參考文獻
中文部份
方吉正（2010）。情境認知學習理論與教學應用。載於張新仁主編，學習與教學新趨勢（345-402頁）。台北市：心理。
王文科、王智弘譯（1991）。學習心理學－學習理論導論。臺北市：五南。
行政院（2002）。數位學習國家型科技計畫。台北：行政院國家科學委員會。
余民寧（2006）。影響學習成就因素的探討。教育資料與研究雙月刊，73，
11-24。
周文忠（2005）。虛擬實境之意義與應用。資訊科學應用期刊，1（1），
121-127。
周春美、沈健華（2007）。認知學徒制對實習生專業社會化之研究。高雄師大
學報：教育與社會科學類，22，93-110。
林琬淇（1997）。技職院校實施非同步網路合作學習教學模式之相關研究。
台南科大學報，26，201-222。
邱皓政（2005）。量化研究與統計分析。台北市：五南。
徐新逸（1995a）。如何借重電腦科技來提昇問題解決的能力﹖－談「錨式情境教學法」之理論基礎與實例應用（上）。教學科技與媒體，20，25-30。
徐新逸（1995b）。如何借重電腦科技來提昇問題解決的能力﹖－談「錨式情境教學法」之理論基礎與實例應用（下）。教學科技與媒體，21，47-51。
徐新逸（1996）。情境學習在數學教育上之應用。教學科技與媒體，29，
13-22。
徐新逸（2010）。模擬式教材之模式發展與實證研究。2011年12月20日
取自http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/
dspace/handle/987654321/54695
秦夢群（1997）。教育行政－理論部分。台北市：五南。
許瑛玿、廖桂菁（2003）。情境式網路學習混成式知識移轉之實習輔導模式 環境互動行為分析：以高中地球科學線上學習為例。師大學報：科學教育類，
48（1），93-118。
張文華、郭重吉(1995)。科教革新中評量理念的重建。教育研究雙月刊，45，23-30。
張春興（2000）。張氏心理學辭典。台北市：東華。
張春興（2012）。教育心理學。台北市：東華。
張雪梅（2006）。以學生學習為中心的大學評鑑：大學生能力及其與大學評鑑
結果關係初探。教育政策論壇，9（4），49-76。
張敬宜（2001）。多元學習情境教學模組之研發─ 以「二氧化碳」主題為例。科學教育學刊，9(3)，235-252。
教育部統計處（2011）。中華民國大專院校校數統計。2011年12月28日取自
http://www.edu.tw/files/ site_content/B0013/
overview03.xls
教育資料館（2008）。視聽教育－學理基礎。2012年3月18日，取自
http://3d.nioerar.edu.tw/ 2d/av/lesson/lesson_0301.asp
陳品華（2006）。技職大學生自我調整學習的動機困境與調整策略之研究。 教育心理學報，38（1），37-50。
陳繁興、林英明（2004）。科技教育的特性與社教功能--網際網路教學為例。生活科技教育月刊，37（8），3-9。
彭森明(2006)。學習成就評量的多元功能及其相應研究設計。教育研究與發展期刊，2(4)，21-37。
馮丹白、吳育昇、林清芳（2003）。強化我國技術學院實務教學提升高等技職
教育品質之探討。商業技職教育季刊，91，20-28。
黃永和（2009）。情境學習與教學研究。台北市：國立編譯館。
鄒浮安（1994）。家庭社經地位與學業成就之關係：後設分析。教育研究資訊，2（3），38-47。
鄭芬蘭 （2003）。技職大學生自卑感受之分析研究。師大學報：教育類，
48(1)，67-90。
簡明忠（1999）。技職學生應具備的關鍵能力及改進培育途徑之探討。載於
教育部技職司主編，技職教育的回顧與前瞻（245-256頁）。台北市：
教育部技職司。
簡茂發（2001）。多元化評量之理念與方法。現代教育論壇，7，189-197。
台北市：國立教育資料館。

英文部份
Aarkrog, V. (2005). Learning in the workplace and the
significance of school‐based education: a study of
learning in a Danish vocational education and training
programme. International Journal of Life long Education,
24(2), 137-147.
Alexander, G.,Van Wyk, M.M., Bereng, T., & November, I.
(2010). Legitimate Peripheral Participation (LPP) – The
case for Recognition of Prior Learning sites and
knowledges in South Africa’s transforming education
system. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 45-52.
Ahn, T., Ryu, S., & Han, I. (2007). The impact of Web
quality and playfulness on user acceptance of online
retailing. Information & Management, 44(3), 263-275.
Anderman, E. M. , Noar, S. N., Zimmerman, R. S., & Donohew,
L. (2004). The need for sensation as a prerequisite for
motivation to engage in academic tasks. In Pintrich, P.
R., & Maehr, M. L. (Eds.), Motivating Students, Improving
Schools: The Legacy of Carol Midgley (pp. 1-26).
Amsterdam, London : JAI.
Andrade, H., & Du, Y. （2005）. Student perspectives on
rubric-referenced assessment. Practical Assessment,
Research, and Evaluation, 10(3). Retrieved from
http://pareonline.net/pdf/v10n3.pdf
Bednar, A., Cunningham, D. J., Duffy, T., & Perry, D.
(1995). Theory in practice: How do we link? In G. Anglin
(Ed.), Instructional technology: Past, present, and
future (2nd ed., pp.100–112). Englewood, CO: Libraries
Unlimited.
Berge, Z. L. (1998). Guiding principles in web-based
instructional design. Educational Media
International, 35(2), 72-76.
Boaler, J. (1999). Participation, Knowledge and Beliefs: A
Community Perspective on Mathematics Learning.
Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40(3), 259-281.
Brooks, G., Miles, J. N. V., Torgerson, C. J., & Torgerson,
D. J. (2006). Is an intervention using computer software
effective in literacy learning? A randomized controlled
trial. Educational Studies, 32, 133–143.
Brown, J. S., & Collins, A. (1988). The Computer as a Tool
for Learning Through Reflection. In Mandl, H., & Lesgold,
A. (Eds.), Learning Issues for Intelligent Tutoring \
Systems (pp.1-18). New York, NY: Springer.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated
cognition and the culture of learning. Educational
researcher, 18 (1), 32-42.
Campbell, L., Campbell, B., & Dickinson, D.(1996). Teaching
and learning through multiple intelligences. Boston:
Allyn & Bacon.
Chen, B. H., & Chiou, H.H. (2012). Learning Style, Sense of
Community and Learning Effectiveness in Hybrid Learning
Environment. Interactive Learning Environment. Advance
online publication. DOI:10.1080/10494820.2012.680971
Choi, H. J., & Johnson, S. D. (2007). The effect of problem-
based video instruction on learner satisfaction,
comprehension and retention in college courses. British
Journal of Educational Technology, 38(5), 885-895.
Choi, J., & Hannifin, M. (1995). Situated cognition and
learning environments: Roles, structures, and
implications for design. Educational Technology, Research
and Development, 43(2), 53-69.
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (CTGV) (1992).
Emerging Technologies, ISD, and Learning Environments:
critical Perspectives. Educational Technology Research
and Development, 40(1), 65-80.
Coldwell, J. Craig, A. Paterson, T., & Mustard, J. (2008).
Online Students: Relationships between participation,
demographics and academic performance. The Electronic
Journal of e-Learning, 6 (1), 19–30.
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989).
Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading,
writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.),
Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of
Robert Glaser (pp.453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum.
Collins, A. (1993).Design issues for learning environments.
(Technical report No. 27). New York, NY: Northwestern
University, Center for Technology in Education. (ERIC
Document Reproduction Service No. ED 357 733)
Collins, D., Deck, A., & McCrickard, M. (2008). Computer
Aided Instruction: A Study of Student Evaluations and
Academic Performance. Journal of College Teaching &
Learning, 5(11), 49-58. Retrieved from
http://www.cluteinstitute-onlinejournals.com /
PDFs/a607.pdf
Danish Evaluation Institute. (2003). Quality Procedures in
European Higher Education: An ENQA Survey. Helsinki:
ENQA.
Deci, E., L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. C., & Ryan,
R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-
determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26,
325–346.
Dias, L.B. (1999). Integrating technology: some things you
should know. Leading and Learning with Technology, 27(3),
10–13.
Duffy, T. M., & Jonassen, D. H. (1992). Constructivism: New
implications for instructional technology. In Duffy, T.
M., & Jonassen, D. H. (Eds.), Constructivism and the
technology of instruction – A conversation (pp.1–16).
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Duncan, T. G., & McKeachie, W. J. (2005). The making of the
motivated strategies for learning questionnaire.
Educational Psychologist, 40 (2), 117-128.
Edens, K. M. (2000). Preparing problem solvers for the 21st
century through problem-based learning. College Teaching,
48(2), 55-66.
Ewell, P. T. (2001). “Accreditation and Student Learning
Outcomes: A Proposed Point of Departure,” CHEA
Occasional Paper, September, 2001, Washington, DC:
Council for Higher Education Accreditation.
Fraser, B. J. (1982). Handbook of Test of Science-Related
Attitudes (TOSRA). Hawthorn, Victoria 3122.
Gallavara, G., Hreinsson, E., Kajaste, M., Lindesjöö, E.,
Sølvhjelm, C., Sørskår, A. K., Zadeh, M. S. (2008).
Learning outcomes: Common framework - different
approaches to evaluation learning outcomes in the Nordic
countries. Retrieved from http://www.enqa.eu/files/NOQA%
20report_occasional%20papers%2015.pdf
Gifford, C.E., & Mullaney, J. P. (1998). From rhetoric to
reality: applying the communication standards to the
classroom. Northeast Conference Review, 46, 12-18.
Ginns, P. (2005). Meta-analysis of the modality effect.
Learning and Instruction, 15, 313-331.
Greeno, J. G., Smith, D. R., & Moore, J. L. (1993).
Transfer of situated learning. In D. K. Detterman & R. J.
Sternberg (Eds.), Transfer on trial: Intelligence,
cognition, and instruction. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Hechter, R. P. (2007). An alternative method of revision.
Physics Education, 42(1), 12-14.
Hidi, C., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the
academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st
century. Review of Educational Research, 70, 151-179.
Hidi, S., Berndorff, D., & Ainley, M. (2002). Children's
argument writing, interest, and self-efficacy: an
intervention study. Learning and Instruction, 12, 429-446.
Hsu, M. H., & Chiu, C. M. (2004). Internet self-efficacy
and electronic service acceptance. Decision support
systems, 38(3), 369-381.
Hwang, G. J., Chu, H. C., Shih, J. L., Huang, S. H., &
Tsai, C. C. (2010). A decision-tree-oriented guidance
mechanism for conducting nature science observation
activities in a context-aware ubiquitous learning
environment. Educational Technology & Society, 13(2), 53–
64.
Jonassen, D.H. (1991). Objectivism vs. constructivism: Do
we need a new paradigm? Educational Technology Research
and Development, 39(3), 5–14.
Jonassen, D.H. (1996).Computers in the classroom: Mindtools
for critical thinking. Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice-
Hall.
Jonassen, D.H., & Land, S. (2000). The theoretical
foundations of learning environments. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kapur, M. & Kinzer, C. K. (2007). Examining the effect of
problem type in a synchronous computer-supported
collaborative learning (CSCL) environment. Educational
Technology Research & Development, 55, 439-459.
Kapur, M. (2008). Productive Failure. Cognition and
Instruction, 26, 379-424.
Kapur, M. & Kinzer, C. K. (2009). Productive failure in
CSCL groups. International Journal of Computer-Supported
Collaborative Learning, 4, 21-46.
Kim, M. C., & Hannafin, M. J. (2011). Scaffolding problem
solving in technology-enhanced learning environments
(TELEs): Bridging research and theory with practice.
Computers & Education, 56(2), 403-417.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning:
Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge
University Press.
Levine, J. (1998). Planning strategically for technology
integration. Retrieved from
http://www.coe.uh.edu/insite/elec_pub/ HTML1998/
el_levi.htm on.
Liao, Y. C. (2007). Effects of computer-assisted
instruction on students’ achievement in Taiwan: A meta-
analysis. Computers & Education, 48(2), 216-233.
Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. A. (2002). Motivation as
an enabler for academic success. School Psychology
Review, 31, 313-327.
Lubinescu, E. S., Ratcliff, J. L., & Gaffney, M. A. (2001).
Two Continuums Collide: Accreditation and Assessment. New
Directions for Higher Education, 113, 5-21.
Mayer, R. E., & Chandler, P. (2001). When learning is just
a click away:does simple user interaction foster deeper
understanding of multimedia messages? Journal of
Educational Psychology, 93(2),
390-397.
Mayer, R. E., Dow, G. T., & Mayer, S. (2003). Multimedia
learning in an interactive self-explaining environment:
what works in the design of agent-based microworlds?
Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 806-813.
Merrill, M.D. (1992). Constructivism and Instructional
Design. In Duffy, T.M., & Jonassen, D.H. (Eds.),
Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: A
Conversation (pp. 99-114). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Moon, J., & Kim, Y. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-
Wide-Web context. Information & Management, 38, 217–230.
Morton, C. (1996). The modern land of Laputa. Phi Delta
Kappan, 77(6), 416–419.
Moskal, B. M. (2003). Recommendations for developing
classroom performance assessments and scoring rubrics.
Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 8(14).
Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp? V=8&n=14
National council on-Vocational Education (1991). Solutions.
Washiton D. C.: National council on-Vocational Education.
Op’t Eynde, P., & Turner, J.E. (2006). Focusing on the
complexity of emotion issues in academic learning: A
dynamical component systems approach. Educational
Psychology Review, 18, 361–376.
Paterson, W. A., Henry, J .J., O’Quin, K., Ceprano, M. A.,
& Blue, E. V. (2003). Investigating the effectiveness of
an integrated learning system on early emergent readers.
Reading Research Quarterly, 38, 172–207.
Piirainen–Marsh, A., & Tainio, L. (2009). Collaborative
Game-play as a Site for Participation and Situated
Learning of a Second Language. Scandinavian Journal of
Educational Research, 53(2), 167-183.
Reigeluth, C. M. (2011). Instructional theory and
technology for a postindustrial world. In Reiser, R., &
Dempsey, J.V. (Eds.) Trends and Issues in Instructional
Design and Technology. USA: Pearson Higher Education.
Roca, J. C., & Gagné, M. (2008). Understanding e-learning
continuance intention in the workplace: A self-
determination theory perspective. Computers in Human
Behavior, 24(4), 1585-1604.
Rogoff, B. (1995). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive
development in social context. NY: Oxford University.
Rovai, A. P. (2002). Sense of community, perceived
cognitive learning and persistence in asynchronous
learning networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 5
(4), 319-332.
Rovai, A. P., & Lucking, R. (2000, September). Measuring
sense of classroom community. Paper presented to Learning
2000: Reassessing the Virtual University, Roanoke, VA.
Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, Learning, and Motivation.
Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 299-323.
Schunk, D. H. (2000). Learning theories: An educational
perspective (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.
Schwan, S., & Riempp, R. (2004). The cognitive benefits of
interactive videos: learning to tie nautical knots.
Learning and Instruction, 14 (3), 293-305.
Schwier, R. (2002). Shaping the metaphor of community in
online learning environments. Retrieved from
http://cde.athabascau.ca/ ISEC2002/papers/schwier.pdf
Shea, P., Li, C. S., & Pickett, A. (2006). A study of
teaching presence and student sense of learning community
in fully online and web-enhanced college courses.
Internet and Higher Education, 9(3), 175-190.
Sprague, D., & Dede, C. (1999). Constructivism in the
classroom: If I teach this way, am I doing my job?
Learning and Leading with Technology, 27 (1), 6-9, 16-17.
Stiggins, R. J. (2001). Student-involved classroom
assessment (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Merrill/Prentice-Hall.
Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college : Rethinking the causes
and cures of student attrition. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
Watson, P. (2002) The role and integration of learning
outcomes into the educational process. Active Learning in
Higher Education, 3(3), 205-219.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning,
meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University
Press.
Wighting, M. J. (2006). Effects of Computer Use on High
School Students’Sense of Community. The Journal of
Educational Research, 99(6), 371-379.
Yang, Y.F. (2011): Engaging students in an online situated
language learning environment. Computer Assisted Language
Learning, 24(2), 181-198.
Yip, M. (2009). Differences between high and low academic
achieving university students in learning and study
strategies: A further investigation. Educational Research
and Evaluation, 15 (6), 561-570. doi:
10.1080/13803610903354718