:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:儒佛會通與純粹力動理念的啟示
書刊名:中國文哲研究集刊
作者:吳汝鈞 引用關係
作者(外文):Ng, Yu-kwan
出版日期:2002
卷期:21
頁次:頁141-169
主題關鍵詞:純粹力動絕對有絕對無絕對意識純粹經驗Reine VitalitatAbsolutes SeinAbsolutes NichtsSunyaAbsolutes bewuβtseinPure exprience
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:31
     本文試圖探討以純粹力動一理念作為思想之橋樑,以溝通儒家與佛教兩大思想體系的可能性。按就理論立場言,儒家是實體主義思想,其具有終極原理義的天道、良知,都是絕對有。佛教則是非實體主義思想,其具有終極原理義的空性是絕對無。雙方的對立性很明顯,不易溝通。本文提 出「純粹力動」一理念,作為表示終桂原理的絕對有與絕對無之外的另一表述式,它一方面可以綜合絕對有與絕對無的殊勝性格,如運動性與虛靈性。同時亦可超越或克服絕對有與絕對無思想所可能向椏端處發展而出現的流弊,如常住論與虛無主義。另外,本文又檢討京都學派所提的「自我淘空的神」的說法,認為不能成立,不能消融基督教的實體主義思想與佛教的非實體主義思想的矛盾。二者的會通,仍需在純粹力動哲學或現象學的脈絡下成立。
      This article aims at bringing Confucianism and Buddhism together for a dialogue via the idea of Pure Vitality as a thought-bridge. Confucianism, as a substantialist philosophy, has Heavenly Way or Moral Consciousness as the ultimate principle, whereas Buddhism, as a non-substantialist philosophy, has Emptiness as the ultimate principle. It is difficult for these two great philosophies to have a harmonious encounter. In this context, the author puts forward the idea of Pure Vitality as a new ultimate principle. It can, on the one hand, synthesize the positive and constructive implications embraced by Moral Consciousness and Emptiness, namely, the dynamism of moral Consciousness and the quiescence of Emptiness. On the other hand, it can also transcend or overcome the radical dead ends both ideas of moral Consciousness and Emptiness may unfortunately lead to, i.e., eternalism and nihilism. The author also doubts the tenability of the conception of "Self-emptying God" proposed by the Kyoto School. This conception implies a direct injection of non-substantialism into substantialism, which just mutually oppose each other, as Confucianism and Buddhism do. The author is of the opinion that Christianity and Buddhism can be united and compared only in the context of the idea of Pure Vitality,which, as a transcendental activity, can overcome the contradiction between these two religions. In a nutshell, the idea of Pure Vitality is, indeed, the perfect expression to transmit the seemingly contradictory contents of substantialism and non-substantialism, whether they be represented by Moral Consciousness and Emptiness, or God and Emptiness.
圖書
1.二諦義。東京。  延伸查詢new window
2.牟宗三(1959)。道德的理想主義。道德的理想主義。臺中。  延伸查詢new window
3.王守仁(1976)。傳習錄。正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.妙法蓮華經玄義。  延伸查詢new window
5.釋智顗。維摩經略疏。  延伸查詢new window
6.求那跋陀羅。勝鬘師子吼一乘大方便方廣經。  延伸查詢new window
7.熊十力(1976)。體用論。臺北:台灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.程頤、程顥、王孝魚(1981)。二程集。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.牟宗三(1963)。才性與玄理。人生出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.Cobb, John B. Jr.、Ives, Christopher(1990)。The Emptying God: A Buddhist-Jewish-Christian Conversation。Orbis Books。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
1. 評:楊澤編《閱讀張愛玲--張愛玲國際研討會論文集》(臺北市:麥田出版,1999);林幸謙著《歷史、女性與性別政治--重讀張愛玲》(臺北市:麥田出版,2000)
2. 評:阿部兼也著《魯迅の仙台時代--魯迅の日本留学の研究》(仙台市:東北大学出版会,1999)
3. 評:胡曉真編《世變與維新:晚明與晚清的文學藝術》(臺北市:中央研究院中國文哲研究所, 2001)
4. 評:王次澄著《宋元逸民詩論叢》(臺北市:大安出版社, 2001)
5. 評:張素卿《敘事與解釋:《左傳》經解研究》(臺北巿:書林出版公司, 1998)
6. 評:吳冠宏著《聖賢典型的儒道義蘊試詮》(臺北市:里仁書局, 2000)
7. 評:岡本さえ著《近世中国の比較思想:異文化との邂逅》(東京:東京大學出版會, 2000)
8. 評:林仁川、徐曉雍著《明末清初中西文化衝突》(上海市:華東師範大學出版社, 1999)
9. 評:陳綸緒(Albert S.J. Chan)著, «Chinese Books and Documents in the Jesuit Archives in Rome--A Descriptive Catalogue» [《羅馬耶穌會檔案處藏漢和圖書文獻目錄提要》] (New York & London : M. E. Sharpe, 2002)
10. 評:Lydia Liu ed., «Tokens of Exchange: The Problem to Translation in Global Circulations» (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1999)
11. 評:Rey Chow ed., «Modern Chinese Literary and Cultural Studies in the Age of Theory: Reimaging a Field» (Durham: Duke University Press, 2000)
12. Exploring the Matter and Minds of Late Ming Dynasty Readers
13. 胡適愛國主義中「國界」與「是非」的抉擇
14. 論朱熹對方崧卿《韓集舉正》的批評--方崧卿、朱熹校勘思想比較研究
15. 論常州學派研究之新方向
 
QR Code
QRCODE