臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：土地經濟之政策與事件探討：以台灣為例之三篇論文集
作者：王思永
作者(外文)：Szu-Yung Wang
校院名稱：國立臺灣大學
系所名稱：農業經濟學研究所
指導教授：張宏浩
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2020
主題關鍵詞：契作；農家所得；matching frontier method；環境災害；地下管線；房價；人口遷徙；差異中的差異法；綠能專區；農地價格；台灣；contract farming；farm income；matching frontier method；environmental hazard；underground pipelines explosion；house price；migration；differences-in-differences Solar farm；farmland price；Taiwan
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:4
第一篇文章：
舊瓶裝新酒：利用matching frontier檢驗契作對農家收入的影響
契作對農家收入是一直是熱門的研究議題。本篇文章採用最新的計量方法─the matching frontier重新檢視契作對農家所得的影響。本研究採用具代表性的台灣主力農家資料庫，從中選出18,115筆作物別資料用以分析。分析結果指出契作對農家收入有顯著的影響。此外，常用於研究此議題的傾向評分匹配法或一對一匹配法通常低估該效果。
關鍵詞：契作、農家所得、matching frontier method、台灣
第二篇文章：
地下管線爆炸事件對房價之影響─以台灣為例
許多文獻發現災難對房價的負面影響，但地下管線對房價的影響卻鮮少被提及。為補足知識缺口，本研究透過一個意外的地下管線爆炸事件評估其對房價造成的影響。本研究使用內政部的實價登錄資料，並採用差異中的差異法針對39,266筆房地產交易進行分析。分析結果顯示，意外爆炸事件顯著減少爆炸區域與鄰近區域5.2%與1.9%的房價。此外，本研究提出人口遷徙，可以作為房價下跌的機制之一。
關鍵詞：環境災害、地下管線、房價、人口遷徙、差異中的差異法
第三篇文章：
綠能專區對農地價格之影響─以台灣為例
近年來無論世界各國或台灣，再生能源成長快速。台灣於2009與2017分別修改再生能源發展條例與電業法，鼓勵發展再生能源，促進電業自由。為響應政策，部分農地被列為「嚴重地層下陷地區內不利耕作得設置綠能設施之農地」，以下稱為綠能專區。本研究利用差異中的差異法評估綠能專區與電業自由對農地價格之衝擊。分析結果指出，上述兩政策分別造成農地價格下跌20.8%與15.8%。
關鍵詞：綠能專區、農地價格、台灣
This dissertation collects three essays that apply program evaluation study on land economics in Taiwan. The first essay examines the association between contract farming and farm household income, using a newly developed econometric matching approach. The second essay investigates the impacts of an unexpected pipeline explosion in Kaohsiung City. The third essay examines the impacts of energy policy and energy market liberalization on farmland value. Although a considerable body of literature has paid attention on similar topics in western countries, little evidence is found in Asia. Given that various land characteristics in Taiwan differ from western economies, the specialties then set our real estate market apart from prior studies. All of these three essays aim to provide more empirical evidence and insights to current interesting program and event in Taiwan, using representative dataset and reliable econometric approach.
The second and third essay heavily rely on the Registering the Actual Selling Price of Real Estate dataset. This dataset is an administrative profile and it provides accurate information real estate market in Taiwan. The main findings of the second and third essay are summarized below. First, we found the value of land and real estate is sensitive to relevant policy and event. For instance, either the impacts of the pipeline explosion (essay 2) or the energy policies (essay 3) on property values are relatively larger than similar foreign studies. Second, heterogeneity of property matters. Due to the common mixed-use of residential, industrial, commercial property, comparison among different types of property plays an important role in evaluating the effects of programs and events (essay 2). Moreover, we found farmland sizes in the transaction records are mostly small than a hectare (essay 3). This phenomenon is not commonly seen in western economies. Consider the special characteristics mentioned above, our analysis framework can be applied to similar countries to check the robustness of our findings. We present detailed abstract of each essay as following.
Essay 1:
An Old Bottle with New Wine: Examining the Effects of Contract Farming on Farm Income Using the Matching Frontier Approach
It has been a longstanding research interest on the association between contract farming and farm household income. This study applied a recently developed econometric method, the matching frontier method, to estimate the association between contract farming and farm income. A unique sample of 18,115 crop-specific dataset drawn from a nationally representative farm household survey in Taiwan was used. A positive association between contract farming and farm income was evident. Moreover, the commonly used propensity score and one-on-one matching method underestimated the treatment effects.
Keywords: Contract farming, farm income, matching frontier method, Taiwan.
Essay 2:
The Impacts of Underground Pipeline Explosion on House Price — Empirical Evidence in Taiwan
Literature has documented the negative impacts of disasters on house prices, but little is known about underground pipelines. This study assesses the impact of an unexpected pipeline explosion on house prices. The difference-in-difference model is estimated using a sample of 39,266 transaction records drawn from an administrative population-based house sales dataset. Results show that the explosion decreased house prices in the disaster and surrounding areas of the explosion site by 5.2% and 1.9%, respectively. Moreover, migration out of disaster areas into surrounding areas of the explosion site can be viewed as a mechanism behind the explosion effects on housing prices.
Keywords: Environmental hazard, underground pipelines explosion, house price, migration, differences-in-differences.
Essay 3:
The Impact of Green Energy Utilizing on Farmland Price — Empirical Evidence in Taiwan
As a rapid growth of renewable energy worldwide, Taiwan enacted the Renewable Energy Development Act (REDA) and the Electronic Act (EA) in 2009 and 2017, promoting green energy, electronic liberalization, and sustainable environment. A large area of farmlands in Taiwan was turned into designated zones where the farmlands are no longer suitable for agriculture and are able to be used as construction of photovoltaic utilization. This study aims to examine the impact of solar farm and electronic liberalization on farmland price by using the differences-in-differences approach. The results indicate that the REDA and EA decreased the farmland price in the designated zones by 20.8% and 15.8% respectively.
Keywords: Solar farm, farmland price, Taiwan.
Awotide, B.A., A. Fashogbon and, T.T. Awoyemi, 2015, Impact of Agro-Industrial Development Strategies on Smallholder Rice Farmers’ Productivity, Income and Poverty: The Case of Contract Farming in Nigeria. Paper presented at the International Conference, Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford.
Athey, S. and G.W. Imbens, 2015. A Measure of Robustness to Misspecification, American Economic Review, 105(5), pp. 476-480.
Bellemare, M.F., 2012, As You Sow, So Shall You Reap: The Welfare Impacts of
Contract Farming, World Development, 40(7), pp. 1418-1434.
Escobal, J. A. and D. Cavero, 2012, Transaction Costs, Institutional Arrangements and Inequality Outcomes: Potato Marketing by Small Producers in Rural Peru, World Development, 40(2), pp. 329-341.
Girma, J. and C. Gardebroek, 2015, The Impact of Contracts on Organic Honey Producers'' Incomes in Southwestern Ethiopia, Forest Policy and Economics, 50, pp. 259-268.
Jones, S. and P. Gibbon, 2011, Developing Agricultural Markets in Sub-Saharan Africa: Organic Cocoa in Rural Uganda, Journal of Development Studies, 47(10), pp. 1595-1618.
King, G., C. Lucas and R.A. Nielsen, 2017, The Balance-Sample Size Frontier in Matching Methods for Causal Inference, American Journal of Political Science, 61(2), pp. 473-489.
Maertens, M., and J.F.M. Swinnen, 2009, Trade, Standards, and Poverty: Evidence from Senegal, World Development, 37(1), pp. 161-178.
Michelson, H., T. Reardon and F. Perez, 2012, Small Farmers and Big Retail: Trade-Offs of Supplying Supermarkets in Nicaragua, World Development, 40(2), pp. 342-354.
Minten, B., L. Randrianarison and J.F.M. Swinnen, 2009, Global Retail Chains and Poor Farmers: Evidence from Madagascar, World Development, 37(11), pp. 1728-1741.
Miyata, S., M. Nicholas and D. Hu, 2009, Impact of Contract Farming on Income: Linking Small Farmers, Packers, and Supermarkets in China, World Development, 37(11), pp. 1781-1790.
Narayanan, S., 2014, Profits from Participation in High Value Agriculture: Evidence of Heterogeneous Benefits in Contract Farming Schemes in Southern India, Food Policy, 44, pp. 142-157.
Setboonsarng, S., P.S. Leung and A. Stefan, 2008, Rice Contract Farming in Lao PDR: Moving from Subsistence to Commercial Agriculture, ADBI Discussion Paper 90. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute Discussion Papers.
Wainaina, P.W., J.J. Okello and J.M. Nzuma, 2014, Blessing or Evil? Contract Farming, Smallholder Poultry Production and Household Welfare in Kenya, Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, 53(4), pp. 319-340.
Wang, H., P. Moustier and N.T.T. Loc, 2014, Economic Impact of Direct Marketing and Contracts: The Case of Safe Vegetable Chains in Northern Vietnam, Food Policy, 47, pp. 13-23.
Angrist, J., & Pischke, J. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
ATTOM Data Solution. (2017). 17.3 Million U.S. Homes with Combined Value of $4.9 Trillion in Zip Codes with High Environmental Hazard Risk. Available at https://www.attomdata.com/news/heat-maps/2016-environmental-hazard-housing-risk-index/. Accessed on December 3, 2018.
Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2003). How much should we trust difference-in-difference method?. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1), 249–275.
Boxall, C., Chan, H., & McMillan, L. (2005). The impact of oil and natural gas facilities on rural residential property values: A spatial hedonic analysis. Resource and Energy Economics, 27(3), 248–269.
Bleich, D. (2003). The reaction of multifamily capitalization rates to natural disasters. Journal of Real Estate Research, 25(2), 133–144.
Boyle A., & Kiel, A. (2001). A survey of house price hedonic studies of the impact of environmental externalities. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 9(2), 117–144.
Carroll, M., Clauretie, M., Jensen, J., & Waddoups, M. (1996). The economic impact of a transient hazard on property values: The 1988 PEPCON explosion in Henderson, Nevada. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 13(2), 143–167.
Clark, E., Michelbrink, L., Allison, T., & Metz, C. (1997). Nuclear power plants and residential housing prices. Growth and Change, 28(4), 496–519.
Department of Transportation, United States. (2019). Pipeline incident 20-year trends. Available at https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/data-and-statistics/pipeline/pipeline-incident-20-year-trends. Accessed on October 25, 2019
Fan, Q., & Davlasheridze, M. (2015). Flood risk, flood mitigation, and location choice: Evaluating the national flood insurance program’s community rating system, Risk Analysis, 36(6), 1125–1147.
Fischel, W. (2001). Why are there NIMBYs?. Land Economics, 77(1), 144–152.
Freybote, J., & Fruits, E. (2015). Perceived environmental risk, media, and residential sales prices. Journal of Real Estate Research, 37(2), 217–244.
Gill, A., & Picou, S. (1998). Technological disaster and chronic community stress. Society and Natural Resources, 11, 795–815.
Greenstone, M., & Justin, G. (2008). Does hazardous waste matter? Evidence from the housing market and the superfund program. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 12(3), 951–1003.
Hansen, J., Benson, E., & Hagen, D. (2006). Environmental hazards and residential property values: Evidence from a major pipeline event. Land Economics, 82(4), 529–541.
Hunter, M. (2005). Migration and environmental hazards. Population and Environment, 26(4), 273–302.
Kaohsiung City Government. (2013). Kaohsiung gas explosion reconstruction websites. Available at https://www.kcg.gov.tw/Default.aspx. Accessed on October 20, 2019.
Mileti, S. (1999). Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United States. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
Ministry of the Interior in Taiwan. (2016). Report of the Housing Price Index. Published by Ministry of the Interior in Taiwan, Taipei, Taiwan.
Mora, R. & Reggio, I. (2012). Treatment effect identification using alternative parallel assumptions. Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Mimeo.
Simons, A. (1999). The effect of pipeline ruptures on noncontaminated residential easement-holding property in Fairfax County. The Appraisal Journal, 67(3), 255–263.
Simons, A., Winson-Geideman, K., & Mikelbank, A. (2001). The effects of an oil pipeline rupture on single family house prices. The Appraisal Journal, 69(4), 410–418.
Simons, A., & Saginor, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the effect of environmental contamination and positive amenities on residential real estate values. Journal of Real Estate Research, 28(1), 71–104.
Social Affairs Bureau of Kaohsiung City Government. (2015). Gas explosion reconstruction project online appendix. Available at http://socbu.kcg.gov.tw/kcg_gas/index.php?prog=21&icf_code=F201506005. Accessed on October 22, 2019.
Taylor, O., Phaneuf, J., & Liu, X. (2016). Disentangling property value impacts of environmental contamination from locally undesirable land uses: Implications for measuring post-cleanup stigma. Journal of Urban Economics, 93(1), 85–98.
Xu, M., & Xu, Y. (2017). Environmental hazards and mortgage credit risk: Evidence from Texas pipeline incidents. Real Estate Economics, 1–40.
Yamane, F., Ohgaki, H., & Asano, K. (2013). The immediate impact of the Fukushima Daiichi accident on local property values. Risk Analysis, 33(11), 2023–2040.
Beltran, A., David M., and Robert E. (2018). Is flood risk capitalised into property values?, Ecological Economics, 146, 668–685.
Boyle A., Kiel. A. (2001). A survey of house price hedonic studies of the impact of environmental externalities, Journal of Real Estate Literature, 9, 117–144.
Bureau of Energy, statistics handbook 2017. Taipei: Ministry of Economic Affairs
Daniel, E., Florax, J., and Rietveld, P. (2009). Flooding risk and housing values: an economic assessment of environmental hazard. Ecological Economics, 69, 355–365.
Emmann, C., Guenther-Lübbers, W., Theuvsen, L. (2013). Impacts of biogas production on the production factors land and labour—current effects, possible consequences and further research needs. International Journal on Food System Dynamics, 4, 38–50.
Greenberg, M., and Hollander, J. (2006). Neighborhood stigma twenty year later: revisiting superfund sites in Suburban New Jersey. The Appraisal Journal, 161–173.
Groothuis, A., Groothuis, D., Whitehead, C. (2008). Green vs. green: measuring the compensation required to site electrical generation windmills in a viewshed. Energy Policy, 36, 1545–1550.
Grover, S. (2002). Economic impacts of wind power in Kittitas County. Wind Engineering, 26, 315–328.
Habermann, H., Breustedt, E. (2011). Der biogaserzeugung auf landwirtschaftliche pachtpreise in Deutschland. The German Journal of Agricultural Economics, 60, 85–100.
Haughton, J., Giuffre, D., Barrett, J., Tuerck, G. (2004). An economic analysis of a wind farm in Nantucket Sound. Boston, MA: Beacon Hill Institute at Suffolk University.
Heintzelman, D., Tuttle, M. (2012). Values in the wind: a hedonic analysis of wind power facilities. Land Economics, 88, 571–588.
Joskow P. (2006), Introduction to electricity sector liberalization: lessons learned from cross countries studies, in: Sioshansi, P., Pfaffenberger, W. (eds.), Electricity market reform: an international perspective, Oxford, Elsevier.
Khatri, M. (2004). Impact of wind farms on the value of residential property and agricultural Land. London, UK: Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors.
Ladenburg, J., Dubgaard, A. (2007). Willingness to pay for reduced visual disamenities from offshore wind farms in Denmark. Energy Policy, 35, 4059–4071.
McClusky, J. and Rausser, C. (2003). Stigmatized asset value: is it temporary or long-term?. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85, 276–285.
McKenzie, R., and Levendis J. (2010). Flood hazards and urban housing markets: the effects of Katrina on New Orleans. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 40, 62–76.
Mora, R. & Reggio, I. (2012). Treatment effect identification using alternative parallel assumptions. Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Mimeo.
Nagayama, H. (2009). Electric power sector reform liberalization models and electric power prices in developing countries. An empirical analysis using international panel data, Energy Economics, 3, 463–472.
Patchin, J. (1991). Contaminated properties—stigma revisited. The Appraisal Journal, 59, 167–172.
Ritter, M., Deckert, L. (2017). Site assessment, turbine selection, and local feed-in tariffs through the wind energy index. Applied Energy, 185, 1087–1099.
Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition, Journal of Political Economy, 82, 34–55.
Shultz, C., Hall, J., Strager, M. (2018). Production of wind energy and agricultural land values: evidence from Pennsylvania. Working Paper No. 15–11, Department of Economics, West Virginia University. Available online: https://business.wvu.edu/files/d/13f8b90e-982f-45cb-86d0-d1c20eff8ef4/15-11.pdf, (accessed on 3 October 2019).
Taiwan Power Company (2018). Taiwan Power Company Sustainability Report, https://www.taipower.com.tw/upload/319/2018120416431215952.pdf, (accessed on 5 October 2019)
Taylor, J., Davies, M., Mavrogianni, A., Shrubsole, C., Hamilton, I., Das, P., Jones, B.,Oikonomou, E., Biddulph, P. (2016). Mapping indoor overheating and air pollution risk modification across Great Britain: a modeling study. Building and Environment, 99, 1–12.
Vyn, R., McCullough, R. (2014). The effects of wind turbines on property values in Ontario: does public perception match empirical evidence. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62, 365–392.
Yarrow, G. (2008), Report for the Australian energy markets commission on the impact of maintaining price regulation, Regulatory Policy Institute, Oxford, UK.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：795（臺灣：780，外國：15） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1348743 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67157345
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上