:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:創造力測量的輔助工具:中文遠距聯想量表的發展
書刊名:應用心理研究
作者:任純慧陳學志 引用關係練竑初卓淑玲 引用關係
作者(外文):Jen, Chun-huiChen, Hsueh-chihLien, Hung-chuCho, Shu-ling
出版日期:2004
卷期:21
頁次:頁195-217
主題關鍵詞:遠距聯想測驗創造力中文量表編製連結論Remote association testCreativityChinese scale developmemtRemote association
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(16) 博士論文(6) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:16
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:148
     Mednick(1962)主張,創造是把有用的、不尋常、原創的想法相互連結的過程,越是有創造力的人越能夠將看似不相關的事物連結在一塊,也就是進行遠距聯想(remote association)。Mednick(1962)的「遠距聯想測驗」中,提供三個英文字(相當於中文的詞彙,例如:rat,blue,cottage),而要受測者找出一個能與這三個英文字組成關聯字對的英文字(如:cheese)。考量到中文的特性,本研究將測驗的線索刺激由「詞對」層次改為「字對(雙字詞)」的層次,例如提供「航、婚、知」三個字,而要受測者找出一個可以和這三個字組成一個合法雙字詞的單字:「通」。本研究由教育部國語辭典簡編本編輯資料字詞頻統計報告中,選取三個含有共同字的雙字詞組共160組,經407位大學生施測後,經過項目分析選擇良好區辨力及適當難度水準的題目各30題,分別編製成中文遠距聯想量表甲、乙題本。其中信度再測.88與.79,Cronbach α係數為.58-.74,並且與威廉斯創造力測驗求相關,結果發現此量表不但具有良好的信度與效度,而且施測及計分也更加的方便精確。本研究以該兩套題本向1094名國中生、463名高中生、251名大學生施測,建立測驗的常模。
     To develop the Chinese Remote Association Test (CRAT), researchers utilized three Chinese characters to form stimulus in each item. The subject must find a target Chinese character that can link the three Chinese characters to make two-character Chinese words individually. 160 items were chosen from the data bank of vocabulary. After pretesting 407 college students, 60 items which had appropriate difficulty levels and good discriminative power were chosen to comprise the Chinese Remote Association Test form A and form B. Subsequent studies of CRAT yielded split-half reliability coefficients ranging from .64 to .77, and Cronbach's α coefficients ranging from .58 to .74. Satisfactory concurrent validity were found. Percentile ranks and T-score norms of CRAT were created based on data from 1094 junior high school students, 463 senior high school students and 251 college students.
期刊論文
1.鄭昭明(19971126)。什麼是創造力?。臺大校訊。  延伸查詢new window
2.Sternberg, R. J.、Lubart, T. I.(1996)。Investing in creativity。American Psychologist,51(7),677-688。  new window
3.Guilford, J. P.(1988)。Some changes in the structure-of-intellect model。Educational and Psychological Measurement,48(1),1-4。  new window
4.Mednick, Sarnoff A.(1962)。The Associative Basis of the Creative Process。Psychological Review,69(3),220-232。  new window
學位論文
1.李嘉雯(1999)。幽默創造過程中後設認知與遠距連結歷程之研究(碩士論文)。中原大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.李秀瓊(1999)。高低創造力者在詞彙連結型態上有否差異?--檢驗Mednick的「連結層級」假說(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.國語辭典簡編本編輯小組(1997)。國語辭典簡編本編輯資料字詞頻統計報告。台北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.Wallas, G.(1926)。The art of thought。London:Jonathan Cape。  new window
3.郭有遹(1992)。發明心理學。台北市:遠流出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Williams, F. E.、林幸台、王木榮(1994)。威廉斯創造力測驗:指導手冊。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.米哈里‧契克森米哈賴(Mihaly Csiksentmihalyi),杜明城(譯)(1996/1999)。創造力。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳靜吉(1976)。分歧式和聯鎖式的聯想訓練對創造思考的影響。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳靜吉、陳嘉成、林偉文(1999)。創造力量表簡介。  延伸查詢new window
4.Andrews, F. M.(1975)。Social and psychological factors which influence the creative process。  new window
5.Eysenck, H. J.(1994)。The measurement of creativity。  new window
6.Mednick, S. A., & Mednick, M. T.(1967)。Examiner’s manual, Remote Associates Test。  new window
7.Menndelsohn, G. A., & Covington, M. V.(1972)。Internal processes and perceptual factors in verbal problem solving: A study of sex and individual differences in cognition。  new window
8.Menndelsohn, G. A., Griswold, B. B., & Anderson, M. L.(1966)。Individual differences in anagram-solving ability。  new window
9.Mooey, R. L.(1963)。A conceptual model for integrating four approaches to the identification of creative talent。  new window
10.Weisbrod, M., Maier, S., Harig, S., Himmelsbach, U. & Spitzer, M.(1998)。Lateralised semantic and indirect semantic priming effect in people with schizophrenia。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
1. 創造力
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE