臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：落實教育品質和平等的績效責任制：美國《NCLB法》的挑戰與回應
書刊名：當代教育研究
作者：陳佩英 引用關係／卯靜儒 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chen, Peiying／Mao, Chin-ju
出版日期：2010
卷期：18:3
頁次：頁1-47
主題關鍵詞：把每個小孩帶上來法；績效責任；美國教育改革；NCLB；Accountability；American education reform；Equity；Quality
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:32
  • 點閱點閱:156
期刊論文
1.Hoerander, C. M.、Lenke, R. J.(2006)。Can no child left behind close the gaps in pass rates on standardized tests?。Contemporary Economic Policy，24(1)，1-17。  new window
2.Fetler, M.(2007)。NCLB blue: An essay review。Education Review，10(9)。  new window
3.Leonardo, Z.(2007)。The war on schools: NCLB, nation creation and the educational construction of whiteness。Race Ethnicity and Education，10(3)，261-278。  new window
4.Tuerk, P. W.(2005)。Research in the high-stakes era: Achievement, resources, and No Child Left Behind。American Psychologist Society，16(6)，419-425。  new window
5.Sunderman, G. L.、Orfield, G.(2006)。Domesticating a revolution: No Child Left Behind reforms and state administrative response。Harvard Educational Review，76(4)，526-556。  new window
6.Superfine, B. M.(2005)。The politics of accountability: The rise and fall of goals 2000。American Journal of Education，112(1)，10-43。  new window
7.楊巧玲(20071200)。美國教育政策的發展及其啟示：沒有任何孩子落後。教育資料集刊，36，153-170。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Manna, P.(2006)。Educational Accountability: Implementing the No Child Left Behind Act。Educational Policy，20(2)，471-494。  new window
9.張奕華(20040800)。從「布朗案」論NCLB政策中績效責任系統之內涵與執行。教育研究，124，139-150。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.周淑卿(19950500)。美國公元2000年教育目標法案。教育研究資訊，3(3)，143-147。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Borkowski, J. W.、Sneed, M.(2006)。Will NCLB improve or harm public education?。Harvard Education Review，76(4)，503-525。  new window
12.陳明印(20020200)。美國2001年初等級中等教育修正法案之分析。教育研究資訊，10(1)，205-228。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.吳清山(1994)。美國教育改革焦點-評析「兩千年教育目標法案」之教育目標。教師天地，73，56-59。  延伸查詢new window
14.楊慶麟(1996)。美國新聯邦教育政策探討。教育資料文摘，38，148-155。  延伸查詢new window
15.Apple, M. W.(2007)。Ideological successsuccess, educational failure? On the politics of No Child Left Behind。Journal of Teacher Education，58(2)，108-116。  new window
16.Azzam, A. M.(2008)。Left behind—By design。Educational Leadership，65(4)，91-92。  new window
17.Branch-Brioso, K., Powell, C. T.,、Roach, R.(2008)。Bush to Obama: Education in transition。Diverse: Issues in Higher Education，25(23)，8-12。  new window
18.Hardy, L.(2008)。The second tier。American School Board Journal，195(11)，20-24。  new window
19.Harris, D. N.,、Herrington, C. D.(2006)。Accountability, standards, and the growing achievement gap: Lessons from the past half-century。American Journal of Education，112，209-238。  new window
20.Jacobson, L.(2008)。NCLB restructuring found ineffectual in California。Education Week，27(24)，15-17。  new window
21.Lewis, A. C.(2009)。Think ahead to red penciling。Phi Delta Kappan，90(5)，315-316。  new window
22.Olson, L.(2004)。Taking root。Education Week，8，1-7。  new window
23.Paige, R.(2006)。No Child Left Behind: The ongoing movement for public education reform。Harvard Educational Review，76(4)，461-473。  new window
24.Zimmer, R., Hamilton, L.,、Christina, R.(2010)。After-school tutoring in the context of No Child Left Behind: Effectiveness of two programs in the Pittsburgh public schools。Economics of Education Review，29(1)，18-28。  new window
25.Yang, C. L.(1996)。美國新聯邦教育政策探討。教育資料文摘，38，148-155。  延伸查詢new window
26.Wu, C. S.(1994)。美國教育改革焦點--評析「兩千年教育目標法案」之教育目標。教師天地，73，56-59。  延伸查詢new window
27.Apple, M. W.(2007)。Ideological success, educational failure? On the politics of No Child Left Behind。Journal of Teacher Education，58(2)，108-116。  new window
28.Azzam, A. M.(2008)。Left behind-By design。Educational Leadership，65(4)，91-92。  new window
29.Branch-Brioso, K.、Powell, C. T.、Roach, R.(2008)。Bush to Obama: Education in transition。Diverse: Issues in Higher Education，25(23)，8-12。  new window
30.Hardy, L.(2008)。The second tier。American School Board Journal，195(11)，20-24。  new window
31.Olson, L.(2004)。Taking root。Education Week，8，S1-S7。  new window
32.Zimmer, R.、Hamilton, L.、Christina, R.(2010)。After-school tutoring in the context of No Child Left Behind: Effectiveness of two programs in the Pittsburgh public schools。Economics of Education Review，29(1)，18-28。  new window
33.Harris, D. N.、Herrington, C. D.(2006)。Accountability, standards, and the growing achievement gap: Lessons from the past half-century。American Journal of Education，112，209-238。  new window
34.Jacobson, L.(2008)。NCLB restructuring found ineffectual in California。Education Week，27(24)，15-17。  new window
35.Lewis, A. C.(2009)。Think ahead to red penciling。Phi Delta Kappan，90(5)，315-316。  new window
36.Paige, R.(2006)。No Child Left Behind: The ongoing movement for public education reform。Harvard Educational Review，76(4)，461-473。  new window
會議論文
1.Haney, W. M.(2006)。Evidence on education under NCLB (and How Florida Boosted NAEP Scores and Reduced the Race Gap)。New York。  new window
2.Haney, W. M.(2006)。Evidence on education under NCLB (and How Florida Boosted NAEP Scores and Reduced the Race Gap)。New York City。  new window
研究報告
1.California Department of Education.(2007)。2007 adequate yearly progress report:Information Guide。California。  new window
2.Field, S., Kuczera, M.,、Pont B.(2007)。No more failures: The steps to equity in education。  new window
3.Mathis, W. J.(2009)。NCLB’s Ultimate Restructuring Alternatives: Do they Improve the Quality of Education。  new window
4.McNeil, L. M., Coppola, E., Radigan, J.,、Heilig, J. V.(2008)。Avoidable losses: High-stakes accountability and the dropout crisis。  new window
5.U.S. Department of Education.(2004)。New No Child Left Behind flexibility: Highly qualified teacher。  new window
圖書
1.Linn, R. L.(2005)。Test-based educational accountability in the era of No Child Left Behind。Oakland, CA：The Regents of the University of California。  new window
2.Meier. D.、Wood, G. Eds.(2004)。Many children left behind: How the no child left behind act is damaging our children and our schools。Boston, MA：Beacon Press。  new window
3.U.S. Department of Education.(1991)。American 2000! An education strategy。ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 327009。Washington, DC：Department of Education。  new window
4.Vinovskis, M. A.(2009)。From a nation at risk to No Child Left Behind : national education goals and the creation of federal education policy。New York：Teachers College, Columbia University。  new window
5.Sunderman, G. L.(2006)。The unraveling of no child left behind: How negotiated changes transform the law。Cambridge：The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University。  new window
6.Rebell, M. A.,、Wolff, J. R.(2008)。Moving every child ahead: From NCLB hype to meaningful educational opportunity。New York：Teacher College, Columbia University。  new window
7.Elmore, R. F.(2002)。Bridging the gap between standards and achievement: The imperative for professional development in education。Washington, DC：Albert Shanker Institute。  new window
8.Barton, P. B.(2006)。“Failing” or “succeeding” schools: How can we tell?。Washinton, DC：American Federation of Teachers。  new window
9.Guisbond, L.,、Neill, M.(2004)。Failing our children: No Child Left Behind undermines quality and equity in education。Cambridge：The National Center for Fair and Open Testing。  new window
10.Sadovnik, A. R.、O'Day, J.、Bohrnstedt, G.、Borman, K. M.(2008)。No Child Left Behind and the reduction of the achievement gap: Sociological perspectives on federal educational policy。New York：Routledge。  new window
11.National Conference of State Legislatures.(2005)。Task force on No Child Left Behind Final Report。Denver：National Conference of State Legislatures。  new window
12.Hess, Frederick M.、Petrilli, Michael J.(2006)。No Child Left Behind Primer。NY：Peter Lang Publishing。  new window
13.Ravitch, D.(2010)。The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education。New York, NY：Basic Books。  new window
14.Noddings, N.(2005)。The challenge to care in schools: An alternatives approach to education。New York：Teacher College Press。  new window
15.卯靜儒、陳佩英、蘇源恭(2008)。美國中小學教師評鑑方案之分析。教師評鑑理論與實務。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
16.Armor, D. J.(2008)。Can NCLB close achievement gaps?。No Child Left Behind and the reduction of the achievement gap: Sociological perspectives on federal educational policy。New York。  new window
17.Brown, W.(2000)。Reporting NAEP achievement levels: An analysis of policy and external reviews。Student performance standards on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: Affirmation and improvements。Washington, DC。  new window
18.Darling-Hammond, L.(2004)。From “separate but equal” to “No Child Left Behind:” The collision of new standards and old equalities。Many children left behind: How the No Child Left Behind ct is damaging our children and our schools。Boston。  new window
19.Ryan, J. E.(2004)。The tenth amendment and other paper tigers: The legal boundaries of education governance。Who’s in charge here? The tangled web of school governance and policy。Washington, DC。  new window
20.Sirotnik, K. A.(2004)。Introduction: Critical concerns about accountability concepts and practices。Holding accountability accountable: What ought to matter in public education。New York。  new window
21.Sunderman, G. L., Tracey, C. A., Kim, J,、Orfield, G.(2004)。Listening to teachers:Classroom realities and No Child Left Behind。  new window
22.U.S. Department of Education(2004)。Meeting the highly qualified teachers challenge: The Secretary's third annual report on teacher quality。Washinton, DC。  new window
23.Mao, C. J.、Chen, P.、Saw, G. K.(2008)。美國中小學教師評鑑方案之分析。教師評鑑理論與實務。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
24.Brown, W.(2000)。Reporting NAEP achievement levels: An analysis of policy and external reviews。Student performance standards on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: Affirmation and improvements。Washington, DC。  new window
25.Armor, D. J.(2008)。Can NCLB close achievement gaps?。No Child Left Behind and the reduction of the achievement gap: Sociological perspectives on federal educational policy。New York。  new window
26.Darling-Hammond, L.(2004)。From 'separate but equal' to 'No Child Left Behind:' The collision of new standards and old equalities。Many children left behind: How the No Child Left Behind ct is damaging our children and our schools。Boston。  new window
27.Ryan, J. E.(2004)。The tenth amendment and other paper tigers: The legal boundaries of education governance。Who's in charge here? The tangled web of school governance and policy。Washington, DC。  new window
28.Sirotnik, K. A.(2004)。Introduction: Critical concerns about accountability concepts and practices。Holding accountability accountable: What ought to matter in public education。New York。  new window
其他
1.U.S. Department of Education.(2004)。Meeting the highly qualified teachers challenge:The Secretary’s third annual report on teacher quality，Washinton, DC。  new window
2.Bracey, G. W.(2004)。The seven deadly absurdities of No Child Left Behind，http://nochildleft.com/2004/oct04absurd.html， 20090723。  new window
3.California Department of Education(2007)。2007 adequate yearly progress report: Information guide，http://www.cde.ca.gov/ayp/， 20071202。  new window
4.California Teacher Association(2007)。Erase, rewrite, and reauthorize! Reauthorizing ESEA/NCLB fact sheet，http://www.cta.org/NR/rdonlyres/31310D9B-7793-4E0FBBD69A60392426A9/0/3ESEAFrequentlyAskedQuestionsFINAL41907.doc， 20070723。  new window
5.Carey, K.(2007)。The pangloss index: How states game the No Child Left Behind Act，http://www.educationsector.org/usr_doc/The_Pangloss_Index.pdf， 20080108。  new window
6.Center on Education Policy(2007)。Answering the question that matters most: Has student achievement increased since No Child Left Behind?，http://www.cep-dc.org/document/docWindow.cfm?fuseaction=document.viewDocument&documentid=200&documentFormatId=3620， 20080108。  new window
7.U.S. Department of Education(2004)。New No Child Left Behind flexibility: Highly qualified teacher，http://www.ed.gov/nclb/methods/teachers/hqtflexibility.pdf， 20070707。  new window
8.U.S. Department of Education(2007)。Teacher quality enhancement program: Grantee level analysis (2005-06Data) for partnership and state grants，http://www2.ed.gov/programs/heatqp/tqeanalysis0506.pdf， 20100408。  new window
9.U.S. Department of Education(2009)。National Assessment of Educational Progress，http://nationsreportcard.gov/math2009/， 20100601。  new window
10.Dietz, S.(2010)。How many schools have not made adequate yearly progress under the No Child Left Behind Act?，http://www.cep-dc.org/document/docWindow.cfm?fuseaction=document.viewDocument&documentid=303&documentFormatId=4598， 20100601。  new window
11.Dillon, S.(2009)。Sluggish Results Seen in Math Scores，http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/15/education/15math.html?_r=1， 20100407。  new window
12.Dillon, S.(2010)。Obama Calls for Major Change in Education Law，http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/14/education/14child.html?ref=education， 20100407。  new window
13.Editorial Projects in Education Research Center(2007)。Educations counts，http://www2.edweek.org/rc/edcounts/， 20070714。  new window
14.Emerick, S.，Hirsch, E.，Berry, B.(2004)。Does highly qualified mean high-quality?，http://hub.mspnet.org/index.cfm/11940， 20070727。  new window
15.EPE Research Center(2008)。Schools-Adequate yearly progress and improvement status under NCLB，http://www.edweek.org/media/16ayp-schools.pdf， 20090130。  new window
16.EPE Research Center(2008)。Schools and districts-Stages of improvement under NCLB，http://www.edweek.org/media/16ayp-ini.pdf， 20090130。  new window
17.Hoff, D.(2008)。The latest news on the reauthorization of the No Child Left Behind act，http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/NCLB-ActII/2008/03/antinclb_bills_advance_in_ariz.html#trackback， 20080322。  new window
18.Hoff, D.(2009)。The latest news on the reauthorization of the No Child Left Behind act，http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/NCLB-ActII/， 2009/01/30。  new window
19.Mathis, W. J.(2009)。NCLB's ultimate restructuring alternatives: Do they improve the quality of education，http://greatlakescenter.org/docs/Policy_Briefs/Mathis_Restructuring.pdf， 20091220。  new window
20.McNeil, L. M.，Coppola, E.，Radigan, J.，Heilig, J. V.(2008)。Avoidable losses: High-stakes accountability and the dropout crisis，http://centerforeducation.rice.edu/Research/AvoidableLosses.htm， 20080320。  new window
21.NSBA(2008)。Obama's position on education，http://www.cabe.org/uploaded/Convention_Handouts/Obama's_position_on_Education_9_08.pdf， 20090901。  new window
22.Reich, R.(2006)。Equality and adequacy in the state's provision of education: Mapping the conceptual landscape，http://www.irepp.stanford.edu/documents/GDF/STUDIES/01-Reich/1-Reich(3-07).pdf， 20070714。  new window
23.Saulny, S.(2010)。Detroit plan would close 45 schools，http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/18/education/18detroit.html， 20100404。  new window
24.Spellings, M.(2006)。Key policy letters signed by the education secretary or deputy secretary，http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/secletter/060905.html， 20080104。  new window
25.Sunderman, G. L.，Tracey, C. A.，Kim, J.，Orfield, G.(2004)。Listening to teachers: Classroom realities and No Child Left Behind，http://rapb.mspnet.org/index.cfm/9090， 20100603。  new window
26.The Economist YouGov Poll(2009)。The Economist Yougov poll September 27-29 2009，http://media.economist.com/images/pdf/Toplines20091001.pdf， 20100406。  new window
27.The Education Trust(2003)。Telling the whole truth (or not) about highly qualified teachers: New state data，http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/27/fa/ad.pdf， 20070901。  new window
28.U.S. Department of Education(2010)。A blueprint for reform: The reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act，http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/blueprint/blueprint.pdf， 20100601。  new window
29.Weinstein, A.(2009)。Obama on No Child Left Behind，http://www.education.com/magazine/article/Obama_Child_Left_Behind/， 20090909。  new window
30.White House(2002)。President signs landmark education bill，http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/01/20020108-1.html， 20070709。  new window
31.Field, S.，Kuczera, M.，Pont, B.(2007)。No more failures: The steps to equity in education，http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/50/18/38692453.pdf， 20080215。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：780（臺灣：774，外國：6） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1669892 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67487285
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上