:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:新臺幣匯率與央行干預行為
書刊名:臺灣經濟預測與政策
作者:楊雅惠許嘉棟 引用關係
作者(外文):Yang, Ya-hweiShea, Jia-dong
出版日期:2005
卷期:35:2
頁次:頁23-41
主題關鍵詞:新臺幣匯率央行干預Intervention of central bankExchange rate
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:10
  • 共同引用共同引用:9
  • 點閱點閱:145
在我國所採行的機動匯率制度下,央行常為了政策性考量而進場干預匯市,其影響不容忽視。本文藉由央行最適干預行為分析,將央行的政策目標變數引入新臺幣匯率決定式。在本文對新臺幣匯率決定式的實證估計中,無論是否考慮央行干預行為,均發現國內外相對物價、利率差距與鄰國日韓之匯率走勢都有顯著影響;又央行基於穩定物價、刺激景氣與平穩匯市等政策目標而進場干預,亦顯著影響了匯率走勢。本文的實證分析清楚顯示:考慮央行干預行為的模型比忽略央行干預行為的模型,在解釋能力與預測能力兩方面表現都較佳。
The intervention of the Central Bank into the foreign exchange market is invariably undertaken based on policy objective considerations, and the influence that is brought to bear by such intervention is often far too significant to be ignored. This paper sets out to establish a model of optimal Central Bank behavior, under policy objective considerations, in an attempt to explain the determination of the New Taiwan Dollar exchange rate. Our empirical study finds that the comparative prices and interest differences between domestic and foreign countries, and the exchange rate trends within neighboring countries such as Japan and South Korea, play significant roles influencing the exchange rate trend of the New Taiwan Dollar. In addition to the market mechanism, major policy considerations, such as domestic price stabilization, stimulation of the economy and exchange rate stabilization, have driven the Central Bank to undertake significant intervention into the market. Other comparative empirical studies have shown that a model which includes government intervention is far better, both in terms of explanatory power and forecasting power, than a model which excludes government intervention.
期刊論文
1.Baillie, R.、Osterberg, W. P.(1997)。Why Do Central Banks Intervene?。Journal of International Money and Finance,16(6),909-919。  new window
2.Dominguez, K. M.、Dominguez, Kathryn M.(1998)。Central Bank Intervention and Exchange Rate Volatility。Journal of International Money and Finance,17(1),161-190。  new window
3.吳中書、許嘉棟(19941200)。公債融通下政府收支與貨幣政策效果之模擬分析。經濟論文叢刊,22(4),393-423。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.許嘉棟(1988)。影響新臺幣匯率的因素試析。貨幣市場簡訊,52,1-5。  延伸查詢new window
5.王素彎、劉其昌(1988)。臺幣與美元匯率決定因素的實證分析。臺灣經濟金融月刊,24(4),24-31。  延伸查詢new window
6.萬哲鈺(2000)。中央銀行臺北外匯市場干預行為分析。臺灣經濟學會年會論文集,2000,109-125。  延伸查詢new window
7.Eijffinger, S.、Gruijters, A.(1991)。On the Short-Term Objectives of Daily Intervention by the Deutsche Bundesbank and the Federal Reserve System in the U. S. Dollar-Deutsche Mark Exchange Market。Kredit Kapital,50-72。  new window
8.沈中華(1992)。用「無拋補利率平價說」解釋臺灣利率對美元匯率的變動。企銀季刊,16(1,1-13。  延伸查詢new window
9.吳中書(1999)。臺灣匯率與資本移動關連性之探討。中央銀行季刊,21(2),48-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.袁中越、余德培(1990)。時間數列在匯率預測模型之應用。基層金融,21,107-134。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.李秀雲(2002)。中央干預與新臺幣兌美元的匯率走勢。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.俞海琴(1986)。我國央行外匯干預行為之研究(碩士論文)。國立台灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.張淑菁(1994)。台灣地區外匯市場干預行為之實證分析─1985年至1993年(碩士論文)。國立中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊碧人(1985)。外匯市場干預法則之實證,0。  延伸查詢new window
4.謝豐鎮(1997)。外匯干預與沖銷措施之實證研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.汪義育、林柏生(1989)。匯率、利率估計與預測之研究-臺灣實證分析。匯率、利率估計與預測之研究-臺灣實證分析。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE