:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:專題導向學習對技術型高中專題製作課程學習成效之研究
作者:楊孟山
作者(外文):YANG, MENG-SHAN
校院名稱:國立臺北科技大學
系所名稱:技術及職業教育研究所
指導教授:林宜玄
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2019
主題關鍵詞:技術型高中專題導向學習專題製作課程學習成效Vocational High SchoolProject-Based LearningProject CourseLearning Outcomes
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:2
本研究旨在探討專題導向學習對專題製作課程學習成效的影響。研究對象選擇北部一所技術型高中電機電子群三年級學生,包括控制組15人,實驗組16人,實驗組(班) 採用專題導向學習教學策略,控制組(班)採傳統學習教學策略。教學前對學生基礎能力、學習風格、問題解決能力與問題解決態度實施前測,實施教學後對學生學習成就、問題解決能力及問題解決態度進行後測,學生實作作品由教師進行評量。最後根據所得數據分析結果並提出建議。
研究結果經平均數、標準差、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子共變數分析、二因子變異數分析、成對樣本t檢定等統計方法處理分析,得到的研究結論如下:
一、專題導向學習教學策略的學生在專題製作課程實作作品學習成效上明顯高於傳統講述教學模式的學生。同時,專題導向學習教學策略對學生的問題解決的態度影響較大。
二、使用不同教學策略在專題製作課程學習成就上未達顯著差異,與學習者的學習風格關係不明顯。但進一步檢驗發現,擴散型學習風格的學生之學習成就顯著優於同化型學習風格的學生。
三、接受不同教學策略而學習風格不同的學生與學習成效之間不具有交互作用。
四、實驗組與控制組學生在接受不同教學策略後,其問題解決態度有顯著差異。問題解決能力部分分項也有顯著差異。
整體而言,本文提出的專題導向學習教學策略應用於專題製作課程之研究,實驗結果證實可以對技術型高中學生之實作作品帶來顯著學習成效。因此建議可推廣於相關課程。另外,未來研究可以國中或高中學生做為研究對象,以驗證其研究結果是否可推論應用到不同學制的學生。
The study aims to explore the impact of project-based learning on the learning outcomes of the project course. The research subjects selected a third-grade electronic group' student of a vocational high school in the north of Taiwan, including 15 control groups and 16 experimental groups. The experimental group (class) adopted a project-based learning teaching strategy, and the control group (class) adopted a traditional learning teaching strategy. Before the teaching, the pre-testing of the students' basic ability, learning style, problem-solving ability and problem-solving attitude is carried out. After the implementation of the teaching, the student's learning achievement, problem-solving ability and problem-solving attitude are post-tested, and the student's project are evaluated by the teacher. Finally, based on the data obtained, the results are analyzed and recommendations are made. The results of the study were analyzed by statistical methods such as mean, standard deviation, independent sample t-test, ANCOVA, two-way ANOVA, and paired sample t-test. The conclusions of the study are as follows:
1.The students of the project-based learning teaching strategy are significantly better than the traditional students who teach the teaching mode in the production of the project course. At the same time, the project-based learning teaching strategy has a greater impact on students' problem-solving attitudes.
2.The use of different teaching strategies did not reach significant differences in the learning achievements of the project course, and the relationship with the learners' learning styles was not obvious. However, further tests found that students with diverger learning styles achieved significantly better the production than students with assimilator learning styles.
3.There is no interaction between students with different learning strategies and different learning styles and learning outcomes.
4.After the students of the experimental group and the control group received different teaching strategies, their problem-solving attitudes were significantly different. There are also significant differences in the sub-items of problem-solving capabilities.
On the whole, the project-based learning teaching strategy proposed in this paper is applied to the research of the project course. The experimental results prove that it can bring significant learning outcomes to the production of vocational high school students. Therefore, the recommendations can be promoted to relevant courses. In addition, future research can be conducted by middle school or high school students to verify whether their research results can be inferred to students of different academic systems.
壹、中文部份
王文科(2002)。教育研究法 (增訂七版)。臺北: 五南。
王文中、呂金燮、吳毓瑩、張郁雯、張淑慧 (2008)。教育測驗與評量-教室學習的觀點。臺北: 五南。
王裕方(1998)。電腦態度與學習績效的影響因素探討-中學生網頁製作教學的實地實驗研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學,桃園市。
王琇葉(2007)。STS教學模式配合問題解決教學歷程融入國小一年級生活課程對學童問題解決能力及科學態度之影響研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹市。
王萬清(1987)。電腦補助問題解決課程對兒童問題解決能力及程序思考能力之影響。(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,臺北市。
王秀鶯(2014)。概念構圖融入專題式學習對不同學習風格學生學習成效之影響(未出版博士論文)。國立臺南大學,台南市。
于富雲(2001)。從理論基礎探究合作學習的教學效益。教育資料與研究,38,22-28。
田耐青(2002)。統整多元智慧與學習風格: 把每位學生帶上來。臺北市: 遠流。
田振榮、胡茹萍(2006)。建構高職各學群專業能力指標之研究。教育部委託專案報告。國立臺灣師範大學技術職業教育研究中心:臺北。
朱益賢(2008)。從社會環境成份探討學生的實作技能與科技創造力—透過科技競賽策略。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(NSC95-2511-S-003-021-MY3)。
朱錦鳳(2005)。問題解決創造力測驗指導手冊。臺北:心理。
呂金燮(1999)。實作評量-理論。教育測驗與評量:教室學習觀點。臺北: 五南。
呂素雯(2002)。自然科創造性問題解決教學對國小六年級學童問題解決能力、態度及學習成就之影響研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北師範學院,臺北。
吳百薰(1998)。國小學生學習風格相關因素之研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立台中師範學院,臺中市。
吳明隆(2011)。SPSS統計應用學習實務:問卷分析與應用統計。新北市: 易習。
吳清山(2012)。差異化教學與學生學習。 國家教育研究院電子報,第38期。取自http://epaper.naer.edu.tw/index.php?edm_no=134。
吳清山、林天祐(1997)。實作評量、卷宗評量、真實評量。教育資料與研究,15,68-70。
吳國雄(2006)。認知型態對職業學校工業類科學生問題解決態度與邏輯思考能力之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
吳宗霖(2007)。運用專題導向學習策略與無所不在學習環境於國小六年級生態環境教育之行動研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學,屏東市。
吳秀娟(2007)。主題統整教學對國小學童創造力、問題解決能力及學業成就的影響之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,臺北市。
吳承瑋(2010)。問題導向學習運用於國中生活科技問題解決能力之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
李金泉(2001)。非同步網路輔助教學系統之研究-以技職院校工業安全課程為例(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
李堅萍(2006)。工藝技能學習成效與自我效能之相關性研究。藝術教育研究,12,39-64。
李淑媛(1995)。高一學生問題解決態度、生涯不確定源與生涯決定狀態之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
李慶森(2009)。專題導向學習應用於國小高年級社會學習領域之行動研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
李坤崇(2006)。教學評量。臺北:心理。
岳修平、鐘婉莉(2005)。專題式學習小組網路溝通互動之研究。教育學刊, (25), 1-23.
周家卉(2008)。實作評量在生活科技課程實施之探討。生活科技教育月刊,41(7),51-83。
周江賜(2010)。網路合作學習應用於數位教學平台之教學之研究-以高職數位邏輯實習課程為例(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
林清山(2003)。心理與教育統計學。臺北:東華。
林傳生(1992)。新教學理論與策略。臺北:五南。
林進材(2004)。教學原理。臺北: 五南。
林廷華(1999)。創造性問題解決教學方案對幼兒創造力,問題解決能力之影響。正修學報, (12), 175-196。
林炎旦 (2000)。職業類科教學方法。載於江文雄(主編),職業類科教材教法,260-263。臺北市:師大書苑。
林榮聰(2000)。設計科系學生學習態度之探討(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣科技大學,臺北市。
林錫昭(2004)。非同步網路合作學習對家電實習與電儀表實驗學習成效之影響(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
林建輝(2008)。高職電資群教師專題製作課程教學問題之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
林坤誼、游光昭、洪國峰(2011)。操作技能對思考與實作表現影響之研究. 課程與教學, 14(4), 161-185.
邱貴發 (1992)。電腦輔助教學成效探討。視聽教育,33 (5),11-18。
邱皓政(2004)。結構方程模式。臺北:雙葉。
洪榮昭(1999)。試析科技創作力。國際科技教育整合思考研討會。國立臺東師範學院,臺東。
洪榮昭(2001)。PBL教學策略。技術及職業教育雙月刊,61,10-12。
洪榮昭(2005)。E-learning的發展與運用。台灣教育,631,2-10。
洪榮昭、林展立(2006)。問題導向學習課程發展理論與實務。臺北市:師大書苑。
洪詠善(2016)。從十二年國教課程綱要探討音樂教學之特色與實踐。國教新知,63(2), 3-18。
洪蘭(1997)。心理學(上)(下)。Gleitman著。臺北:遠流。
胡博閔(2010)。數位遊戲學習對學童創造力與實作技能影響之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
柯麗卿(2004)。國中資優生獨立研究與學習風格的關係及獨立研究學習成效相關因素之研究。資優教育研究,4(2),43-64。
韋金龍(1996)。國內大專學生對「合作學習」英語教學活動的看法。教育研究資訊,4(6),13~25。
袁振君(2010)。國外高等工程教育課程研究對我國的啟示。中國電力教育,24,105-107。
夏征農(1992)。辭海。臺北:東華。
曹美惠(2008)。國中國文科實施合作學習之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,臺北市。
張永福(2008)。實作評量的特性及其理論基礎。研究資訊,25(3),79-82。
張玉山、許雅婷(2008)。以問題解決為基礎的科技教學活動設計—以創意機器人研習為例。研習資訊,25(3),61-70。
張玉山、游光昭、蕭佩如(2010)。科技教學評量策略之規劃研究-以水陸兩用車活動為例。工業科技教育學刊,3,53-60。
張志豪(2000)。高中生活科技課程創造思考教學對學生學習成效之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
張芳全(1997)。教學的新典範─合作學習。國教月刊,44(3),7-16。
張金淑(1990)。合作學習對學習效果之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
張春興(1991)。現代心理學。臺北市:東華。
張春興(2001)。教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北市:東華。
張春興(2007)。張氏心理學辭典 (重訂版). 臺北市: 東華。
張麗麗(2002)。評量改革的應許之地,虛幻或真實?談實作評量之作業與表現規準。教育研究,93,76-86。
張俊彥、翁玉華(2000)。我國高一學生的問題解決能力與其科學過程技能之相關性研究。科學教育學刊,8(1),35-55。
莊謙本(1998)。技能評量的內在與外在因素。教學科技與媒體,42,38-42。
教育部(1986)。工業職業學校電機電子群課程標準暨設備標準。臺北市:正中。
教育部(1998)。職業學校各類科課程標準總綱。臺北市:教育部。
教育部(2003)。技術及職業教育百科全書:1技職教育通論。臺北市:教育部。
教育部(2016)。國民及學前教育署補助試辦國民中小學自造教育示範中心作業要點,檢自:http://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/NewsContent.aspx?id=4036
教育部 (2017)。高級中等學校課程實務工作手冊,2017年12月10日,臺北市:教育部。取自http://web.ylsh.ilc.edu.tw/hscd/node/39
教育大辭書編纂委員會(2000)。教育大辭書。臺北市:國立編譯館。
科技部 (2015)。行政院科技部工程司自動化學門規劃書,2018年2月1日,臺北市:科技部。取自http://140.127.114.67/2015%E7%A7%91%E6%8A%80%E9%83%A8%E5%B7%A5%E7%A8%8B%E5%8F%B8%E8%87%AA%E5%8B%95%E5%8C%96%E5%AD%B8%E9%96%80%E8%A6%8F%E5%8A%83%E6%9B%B8.pdf
科技部 (2018)。科教國合司107年度專題研究計畫學門規劃重點研究項目,2018年2月1日,臺北市:科技部。取自https://www.most.gov.tw/sci/ch/detail?article_uid=fe08179d-dc9b-4505-abe5-3d0ae7471ed3&menu_id=2b1505b5-0697-11e5-9a55-b8ac6f2d65c0&content_type=P&view_mode=listView
郭國禎、駱芳美(2004)。教師與教學評量-形成性評量與總結性評量的整合與運用。教育研究,127,85-92。
郭生玉(1989)。心理與教育測驗。臺北: 精華。
郭生玉(2001)。心理與教育研究法。臺北: 精華。
鄒慧英(2000)。另類的統整主題教學—專題學習。國教之友,52,3-11。
彭森明(1996)。實作評量(Performance Assessment)理論與實際。教育資料與研究,9,44-48。
彭森明(2006)。 學習成就評量的多元功能及其相應研究設計。教育研究與發展期刊, 2(4),21-37。
彭國勝(2012)。高職機械群學生專題製作課程學習態度與學習困擾之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北科技大學,臺北市。
葉玉珠(2005)。科技創造力測驗: 指導手冊。臺北市,心理。
葉安琦(2000)。促進國小學童創造性問題解決能力的個案研究-發展問題表徵(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
陳美芳(1994)。學生因素與題目因素對國小高年級兒童乘除法應用問題解題影響之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學教育,臺北市。
陳鎰斌(2008)。高職學校電子科專題製作課程實施探討。臺北市第 9 屆中小學及幼稚園教育專業創新及行動研究論文集。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
陳易芬、林鎂惠(2009)。國小高年級學童學習思考風格量表之編制。國立臺中教育大學測驗統計年刊,17(2),55-75。
陳瓊森(1996)。國中理化教師教育實習與教學能力檢定之研究:合作學習與歷程檔案方案。行政國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告。
陳英豪、吳裕益(1992)。測驗與評量。高雄:復文。
游光昭、林坤誼、洪國峰(2010)。從反思與實踐看國中生在科技實作活動中的學習歷程表現。課程與教學,13(3),219-250。
游姮茹(2005)。心智圖法提升創造性問題解決能力之探究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
黃政傑、林佩璇(1996)。合作學習。臺北:五南。
黃政傑、吳俊憲(2006)。合作學習:發展與實踐。 臺北: 五南。
黃明信、徐新逸(2001)。國小實施網路專題式學習之成效與發展。研習資訊,18(6),29-43。
黃茂在、陳文典(2005)。問題解決的能力。收錄於教育部編印科學素養的內涵與分析。臺北:教育部
黃德芳(2007)。專題導導向學習在國小社會領域教學實施之行動研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
黃春金(2011)。探索教育活動對國小高年級學童的問題解決能力與態度之影響研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學,屏東市。
黃慧雯(2016)。〈手機感測器好多種 5分鐘搞懂原理〉,中時電子報,2016 年5月28日,取自:http://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20160528001322-260412。
楊朝祥(1984)。技術職業教育辭典。臺北:三民。
楊思偉(2002)。基本能力指標之建構與落實。教育研究月刊,96,17-22。
禚建茹(2014)。問題解決能力及形成影響因素之研究(未出版博士論文)。國立臺南大學,臺南市。
蔡志益(2012)。青少年問題解決與憂鬱之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺東大學,臺東縣。
詹秀美、吳武典(1991)。問題解決能力測驗手冊。臺北:心理。
詹秀美、吳武典(2007)。新編問題解決測驗。臺北:心理。
賓靜蓀、林韋萱、張益勤(2014)。動手做開啟真學習。親子天下,58,152-183。
廖年淼、劉玲慧(2012)高職 [專題製作] 職場導向教學-以觀察學習為例。科技與工程教育學刊, 45(2), 1-19。
劉澤宏(2009)。高職工業類科學生問題解決態度與能力評量工具發展之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
劉秀嫚(1998)。合作學習的教學策略。公民訓育學報,285-294。
鄭曜忠(2008)。建構主義取向網路學習對高中學生程式語言與邏輯學習成效影響之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
鄭芳怡、葉玉珠(2006)。兒童解釋形態、領域知識及創意生活經驗與科技創造力之關係。教育與心理研究,29(2),339-368。
鄭富元(2011)。E化專題導向學習融入國小五年級綜合活動學習領域之合作行動研究-以「校園生態池的水生植物」議題為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
鄭麗玉(1993)。認知心理學-理論與運用。臺北:五南。
鄭凱文(2007)。網路合作式創造性問題解決教學對會計學學習成效影響之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化。
鄭英耀、劉昆夏(2005)。創造性問題解決教學效果之研究-以國小自然科為例。國立彰化師範大學舉辦之「培養新世紀的國民」學術研討會論文集,彰化。
盧雪梅(1995)。實作評量的應許、難題和挑戰。教育論壇-實作評量與案卷評量,3-9,臺北:國立教育資料館。
駐洛杉磯辦事處教育組(2017)。專案導向學習和挑戰導向學習的差別。國家教育研究院國際教育訊息電子報,141。取自https://fepaper.naer.edu.tw/paper_view.php?edm_no=141&content_no=6839。
賴佳賢(1999)。重塑合作學習環境的群體支援系統。資訊與教育,72,77-86。
簡妙娟(2000)。高中公民科合作學習教學實驗之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
簡妙娟(2003)。合作學習理論與教學應用。載於張新仁〈主編〉,學習與教學新趨勢(406-436頁)。臺北市:心理。
戴文雄(1992)。高工學生認知型態與空間觀念對機械製圖學習成效之研究。高雄:復文。
顧炳宏、陳瓊森、溫媺純(2014)。以實作評量方式探討引導發現式教學模式之學習成效-以「聲音」概念為例。科學教育學刊,22(1),57-86。

貳、英文部份
Ahghar, G. (2012). Auto-regulation learning of high school students in Tehran. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 688-694.
Ainsworth, S., Wood, D., & O'Malley, C. (1998). There is more than one way to solve a problem: Evaluating a learning environment that supports the development of children's multiplication skills. Learning and Instruction, 8(2), 141-157.
Agassi, J. (1997). Thought, Action and Scientific Technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7(1-2), 33-48.
Albanese, M. (2000). Problem‐based learning: why curricula are likely to show little effect on knowledge and clinical skills. Medical education, 34(9), 729-738.
Akhtar, K., Perveen, Q., Kiran, S., Rashid, M., & Satti, A. K. (2012). A Study of Student’s Attitudes towards Cooperative Learning. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(11), 7.
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organization, In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings(Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123-167.
Amabile, T. M.(1996).Creativity in context.Boulder, Colorado:Westview Press Inc..
Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D.R., et al (2001) A taxonomy for learning,teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
Ausubel, D. P., & Robinson, F. G. (1969). Schooling learning: An introduction to educational psychology. N. Y.: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 59-72.
Atkinson, S. (2000). Does the need for high levels of performance curtail the development of creativity in design and technology project work? International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10, 255–281.
Baldwin, B. A., & Reckers, P. M. (1984). Exploring the role of learning style research in accounting education policy. Journal of Accounting Education, 2(2), 63-76.
Bartlett, M. S. (1951). The effect of standardization on a χ 2 approximation in factor analysis. Biometrika, 38(3/4), 337-344.
Barak, M. & Dori, Y. J. (2005). Enhancing undergraduate students' chemistry understanding through project-based learning in an IT environment. Science Education, 89(1), 117-139.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of though and action: A social cognitive theory. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Besemer, S. P., &; Treffinger, D. J. (1981). Analysis of Creative Products: Review and Synthesis*. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 15(3), 158-178.
Besemer, S. P. (1998). Creative Product Analysis Matrix: Testing the Model Structure and a Comparison Among Products--Three Novel Chairs. Creativity Research Journal, 11(4), 333-346.
Besemer, S. P., &; O'Quin, K. (1999). Confirming the Three-Factor Creative Product Analysis Matrix Model in an American Sample. Creativity Research Journal, 12(4), 287-296.
Blankstein, K. R., Flett, G. L., & Watson, M. S. (1992). Coping and academic problem-solving ability in test anxiety. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 48(1), 115-122.
Blumenfeld, P., Soloway, E., Marx, R., Krajcik, J., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991) Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning, Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4).
Bowers, L., Huisingh, R., & LoGiudice, C. (2005). Tasks of Problem Solving: Elementary. LinguiSystems.
Bowers, L., Huisingh, R., & LoGiudice, C. (2010). Social language development test: Adolescent. LinguiSystems.
Bransford, J. D., & Stein, B. S. (1984). The IDEAL problem solver: A guide for improving thinking, learning, and creativity. N. Y.: W. H. Freeman.
Brandsford, J., Sherwood, R., Vye, N., & Rieser, J. (1986). Teaching thinking and problem solving, America Psychologist, 41(10), 1078-1089.
Brevik, P.S., Senn, J.A. (1994). Information literacy: Educating children for the 21st century. Scholastic Inc., New York
Brown, H. D., & Burke, R. C. (1987). Accounting education: A learning-styles study of professional-technical and future adaptation issues. Journal of Accounting Education, 5(2), 187-206.
Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching . White Plains, NY.
Buckmaster, L. (1994). Effects of activities that promote cooperation among seventh graders in a future problem solving classroom.Elementary School Journal, 95(1), 49-62.
Buck Institute for Education (2016). Why Project Based Learning (PBL)? Retrieved from http://bie.org/
Caropreso, E. J., & Haggerty, M. (2000). Teaching Economics: A Cooperative Learning Model. College Teaching, 48(2), 69-74.
Capraro, R. M., & Slough, S. W. (2013). Why PBL? Why STEM? Why now? An introduction to STEM project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach. In STEM project-based learning (pp. 1-5). Brill Sense.
ChanLin, L. J. (2008). Technology integration applied to project-based learning in science. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(1), 55-65.
Chua, K. J., Yang W. M. & Leo, H. L. (2014). Enhanced and conventional project-based learning in an engineering design module. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(4), 437-458.
Chang, Y. (2014). 3D-CAD effects on creative design performance of different spatial abilities students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(5), 397-407.
Darley, J. M., Glucksberg, S., & Kinchla, R. A. (1991). Psychology. 5th. NY: Prentice Hall.
Donnelly, B. (1994). Creativity in the workplace. The Journal of Technology Studies, 4-8.
Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. J. (1992). Teaching elementary students through their individual learning styles: Practical approaches for grades 3-6. Allyn and Bacon.
D'Zurilla, T. J., & Nezu, A. M. (1987). The Heppner and Krauskopf approach: A model of personal problem solving or social skills?. The Counseling Psychologist, 15(3), 463-470.
D'Zurilla, T. J., Nezu, A. M., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2002). Social problem-solving inventory--revised (SPSI-R). Multi-Health Systems
DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale Development: Theory and Applications. CA: Sage.
Fallik, O., Eylon, B. S., & Rosenfeld, S. (2008). Motivating teachers to enact free-choice project-based learning in science and technology (PBLSAT): Effects of a professional development model. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(6), 565-591.
Fink, F. K., Anderson, O. K., Bak, T., &; Larsen, L. B. (2002). The international ization of postgraduate programmes. Global Journal of Engineering, 6(2), 125-132.
Fogarty, R. (1997). Problem–based learning and other curriculum models for the multiple intelligences classroom. Illinois: Skylight
Fried-Booth, D. L. (1987). Project work. Oxford: Oxford University.
Gagne, R. M.(1980). Learnable aspects of problem solving. Educational Psychologist, 15(2), 84-92.
Gardner, B.S., & Korth, S.J. (1997), A framework for learning to work in teams. Journal of Education for Business, 74(1), 28-33.
Geiger, M. A., & Pinto, J. K. (1991). Changes in learning style preference during a three-year longitudinal study. Psychological reports, 69(3), 755-762.
Glover, T. (1993). The teaching of educational psychology through project-based learning. Retrieved from ERIC database.(ED367703)
Guilford, J. P., &; Hoepfner, R. (1971). The analysis of intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Guilford, J. P. (1986). Creative talents: Their nature, uses and development. N. Y.: Bearly.
Hatch, L. (1988). Problem solving approach. Instructional strategies for technology education, 37, 89.
Heppner, P. P., & Petersen, C. H. (1982). The development and implications of a personal problem-solving inventory. Journal of counseling psychology, 29(1), 66.
Heppner, P. P., & Baker, C. E. (1997). Applications of the Problem Solving Inventory. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 29(4), 229-241.
Herman, J. L., Aschbacher, P. R., &; Winters, L. (1990). Issues in developing alternative assessments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the California Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Jacobs, H. H. (1989). Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria,VA
James, W. B., & Gardner, D. L. (1995). Learning styles: Implications for distance learning. New directions for adult and continuing education, 1995(67), 19-31.
Jitendra, A. K., Griffin, C. C., Haria, P., Leh, J., Adams, A., & Kaduvettoor, A. (2007). A comparison of single and multiple strategy instruction on third-grade students' mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 115.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1975). Learning together and alone. NJ: Prentice, Hall.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1995). Why Violence Prevention Programs Don't Work--And What Does. Educational Leadership, 52(5), 63-67.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Johari, A., & Bradshaw, A. C. (2006). Project-based learning in an internship program: A qualitative study of related roles and their motivational attributes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(3), 329-359.
Kaiser,H.F.(1974). An index of factorical simplicity. Psychometrica, 39,31-36.
Kahney, H. (1986). Problem solving - A cognitive approach. Open University Press.
Katz, L. G. (1994). The project approach. ERIC Digest. Champaign, Retrieved from http:// ericps.crc.uiuc.edu/eece/pubs/digests/1994/lk-pro94.html.
Kane, M., Crooks, T., &; Cohen, A. (1999). Validating Measures of Performance. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 18(2), 5-17.
Karaman, S., & Celik, S. (2008). An exploratory study on the perspectives of prospective computer teachers following project-based learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 18(2), 203-215.
Keefe, J. W. (1988). Profiling and Utilizing Learning Style. NASSP Learning Style Series.
Kilpatrick, J. (1985). A retrospective account of the past 25 years of research on teaching mathematical problem solving. Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives, 1-15.
Kilpatrick, W. H. (1918). The project method. Teachers College Record, 19, 319-334.
Knoll, M. (1997). The project method: its vocational education origin and international development. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 34(3), 59–80
Kolmos, A. (1996). Reflection son project work and problem-based learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 21(2), 141-148.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Krajcik, J. S., Czerniak, C., & Berger, C. (1999). Teaching children science: A project-based approach. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
Lavonen, J., Meisalo, V., & Lattu, M. (2002). Collaborative problem solving in a control technology learning environment, a pilot study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 12(2), 139-160
Lappalainen Pia. (2009). Communication as part of the engineering skills set. European Journal of Engineering Education, 2, 123-129.
Lee, C.-I., & Tsai, F.-Y (2004). Internet project-based learning environment: the effects of thinking styles on learning transfer. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 31-39.
Loo, R. (1997). Evaluating change and stability in learning style scores: a methodological concern. Educational psychology, 17(1-2), 95-100.
Lu, Y. L., Lian, I. B., & Lien, C. J. (2015). The application of the analytic hierarchy process for evaluating creative products in science class and its modification for educational evaluation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 413-435.
Markham, T., Larmer, J., & Ravitz, J. (2003). Project-Based Learning Handbook: A Guide to Standards Focused Project-Based Learning for Middle and High School Teachers. Novato, CA: Buck Institute for Education.
Marriott, P. (2002). A longitudinal study of undergraduate accounting students' learning style preferences at two UK universities. Accounting Education, 11(1), 43-62.
Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S. & Soloway, E. (1997). Enacting project-based science. The Elementary School Journal, 97(4), 341-358.
Mayer, R. (1998). Cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational aspects of problem solving. Instructional Science, 26(1-2), 49-63.
Mayer, R. E. (1992). Thinking, problem solving, cognition. WH Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co.
Merriam-Webster(2003).Merriam-Webster’s collegiate dictionary,(11th Ed.). Massachusetts: Spring field IncorporatEd.
Moursund, D. (1999). Project-Based Learning Using Information Technology. Eugene, Oregan: International Society for Technology in Education Publications, pp. 53-91.
Morgan, A. (1983). Theoretical aspects of project-based in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 14(1), 66-78.
Morales, T. M., Bang, E., & Andre, T. (2013). A one-year case study: understanding the rich potential of project-based learning in a virtual reality class for high school students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(5), 791-806.
Morton, J. A. (2005). A study to determine the influence of teaching problem solving tools to educationally at risk high school students.. Humanities and social sciences, 66(4), 1266-1278.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall.
Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. NY: Basic Books.
Piaget, J. (1968). The Structuralism. Paris: University of France.
Pinto, J. K., Geiger, M. A., & Boyle, E. J. (1994). A three-year longitudinal study of changes in student learning styles. Journal of College Student Development.
Pritchard, A. (2009). Ways of learning: learning theories and learning styles in the classroom (2nd ed.). London and New York, Routledge.
Quellmalz, E. S. (1991). Developing criteria for performance assessments: The missing link. Applied Measurement in Education, 4(4), 319-331.
Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30, 933-958.
Shyu, H. Y. & Chou, Y. H. (2002). An instructional design model of web-enhanced project-based learning for elementary and secondary school students. Educational New Thinking and Innovation. Taipei, Taiwan: Psychological Publishing Press.
Simpson, J. A., & E. S. C. Weiner (2003). The Oxford English dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon.
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. N. Y.: Appleton Century Crofts.
Tan, C., & Chan, Y. Y. (2008). Knowledge community: A knowledge-building system for global collaborative project learning. Proceeding of the IEEE, 96(6), 1049-1061.
Treffinger D. J., & Isaksen, S. G. (1992). Creative problem solving: An introduction. Sarasota: Center for Creative learning, Inc.
Rakoczy, M., & Money, S. (1995). Learning styles of nursing students: a 3-year cohort longitudinal study. Journal of professional Nursing, 11(3), 170-174.
Rasmussen, K. L., & Davidson-Shivers, G. V. (1998). Hypermedia and learning styles: Can performance be influenced? Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7(4), 291-308.
Reise, S. P., Waller, N. G., & Comrey, A. L. (2000). Factor analysis and scale revision. Psychological Assessment, 12(3), 287-297.
Rios, I. d. l., Cazorla, A., Diaz-Puente, J. M., & Yague, J. L. (2010). Project-based learning in engineering higher education: Two decades of teaching competences in real environments. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1368-1378.
Rokeach, M. (1986). Beliefs, attitudes, and values: A theory of organization and change. San Francisco: Jossey Bass Press.
Robinson, J. K. (2013). Project-based learning: improving student engagement and performance in the laboratory. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 405(1), 7-13.
Runco, M. A., & Walberg, H. J. (1998). Personal explicit theories of creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 32(1), 1-17.
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Baxter, G. P., &; Shavelson, R. J. (1993). On the Stability of Performance Assessments. Journal of Educational Measurement, 30(1), 41-53.
Rye, J., Landenberger, R., & Warner, T. A. (2012). Incorporating concept mapping in project-based learning: Lessons from watershed investigations. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(3), 379-392.
Sánchez, J., Olivares, R. (2011). Problem solving and collaboration using mobile serious games. Computers & Education, 57(3), 1943-1952.
Schack, G.D. (1993). Effects of a creative problem-solving curriculum on students of varying ability levels. Gifted Child Quarterly,37(1),32-38.
Seminara, L. (1996). An exploration of the relationship between conceptual knowledge, sex, attitude and problem solving in chemistry. Unpublished doctoral dissertation: Columbia University.
Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative Learning. Review of Educational Research, 50, 315-332.
Slavin, R. E. (1987). Developmental and motivational perspectives on cooperative learning: A reconciliation. Child Development, 58, 1161-1167.
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning theory, research, and practice. (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Steiner, S., Stromwall, L. K., Brzuzy, S., & Gerdes, K. (1999). USING COOPERATIVE LEARNING STRATEGIES IN SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION. Journal of Social Work Education, 35(2), 253-264.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. L. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51(7), 77-688.
Sternberg, J. R. (1996). Cognitive psychology. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
Sternberg, J. R. (1999). Cognitive psychology. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace & Company.
Sternberg, R. J., & Spear-Swerling, L. (1996). Teaching for thinking, psychology in the classroom: A series on applied educational psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Stiggins, R. J. (1987). Design and Development of Performance Assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 6(3), 33-42.
Stutsky, B. J., & Spence Laschmger, H. K. (1995). Changes in student learning styles and adaptive learning competencies following a senior preceptorship experience. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 21(1), 143-153.
Surif, J., Ibrahim, N. H., & Mokhtar, M. (2012). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in problem solving. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 56, 416-425.
Taspınar, Z., & Bulut, M. (2012). Determining of problem solving strategies used by primary 8. grade students’ in mathematics class. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3385-3389.
Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. California: Autodesk Foundation.
Tseng, K.-H., Chang, C.-C., Lou, S.-J., & Chen, W.-P. (2011). Attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning (PjBL) environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(1), 87-102.
Visser, Y. L. (2003). The effect of problem-based and lecture-based instructional strategies on learning problem solving performance, problem solving processes, and attitudes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Florida: Florida State University.
Wells. J. B., Layne, B. H., & Allen, D. (1991) Management development training and learning styles. Public Productivity & Management, 14(4), 415-428.
Wiggins, G. (2011). A True Test: Toward More Authentic and Equitable Assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(7), 81-93.
Wilhelm, J., Sherrod, S., & Walters, K. (2008). Project-based learning environment: Challenging preservice teachers to act in the moment. Journal of Educational Research, 101(4), 220-233.
William Collins Sons (2004). Collins english dictionary-complete & unabridged (6th Ed.). Harper Collins Publishers.
Wolk, S. (1994). Project-based learning: pursuits with a purpose. Retrieved from ERIC database.(EJ 492911)
Xu, Y., & Liu, W. (2010). A project-based learning approach: A case study in China. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(3), 363-370.
Zachman, L., Jorgensen, C., Huisingh, R., Barrett, M. (1984). Test of problem solving (TOPS). Anglais: Lingui Systems Inc.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top