:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:性侵害犯非自願團體心理治療:臺北監獄再犯預防認知行為療法成效之初探
書刊名:犯罪與刑事司法研究
作者:李思賢 引用關係高千雲
作者(外文):Lee, Szu-hsienKao, Chien-yun
出版日期:2004
卷期:3
頁次:頁1-24
主題關鍵詞:性侵害犯非自願團體再犯預防認知治療Sex offenderInvoluntary groupCognitive psychotherapyRelapse prevention
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(9) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:9
  • 共同引用共同引用:8
  • 點閱點閱:261
本研究主要目的是探討再犯預防認知行為療法方案對於臺北監獄性侵害犯之認知與態度改變。採用前後測之準實驗設計,經受刑人簽署同意書後,本研究共收取實驗組48人與控制組40人,實驗組由心理師進行為期16週團體認知心理治療,控制組在此時間內未接受任何心理治療或輔導。研究結果發現:實驗組在被害同理心分量表之前後測得分差異達到統計上顯著,顯示研究對象接受心理治療團體後,在被害同理心之向度上有顯著地正向處遇效果。重複量數變異數分析結果顯示,實驗組與控制組在被害同理心分量表得分上,時間與團體治療交互作用效果達到顯著,而否認犯行分量表的得分在實驗組別上有顯著主要效果。換言之,相較於控制組,實驗組在被害同理心及否認犯行兩個向度上可能有正向處遇效果。此實證資料可供性侵害防治團體治療領導者與犯罪學專家做為團體實施內容以及政策擬定的參考。
The main purpose of this paper was to examine any effect of a cognitive-behavior relapse prevention program on cognitive and attitude change among sex offenders in the Taipei prison. This research used pretest-posttest design. Following the signing of informed consent forms, 88 offenders were recruited (48 as the experimental group and 40 as the control group). The experimental group received 16 weeks of group psychotherapy directed by psychologists and the control group did not receive any program input related to psychotherapy during this period of time. Results using analysis of variance with repeated measures indicated that scores of empathy for victims were significantly different between experimental and control groups. The results also showed that there was an interaction effect of experimental intervention and time on the denial of crimes. Specifically, contrary to the control group, the intervention may have positive effects on empathy for victims and denial of crimes. The findings of this paper supported evidence for the effectiveness of group psychotherapy and can be taken into consideration when making relevant policies and designing appropriate content for prevention programs.
期刊論文
1.Hall, G. C. N.(1995)。Sexual offender recidivism revisited: A meta-analysis of recent treatment studies。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,63(5),802-809。  new window
研究報告
1.侯崇文、周愫嫻、吳建昌、林蕙華、胡佳吟(2000)。性侵害案件偵查心理描繪技術運用。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃富源、黃徵男、周文勇、廖有祿、許福生、黃翠紋、黃家珍(1999)。性侵害加害人之特質與犯罪手法之研究。內政部性侵害防治委員會。  延伸查詢new window
3.柯永河(1999)。「性侵害加害人心理狀態評估工具編製」研究計畫報告。臺北:國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林淑梨(2001)。併有與未併有反社會人格障礙之強暴犯在強暴相關認知差異之探討(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.李維娜(2001)。性侵害犯罪加害人之認知扭曲研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.黃軍義、陳若璋(1997)。強姦犯罪之成因及相關問題之研究。台北:法務部。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.內政部(1996)。台灣刑案統計。  延伸查詢new window
2.王志明(1998)。妨害風化罪受刑人強制診療業務之研究。  延伸查詢new window
3.李思賢(2002)。台北監獄性侵害犯強制治療方案之需求與困境。  延伸查詢new window
4.林明傑(2000)。臨床人員對性罪犯心理治療方案之看法與建議--台灣與密西根的比較研究。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.法務部(2001)。犯罪狀況及其分析。  延伸查詢new window
6.許春金、馬傳鎮(1999)。台灣地區性侵害犯罪狀況與型態之調查研究。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳若璋、劉志如(1999)。性侵害加害人身心治療、輔導教育制度與再犯率分析評估。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳若璋、劉志如(2001)。性侵害加害人身心治療模式之研究。  延伸查詢new window
9.楊士隆、吳芝儀、張聖照、許國賢(2000)。認知行為處遇法在犯罪矯正上之應用。  延伸查詢new window
10.楊士隆、鄭瑞隆(1999)。台灣地區強姦犯罪之成因與處遇對策之研究。  延伸查詢new window
11.Freeman-Longo, R., S. Bird, W. F. Stevenson and J. A. Fiske(1994)。Nationwide survey of treatment programs and models: Serving abuse reaction children and adolescent and adult sex offenders。  new window
12.Gallagher, C. A., D. B. Wilson, P. Hirschfield, M. B. Coggeshall and D. L. MacKenzie(1999)。A quantitative review of the effects of sex offender treatment on sexual reoffending。  new window
13.Marshall, W. L., R. Jones , T. Ward,(1991)。Treatment outcome with sex offenders。  new window
14.Marshall, W. L., S. Hudson and T. Ward(1992)。Sex deviance。  new window
15.Marshall, W. L.(1999)。Current status of North American assessment and treatment programs for sexual offenders。  new window
16.Nicholaichuk, T., A. Gordon and G. Andre(1995)。Long-term outcome of the Clearwater Sex Offender Treatment program。  new window
17.Polizzi, D. M., D. L. MacKenzie and L. J. Hickman(1999)。What work in adult sex offender treatment? A review of prison-and non-prison-based treatment programs。  new window
18.Tierney, D. W. and M. P. McCabe(2001)。An evaluation of self-report measures of cognitive distortions and empathy among Australian sex offenders。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top