:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:職前教師數學教學概念之初探:從研究實作中學習教學
書刊名:科學教育學刊
作者:姚如芬 引用關係郭重吉柳賢
作者(外文):Yau, Ru-fenGuo, Chorng-jeeLieo, Shian
出版日期:2001
卷期:9:1
頁次:頁1-13
主題關鍵詞:教師即研究者數學教學研究實作數學教學概念化職前數學師資培育Teacher as researcherDoing research in mathematics instructional settingConceptualizing mathematics teachingPre-service mathematics teacher education
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:106
     本研究從「教師即研究者」的理念出發,將研究的概念引介入前師資培育的課程中,主要目的在瞭解數學科職前教師透過教學研究實作,其數學學概念的改變歷程。研究者利用一門大學教學系四年級兩學分的選修課-「數學教學研究」,為數學科職前教師營造一個符合建構主義理念的學習情境,讓職前教師透過數學教學研究的實作歷程,引發其數學的教與學作深層的思考,進而提昇其解決解學教學問題的能力。本研究以符號互動論與現象學做為分析與詮釋資料的理論視野,並用來宗析個案教師的數學教學概念之較變。經由分析課室觀、課後晤談所蒐集而得的資料以及相關文化後,研究發現:個案教師的數學教學概念在教學研究實作的歷程中發生了改變;然而,此改變並非全面性的,而是與其教學研究實作的有關。易言之,個案教師在其自定的教學研究實作的情境內,從發特定的數學教學問題解決問題的過程中,產生一連串與其研究情境有關的數學教學概念上的改變,從「學習乃概念之改變」的論點而言,此即顯示透過教學研究實作確能有益於協助職前教師學習教數學。
     A salient feature of this study was to include in the pre-service teacher education program the requirement to do research in the instructional setting. The theoretical perspective of this research was "teacher as researcher". The purpose of this case study was to investigate the process through which a pre-service mathematics teacher learned how to teach by conducting research studies on mathematics teaching and learning. The study was carried out in the context of a two credit hour course called "Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning". The study was carried out in the context of a two credit hour course called "Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning", which was designed for senior mathematics majors. The main purpose of this course was to provide the pre-service teachers a constructivist learning environment allowing them to carry out research studies on the teaching and learning of mathematics. It was expected that this would lead the pre-service teachers to thinking about instruction in mathematics in greater depth, and therefore enhance their abilities in solving problems related to the teaching of mathematics. Theoretical perspectives from symbolic interactionism and phenomenology were adopted by the researcher in an attempt to understand the conception about mathematics teaching and learning of the pre-service teacher. Qualitative research techniques were used to collect and analyze the data. Triangulation of multiple data sources was used to validate the results. The results of this study showed that the conception about mathematics teaching and learning of pre-service teacher change was nevertheless far from being an overall change. The nature and extent of change depended on the research context that the preservice teacher and experienced. In summary, learning to teach can e viewed from the perspective of conceptual change and it can be concluded that , by providing a pre-service teacher opportunities to do research in instructional settings, teacher was found to have learned to teach mathematics.
期刊論文
1.Chall, J. S.(198611)。The Teacher as Scholar。The Education Digest。  new window
2.Stevens, K. B.、Slaton, D. B.、Bunney, S.(1992)。A collaborative research effort between public school and university faculty members。Teacher Education and Special Education,15(1),1-8。  new window
3.林美玲(19930400)。象徵互動論及其在教育上的應用。現代教育季刊,8(2)=30,20-45。  延伸查詢new window
4.Osborne, R.、Wittrock, M.(1985)。The Generative Learning Model and Its Implications for Science Education。Studies in Science Education,12,59-87。  new window
5.郭重吉(19920500)。從建構主義的觀點探討中小學數理教學的改進。科學發展月刊,20(5),548-570。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Blumer, Herbert(1969)。Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method。University of California Press。  new window
2.Boyer, Ernest L.(1990)。Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate。Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching。  new window
3.黃瑞琴(1994)。質的教育研究方法。臺北市:心理出版社股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳秉璋(1985)。社會學理論。台北市:三民。  延伸查詢new window
5.Lincoln, Yvonna S.、Guba, Egon G.(1989)。Fourth generation evaluation。Sage Publications。  new window
其他
1.Alder, P. & Alder, P. A.(1980)。Symbolic interactionism。  new window
2.Allan, K. K. & Miller, M. S.(1990)。Teacherresearcher collaborative: Collaborative professional development。  new window
3.Bennett, C. K.(1993)。Teacher-researchers: All dressed up and no place to go。  new window
4.Bishop(1982)。Implications of research for math teacher education。  new window
5.Brownlie, F.(1990)。The door is open. Won’tyou come in?。  new window
6.Dicker, M.(1990)。Using action research to navigate an unfamiliar teaching assignment。  new window
7.Haberman, M.(1992)。The role of classroom teacher as a curriculum leader。  new window
8.Hanna, B.(1986)。Improving student-teaching effectiveness through action research projects。  new window
9.Henson, K. T.(1996)。Teachers as researchers。  new window
10.Meltzer, B. N., Petras, J. W., & Reynolds, L. T.(1975)。Symbolic Interactionism。  new window
11.Neilsen, L.(1990)。Research comes home。  new window
12.Santa, C. M.(1990)。Teaching as research。  new window
13.Sardo-Brown, D.(1992)。Elementary teachers’ perceptions of action research。  new window
14.SooHoo, S.(1993)。Students as partners in research and restructuring schools。  new window
15.Stansell, J. & Patterson, L.(1988)。Teacher researchers find the answers in their classroom。  new window
16.Sucher, F.(1990)。Involving school administrators in classroom research。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top