臺灣觀光休閒企業社會責任之研究__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

論文基本資料
摘要
外文摘要
參考文獻

題名：	臺灣觀光休閒企業社會責任之研究
作者：	陳彰文
作者(外文)：	Chang-wen Chen
校院名稱：	南華大學
系所名稱：	企業管理系管理科學碩博士班
指導教授：	黃國忠
學位類別：	博士
出版日期：	2013
主題關鍵詞：	財務績效；社會績效；企業實務；企業社會責任；永續經營；Financial Performance；Corporate Practice；Corporate Social Responsibility；Sustainable Business；Social Performance
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:0 點閱:114

　　本文提出當今企業經營理念與目標應有社會實務與經濟實務，除了考量傳統的財務績效外，亦應嚴肅考慮社會績效的表現，讓兩者融入其中、相互爲用，以成就永續經營理念。本文引入多位學者理念，加入研究心得，提出永續企業實務理論架構，描述社會績效與財務績效的相互關係，並在控制相關的營運變數下，以多重財務績效指標，應用三階段最小平方統計方法(3SLS)，期望建構出不偏性、一致性及有效性的實證模式，以便得到較爲可靠的結果，提供相關利害關係人行為的依據。除了運用企業營運資料進行實證外，亦透過觀光休閒企業社會責任消費者認知與反應問卷分析結果，與企業營運資料實證做雙向印證研究，以探尋建立永續企業實務內涵的可靠信息。實證結果由差異分析知不同公司價值與社會績效的企業，其多項營運變量有顯著性差異；再由3SLS實證得知，多項營運變量對於社會績效與財務績效有顯著性的影響。社會績效則在多重的財務指標中，均顯著正向影響財務績效的表現，此點提供投資人良好的投資訊息，更有利於社會責任的推動。而財務績效亦正向影響社會績效，顯示良好財務績效有助於企業社會實務的推動。最後由消費者問卷結果分析，更強化社會績效與財務績效的關係，其間互動有如太極圖，陰陽相生，永續不已，於此帶來了建構永續企業實務模型強力的基石與信心。

以文找文

　　In modern business management, both social and economic practices should be provided in assessing performance of managerial goals of enterprises. It means that, if the sustainable management is achieved, the enterprises should consider not only traditional financial performance but also social performance. Based on a lot of previous studies, this research proposes a sustainable business model which describes the interaction of social performance and financial performance. By controlling the designated managerial variables, a three-stage least squares method (3SLS) with the multiple financial performance indicators is expected to construct an unbias, consistent and valid model. Both data from sampled enterprises and questionnaire survey of consumers are utilized to carry out this empirical study. Significant differences are found in managerial variables among the enterprises with different corporate value and social performance. In the analysis of 3SLS method, it is shown that managerial variables have a significant influence on social performance and financial performance. Furthermore, there is a positive correlation of social performance and financial performance, which provides appropriate investing information to investors and is beneficial to the implication of corporate social responsibility. In addition, according to the analysis of questionnaire survey, a stronger evidence also is obtained to show a strong correlation of social performance and financial performance. Overall, it could be concluded that the results of this study provide a solid basis for constructing a practical model for sustainable business management.

以文找文

一、中文部份
　
1.林少斌(民 93)，企業特徵、創業精神、組織績效、董監事職能之研究，中華大學科管所博士論文，未出版，新竹市。 new window

　
2.林傑斌、林川雄、劉明德(民 94)，統計建模與分析程序，初版，台北：文魁資訊。
　
3.吳萬益、林清河(民 89)，企業研究方法，初版，台北：華泰書局。
　
4.黃靖萱、許癸鎣、李昆昇(民 96)，天下企業公民 TOP 50，天下雜誌，367期，118-127。
　
5.張紹勳、張紹評、林秀娟(民 89)，統計分析-初等統計與高等統計，第四版，台北：松崗圖書。
　
6.俞海琴、周本顎(民 83)，台灣地區上市公司董監事、關係人持股比率和公司托賓Q關係之研究，管理評論，第十三卷第一期，79-98頁。 new window

　
7.陳順宇(民 89)，迴歸分析，第三版，台北：華泰書局。
　
8.康峰菁(民 92)，企業社會責任、財務績效與盈餘管理之國際實證研究，國立臺北大學合作經濟學系研究所博士論文，未出版，台北市。
　
9.廖秀梅(民93)，董事會結構特性與公司績效關係之研究-探討台灣家族探制企業因素的影響，國立臺北大學會研所博士論文，未出版，台北市。 new window

　
二、英文部份
　
1.Agrawal, A. & Mandelker, G. N. (1987), Managerial Incentives and Corporative Investment and Financing Decisions, Journal of Finance, Vol.42, No.4, pp.823-837.
　
2.Alexander, G. J. & Buchholz, R. A. (1978), Corporate Social Responsibility and Stock Market Performance, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.21, pp.479-486.
　
3.Anderson, J. C. & Frankle, A. W. (1980), Voluntary Social Reporting: An Iso-Beta Portfolio analysis, Accounting Review, Vol.55, No.3, pp.467-479.
　
4.Aupperle, K. E., Caroll, A. B. & Hatfield, J. D. (1985), An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Corporte Social Responsibility and Profitability, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.28, No.2, pp.446-463.
　
5.Balabanis, G., Philips, H. C. & Lyall, J. (1998), Corporate Social Responsibility and Economic Performance in the Top British Companies: Are They Linked?, European Business Review , Vol.98, No.1, pp.25–42.
　
6.Beurden, P. V. & Gossling, T. (2008), The Worth of Values- A Literature Review on the Relation Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.82, No.2, pp.407-424.
　
7.Blacconiere, W. G. & Patten, D. M. (1994), Environmental Disclosures, Regulatory Costs, and Changes in Firm Value, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol.18, No.3, pp.357-377.
　
8.Brammer, S., Brooks, C. & Pavelin, S. (2006), Corporate Social Performance and Stock Returns UK Evidence from Disaggregate Measures, Financial Management, Vol.35, No.3, pp.97-116.
　
9.Brooks, L. J. (1997), Business Ethics in Canada: Distinctiveness and Directions , Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.16, pp.591-604.
　
10.Brenton, S. & Hacken, L. T. (2006), Ethical Consumerism: Are Unethical Labour Practices Important to Consumers?, Journal of Research for Consumers, Vol.11, pp.1-4
　
11.Carter, C. R. (2000), Purchasing Social Responsibility and Firm Performance: The key mediating roles of organizational learning and supplier performance, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol.35, No.3/4, pp.177-194.
　
12.Cacioppe, R., Forster, N. & Fox, M. (2007), A Survey of Managers’ Perceptions of Corporate Ethics and Social Responsibility and Actions that may Affect Companies’ Success, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.82, No.3, pp.681-700.
　
13.Carroll, A. B. (1979), A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance, Academy of Management Review, Vol.4, No.4, pp.497-505.
　
14.Cho, M. H. (1998), Ownership structure, investment, and the corporate value: an empirical analysis, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.47, No.1, pp.103-121.
　
15.Chaganti, R. & Damanpour, R. (1991), Institutional Ownership, Capital Structure, and Firm Performance, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.12, pp.479-491
　
16.Chen, M. S. & Chen, C. C. (1998), Theoretical Framework Linking Resource Maintenance and Environmental Protection, Environment & Ecology, Vol.16, No.2, pp.324-333
　
17.Cornell, B. & Shapiro, A. C. (1987), Corporate Stakeholder and Corporate Finance, Financial Management, Vol.16, No.1, pp.5-14.
　
18.Crutchley, C. E. & Hansen, R. S. (1989), A Test of the Agency Theory of Managerial Ownership, Corporate Leverage, and Corporate Dividends, Financial Management, Vol.18, No.4, pp.36-46.
　
19.Davis, K. (1973), The Case for and against Business Assumption of Social Responsibilities, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.16, pp.312-322.
　
20. Demsetz, H. & Lehn, K. (1985), The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences, Journal of Political Economy, Vol.93, No.6, pp.1155-1177.
　
21.Demsetz, H. (1983), The Structure of Ownership and the Theory of the Firm, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol.26, No.2, pp.375-390.
　
22.Donladson, T. & Preston, L. E. (1995), The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence and implications, Academy of Management Review, Vol.3, pp.467-473.
　
23.Donker,H., Poff, D. & Zahir, S. (2008), Corporate Values, Codes of Ethics, and Firm Performance- A Look at the Canadian Context, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.82, No.3, pp.527-537.
　
24.Dowell, G., Hart, S. & Yeung, B. (2000), Do Corporate Global Environment Standards Create or Destroy Market Value?, Management Science, Vol.46, No.8, pp.1059-1074.
　
25.Eviews.com (1998), Eviews User’s Guide(2nd), Irvine CA: Quantitative Micro Software.
　
26.Fassin, Y. (2009), The Stakeholder Model Refined, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.84, No.1, pp.113-135.
　
27.Fama, E. F. (1980), Agency Problems and Theory of the Firm, Journal of Political Economy, Vol.88, No.2, pp.288-307.
　
28.Freedman, M. & Stagliano, A. J. (1991), Differences in Social-Cost Disclosures: A Market Test of Investor Reactions, Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol.4, No.1, pp.68–83.
　
29.Freeman, E. (2003), Lecture–Stakeholder Management Revisited: What’s the State of the Atr?, Leuven, 20 November.
　
30.Frederick, W. C. (1987), The growing concern over business responsibility, California Management Review, Vol.2, No.4, pp.54-61.
　
31.Friedman, M. (1970), The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits, New York Times Magazine, September 13, pp.122-126.
　
32.Goll, I. & Rasheed, A. A. (2004), The Moderating Effect of Environmental Munificence and Dynamism on the Relationship between Discretionary Social Responsibility and Firm Performance, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.49, No.1, pp.41-54.
　
33.Graves, S. B. & Waddock, S. A. (1994), Institutional owners and corporate social performance, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.37, No.4, pp.1034–1046.
　
34.Graves, S. B. & Waddock, S. A. (1999), A Look at the Financial-Social Performance Nexus When Quality of Management is Held Constant, International Journal of Value-Based Management, Vol.12, No.1, pp.87–99.
　
35.Graff, H. J., Musters, C. J. M. & Keurs, W. J. (1996), Sustainable Development: Looking for New Strategies, Ecological Economics, Vol.16, pp.205-216.
　
36.Hart, S. L.& Ahuja, G. (1996), Does It Pay to be Green? An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Emission Reduction and Firm Performance, Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol.5, No.1, pp.30-37.
　
37.He, Y., Tian, Z. & Chen, Y. (2007), Performance Implications of Nonmarket Strategy in China, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Vol.24, No.2, pp.151-169.
　
38.Herremans, I. M., Akathaporn, P. & McInnes, M. (1993), An Investigation of Corporate Social Responsibility Reputation and Economic Performance, Accounting Organizations and Society, Vol.8, No.7/8, pp.587–604.
　
39. Hofstede, G. & Hofstede, J. G. (2005), Culture and organizations: Software of the mind, New York: McGraw-Hill.
　
40.Huang, K. C. and Chen, C. W. (2012), Impact of shareholding structure on the relationship of social-financial performance: Evidence from Taiwan, African Journal of Business Management, Vol.6, No.27, pp.8080-8087.
　
41.Jamali, D., Sidani, Y. & El-Asmar, K. (2008), A three Country Comparative Analysis of Managerial CSR perspectives: Insights From Lebanon, Syria and Jordan, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.85, No.2, pp.173-192.
　
42.Jensen, G. R., Solberg, D. P. & Zorn, T. S. (1992), Simultaneous Determination of Insider Ownership, Debt, and Dividend Policies, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol.27, No.2, pp.247-263.
　
43.Jensen, M. C. & Meckling, W. H. (1976), Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.3, No.4, pp.305-360.
　
44.Jones, T. M. (1995), Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics, Academy of Management Review, Vol.20, No.2, pp.404-437.
　
45.Judge, W. Q. & Douglas, T. J. (1998), Performance Implications of Incorporating Natural Environmental Issues into the Strategic Planning Process: An Empirical Assessment, Journal of Management Studies, Vol.35, No.2, pp.241-262.
　
46.Kumar, R., Lamb, W. B. & Wokutch, R. E. (2002), The End of South African Sanctions, Institutional Ownership, and the Stock Price Performance of Boycotted Firms, Business and Society, Vol.41, No.2, pp.133–165.
　
47.Lee, J. A., Soutar, G. N. & Sneddon, J. (2010), Personal Values and Social Marketing: Some Research Suggestions, Journal of Research for Consumers, Vol.18, pp.1-4.
　
48.Lindgreen, A., Swaen, V. & Johnston, W. J. (2009), Corporate Social Responsibility- An Empirical Investigation of U.S. Organizations, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.85, pp.303-323.
　
49.Luo, X. & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006), Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Satisfaction, and Market Value, Journal of Marketing, Vol.70, No1, pp.1-18.
　
50.Maon, F., lindgreen, A. & Swaen, V. (2009), Designing and implementing Corporate Social Responsibility: An integrative Framework grounded in Theory and practice, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.87, pp.71-89.
　
51.Maignan, I. & Ferrell, O. C. (2001), Corporate Citizenship as a Marketing Instrument : Concepts, Evidence, and Research Directions, European Journal of Marketing, Vol.35, No.3/4, pp.457-484.
　
52.McWilliams, A. & Siegel, D. (2001), Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective, Academy of Management Review, Vol.26, No.1, pp.117-127.
　
53.McWilliams, A. & Siegel, D. (2000), Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification?, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.21, No.5, pp.603-609.
　
54.McConnell, J. J. & Servaes, H. (1990), Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.27, No.2, pp.595-612.
　
55.Modic,S. J. (1988), Movers and Shakers, Industry Week, Vol.236, No.2, pp.47-52.
　
56.Morck, R., Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. W. (1988), Management Ownership and Market Valuation, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.20, pp.293-315.
　
57.Moore, G. (2001), Corporate Social and Financial Performance: An Investigation in the U.K. Supermarket Industry, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.34, No.3/4, pp.299-315.
　
58.Okamoto, D. (2009), Social Relationship of a Firm and the CSP–CFP Relationship in Japan:Using Artificial Neural Networks, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.87, pp.117-132.
　
59.Orlitzky M., & Benjamin, J. D. (2001), Corporate Social Performance and Firm Risk: A Meta-Analytic Review, Business and Society, Vol.40, No.4, pp.369-396.
　
60.Orlitzky, M. (2001), Does Firm Size Confound the Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Firm Financial Performance?, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.33, No.2, pp.167-180.
　
61.Pava, M. L. & Krausz, J. (1996), The Association Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Paradox of Social Cost, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.15, No.3, pp.321-357.
　
62.Peinado-Vara, E. (2006), Corporate Social Responsibility in Latin America, The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, Vol.21, No.1, pp.61–69.
　
63.Pound, J. (1988), Proxy Contests and the Efficiency of Shareholders Oversight, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.20, pp.237-265.
　
64.Posner B. Z. & Schmidt W. H. (1992), Values and the American Manager: An Update Updated, California Management Review, Vol.34, No.3, pp.80-94.
　
65.Preston, L. E., & O’bannon, D. P. (1997), The Corporate Social-Financial Performance Relationship:A Typology and Analysis, Business and Society, Vol.36, No.4, pp.419-429.
　
66.Quazi, A. & O’Brien, D. (2000), An Empirical Test of a Cross – National Model of Corporate Social Responsibility, Journal of Busness Ethics, Vol.25, pp.33-51.
　
67.Ramasamy, B. & Yeung, M. (2009), Chinese Consumers’ Perception of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.88, No.1, pp.119-132.
　
68.Royne, M. B., Levy, M & Martinez, J. (2011), The Public Health Implications of Consumers'' Environmental Concern and Their Willingness to Pay for an Eco‐Friendly Product, Journal of Consumer Affairs, Vol.45, No.2, pp.329-343.
　
69.Ruf, B. M., Muralidhar, K., Brown, R. M., Janney, J. J. & Paul, K. (2001), An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between Change in Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: A Stakeholder Theory Perspective, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.32, No.2, pp.143–156.
　
70.Schnietz, K. E. & Epstein, M. J. (2005), Exploring Financial Value of a Reputation for Corporate Social Responsibility During a Crisis, Corporate Reputation Review, Vol.7, No.4, pp.327-345.
　
71.Schuler, D. A. & Cording, M. (2006), A Corporate Social Performance-Corporate Financial Performance Behavioral Model for Consumers, Academy of Management Review, Vol.31, No.3, pp.540-558.
　
72.Schnietz, K. E. & Epstein, M. J. (2005), Exploring Financial Value of a Reputation for Corporate Social Responsibility During a Crisis, Corporate Reputation Review, Vol.7, No.4, pp.327-345.
　
73.Seifert, B., Morris, S. A. & Bartkus, B. R. (2004), Having, Giving, and Getting: Slack Resources, Corporate Philanthropy, and Firm Financial Performance, Business and Society, Vol.43, No.2, pp.135-161.
　
74.Sen, A. (1997), Economics, Business Principles and Moral Sentiments, Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol.7, No.3, pp.5-15.
　
75.Simpson, W. G. & Kohers, T. (2002), The Link between Corporate Social and Financial Performance：Evidence from the Banking Industry, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.35, No.2, pp.97-109.
　
76.Sotorrio, L. L. & Sanchez, J. L. F. (2008), Corporate Social Responsibility of the Most Highly Reputed European and North American Firms, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.82, No.2, pp.379-390.
　
77.Spicer, B. H. (1978), Investors, Corporate Social Performance and Information Disclosure: An Empirical Study, Accounting Review, Vol.53, No.1, pp.94-111.
　
78.Stanwick, P. A. & Stanwick, S. D. (1998), The Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Organizational size, Financial Performance, and Environment Performance: An Empirical Examination, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.17, No.2, pp.195-204.
　
79.Swanson, D. L. (1995), Addressing a theoretical problem by reorienting the corporate social performance model, Academy of Management Review, Vol.20, No.1, pp.43-64.
　
80.Titman, S. & Wessels, R. (1988), The Determinants of Capital Structure Choice, The Journal Of Finance ,Vol.17, No.1, pp.1-20.
　
81.Ullmann, A. A. (1985), Data in Search of a Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationships among Social Performance, Social Disclosure, and Economic Performance of U.S. Firms, Academy of Management Review, Vol.10, No.3, pp.540-557.
　
82.Vance, S. C. (1975), Are Socially Responsible Corporations Good Investment Risk?, Management Review, Vol.64, No.8, pp.18-24.
　
83.Waddock, S. A. & Graves, S. B. (1997), The corporate social performance - financial performance link, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.18, pp.303-319.
　
84.Wahba,H. (2008), Does the market value corporate environmental responsibility-An empirical examination, Corporate social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Vol.15, pp.89-99.
　
85.Weidenbaum, M. & Vogt, S. (1987), Takeovers and Stockholders: Winners and Losers, California Management Review, Vol.29, No.4, pp.157-168.
　
86.Williams, G. & Zinkin, J. (2008), The effect of culture on consumers’ willingness to punish irresponsible corporate behaviour: Applying Hofstede’s typology to the punishment aspect of Corporate Social Responsibility, Business Ethics:A European Review, Vol.17, No.2, pp.210-226
　
87.Wood, D. J. (1991), Social Issues in Management: Theory and Research in Corporate Social Performance, Journal of Management, Vol.17, No.2, pp.383-406.
　
88.Wright, P., Ferris, S. P., Sarin, A. & Awasthi, V. (1996), Impact of Corporate Insider, Blockholder , and Institutional Equity Ownership on Firm Risk Taking, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.39, No.2, pp.441-463.
　
89.Wu, M. (2006), Corporate Social Performance, Corporate Financial Performance, and Firm Size: A Meta-Analysis, Journal of American Academy of Business, Vol.8, No.1, pp.163-171.
　
90.Zu, L. & Song, L. (2009), Determinants of Managerial Values on Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from China, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.88, No.1, pp.105-117

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	企業社會責任與公司財務績效的關係--公司聲譽的中介效果
2.	Does State Ownership Hinder the Positive Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Financial Performance and Stock Prices? Evidence from China
3.	創新或過度投資？過度自信經理人從事企業社會責任活動對公司經營績效的影響
4.	若即若離？探索TSSCI商管社群網絡結構及知識活動--編輯群重疊的策略觀點
5.	Does CSR Materiality Affect Financial Performance in Taiwan?
6.	董監事多元化與企業價值之關聯性
7.	庫藏股買回決策與資金成本相關變數之研究
8.	企業社會責任履行、媒體監督與財務績效研究--基於A股重污染行業的經驗數據
9.	The Impact of Media Reputation on Stock Market and Financial Performance of Corporate Social Responsibility Winner
10.	碳績效與財務績效
11.	臺灣與美國職業運動公益活動之比較
12.	家族企業對董監事暨重要職員責任保險之需求分析
13.	臺灣銀行業企業社會責任與財務績效
14.	財務績效、公司稅與企業社會責任揭露
15.	董事會結構與創新活動之關聯性研究--以資訊電子業為例

1.	財務金融研究
2.	企業社會責任是否影響企業財務績效？以泰國製造業為例
3.	組織認同對組織績效與成員行為跨層次分析
4.	生產力與技術效率之研究—台灣資訊服務業與農業之驗證
5.	企業國有化、國際化及慈善行為與財務績效之關係研究-以中國上市公司為例
6.	國民中學校長職能模型建構之研究
7.	政府股權對公司治理與企業績效之影響
8.	企業接班人選擇與公司治理、社會責任與財務績效間系統動態關係之研究
9.	重大金融事件對會計資訊攸關性的影響
10.	從核心代理問題的角度探討股權結構，董事會特性對公司價值及盈餘管理之影響
11.	合格境外機構投資人制度對投資/現金流量敏感度之影響
12.	董事會之獨立、專業、參與對企業績效及風險之影響
13.	安全性、資訊不對稱、公司治理與外資持股偏好之關連性
14.	銀行經營績效：公司治理、資產規模與外資進入
15.	董事與監察人對員工分紅配股之影響：以上市電子業為例

無相關書籍

無相關著作

1.	企業風險管理
2.	服務行銷與管理：企業創造價值的過程
3.	企業倫理
4.	社會工作倫理
5.	海洋保育行動與文化產業之建構初探
6.	綠色社會責任與營運效率：日月潭國家風景區民宿業之研究
7.	以企業社會責任觀點推展高科技物業的室內空氣品質管理
8.	四重溪溫泉區經營策略指標建構與分析
9.	臺灣博物館網際網路應用與目標公眾關係建立研究
10.	「幸福保衛站」政策創新之探究
11.	由優質企業視角論兩岸企業社會責任法制化
12.	企業社會責任可提升銀行經營績效嗎？--隨機邊界法之應用
13.	臺灣企業環境責任觀念架構之建構--以資訊科技產業領導廠商為例
14.	由德國員工參與法制探討我國員工獎勵制度的相關法律問題--以公司法為中心
15.	所有權性質、治理環境與企業社會責任信息披露的經濟後果：基於分析師盈利預測的研究視角

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫