:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:擴散性思考與聚斂性思考的交會:有限解答之擴散性思考測驗之編製與信效度檢驗
書刊名:教育科學研究期刊
作者:陳學志 引用關係洪素蘋 引用關係許禕芳邱皓政 引用關係關秉寅 引用關係詹志禹 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Hsueh-chinHung, Su-pinHsu, Yi-fangChiou, Haw-jengKuan, Ping-yinChan, Chih-yu
出版日期:2009
卷期:54:4
頁次:頁29-61
主題關鍵詞:創造認知能力測量頓悟性思考頓悟性問題擴散性思考Cognitive measure of creativityInsightInsight problemsDivergent thinking
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:255
  • 點閱點閱:98
摘要: 本研究旨在編擬一套適用於臺灣高中職學生的創造認知能力測量工具。測驗的建置,融合擴散性思考與頓悟性思考兩種客觀測量工具的優勢並改善其缺失,同時利用中文方塊字富有變化的有限集合特性,編製「有限解答之擴散性思考測驗」。測驗內容要求學生在某中文字(例如「里」字)上,進行部分筆畫的刪減,以拆解出其他合法的中文字。依據學生作答反應的個數、類別與新奇性,分別評定其流暢力、變通力與獨創力。其優點:一、評量兼顧新奇性與適切性;二、評分簡便且指標多元。本研究以北臺灣地區的高中職學生為母群體進行抽樣與施測,取得效標關聯效度證據。最後,以1,200 位高中職學生為樣本建立測驗的獨創性常模,提供後續研究者一套合宜的評量工具。
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to develop a measure of creative cognition which would enable educators to more accurately and objectively measure the development of creativity in Taiwanese high school students. The instrument was designed to measure the constructs of divergent-thinking and insight, as previous research has suggested that these are the only two dimensions of creativity which can be measured objectively. To overcome problems encountered in previous attempts to measure these two abilities, and to combine the strengths of separate measures of both, a test was developed which involves having students subtract strokes from the Chinese characters “里” to form another legal Chinese character. Responses are scored for fluency (the number of legal responses), flexibility (the variety of perspectives represented in the responses), and originality (statistical infrequency). The stroke-subtraction test offers advantages compared to other measures of creativity in that it emphasizes the novelty and appropriateness of the responses simultaneously. Further, use of the three score indexes simplifies the scoring process. The test was piloted with 1,200 Taiwanese high school students, and this sample was used to establish a norm for the purpose of norm-referenced score interpretations. The results were also compared with those from several other measurements to provide evidence supporting the criterion-related validity of the instrument. Based on the findings, implications for educational administrators, schools, teachers are discussed. Finally, suggestions for future research are offered.
期刊論文
1.Kogan, N.、Pankove, E.(1974)。Long-term predictive validity of divergent-thinking tests: some negative evidence。Journal of Educational Psychology,66(6),802-810。  new window
2.江美惠(20051200)。創造性問題解決教學方案對資優學生創造力及問題解決能力影響之研究。資優教育研究,5(2),83-106。  延伸查詢new window
3.任純慧、陳學志、練竑初、卓淑玲(20040300)。創造力測量的輔助工具:中文遠距聯想量表的發展。應用心理研究,21,195-217。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.吳靜吉(20020900)。華人學生創造力的發掘與培育。應用心理研究,15,17-42。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.陳昭儀(20000400)。傑出理化科學家之人格特質及創造歷程之研究。師大學報.科學教育類,45(1),27-45。  延伸查詢new window
6.Mednick, Sarnoff A.(1962)。The Associative Basis of the Creative Process。Psychological Review,69(3),220-232。  new window
7.Schooler, J. W.、Ohlsson, S.、Brooks, K.(1993)。Thoughts beyond words: When language overshadows insight。Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,122(2),166-183。  new window
8.陳學志、彭淑玲、曾千芝、邱皓政(20080200)。藉由眼動追蹤儀器探討平均掃視幅度大小與創造力之關係。教育心理學報,39(專刊),127-149。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.陳學志、徐芝君(20061000)。幽默創意課程對教師幽默感及創造力的影響。師大學報. 教育類,創造力特刊,71-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.丁興祥、邱皓政、蔡啟通、林逸媛。國中學生拖弄思創造思考測驗評分常模修訂。測驗年刊,39,105-116。  延伸查詢new window
11.張麗君。國臺雙語兒童期雙語能力與智力、創造力之相關探討。師大學報:教育類,53(1),79-106。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Cropley, A. J.(1972)。A Five-year Longitudinal Study of the Validity of Creativity Tests。Developmental Psychology,6,119-124。  new window
13.Dykes, M.、McGhie, A.。A Comparative Study of Attention Strategies in Schizophrenics and Highly Creative Normal Subjects。British Journal of Psychiatry,128,50-56。  new window
14.Guilford, J. P.。The Structure of Intellect。Psychological Bulletin,53,267-293。  new window
15.Howieson, N.。A Longitudinal Study of Creativity: 1965-1975。Journal of Creative Behavior,15,117-134。  new window
16.Mumford, M. D.、Whetzel, D. L.。Insight, Creativity, and Cognition: On Sternberg and Davidson's the Nature of Insight。Creativity Research Journal,1,103-107。  new window
17.Runco, M. A.。Reliability and Validity of Ideational Flexibility as a Function of Academic Achievement。Perceptual and Motor Skills,61,1075-1081。  new window
會議論文
1.吳靜吉、陳嘉成、林偉文。創造力量表簡介。  延伸查詢new window
2.邱發忠、陳學志。促發思考因素對創造表現之影響。臺北市。250。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.吳靜吉(1998)。新編創造思考測驗研究第二年期末報告。臺北市:教育部訓育委員會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.洪素蘋(2004)。重要他人回饋、創意自我效能、內、外在動機對創意行為的影響:社會認知理論為基礎的結構方程模式檢驗(碩士論文)。國立交通大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.邱發忠(2005)。創造力認知運作機制之探究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.黃博聖。詞彙聯想策略測驗的發展。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.林幸台、王木榮。威廉斯創造力測驗。威廉斯創造力測驗。臺北市:心理。  延伸查詢new window
2.Finke, R. A.、Ward, T. B.、Smith, S. M.(1996)。Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications。Bradford:The MIT Press。  new window
3.毛連塭、郭有遹、陳龍安、林幸台(20000000)。創造力研究。臺北:心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Sternberg, Robert J.、Lubart, Todd I.(1995)。Defying the Crowd: Cultivating Creativity in a Culture of Conformity。Free Press。  new window
5.吳靜吉。創造思考測驗評分手冊。創造思考測驗評分手冊。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
6.吳靜吉。語文創造思考測驗評分手冊。語文創造思考測驗評分手冊。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
7.吳靜吉、高泉豐、丁興祥、葉玉珠。拖弄思圖形創造思考測驗〈甲式〉指導手冊及研究手冊評分手冊。拖弄思圖形創造思考測驗〈甲式〉指導手冊及研究手冊評分手冊。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
8.Eysenck, H. J.。Genius: The Natural History of Creativity。Genius: The Natural History of Creativity。New York, NY。  new window
9.Lubart, T. I.。Creativity。Thinking and Problem Solving。New York, NY。  new window
10.Rhodes, M.。An Analysis of Creativity。Frontiers of Creativity Research。New York, NY。  new window
11.Torrance, E. P.。Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-technical Manual。Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-technical Manual。Princeton, NJ。  new window
12.Wakefield, J. F.。Creative Thinking: Problem-solving Skills and the Art Orientation。Creative Thinking: Problem-solving Skills and the Art Orientation。Norwood, NJ。  new window
13.Wallas, G.。The Art of Thought。New York, NY:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich。  new window
14.Williams, F. E.。Creativity Assessment Packet。Creativity Assessment Packet。Buffalo, NY。  new window
其他
1.吳靜吉,陳淑惠,李慧賢,郭俊賢,王文中,劉鶴龍。創新行為量表之編制與修訂。  延伸查詢new window
2.邱皓政。創意生活經驗量表之修訂與複核效度檢驗。  延伸查詢new window
3.邱皓政。威廉斯創造傾向量表之修訂與因素效度檢驗。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Barron, F.(1988)。Putting creativity to work。The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives。New York:Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Hocevar, D.、Bachelor, P. A.(1989)。A taxonomy and critique of measurements used in the study of creativity。Handbook of creativity。New York, NY:Plenum Press。  new window
3.Plucker, J. A.、Renzulli, J. S.(1999)。Psychometric approaches to the study of human creativity。Handbook of creativity。Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE