:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從性別角度探討社會弱勢者的電腦學習:以臺北市職訓中心第九期「電腦基礎班」為例
書刊名:女學學誌:婦女與性別研究
作者:林宇玲 引用關係
作者(外文):Lin, Yuling
出版日期:2004
卷期:17
頁次:頁201-241
主題關鍵詞:性別與電腦後結構女性主義社會弱勢者電腦實踐行動者網絡理論Gender and computerPoststructuralist feminismThe socially disadvantagedComputer practicesActor-network theoryANT
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:22
  • 點閱點閱:54
為瞭解社會弱勢者與電腦之間的複雜、建構關係,本研究採用後結構女性主義的理論觀點,以及行動者網絡理論 (簡稱ANT) 的分析策略,深入調查台北市職訓中心第九期「電腦基礎班」學員 (包括被資遺失業員工、負擔家計婦女、中高齡與身心障礙者) 的電腦學習與實踐。本研究有四項發現:(一) 執政者的電腦職訓計畫並不符合社會弱勢者的實際需求。(二) 制式化的電腦科技、教學環境、以及教學設計並不適合所有的弱勢學員。(三) 缺乏性別考量的電腦訓練,難以消除性別的數位落差。(四)性別交錯著其他社會力 (如:年齡、經濟能力、身心狀況) 共同影響弱勢者的電腦學習,導致不同學員在電腦表現上有明顯的差異。
In order to understand the complex and constructive relationship between the socially disadvantaged and computer, this study uses the theoretical perspective of poststructuralist feminism and Actor-Network Theory to investigate how students from various social backgrounds in the “Basic Computer" course learn and practice computer. This study has four important findings:1) Computer training programs provided by the government do not fit into the needs of the socially disadvantaged, 2) Institutionalized computer technologies, learning context and pedagogy are not suitable for every disadvantaged student, 3) Gender­blind computer training programs cannot effectively close the gender digital divide, 4) Gender intersecting with other social forces such as age, economic condition and disability interactively influence students' learning and performance of computer technologies.
期刊論文
1.Faulkner, Wendy(1998)。Extraordinary Journeys around Ordinary Technologies in Ordinary Lives。Social Studies of Science,28(3),484-489。  new window
2.Light, J. S.(1995)。The digital landscape: New space for women?。Gender Place & Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography,2(2),199-146。  new window
3.Fox, S.(2000)。Communities of Practice, Foucault and Actor-network Theory。Journal of Management Studies,37(6),853-867。  new window
4.林宇玲(2000)。解讀全球資訊網上之臺灣女性網站:由網站論述表現來看性別與科技之關係。婦女與兩性學刊,11,1-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.林宇玲(2003)。社會弱勢者與電腦學習:以臺北市職訓中心第五期「電腦基礎班」為例。教學科技與媒體,64,4-17。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Clarke, J.(2002)。A new kind of symmetry: Actor-Network theories and the new literacy studies。Studies in the education of adults,34(2),107-123。  new window
7.Faulkner, W.(2000)。The power and the pleasure? A research agenda for Making gender stick to engineers。Science, technology and human values,25(1),89-119。  new window
8.Henwood, F.、Wyatt, S.(2000)。Persistent inequalities: Gender and technology in the year 2000。Feminist Review,64,128-131。  new window
9.Mulcahy, M. D.(1998)。Designing the user/using the design: The shifting relations of a curriculum technology change。Social Studies of Science,28(1),5-37。  new window
10.Mulcahy, M. D.(1999)。Working bodies and representations: Tales from a training field。Science, technology and human values,24(1),80-104。  new window
11.Rolf, Wolff-Michael(1996)。Knowledge diffusion in a grade 4-5 classroom during a unit on civil engineering: An analysis of a classroom community in terms of its changing resources and practices。Cognition and Instruction,14(2),179-220。  new window
研究報告
1.Silverstone, R.、Haddon, L.(199708)。The Role of AC Services in Preventing Social Exclusion in the Emerging Information Society。University of Sussex。  new window
2.Silverstone, R.、Haddon, L.(199803)。New Dimensions of Social Exclusion in a Telematic Society。University of Sussex。  new window
學位論文
1.楊玉明(1998)。高齡者電腦態度之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.林宇玲(20020000)。網路與性別。臺北:華之鳳科技。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Foucault, Michel、Hurley, Robert(1980)。The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction。Vintage Books。  new window
3.林宇玲(2002)。女性與電腦網路。女性與電腦網路。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.Gomart, E.、Hennion, A.(1999)。A sociology of attachment: Music amateurs, drug users。Actor Network Theory and After。Oxford。  new window
5.Grundy, F.、Grundy, J.(1996)。Women and computers。Women and computers。Exeter。  new window
6.Kirkup, G.(2001)。Getting our hands on it: Gendered inequality in access to information and communications technologies。Access denied in the information age。London。  new window
其他
1.Chamberlain, L.(2002)。Gender review of ICT projects。  new window
2.Commission of the European Communities(2001)。e-Inclusion: The information society‘s potential for social inclusion in Europe。  new window
3.Couldry, N.(2002)。The forgotten digital divide researching social exclusion/ inclusion in the age of personalized media。  new window
4.Elovaaras, P.(2001)。Heterogeneous hybrids: Information technology in texts and practices or from networks to fluids and fires。  new window
5.Hafkin, N. J.(2002)。Background paper to UN/INSTRAW Virtual Seminar Series on Gender and ICTs.。  new window
6.Hafkin, N. J.,Taggart, N.(2001)。Gender, information technology, and developing countries: An analytic study。  new window
7.Jackson, C.(2000)。Information and communications technology and social Eeclusion。  new window
8.Jarboe, K. P.(2001)。Inclusion in the Information age: Reframing the debate。  new window
9.Law, J.(2000)。Network, relations cyborgs: On the social study of technology。  new window
10.Marcelle, G.(2002)。Information and communication technologies (ICT) and their impact on and use as an instrument for the advancement and empowerment of women: Report from the online conference Con ducted by the Division for the Advancement of Women。  new window
11.Simpson, N.(2000)。Studying innovation in education: The case of the connected project。  new window
12.Thompson, J.(2000)。Social exclusion。  new window
13.Warschauer, Mark(2002)。Reconceptualizing the digital divide。  new window
圖書論文
1.Latour, Bruno(1999)。On Recalling ANT。Actor Network Theory and After。Oxford:Blackwell。  new window
2.Law, John(1999)。After ANT: Complexity, Naming and Topology。Actor Network Theory and After。Oxford:Blackwell。  new window
3.Ormrod, S.(1995)。Feminist Sociology and Methodology: Leaky Black Boxes in Gender/ Technology Relations。The Gender-Technology Relation: Contemporary Theory and Research。London:Taylor and Francis。  new window
4.Callon, Michel(1986)。Elements of a Sociology of Translation: the Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay。Power, Action, and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?。London:Routledge and Kegan Paul。  new window
5.Latour, Bruno(1986)。The Powers of Association。Power, Action, and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?。Routledge and Kegan Paul。  new window
6.Lax, S.(2001)。Information, Education and Inequality: Is New Technology the Solution?。Access Denied in the Information Age。London:Palgrave。  new window
7.McNutt, J. G.(1998)。Ensuring Social Justice for the New Underclass: Community Interventions to Meet the Needs of the New Poor。Cyberghetto Or Cybertopia? Race, Class, and gender on the Internet。Praeger。  new window
8.National Telecommunications and Information Administration(2002)。Falling Through the Net: The Digital Divide。Computers and the Internet。California:Greenhaven Press。  new window
9.Singleton, V.(1995)。Networking construction of gender and constructing gender networks: Considering definitions of woman in the British cervical screening programme。The Gender-Technology Relation: Contemporary Theory and Research。London:Taylor & Francis。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE