:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以標準化Metadata為核心發展金融機構Ontology之探討
書刊名:圖書館學與資訊科學
作者:劉文卿 引用關係馮國卿
作者(外文):Liou, Wen-chingFeng, Kuo-ching
出版日期:2003
卷期:29:2
頁次:頁45-59
主題關鍵詞:索引典知識本體論後設資料都柏林核心集ThesaurusOntologyMetadataDublin core
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(2) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:22
  • 點閱點閱:40
索引典(Thesaurus)與知識本體論(Ontology)兩者皆可提供結構化的詞彙用以描述特定領域知識(Domain Knowledge)。然而想要進一步對領域知識創造出更具有豐富與彈性的知識內涵描述,知識本體論相較於索引典,它包含了比索引典更為廣泛的語意關係(Semantic Relationship),且其概念定義較為明確。因此,本研究將以某金融機構為例,利用既有之索引典發展出與金融業務相關之Ontology。並利用都柏林核心集(Dublin Core)為建立文件管理的詮釋資料(Metadata);此外使用立法院國會索引典中與財務金融相關詞彙索引典作為輸入之標準,以節省重新開發特定領域 Ontology所需龐大的時間與成本,並建立個案金融機構的Ontology。 本文將以(Object Management Group,簡稱為OMG)所提出之MOF(Meta Object Facility)的四層架構為本研究之核心,並參考其他企業模型理論(Enterprise Framework Modeling)如:Zen of Meta-Modeling,並進一步將其擴充為五層之架構。本研究之五層架構由上而下分別為,第一層為Thing,第二層為資源描述架構RDF/RDF'S,第三層為網絡層Network,第四層為Metadata Ontology,第五層為Domain Knowledge,並以此架構做為企業知識管理系統之基礎並發展雛型系統。
Thesaurus can provide structured vocabularies for describing domain knowledge, however, if we want to create a knowledgech description of an object, such as required by the semantic web, thesaurus turn out to provide only pant of the knowledge needed. In this paper we try to solve the problems related to capture background knowledge for banking and finance resources. We scribe a case study in which we attempt to construct an Ontology for a subset of banking and finance, and use the thesaurus of Taiwan congress as input. At the same time, we also follow Dublin core as well as metadata standard. In this paper, we improve the 4 layers of framework, it is created by meta object facility (MOF) of Open anagement Group (OMG), we are extending the framework from 4 layers to 5 layers, including Thing, RDFS, networks, metadata Ontology and domain knowledge, we can apply this framework to develop knowledge management system in the enterprise.
期刊論文
1.黃惠株(19960300)。淺談索引典。佛教圖書館館訊,5,2-7。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Chandrasekaran, B.、Benjamins, V. R.(1999)。What are ontologies and why do we need them。IEEE Intelligent Systems,14,20-26。  new window
3.William, S.、Austin, T.(1999)。Ontologies。IEEE Intelligent Systems,18-19。  new window
4.Guarino, Nicola(1997)。Understanding, building and using ontologies。International journal of human and computer studies,46(3/4),219-310。  new window
5.Decker, S.、Melnik, S.、Harmelen, F. V.、Fensel, Dieter、Klein, M.、Broekstra, J.、Erdmann, M.、Horrocks, I.(2000)。The Semantic Web: the roles of XML and RDF。IEEE Internet Computing,4(5),63-74。  new window
6.張嘉彬(1998)。索引典及其於資訊檢索上之探討。書苑,36,46-59。  延伸查詢new window
7.Guarino, Nicola、Welty, Christopher(2001)。Supporting Ontological Analysis of Taxonomic Relationships。Data and knowledge engineering,39(1),51-74。  new window
8.Corcho, Oscar、Fernández-López, Mariano、Gómez-Pérez, Asunción(2003)。Methodologies, Tools and Languages for Building Ontologies. Where is Their Meeting Point?。Data and knowledge engineering,46,41-64。  new window
9.Balasubramanian, V.、Bashian, A.(1998)。Document Management and Web Technologies。Communications of the ACM,41(7),107-115。  new window
會議論文
1.阮明淑、溫達茂(2002)。Ontology應用於知識組織之初探。佛教知識組織管理研討會,(會議日期: 民91年9月13-14日),(7)1-(7)16。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳玫言、吳蕙如、蔡銘箴(2001)。科技產業下知識管理系統運作模式與探討-以臺積電為實例。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.Soergel, Dagobert(2001)。Thesauri and Ontologies in Digital Libraries Tutorial。Roanoke, VA.。694。  new window
4.Visser, P.、Bench-Capon, T.(1996)。On the Reusability of Ontologies in Knowledge-System Design。New York。256-261。  new window
圖書
1.黃慕萱(1996)。資訊檢索。臺北:臺灣學生書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Wellisch, Hans H.(1995)。Indexing from A to Z。New York。  new window
3.Karp, P. D.、Chaudhri, V. K.、Thomere, J.(199907)。XOL: An XML-based Ontology Exchange Language。  new window
4.美國資訊科學學會台北分會、農業科學資料服務中心、國立中央圖書館(1994)。索引典理論與實務。臺北:國立中央圖書館。  延伸查詢new window
5.張慧銖(2001)。主題分析。中國圖書館學會九十年圖書館人員分編進修研習班研習手冊。臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Fensel, Dieter(2000)。Ontologies: Silver Bullet for Knowledge Management and Electronic Commerce。Ontologies: Silver Bullet for Knowledge Management and Electronic Commerce。New York/Berlin。  new window
7.Guarino, Nicola、Welty, Christopher(2002)。Identity and Subsumption。The Semantics of Relationships: An Interdisciplinary Perspective。Dordrecht。  new window
8.ISO Technical Committee。ISO 2788: Documentation Guidelines for the Establishment and Development of Monolingual Thesauri。ISO 2788: Documentation Guidelines for the Establishment and Development of Monolingual Thesauri。  new window
9.Aitchison, Jean、Gilchrist, Alan、Bawden, David(1997)。Thesaurus Construction: A Practical Manual。Thesaurus Construction: A Practical Manual。London。  new window
10.Megill, Kenneth A.、Schantz, Herbert F.(1999)。Document Management: New Technologies for the Information Services Manager。Document Management: New Technologies for the Information Services Manager。London。  new window
11.National Information Standards Organization(1994)。National Information Standards Organization, ANSI/NISO Z39.19。Guidelines for the Construction, Format, and Management of Monolingual Thesauri。Bethesda, Maryland。  new window
12.Tannenbaum, Adrienne(1994)。Implementing a Corporate Repository: The Models Meet Reality。Implementing a Corporate Repository: The Models Meet Reality。New York。  new window
13.Purba, Sanjiv(2000)。Data Management Handbook。Data Management Handbook。London。  new window
14.Inmon, W. H.、Zachman, John A.、Geiger, Jonathan G.(1997)。Data stores, Data Warehousing, and the Zachman Framework: Managing Enterprise Knowledge。Data stores, Data Warehousing, and the Zachman Framework: Managing Enterprise Knowledge。New York。  new window
其他
1.吳政叡(2002)。都柏林核心集(Dublin Core)。  延伸查詢new window
2.Santosus, M.,Surmacs, J.(2000)。The ABCs of Knowledge Management。  new window
3.Sowa, J. F.(2001)。Agents。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE