The Resource-Based View within the Convesation of Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal: .363-81.
Malecki, E. J. & Bradbury, S. L. 1992. R&D Facilities and Professional Labour: Labour Force Dynamics in High Technology 1. Regional Studies, 26(2): 123-36.
March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 2(1): 71-87.
Marco, A. C. 2007. The dynamics of patent citations. Economics Letters, 94(2): 290-96.
Maurseth, P. B. 2005. Lovely but dangerous: The impact of patent citations on patent renewal. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 14(5): 351-74.
Maurseth, P. B. & Verspagen, B. 2002. Knowledge Spillovers in Europe: A Patent Citations Analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 104(4): 531-45.
Miles, G., Snow, C. C., & Sharfman, M. P. 1993. Industry variety and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3): 163-77.
Miller, D. & Chen, M.-J. 1994. Sources and Consequences of Competitive Inertia: A Study of the U.S. Airline Industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1): 1-23.
Murray, J. Y., Kotabe, M., & Zhou, J. N. 2005. Strategic Alliance-Based Sourcing and Market Performance: Evidence from Foreign Firms Operating in China. Journal of International Business studies, 36(2): 187-208.
Nelson, A. J. 2009. Measuring knowledge spillovers: What patents, licenses and publications reveal about innovation diffusion. Research policy, 38(6): 994-1005.
Nelson, R. R. 1986. Institutions Supporting Technical Advance in Industry. The American Economic Review, 76(2): 186-89.
Patel, P. & Pavitt, K. 1997. The technological competencies of the world''s largest firms: Complex and path-dependent, but not much variety. Research policy, 26(2): 141-56.
Podolny, J. M. 1993. A Status-Based Model of Market Competition. American Journal of Sociology, 98(4): 829-72.
Podolny, J. M. 2005. Status signals-a sociological study of market competition: Princeton and Oxford.
Podolny, J. M. & Toby, E. S. 1995. A Role-Based Ecology of Technological Change. American Journal of Sociology, 100(5): 1224-60.
Porter, M. E. 1980. Competitive strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competition. New York.
Prahalad, C. K. & Hamel, G. 1990. The Core Competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3): 79.
Reger, R. K. & Huff, A. S. 1993. Strategic Groups:A Cognitive Perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 103-24.
Rugman, A. M. & Verbeke, A. 2001. Subsidiary-specific advantages in multinational enterprises. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3): 237-50.
Scott, J. 2000. Social network analysis: A handbook: Sage.
Stolpe, M. 2002. Determinants of knowledge diffusion as evidenced in patent data: the case of liquid crystal display technology. Research policy, 31(7): 1181-98.
Stuart, T. E. & Podolny, J. M. 1996. Local search and the evolution of technoloical capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Special issue): 21-38.
Symeonidis, G. 1996. Innovation, firm size and market structure: Schumpeterian hypotheses and some new themes. OECD Economic Studies(27): 35-70.
Teece, D. J. 1986. Profiting from Technology Innovation: Implications for
Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy. Research policy, 15(6): 285-305.
Teece, D. J. & Pisano, G. G. 1994. The dynamic capabilities of firms: An introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change: 537-56.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. G., & Shuen, A. 1997. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal: 509-33.
Thompson, P. 2006. Patent Citations and the Geography of Knowledge Spillovers: Evidence from Inventor- and Examiner-added Citations. Review of economics and statistics, 88(2): 383-88.
Thompson, P. & Fox-Kean, M. 2005. Patent Citations and the Geography of Knowledge Spillovers: A Reassessment. The American Economic Review, 95(1): 450-60.
Trajtenberg, M. 1990. A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations. The RAND Journal of Economics, 21(1): 172-87.
Tsai, W. 2001. Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(5): 996-1004.
Tsai, W. 2001. Knowledge Transfer in Intraorgnizational Newworks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5): 996-1004.
Valente, T. 2010. Social networks and health: Oxford.
Vernon, R. 1966. International investment and internaitonal trade in the product cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economices, 80(2): 190-207.
Wasserman & Faust. 1995. Social network analysis: methods and applications: Cambridge.
Whittington, R., Pettigrew, A., Simon, P., Fenton, E., & Conyon, M. 1999. Change and Complementarities in the New Competitive Landscape: A European Panel Study, 1992-1996. Organization Science, 10(5): 583-600.
Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E., & Sapienza, H. J. 2001. Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7): 587-613.
翁順裕. 2010. 從網絡的結構分析探討「技術位置」與「技術角色」-以保險商業方法專利為例. 管理學報, 27(2): 97-122.new window

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE