:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:由個人自我構念價值看中國、香港與臺灣之文化趨向及爭辯行為
書刊名:新聞學研究
作者:葉蓉慧 引用關係陳凌
作者(外文):Yeh, Becky Jung-huelChen, Ling
出版日期:2004
卷期:80
頁次:頁51-87
主題關鍵詞:自我構念價值傾向中國香港臺灣爭辯Self-construalValue orientationsArgumentativeChinaHong KongTaiwan
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:114
本研究以個人自我構念取代集體層面的文化傾向(如集體主義∕個人主義)試圖瞭解並預測中國、香港與台灣三個華人社會文化中,社會化過程所造成之個人價值「自我構念」趨勢及對於爭辯行為之影響。調查對象為中國(上海、廣州、北京)、香港與台灣三地區共1131位大學生。研究結果顯示中港台華人社群總體上以互賴程度高之兩種個人價值形態為主,即「雙文化型」與「互賴型」。台灣在三地間之人我互賴考量較其他兩地為高。若將互賴構念程度置於集體主義與個人主義兩極化圖譜中,來標示三地之文化價值傾向,台灣則傾向集體主義,中國次之,而香港則最接近於個人主義。三地區間最傾向於爭辯與避免爭辯之價值類型皆為獨立型。本文並進一步討論爭辯在華人社會中之意義與意涵。
This study employs the notion of independent and interdependent self-construals as indicators of individual values to measure and predict how values have an influence on argumentative behaviors. A total of 1131 college students from China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan were involved in this survey. The results indicate that the overall Chinese society places higher values on self-and-others?relationships. To place three cultures (China, Hong Kong and Taiwan) on the collectivism/individualism continuum, Taiwan was marked on the collectivism end and Hong Kong on the individualism end. Surprisingly, the independent value type (high on independent self-construal and low on interdependence) is found to be approached and avoid any arguing.
期刊論文
1.Gudykunst, W. B.、Matsumoto, Y.、Ting-Toomey, S.、Nishida, T.、Kim, K. S.、Heyman, S.(1996)。The influence of cultural individualism-collectivism, self-construals and individual values on communication styles across cultures。Human Communication Research,22(4),510-543。  new window
2.Smith, P. B.、Peterson, M. F.、Schwarts, S. H.(2002)。Cultural Values, Sources of Guidance, and Their Relevance to Managerial Behavior: A 47-nation Study。Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,33(2),188-208。  new window
3.Yum, June Ock(1988)。The impact of Confucianism on interpersonal relationships and communication patterns in East Asia。Communication Monographs,55(4),374-388。  new window
4.Schwartz, Shalom H.(1992)。Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries。Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,25,1-65。  new window
5.Brockner, J.、Chen, Y. R.(1996)。The Moderating Roles of Self-Esteem and Self-Construal in Reaction to the Self: Evidence from the People's Republic of China and the United States。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,71,603-615。  new window
6.Cross, S. E.(1995)。Self-Construals, Coping, and Stress in Cross-Cultural Adaptation。Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,26,673-697。  new window
7.Infante, D. A.(1982)。The Argumentative Student in the Speech Communication Classroom: An Investigation and Implications。Communication Education,31,141-148。  new window
8.Infante, D. A.、Gorden, W.(1991)。How Employees See the Boss: Test of an Argumentative and Affirming Model of Superiors' Communicative Behavior。Western Journal of Speech Communication,55,294-304。  new window
9.Infante, D. A.、Gorden, W.(1989)。Argumentativeness and Affirming Communicator Style as Predictors of Satisfaction/ Dissatisfaction with Subordinates。Communication Quarterly,37,81-90。  new window
10.Infante, D. A.、Rancer, A. S.(1996)。Argumentativeness and Verbal Aggressiveness: A Review of Recent Theory and Research。Communication Yearbook,19,319-351。  new window
11.Infante, D. A.、Rancer, A. S.(1982)。A Conceptualization and Measure of Argumentativeness。Journal of Personality Assessment,46,72-80。  new window
12.Infante, D. A.、Rancer, A. S.、Jordan, F. F.(1996)。Affirming and Nonaffirming Style, Dyad Sex, and the Perception of Argumentation and Verbal Aggression in an Interpersonal Dispute。Human Communication Research,22。  new window
13.Kim, M.(1999)。Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Motivations of Verbal Communication: Review, Critique, and a Theoretical Framework。Communication Yearbook,22,51-89。  new window
14.Kim, M.、Aune, K.、Hunter, J. E.、Kim, H. J.、Kin, J. S.(2001)。The Effect of Culture and Self-Construals on Predispositions Toward Verbal Communication。Human Communication Research,27,382-408。  new window
15.Kim, M. S.、Hunter, J. E.、Miyahara, A.、Horvath, A.、Bresnahan, M.、Yoon, H. J.(1996)。Individual- vs. Culture-Level Dimensions of Individualism and Collectivism: Effects on Preferred Conversational Styles。Communication Monographs,63(1),29-49。  new window
16.Markus, H. R.、Kitayama, S.(1991)。Culture and Self: Implication for Cognition, Emotion and Motivation。Psychological Review,98,224-253。  new window
17.Oetzel, J. G.(1998)。Explaining Individual Communication Processes in Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Groups Through Individualism-Collectivism and Self-Construal。Human Communication Research,25(2),202-224。  new window
18.Oetzel, J.、Ting-Toomey, S.、Matsumoto, T.、Yokochi, Y.、Pan, X.、Takai, J.、Wilcox, R.(2001)。Face and Firework in Conflict: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of China, Germany, Japan and the United States。Communication Monographs,68,235-258。  new window
19.Park, H. S.、Levine, T.(1999)。The Theory of Reasoned Action and Self-Construal: Evidence from Three Cultures。Communication Monographs,66,199-218。  new window
20.Prunty, A. M.、Klopf, D. W.、Ishii, S.(1990)。Argumentativeness: Japanese and American Tendencies to Approach and Avoid Conflict。Communication Research Reports,7,75-79。  new window
21.Prunty, A. M.、Klopf, D. W.、Ishii, S.(1990)。Japanese and American Tendencies to Argue。Psychological Reports,66。  new window
22.Rancer, A .S.、Baukus, R. A.、Infante, D. A.(1985)。Relations between Argumentativeness and Belief Structures about Arguing。Communication Education,34,37-47。  new window
23.Rancer, A. S.、Kosberg, R. L.、Baukus, R. A.(1992)。Beliefs about Arguing as predictors of Trait Argumentativeness: Implications for Training in Argument and Conflict Management。Communication Education,41(4),375-387。  new window
24.Singelis, T.、Bond, M. H.、Sharkey, W. R.、Lai, C. S. U.(1999)。Unpacking Culture's Influence on Self-Esteem and Embarrassability: The Role of Self-Construals。Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,30,315-341。  new window
25.Singelis, T. M.、Brown, W. J.(1995)。Culture, Self and Collectivist Communication: Linking Culture to Individual Behavior。Human Communication Research,21,354-389。  new window
26.Suzuki, S.、Rancer, A. S.(1994)。Argumentativeness and Verbal Aggressiveness: Testing for Conceptual and Measurement Equivalence Across Cultures。Communication Monographs,61,256-279。  new window
會議論文
1.Singelis, T. M.(1994)。Bridging the Gap between Culture and Communication。Lisse:Swets & Zeitlinger。278-293。  new window
圖書
1.Hall, Edward T.(1976)。Beyond Culture。Garden City, New York:Anchor Press:Doubleday。  new window
2.Hofstede, Geert H.(1980)。Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values。Beverly Hills, California:Sage。  new window
3.楊中芳(2001)。現代化、全球化是與本土化對立的嗎?-試論現代化研究的本土化。如何理解中國人:文化與個人論文集。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.Barnlund, D.(1989)。Communication Styles of Japanese and Americans。Communication Styles of Japanese and Americans。Belmont, CA。  new window
5.Berry, J. W.、Kim, U.(1988)。Acculturation and Mental Health。Health and Cross-Cultural Psychology。New York, NY。  new window
6.Rancer, A.(1998)。Argumentativeness。Communication and Personality: Trait Perspectives。New Jersey。  new window
7.Triandis, H. C.(1994)。Individualism & Collectivism。Individualism & Collectivism。Boulder, CO。  new window
圖書論文
1.Kagitcibasi, C.(1994)。A Critical Appraisal of Individualism and Collectivism: Toward a New Formulation。Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications。Sage。  new window
2.Kim, U.(1994)。Individualism and Collectivism: Conceptual Clarification and Elaboration。Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications。Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE