[1]陳佳貴，黃群慧，彭華崗(2009)，中國企業社會責任研究報告［M］，北京：社會科學文獻出版社。
[2]曹洪彬(2006)，我國捐贈的公共經濟學分析 [D]，廈門：廈門大學博士學位論文。
[3]鄧子基(2000)，借鑒“公共財政論”“發展”國家分配論[J]，財政研究。
[4]金碚(1999a) ，論國有企業是特殊企業[J] ，學習與探索。
[5]金碚(1999b) ，三論國有企業是特殊企業[J] ，中國工業經濟。
[6]盧正文，劉春林(2011)，管理學報，第8卷第7期。
[7]李雙龍(2005)，試析企業社會責任的影響因素[J]，經濟體制改革。
[8]賴爾芬，王芳(2012)，基於成本收益分析的企業慈善捐贈行為探討，臺灣農業探索，第4 期。
[9]劉軍偉，鄭小明(2009)，我國企業慈善捐贈的理論淵源與現狀研究，企業經濟第7期(總第347期)。
[10]山立威，甘犁，鄭濤(2008)，公司捐款與經濟動機———汶川地震後中國上市公司捐款的實證研究［J］，經濟研究，11：51-61。
[11]田利華，陳曉東（2007），企業策略性捐贈行為研究：慈善投入的視角[J] ，中央財經大學學報。
[12]徐立(2012)，企業慈善行為研究。商丘職業技術學院學報第3期，第11卷(總第60期) 。
[13]Abbott, W. F., & Monson, R. J. (1979). On the measurement of corporate social responsibility: Selfreported disclosure as a method of measuring corporate social involvement. Academy of Management Joumal, 22, 501-515.
[14]Adams, M., & Hardwick, P. (1998). An analysis of corporate donations: United Kingdom evidence. Journal of Management Studies, 35: 641–654.
[15]Alexander, G. J., & Buchholz, R. A. (1978). Corporate social responsibility and stock market performance. Academy of Management Journal, 21(3): 479-485.
[16]Amato, L., & Amato, C. (2007). The effects of firm size and industry on corporate giving . Journal of Business Ethics, 72(3), 229–241.
[17]Andreoni, J. (1989). Giving with impure altruism: applications to charity and ricardian equivalence. Journal of Political Economy, 97, 1447–1458.
[18]Arthur, M. (2003). Share price reactions to work family initiatives: An institutional perspective , Academy of Management Journal, 46, 497–505.
[19]Atkinson, L., & Galaskiewicz, J. (1988). Stock ownership and company contributions to charity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 82–100.
[20]Aupperle, K.E., Carroll, A.B., & Hatfield,J.D. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2): 446–463.
[21]Baltagi, B. H. 2001, Econometric analysis of panel data (2nd ed.), John Wiley & Sons.
[22]Barbara, R., Bartkus, Morris, Sara .A., & Bruce, Seifert (2002). Governance and Corporate Philanthropy : Restraining Robin Hood? Business Society, 41: 319.
[23]Barnett, M. L. (2005). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review.
[24]Barnett, M.L., & Salomon, R.M. (2006). Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27(11), 1101-1156.
[25]Barnett, M. L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 794–816.
[26]Barney, J.B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17: 99–120.
[27]Baron, D.P., & Harjoto, M., Jo, H. (2008). The economics and politics of corporate social performance. Stanford graduate school of business Research paper 1993.
[28]Baron, D. (2001). Private politics, corporate social responsibility and integrated strategy. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 10, 7-45.
[29]Bar-Tel, D. (1976). Pro-social behavior: Theory and research (Hemisphere Publishing Company, Washington, DC).
[30]Bartkus, B. R., Morris, S. A., & Seifert, B. (2001). Stronger governance mechanisms: Do they influence corporate philanthropy? Paper presented at the Academy of Management, Washington, DC.
[31]Bartkus, B. R., Morris, S. A., & Seifert, B. (2002). Governance and corporate philanthropy: restraining Robin Hood? Business and Society, 41:3,319–345.
[32]Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance , Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 488-506.
[33]Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2010). Individual and corporate social responsibility. Economica, 77:1-19.
[34]Becchetti, L., Di Giacomo, S., & Pinnacchio, D. (2005). Corporate social responsibility and corporate performance: Evidence from a panel of US listed companies. CEIS Working Paper.
[35]Berle, A. A. (1931). Corporate powers as powers in trust. Harvard Law Review, 31: 1049–1074.
[36]Berman,S. L., Wicks, A.C, Kotha, S., Jones, T.M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and the firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42 (5): 488-506.
[37]Boatsman, J. R., & Gupta, S. (1996). Taxes and corporate charity: Empirical evidence from micro-level data. National Tax Journal, 49, 193-213.
[38]Bothwell, J. L. (1980). Profitability, risk and separation of ownership from control . Southern Economic Journal, 39, 366-72.
[39]Brakeley, G. A. (1988).Donor recognition: A fund raiser's form of tender loving care. NSFRE Journal, 17 (1), 27-30.
[40]Brammer, S., &, Millington, A. (2004). The development of corporate charitable contributions in the UK: A stakeholder analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 41, 1411–1434.
[41]Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2005). Corporate reputation and philanthropy: An empirical analysis . Journal of Business Ethics, 61, 29–44.
[42]Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2006). Firm size, organizational visibility and corporate philanthropy: an empirical analysis. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15:1, 6–18.
[43]Brammer S., & Millington A. (2008). Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29: 1325-1343.
[44]Brenner, S. N., & Cochran, P. (1991). The stakeholder theory of the firm: Implications for business and society theory and research. In J. F. Mahon (Ed.). International Association for Business and Society-1991 Proceedings, 449-467.
[45]Brik, AB., Rettab, B., & Mellahi, K. (2011). Market orientation, corporate social responsibility and business performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 99: 307-324.
[46]Brown, W., Helland, E., & Smith, J. K. (2006). Corporate Philanthropic Practices, Journal of Corporate Finance, 12, 855–877.
[47]Bruch, H., & Walter, F. (2005). The keys to rethinking corporate philanthropy. Sloan Management Review, 47(1), 49-55.
[48]Buchholtz, A. K., Amason, A. C., & Rutherford, M. A. (1999). Beyond
resources: The mediating effects of top management discretion and
values on corporate philanthropy, Business & Society, 38(2), 167–187.
[49]Buckley, Peter J., John, H. Dunning., & Robert, B. Pearce. (1977). The influence of firm Size, industry, nationality, and degree of Multinationality in the growth and profitability of the world’s largest firms. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, CXIV:243-57.
[50]Burlingame, D. F., & Young, D. R. (1996). Corporate philanthropy at the crossroads. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
[51]Burt, R. S. (1983). Corporate profits and cooptatian. New York: Academic Press.
[52]Callan, S.J., Thomas, J. M. (2009). Corporate financial performance and corporate social performance: an update and reinvestigation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16: 61-78.
[53]Campbell, D., & Slack, R. (2008). Corporate ‘philanthropy strategy’ and ‘strategic philanthropy’: Some insights from voluntary disclosures in annual reports. Business and Society, 47 (2), 187.
[54]Campbell, D.J., Moore, G. & Metzger, M. (2002). Corporate philanthropy in the U.K. 1985–2000: some empirical findings. Journal of Business Ethics, 39:1/2, 29–41.
[55]Campbell, J. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32: 946-967.
[56]Campbell, L., Gulas, C., & Gruca, T. (1999). Corporate giving behavior and decision maker social consciousness. Journal of Business Ethics, 19(4): 375-383.
[57]Capar, N., & Kotabe, M. (2003). The relationship between international diversification and performance in service firms. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 34, pp. 345-355.
[58]Carroll, A.B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review 4(1): 497–505.
[59]Carroll, A.B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34, pp. 39-48.
[60]Carroll, A.B. (2004). Managing ethically with global stakeholders: A present and future challenge . Academy of Management Executive, 18(2): 114-120.
[61]Caruso, E. F., & Singh, J. B. (2003). The content and focus of the codes of ethics of the world’s largest transnational corporations. Business and Society Review, 108(1): 71-94.
[62]Cestone, G., & Cespa, G. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and managerial entrenchment. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 16, 741-77.
[63]Chang, E.C., & Wong, S. M. L. (2004). Political control and performance in China’s listed firms. Journal of Comparative Economics, 32, 617–636.
[64]Chand, M. (2006). The relationship between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance: Industry type as a boundary condition. The Business review, 5, pp. 240-245.
[65]Chang, S., & Hong, J. (2002). How much does the business group matter in Korea? Strategic Management Journal, 23: 265-274.
[66]Christensen, H. K.,& Montgomery, C.A. (1981). Corporate economic performance: Diversification strategy versus market structure. Strategic Mangement Journal , 2(4)327-343.
[67]Christensen, L. T., & S. Askegaard. (2001). Corporate identity and corporate image revisited – A semiotic perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 35(3/4), 292–315.
[68]Christmann, P. (2004) . Multinational companies and the natural environment: determinants of global environmental policy standardization. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5): 747-760.
[69]Chen, H., Chen, J. Z., Lobo, G. J., & Wang, Y. (2010). Association between borrower and lender state ownership and accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting Research, 48(5), 973–1014.
[70]Chen, H., & Wang, X. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance in China: an empirical research from Chinese firms. Corporate Governance, 11: 361-370.
[71]Choi, J. S., Kwak, Y. N., & Choe, C. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: evidence from Korea. Australian Journal of Management, 35: 291-311.
[72]Clarkson, M. B. E., Deck, M. C., & Shiner, N. J. (1992). The stakeholder management model in practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Las Vegas. NV, Preston.
[73]Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review , 20(1), 92—117.
[74]Clarkson, P., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2006). Does it really pay to be green? Determinants and Consequences of Proactive Environmental Strategies.Workingpaper.
[75]Cochran, P. L., & Wood, R. A. (1984). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27(1): 24-56.
[76]Coffey, B.S., & Fryxell, G.E. (1991). Institutional ownership of stock and dimensions of corporate social performance: An empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(6): 437-444.
[77]Coffey, B. S., & Wang, J. (1998). Board diversity and managerial control as predictors of corporate social performance, Journal of Business Ethics , 17(14), 1595–1603.
[78]Coles, J. W., & McWilliams, V. B., & Sen, N. (2001). An examination of the relationship of governance mechanisms to performance. Journal of Management, 27, 23-50.
[79]Collins, M. (1994). Global corporate philanthropy and relationship marketing. European Management Journal, 12, 226–234.
[80]Corey, E.R. (1991). Industrial marketing cases and concepts. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
[81]Cowen, Scott. S., Linda, B. Ferreri., & Lee, D. Parker. (1987). The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency-based analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12 (2): 111-122.
[82]Crane, A. L., Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). Corporations and Citizenship (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
[83]Davidson, W. N., & Worrell, D. L. (1990). A comparison and test of the use of accounting and stock market data in relating corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Akron Business and Economic Review, 21, 7-19.
[84]Dallocchio, M., & Salvi, A. (2005). Finanza d'Azienda. Milano: EGEA.
[85]Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Johnson, J. L., & Ellstrand, A. E. (1999). Number of directors and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 674-686.
[86]Deckop, J. R., Merriman, K.K., & Gupta, S. (2006). The effects of CEO pay structure on corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 32(3), 329–342.
[87]Demsetz, H., & Villalonga, B. (2001). Ownership structure and corporate performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 7, 209−233.
[88]Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91.
[89]Dunning, John H., (1988). The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19 (1):1-31.
[90]Easterbrook, H. F., & Fischel, D. R. (1991). The economic structure of corporate law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[91]Edmondson, V. C., & Carroll, A. B. (1999). Giving back: An examination of the philanthropic motivations, orientations and activities of large black-owned Businesses. Journal of Business Ethics, 19(2), 171-179.
[92]Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14: 57-74.
[93]Elango, B. (1998). “An empirical examination of the influence of industry and firm drivers on the rate of internationalization by firms”, Journal of International Management, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 201-221.
[94]Epstein, K. (2005). Philanthropy, INC., Stanford Social Innovation Review, 3(2): 20-27.
[95]Erfle, S., & McMillan, H. (1990). Media, political pressure, and the firm: the case of petroleum pricing in the late 1970s. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105:1, 115–134.
[96]Estrin, S., & Perotin, V. (1991). Does Ownership Always Matter? International Journal of Industrial Organization, 9(1), 55–72.
[97]European Commission, Employment & Social Affairs. (2001). Promoting a european framework for corporate social responsibility. Green Paper, Luxembourg.
[98]Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88, 288-307.
[99]Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. N. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301-325.
[100]Fan, J. P. H., Wong, T. J., & Zhang, T. (2007). Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and post-IPO performance of China’s newly partially privatized firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 84: 330–357.
[101]Fernández-Kranz, D., & Santaló, J. (2010). When necessity becomes a virtue: The effect of product market competition on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 19(2):453-487.
[102]Fisman, R., Heal, G., & Nair, V. (2006). A model of corporate philanthropy. Columbia University working paper.
[103]Firth, M., Fung, P.M.Y., & Rui, O. R. (2007). Ownership, two-tier board structure, and the informativeness of earnings-evidence from China, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26, 463–496.
[104]Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33: 233–258.
[105]Freedman, M., & Jaggi, B. (1982). Pollution disclosures, pollution performance and economic performance. Omega, 10(2): 167-76.
[106]Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston, MA.
[107]Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, 173-178.
[108]Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, 33. (Original work published 1962)
[109]Fry, L., Keim, G., & Meiners, R. (1982). Corporate contributions: altruistic or for profit? Academy of Management Journal, 25: 94–106.
[110]Galaskiewicz & Joseph (1985). Social organization of an Urban economy: A study of business philanthropy and nonprofit organizations. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
[111]Galaskiewicz, J. (1997). An urban grants economy revisited: corporate charitable contributions in the Twin Cities, 1979–81, 1987–89. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34: 454–479.
[112]Galaskiewicz, J., (1997). An Urban grants economy revisited: Corporate charitable contributions in the twin cities.1979–81, 1987–89, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 445–471.
[113]Galaskiewicz, J., & Burt, R. S. (1991). Interorganization contagion in corporate philanthropy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 88–105.
[114]Garcia-Castro, R., Canela, M. A., & Ariño, M. A. (2006). Over the long run? The impact of stakeholder management on short run and long run shareholder value creation.
[115]Gardberg, N. A., & Fombrun, C. J. (2006). Corporate citizenship: Creating intangible assets across institutional environments. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 329–346.
[116]Geiger, S. W., & Cashen, L. H.(2002). A multidimensional examination of slack and its impact on innovation. Journal of Managerial Issues, Vol. 14, pp. 68-84.
[117]Gillan, S. L., & Starks, L.T. (1998). A survey of shareholder activism: motivation and empirical evidence. Contemporary Finance Digest, 2 (3), 10– 34.
[118]Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 777-798.
[119]Godfrey, P.C., Merrill, C.B., & Hansen, J.M. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30:425-445.
[120]Griffin, J.J., & Mahon, J.F. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate. twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business and Society, 36(1): 5–31.
[121]Crahn, J.L., Hannaford, W. J., & Laverty, K. J. (1987). Corporate philanthropy and marketing strategy: A review and Directions for Research , in M, R, Solomon (ed,), AMA Educators Proceeds, Series 53 (American Marketing Association, Chicago), 67-69.
[122]Grant, RM. (1991) . The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, Spring: 114–135.
[123]Griffin, J.J., Mahon, J.F. (1997). The corporate social performance and financial performance debate: twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business & Society, 36(1): 5–31.
[124]Habib, M. M., & Victor, B.( 1991). Strategy, structure, and performance of US manufacturing and service MNCs: A comparative analysis, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, No. 8, pp. 589-606.
[125]Haley, U. C. V. (1991), Corporate contributions as managerial masques: reframing corporate contributions as strategies to influence society. Journal of Management Studies, 28(5), 485-509.
[126]Handelman, J. M., & Arnold, S. J. (1999). The role of marketing actions with a social dimension: Appeals to the institutional environment. Journal of Marketing, 63, 33-48.
[127]Harrison, R. (2003). Corporate social responsibility and the consumer movement. Consumer Policy Review, 13(4), 127-131.
[128]Hart, & Stuart, L. (1995). A natural resource based view of the firm , The Academy of Management Review, 20 (4): 986-1014.
[129]Helland, E., & Smith, J. K. (2003). Corporate philanthropy. Working paper (Claremont Mckenna College, Claremont, CA).
[130]Herremans, I. M., Akathaporn, P., & McInnes, M. (1993). An investigation of corporate social responsibility reputation and economic performance. Accounting Organizations and Society, 18: 587–604.
[131]Hess, D., N. Rogovsky., & Dunfee, T. W. (2002), The next wave of corporate community involvement: Corporate social initiatives, California Management Review, 44(2), 110–125.
[132]Hill. C. W, L.. & Jones. T. M. (1992). Stakeholder agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29: 131-154.
[133]Hillman, A.J., & Keim, G.D. (2001).Shareholder value, stakeholder management and social issues: what’s the bottom line?’ Strategic Management Journal, 22:2, 125–139.
[134]Himmelstein, J. L. (1997). Looking good and doing good. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
[135]Hines, C., & Ames, A. (2000). Ethical consumerism. A research study conducted for the co-operative bank by MORI, London: MORI.
[136]Hoffman, A. (1995). The environmental transformation of American industry: An institutional account of organizational evolution in the chemical and petroleum industries (1960-1993). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
[137]Huang, C.J. (2010). Corporate governance, corporate social responsibility and corporate performance. Journal of Management and Organization, 16: 1-13.
[138]Hull, C.E., & Rothenberg, S. (2008). Firm performance: the interactions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation. Strategic Management Journal, 29: 781-789.
[139]Husted, B. (2005). Culture and ecology: A cross-national study of the determinants of environmental sustainability. Management International Review, 45(3): 349-371.
[140]Husted, B., & Salazar J. (2006).Taking friedman seriously: Maximizing profits and social performance. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1): 75-91.
[141]Ingram, R. W. (1978). An investigation of the information content of (certain) social responsibility disclosures. Joumal of Accounting Research, 16(2), 270-285.
[142]Inoue, Y., & Lee, S. (2011). Effects of different dimensions of corporate social responsibility on corporate financial performance in tourism-related industries. Tourism Management, 32: 790-804.
[143]Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2012). What drives corporate social performance? International evidence from social, environmental and governance scores. Journal of International Business Studies (Forthcoming).
[144]Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305-360.
[145]Jensen & Tirole (2001). Corporate governance. Econometrica, 69.
[146]Jensen & Michael, C. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function”, Business Ethics Quarterly, 12 (2): 235-247.
[147]Jiang, R.H.J. & Bansal, P. (2003). Seeing the need for ISO 14001. Journal of
Management Studies, 40:4, 1047-1067.
[148]Johnson, O. (1966). Corporate philanthropy: an analysis of corporate contributions. Journal of Business, 39:489–504.
[149]Jones, T.M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2): 404–437.
[150]Johnson, R.D. & Greening, D.W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 564-576.
[151]Jones, G.H., Jones, B.H & Little, P. (2000). Reputation as reservoir: Buffering against loss in times of economic crisis. Corporate Reputation Review, 3(1): 21-29.
[152]Jones, T. M., Hill, C. W. L., & Kelley, P. C. (1989). A generalized Jheory of agency, A paradigm for business and society. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Washington. DC.
[153]Kapstein, E. B. (2001). The corporate ethics crusade . Foreign Affairs, 80, 105–19.
[154]Kim, W. C., Hwang, P., & Burgers, W. P. (1989). Global diversification strategy and corporate proconfiguration performance, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 10, pp. 45-57.
[155]Kinnear, Thomas, C., & Ann, R., Root. (1995). 1994 Survey of marketing research. Chicago: American Marketing Association.
[156]Kosnik, R. D., & Chatterjee, S. (1997). Corporate governance. St. Paul, MN: West.
[157]Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(1): 64-81.
[158]Kramer, M., & Kania, J. (2006). Change the game: Leading corporations switch from defense to offense in solving global problems. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 4(1):20-27.
[159]Krausz, J., & Pava, M. L. (1995). Corporate responsibility and financial performance. The paradox of social cost, London: Quorum Books.
[160]Krebs, D. L., (1970), Altruism - An examination of the concept and a review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 73(4), 258-302.
[161]Landon, S., & Smith, C.E. (1997). The use of quality and reputation indicators by consumers. The case of Bordeaux wine. Journal of Consumer Policy, 20: 289–323.
[162]Lee, D.D., Faff, R.W., & Langfield, S.K. (2009). Revisiting the vexing question: does superior corporate social performance lead to improved financial performance. Australian Journal of Management, 34: 21-49.
[163]Letza, S., Sun, X., & Kirkbride, J. (2004). Shareholding versus stakeholding: A critical review of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(3): 242–262.
[164]Levy, F., & Shatto, G. (1978). An evaluation of corporate contributions. Public Choice, 33 19-28.
[165]Levy, F. K., & Shaito, G. M. (1980). Social responsibility in large electric utility firms: the case for philanthropy. In Preston L. E. (Ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, Vol. 2. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, 237-49.
[166]Li, H., Meng, L., Wang, Q., & Zhou, L. (2008). Political connections, financing and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese private firms. Journal of Development Economics, 87: 283–299.
[167]Li, H., Meng, L., & Zhang, J. (2006). Why do entrepreneurs enter politics? Evidence from China. Economic Inquiry, 44: 559–578.
[168]Li, L., & Qian, G. (2005). Dimensions of international diversification: Their joint effects on firm performance, Journal of Global Marketing, Vol. 18, No. 3/4, pp. 7-35.
[169]Lin, J. Y., & Tan, G. (1999). Policy burdens, accountability, and the soft budget constraint. The American Economic Review, 89(2), 426–431.
[170]Lin, T.W. (2004), Corporate Governance in China: Recent Development, Key Problems, and Suggested Solutions, Accounting and Corporate Governance, 1, 1–23.
[171]Logsdon, J. M. & Wood, D. J. (2002). Business citizenship: From domestic to global level of analysis . Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 155–188.
[172]Logsdon, J.M & Wood, D.J. (2005). Global business citizenship and voluntary codes of ethical conduct . Journal of Business Ethics, 59(1–2): 55–67.
[173]Lu, J. W., & Beamish, P. W. (2004). International diversification and firm performance: The S-curve hypothesis . Academy of Management Journal,
47(4): 598–609.
[174]Mackey, A., Mackey, T.B, & Barney, J.B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: investor preferences and corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review, 32(3): 817–835.
[175]Makni, R., Francoeur, C., Bellavance, F. (2009). Causality between corporate social performance and financial performance: evidence from Canadian firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 89: 409-422.
[176]March. J. G. (1962). The business firm as a political coalition. Journal of Politics, 24, 662-78.
[177]Margolis, J.D., Elfenbein, H.A, & Walsh, J.P. (2007). Does it pay to be good? A meta-analysis and redirection of research on the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Working Paper: Harvard Business School.
[178]Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268–305.
[179]Marquis, C., Glynn, M. A., & Davis, G. (2007), Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Academy of Management Review, 32, 925–945.
[180]Margolis, J., & Walsh, J. (2001). People and profits? The search for a link between a company's social and financial performance. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
[181]Marx, J. (1999). Corporate philanthropy: What is the Strategy? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(2)185-209.
[182]Mason, R. L;Gunst, R.F.a; & Webster, J.T.(1975). Regression analysis and problem of multicollinearity. Commun. Statistics, 4(3): 277-292.
[183]McGuire, J.B, Sundgren, A., & Schneeweiss, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal , 31(4): 854–872.
[184]McGuire, J.B., Schneeweis, T., & Branch, B. (1990). Perceptions of firm quality: a cause or result of firm performance. Journal of Management, 16: 167–180.
[185]McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D.(2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal , 21: 603-609.
[186]McWilliams, Abigail, David, D., Van, Fleet., & Kenneth, Cory, D. (2002). Raising rivals costs through political strategy: An extension of resource-based theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39 (5): 707-723.
[187]McWilliams, A., Siegel, D.S., & Wright, P.M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1, 1-18.
[188]McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-127.
[189]Mescon, T. S., & Tilson, D. J. (1987). Corporate philanthropy: A strategic approach to the bottom-line. California Management Review, 29(2), 49-61.
[190]Miles, R.H. (1987). Managing the corporate social environment: A grounded theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
[191]Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., & Wood, D.J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 853–886.
[192]Michael, E. Porter., & Mark, Kramer .R. (2002). The Competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review.
[193]Mizruchi & Mark, S. (1990). Cohesion, structural equivalence, and similarity of behavior: An approach to the study of corporate political power. Sociological Theory, 8: 16-32.
[194]Moch, Michael, K., & Stanley, Seashore. E. (1981). How norms affect behaviors in and of corporations. In P. C. Nystrom and W. H. Starbuck (eds.). Handbook of Organizational Design, 1: 210-237. New York: Qxford University Press.
[195]Moore, G.(2001). Corporate social and financial performance: An investigation in the U.K. supermarket industry.Journal of Business Ethics, 34, 299-315.
[196]Moskowitz, M. R.（1972）. Choosing socially responsible stocks. Business and Society Review, 1: 71-75.
[197]Muller, A., & Whiteman, G.（2009）. Exploring the geography of corporate Philanthropic Disaster.
[198]Navarro, P. (1988). Why do corporations give to charity? Journal of Business, 61, 65–93.
[199]Navarro, Peter. (1988a). Why do corporations give to charity? Journal of Business, 61: 65-93.
[200]Erhemjamts,Otgontsetseg., & Li, Qian. (2011). Corporate social responsibility, firm policies and performance. JEL Classification.
[201]Ogden, S., & Watson, R. (1999). Corporate performance and stakeholder management: balancing shareholder and customer interests in the U.K. privatized water industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42 (5): 526-538.
[202]O'Hare, Barbara (1991).Good Deeds are Good Business. American Demographics, (September), 38-42.
[203]Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003) . Corporate social and financial performance: A Metaanalysis. Organization Studies, 24,403-441.
[204]Pagano, M & Volpin, P.F. (2005). Managers, workers, and corporate control. Journal of Finance, 60(2):841–68.
[205]Palich, L., Cardinal, L., & Miller, C. (2000). Curvilinearity in the diversification-performance linkage: An examination of over three decades of research. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 155-174.
[206]Pava, M. L., & Krausz, J. (1996). The association between corporate social responsibility and financial performance: The paradox of social cost. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(3): 321-357.
[207]Patten, D. M., (2008). Does the market value corporate philanthropy? Evidence from the response to the 2004 Tsunami relief effort. Journal of Business Ethics , 81(3), 599–607.
[208]Podolny, J.M. (1993). A status-based model of market competition. American Journal of Sociology, 98: 829–872.
[209]Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, December: 5-16.
[210]Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2002). The Competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, December, 57-68.
[211]Post, J.E., Preston, L.E., Sachs, S. (2002). Managing the extended enterprise: The new stakeholder view. California Management Review, 45 (1): 6-28.
[212]Powell, T. C., (1996). How much does industry matter? An alternative empirical test. Strategic Management Journal , 17(4), 323–334.
[213]Preston, L.E., & O‟Bannon, D.P. (1997). The corporate social financial performance relationship: A typology and analysis. Business and Society, 36(4): 419–429.
[214]Preston, L.E., Post, J.E. (1975). Measuring corporate responsibility. Journal of General Management, 2 (3): 45-52.
[215]Ramaswamy, K. (1995). Multinationality, configuration, and performance: A study of MNEs in the U.S. drug and pharmaceutical industry, Journal of International Management, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 231-253.
[216]Roberts, P. W., & Dowling, G. R. (2002). Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 1077–1093.
[217]Roberts, R. W. (1992). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: an application of stakeholder theory. Accounting Organisations and Society, 17, 595–612.
[218]Rowley, T., & Berman, S. (2000). A brand new brand of corporate social performance. Business & Society, 39(4), 397-418.
[219]Roy, Shapira.(2012). Corporate philanthropy as signaling and coopration, 80 Fordham L.Rev.
[220]Ruf, B.M., Muralidhar, K., & Paul, K. (1998). The development of a systematic, aggregate measure of corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 24(1), 119–133.
[221]Ruf, B. M., Muralidhar, K., Brown, R. M., Janney, J. J., & Paul, K. (2001). An empirical investigation of the relationship between change in corporate social performance and financial performance: A stakeholder theory perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 32, 143-156.
[222]Rugman, Alan M., Donald J. Lecraw, & Laurence Booth, D. (1985). International business: Firm and environment. New York: Mcgraw-Hill.
[223]Rumelt, R. P. (1987). Theory, strategy, and entrepreneurship. In D. Teece (Ed.), The competitive challenge: 137-158, Boston: Ballinger.
[224]Saiia, D.H. (2001). Philanthropy and corporate citizenship: strategic philanthropy is good corporate citizenship. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 1:2,57–73.
[225]Saiia, D. H., Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2003). Philanthropy as strategy: When corporate charity “begins at home.” Business and Society, 42: 169–201.
[226]Sanchez, C. M. (2000). Motives for corporate philanthropy in El salvador: Altruism and political legitimacy , Journal of Business Ethics, 27(4/2), 363-376.
[227]Schnietz, K.E & Epstein, M.J. (2005). Exploring the financial value of a reputation for corporate social responsibility during a crisis. Corporate Reputation Review, 7(4):327-345.
[228]Schumann, David .W., Jan, Hathcote. M., & West, Su.san. (1991). Corporate advertising in America: A review of published studies on use, measurement, and effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 20 (September), 35-56.
[229]Schwartz R. (1968). Corporate philanthropic foundations. Journal of Finance 23: 479–497.
[230]Scott, W. R. (1994). Institutional environments and organizations: Structural complexity and individualism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[231]Seifert, B., Morris, S. A., & Bartkus, B. R.( 2004). Having, giving, and getting: Slack resources, corporate philanthropy and firm financial performance. Business and Society, 43: 135–161.
[232]Sharfman, M.(1994). Changing institutional rules: The evolution of corporate philanthropy, 1883-1953. Business & Society, 33(3), 236-269.
[233]Sharfman, M., & Dean, J. W. (1991). Conceptualizing and measuring the organizational environment: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Management, 17, 681-715.
[234]Sharfman, M.P., Shaft, T.M. & Tihanyi, L. (2004) A model of global and institutional antecedents of high-level corporate environmental performance, Business and Society, 43(1): 6-36.
[235]Shaw, B., & Post, F. R. (1993). A moral basis for corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 745–751.
[236]Shiu, Y., & Yang, S. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and operational
efficiency. Paper present at the annual meeting of The Business and Information, Taiwan.
[237]Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52, 737–775.
[238]Siefert, B., Morris, S. & Bartkus, B. (2003). Comparing big givers and small givers: Financial correlates of corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(3): 195-211.
[239]Siegel, D., Vitaliano, D. ( 2007). An empirical analysis of the strategic use of
corporate social responsibility. Journal of Economic Management and Strategy
, 16(3), 773-792.
[240]Siegfried, J.J., McElroy, K.M., & Biernot-Fawkes D. (1983). The management of corporate contributions. Research in Corporate Performance and Policy, 5: 87–102.
[241]Simon, F. (1995). Global corporate philanthropy: A strategic framework. International Marketing Review, 112 (4), 20-37.
[242]Simpson, W.G., & Kohers, T. (2002). The link between corporate social and financial performance: Evidence from the banking industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 32(2): 97-109.
[243]Smith, C. (1994). The new corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 72(3), 105-116.
[244]Smith, C. (1994). The New Corporate Philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, May-June,105-116.
[245]Spence, C., & Gray, R.H.(2007). Social and environmental reporting and the business case. London: ACCA.
[246]Stanwick, Peter, A., & Stanwick, Sarah. D. (1998). The relationship between corporate social performance, and organizational size, financial performance, and environmental performance: An empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 17 (2), 195-204.
[247]Stanwick, P.A., Stanwick, S.D. (1998). The relationship between corporate social performance, and organizational size, financial performance, and environmental performance: An empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics ,17(2): 195–204.
[248]Stendardi, E.(1992). Corporate philanthropy: The redefinition of enlighten self-nterest.The Social Science Journal, 29, 1, 21-30.
[249]The Conference Board (1994). Corporate contributions, 1992. Report No. 1014 (January), The Conference Board, New York.
[250]Tian, L., & Estrin, S. (2007). Debt financing, soft budget constraints, and government ownership. Economics of Transition, 15(3), 461–481.
[251]Thorne, D., Ferrell, O.C., & Ferrell, L.(2003). Business and society: A strategic approach to corporate citizenship, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
[252]Ullman, A. A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of U.S. firms. Academy of Management Review, 10(3): 540-557.
[253]Useem, M. (1988). Market and institutional factors in corporate contributions’, California Management Review, 30(2), 77–88.
[254]Van Beurden, P., & Gössling, T. (2008). The worth of values – A literature review on the relation between corporate social and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, pp. 407–424.
[255]Van der Laan, G., Van, Ees. H., & Van, Witteloostuijn .A. (2008). Corporate social and financial performance: an extended stakeholder theory, and empirical test with accounting measures. Journal of Business Ethics, 79: 299-310.
[256]Van, Herpen. HWI., Pennings, JME., & Meulenberg, MTG. (2003). Consumers’ evaluation of socially responsible activities in retailing. Working paper. Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
[257]Varadarajan, P., R. & Menon, A. (1988). Cause-related marketing: A coaligmnent of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy. Joumal of Marketing , 52, 58-74.
[258]Vernon, R. (1998). In the Hurricane’s Eye: The troubled prospects of multinational enterprises. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
[259]Vidaver-Cohen, D., & Altman, B. W. (2000). Corporate citizenship in the new millennium: Foundation for an architecture of excellence. Business and Society Review 105(1), 145–168.
[260]Vogl, A. J. ( 2003). Does it pay to be good?’, Across the Board 40(1), 16–23.
[261]Waddock, S.A., & Graves, S.B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18:4, 303–319.
[262]Waddock, S. A, & Graves, S.B. (1997a). Quality of management and quality of stakeholder relations: Are they synonymous? Business & Society, 36 (3): 250-279.
[263]Walker Information and Council on Foundations. (2002). National benchmark study: Measuring the business value of corporate philanthropy.
[264]Wang, J. & Coffey, B.S. (1992). Board composition and corporate contributions . Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 771–778.
[265]Wang, H., & Qian, C. (2011). Corporate philanthropy and financial performance of Chinese firms: The roles of social expectations and political access. Academy of Management Journal, 54 (6):1159-1181.
[266]Wang, Q., Wong, T. J., & Xia, L. (2008). State ownership, institutional environment and auditor choice: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 46(1), 112–134.
[267]Wartick, S. L., & Cochran, P. L. (1985). The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 10, 758-769.
[268]Wartick, S. L., & Wood, D.J. (1998). International Business and Society. Malden: Blackwell Publishers Ind.
[269]Weiss, L. W. (1969). Advertising, profits, and corporate taxes, flevieiv of Economics and Statis- tics, 51: 421-429.
[270]Wernerfelt, B., & C. Montgomery. (1988). TQ and the importance of focus in firm performance, American Economic Review, 78(1), 246–250.
[271]Whitley, R. ( 1999). Divergent capitalisms: The social structuring and change of business systems (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
[272]Wokutch, R. E., & Spencer, B. A. (1987).Corporate saints and sinners: The effects of philanthropic and illegal activity on organizational performance, California Management Review,29(2), 62–77.
[273]Wood, D. J., & Logsdon, J. M. (2002). Business citizenship: From individuals to organizations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12: 59–94.
[274]Wood, D. J., & Jones, R. E. (1995). Stakeholder mismatching: A theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3(3), 229-267.
[275]Xiao, J.Z., Dahya, J., & Lin, Z. (2004). A grounded theory exposition of the role of the supervisory board in China. British Journal of Management, 15, 39–55.
[276]Zucker & Lynne, G.(1987). Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13: 443-464.