:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從「布朗案」論NCLB政策中績效責任系統之內涵與執行
書刊名:教育研究月刊
作者:張奕華 引用關係
出版日期:2004
卷期:124
頁次:頁139-150
主題關鍵詞:NCLB政策績效責任系統
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:38
期刊論文
1.張奕華(20031000)。從教改萬言書論臺美教改政策:績效責任觀點。教育研究,114,83-95。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Johnson, J.(2004)。What school leaders want?。Educational Leadership,61(7),24-27。  new window
3.張奕華(20021100)。美國教師資格檢定--從教師素質的觀點探討之。教育研究,103,39-50。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.U.S. Department of Education(2004)。Bush Officials Visit Schools in Cleveland, Harrisburg, Detroit, and Lansing to Celebrate Brown v. Board Of Education 50th Anniversary,http://www.edgov/news/pressreleases/2004/05/05142004.html, 2004/05/14。  new window
2.U.S. Department of Education(2004)。President speaks at Brown v. Board of Education National Historic Site,http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/05/20040517-4.html, 2004/05/26。  new window
3.U.S. Department of Education(2004)。Remarks by Secretary Paige at the Opening of the Monroe Elementary School Historical Site,http://www.ed. gov/news/speeches/2004/ 05/05172004.html, 2004/05/31。  new window
4.U.S. Department of Education(2004)。Overview no child left behind,http://www.ed.gov/nclb/overview/intro/presidentplan/page.htmi#title, 2004/05/31。  new window
5.U.S. Department of Education(2004)。New GAO finds that No Child Left Behind is not an unfunded mandate,http://www.ed.gov/news/pressreleases/2004/05/05252004a.html, 2004/06/06。  new window
6.(2004)。美中小學教改遇阻礙,地方要求更多彈性,http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/4/4/5/n501314.htm, 2004/06/15。  延伸查詢new window
7.吳迪珣(2004)。「不讓任一孩子落後」政策應更具彈性,http://www.tw.org/edunews/express_14.html#9j, 2004/06/15。  延伸查詢new window
8.林曉雲(2003)。美國民權簡介,http://www.hooyou.com/chineseversion/chinesearticle/article112403USrights.htm, 2004/05/21。  new window
9.(2004)。布殊訪堪州小學讚種族融合:公校廢隔離50年改變美國,http://content.sina.com/news/39/11/6391184_1_b5.html, 2004/05/26。  延伸查詢new window
10.陳誠(2003)。地方制度法專題:美國的府際關係,http://mypaper.pchome.com.tw/news/macotochen/3/4340997/20031106230952/, 2004/06/06。  延伸查詢new window
11.秦時鉞(2004)。創造歷史:布朗訴教育委員會案50年,http://www.dffy.com/fayanguancha/fangyuan/200405/20040505091748.htm, 2004/05/21。  延伸查詢new window
12.National Park Service(2000)。Monroe elementary,http://www.nps.gov/brvb/pages/monroe.htm, 2004/05/30。  new window
13.Robelen, E. W.(2004)。Bill would make "No Child" flexibility retroactive,http://www.edweek.org/ew/ewstory.cfm?slug=41nclb.h23, 2004/06/26。  new window
14.Robelen, E. W.(2004)。States give more leeway on test rule,http://www.edweek.org/ew/ewstory.cfm?slug=30Participate.h23, 2004/06/26。  new window
15.U.S. Department of Education(2003)。Secretary Paige approves Missouri State accountability plan under no child left behind,http://www.ed.gov/news/pressreleases/2003/04/ 04302003b.html, 2004/05/05。  new window
16.U.S. Department of Education(2003)。Missouri consolidated state application accountability workbook,http://www.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/stateplans03/mocsa.doc, 2004/06/01。  new window
17.U.S. Department of Education(2003)。President Bush, Secretary Paige Celebrate Approval of Every State Accountability Plan Under No Child Left Behind,http://www.ed.gov/news/pressreleases/2003/06/06102003.html, 2004/06/06。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE