:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:價格競爭,共同套裝旅遊與遊客度假生活型態
書刊名:管理研究學報
作者:賀力行 引用關係李堯賢楊琮泰
作者(外文):Ho, Li-hsingLee, Yao-hsienYang, Tsung-tai
出版日期:2005
卷期:5:1
頁次:頁55-76
主題關鍵詞:共同套裝旅遊無削價均衡轉換成本景點專屬環境舒適性Joint-Packaged tourUndercut-Proof equilibriumSwitch costSite-Specific environmental amenities
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:95
  • 點閱點閱:25
本文考量遊客的度假生活型態以及廠商景點設施的隨屬環境舒適性並利用無削價均衡(Undercut-proof equilibrium,UPE)觀念,分析廠商實施共同套裝旅遊的策略聯盟對廠商景點設施的定價與利潤水準,遊客旅遊效用以及對社會福利的影響效果,廠商無論有無參與共同套裝旅遊路線的策略聯盟,其間的價何競爭與利潤水準皆會受到遊客度假生活型態屬性傾向強度的影響。而遊客人數的增加是否會影響破商間的價格競爭,也需視遊客度假生活型態性傾向強度而定。從整體社會福利而言,在遊客對廠商景點設施所專屬環境舒適性的總合評價相對較高或充分高的情況下,實施共同套裝旅遊的策略聯盟才會具有經濟效率。
This paper develops a model for capturing tourist’s lifestyles and firm’s site-specific environmental amenities in the joint-packaged tour strategy alliance. Using the undercut-proof equilibrium, our model examines the effect of firm’s joint-packaged tour strategy alliance on the firm’s scenic facility price, profit, and social welfare. Our results show that price competition between firms and the firm’s profit level are affected by the intensity of tourist’s lifestyle preferences. Whether increasing the number of tourists influences price competition between firms is also dependent on the intensity of tourists’ lifestyle preferences. From the social welfare viewpoint, we find that the firms are profitable to perform the joint-packaged tour strategy alliance under the condition that the tourists give the site-specific environmental amenities of the firms’ scenic facility relatively or sufficiently high valuation.
期刊論文
1.Taylor, O.、Smith, V.(2000)。Environment Amenities as a Source of Market Power。Land Economics,76(4),550-568。  new window
2.陳思倫、劉錦桂(19920500)。影響旅遊目的地選擇之地點特性及市場區隔之研究。戶外遊憩研究,5(2),39-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.鄭健雄(20011200)。農業旅遊行銷通路與策略聯盟之研究。農民組織學刊,3,89-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.林進財、黃美玉(20000300)。臺灣地區隔週休二日國內旅遊區隔之研究。觀光研究學報,5(2),1-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.黃旭男、張德儀、孫仁和(20020600)。臺北市溫泉遊憩區遊客行為之研究。戶外遊憩研究,15(2),1-22。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.李銘輝(19910300)。遊憩需求與遊客行為特性之探討。戶外遊憩研究,4(1),17-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Singh, Nirvikar、Vives, Xavier(1984)。Price and Quantity Competition in a Differentiated Duopoly。RAND Journal of Economics,15(4),546-554。  new window
會議論文
1.鄭健雄、劉孟奇(2001)。墾丁地區遊客度假生活型態與休閒消費行為之研究。臺灣旅遊趨勢學術研討會。臺北:景文技術學院。73-86。  延伸查詢new window
2.鄭健雄、劉孟奇(2002)。臺灣本土化渡假生活型態量表信度與效度之檢定。嘉義:嘉義大學。1-20。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Morgan, B.、Shy, O.(2000)。Undercut-Proof Equilibria。  new window
圖書
1.Stiglitz, Joseph E.(1986)。Economics of the Public Sector。New York:W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.。  new window
2.Wells, W.(1974)。Life Style and Psvchographics。Chicago:American Marketing Association。  new window
3.Shapiro, C.、Varian, H. R.(1999)。Information Rule: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy。Harvard Business School Press。  new window
4.Wells, W. D.、Prensky, D.(1996)。Consumer Behavior。NY:John Wiley & Sons。  new window
5.Shy, Oz(2001)。The Economics of Network Industries。The Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.Engel, James F.、Miniard, Paul W.、Blackwell, Roger D.(2001)。Consumer Behavior。Dryden Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE