:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:探討實質匯率與匯率波動對台灣與中國貿易之影響
作者:蔡錦昌
作者(外文):Tsai, Chin-Ching
校院名稱:中華大學
系所名稱:科技管理博士學位學程
指導教授:徐子光
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2014
主題關鍵詞:實質匯率匯率波動ARDL模型標準差型態波動Real exchange rateExchange rate volatilityARDL modelStandard deviation type volatility
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:54
本文旨在探討實質匯率與匯率波動對台灣與中國在總體產業進出口及個別產業進出口之共整合關係與短期衝擊影響。並分析在不同階段的人民幣匯率制度改革、中國與台灣在加入WTO 組織前後、及2008年全球金融海嘯前後是否對台灣與中國相互間貿易產生影響。
研究期間始於1993年1月到2013年12月,採用標準差計算來衡量匯率的波動,並應用 Pesaran, Shin, and Smith ( 2001)發展之ARDL ( Autoregressive Distributed Lag) 邊界檢定法檢定序列是否存在共整合關係。進而應用ARDL模型對具有共整合產業做短期動態調整分析,並對全部產業做短期關係分析 。
研究結果如下:
檢定發現台灣出口到中國與台灣從中國進口之總出口值與總進口值皆具有共整合關係。在82個個別產業中,台灣出口到中國有62個產業具有共整合,台灣從中國進口有75個產業具有共整合。結果說明大部分產業都具有共整合關係,亦即長期而言變數間具有共移現象。
短期動態調整分析發現,實質匯率、匯率波動、中國匯率制度改革、WTO影響、金融海嘯影響等變數在總體產業上都沒有顯著影響到台灣出口到中國與台灣從中國進口之貿易。在個別產業上,台灣出口到中國與台灣從中國進口之貿易,僅有少數貿易額較小產業會受到實質匯率正向影響,大多數產業呈現不顯著影響。在匯率波動方面,也僅有少數貿易額較小產業會受到實質匯率負向影響,大多數產業亦呈現不顯著影響。另外,中國匯率制度改革、WTO影響、金融海嘯影響等三個變數也都沒有顯著影響到台灣出口到中國與台灣從中國進口之貿易。
在短期關係分析發現,實質匯率與匯率波動在總體產業上都沒有顯著影響到台灣出口到中國與台灣從中國進口之貿易;在其他變數方面,也只有第一次匯率改革有負向影響到台灣出口到中國貿易,其餘變數都沒有顯著影響。在個別產業方面,台灣出口到中國與台灣從中國進口之貿易,只有少數產業會受到實質匯率正向影響,大多數產業呈現不顯著影響。在匯率波動方面,只有少數台灣從中國進口之貿易會受到實質匯率負向影響,大多數產業仍呈現不顯著影響。另外,除中國第一次匯率制度改革有負向顯著影響台灣出口到中國之貿易,其餘變數都沒有顯著影響到台灣出口到中國與台灣從中國進口之貿易。
台灣與中國雙邊政治與經濟關係特殊,但很少有完整分析實質匯率與匯率波動對雙邊貿易的影響;況且過去對台灣與中國在貿易上的研究也都沒有考慮到匯率制度改革的影響,因此本研究探討這些主題便成研究上之重要貢獻。另外,本研究不僅關注在台灣與中國間相互出口總貿易的影響,也針對個別產業(HS二分類碼之項目)進行分析,此亦是本研究之重要貢獻。
The main purpose of this study was to explore trade effects of real exchange rate and exchange rate volatility on Taiwan and China bilateral trade. As such, aggregate trade and eight-two industry trade data were used to explore long- and short-term flow relationships. This research further aimed to (1) analyze the effect of RMB exchange rate regime reform in three reform stages, (2) bilateral trade flow effects before and after WTO participation, and (3) whether bilateral trade was affected by the 2008 global financial crisis.
Data of January 1993-December 2013 periods were targeted for investigation, and standard deviation type volatility was used to measure exchange rate fluctuation. For exploring long-term flow relationships, co-integration was examined by the ARDL boundary test model, and short-term relationship was proven by ARDL error correction mode and general ARDL model.
The first analysis step was to test co-integration relationship. The results confirmed co-integration regardless of aggregate export and import. Among 82 individual industries, co-integration was found in 62 Taiwan’s export industries and 75 Taiwan’s imports industries, implying that most industries had co-integration relationships. In other words, long-term equilibrium relationships existed among variables and these variables had co-move phenomenon in the long term.
Short-term dynamic adjustment analysis found that real exchange rate, exchange rate volatility, RMB exchange rate regime reform, WTO impact and global financial crisis in aggregate industry did not have significant impacts on Taiwan’s import and export trade. Specifically, in individual industries, Taiwan’s export and import as well as real exchange rate had short-term positive effects to only a fraction of industry while most industries showed no significant effect. In terms of exchange rate volatility, only a few industrial were negatively influenced whilst most industries showed no significant effect. In addition, three times of RMB exchange rate regime reform, WTO impact and global financial crisis were found to have no significant impact on Taiwan and China bilateral trade.
Concerning Taiwan’s exports and import in short-term relationship, real exchange rate and exchange rate volatility were found to have no significant effect on aggregate trade. Regarding other variables, only Taiwan’s export to China was significantly negatively affected by the first time of China’s exchange rate regime reform while the rest of variables were not.
Regarding Taiwan’s export and import, real exchange rate showed significantly positive impact on only a few of individual industries. Non-significant effects were found in most of industries. Exchange rate volatility was found to exert significantly negative impact on only a fraction of Taiwan’s import, not on the rest part of this industry. Moreover, only the first time of China’s exchange rate regime reform had significant negative effects on Taiwan’s export. The rest of variables were not significantly affected.
Finally, despite bilateral political and economic relations between Taiwan and China has been considered a special research issue, only few studies have explored the impact of real exchange rate and exchange rate volatility on bilateral trade. Additionally, the impact of the China’s exchange rate regime reform has not been sufficiently taken into consideration in past studies on Taiwan and China bilateral trade. Hence, this study has beneficially contributed important references regarding Taiwan and China bilateral trade. Furthermore, analyses on not only aggregate trade but also individual industries were other contributions of this study.
方文碩、賴奕豪(2001)。匯率風險對出口貿易之衝擊。台灣金融財務季刊,2(1),83-101。new window
方文碩、 張倉耀、葉志權(2005)。匯率貶值及其風險與出口。經濟研究,41(1),105-139。new window
王泓仁(2005)。台幣匯率對我國經濟金融活動之影響。中央銀行季刊,27(1),13-45。
牛慈敏(2012)。我國匯率波動性的不對稱性與中央銀行干涉。未出版之碩士論文,國防大學管理學院財務管理學系,台北市。
江朝宗(2011)。實質所得、相對價格、匯率與國際貿易之關聯分析:以台灣對美日貿易為例。未出版之碩士論文,私立中國文化大學國際貿易學系,台北市。new window
邱如伶(2008)。實質匯率,外人直接投資與中國對外貿易關係之研究。未出版之博士論文,國立政治大學國際經營與貿易研究所,台北市。new window
何碧蘭、陳天志、蔡孟易(2013)。匯率變動對貿易出口影響之研究-以台灣機電類對四大國之出口值為例。桃園創新學報,33,239-258。
林福來、彭建章、劉春蘭(2008)。匯率波動對美國出口的影響-ARDL共整合分析法的應用。人文暨社會科學期刊,4(2),1-9。new window
郭佩婷(2008)。匯率不確定性對台灣出口波動之影響。未出版之碩士論文,國立政治大學國際經營與貿易研究所,台北市。
陳坤銘、郭炳伸、林信助、林家慶(2012)。新台幣實質匯率與產業升級及對外投資關係。中央銀行季刊,34(1),3-38。new window
陳佩玗、田慧琦(2012)。影響中長期新台幣實質有效匯率因素的探討。中央銀行季刊,34(2),43-84。new window
黃久倫(2009)。匯率波動對貿易進出口影響之實證研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立中正大學國際經濟所,嘉義市。
黃素玲(2005)。匯率不確定性對進出口貿易的影響-台灣之實證研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立中正大學國際經濟研究所,嘉義市。
彭德明(2013)。東亞主要新興經濟體匯率變動率波動與共變程度之實證分析。中央銀行季刊,35(3),3-36。new window
黃韻禎(2007)。匯率波動對台灣出口的影響。未出版之碩士論文,國立政治大學國際貿易研究所,台北市。
趙文志(2011)。國際貨幣權力理論的應用:中國匯率政策改變的原因分析。問題與研究,50(2),143-167。new window
趙蒼頡(2006)。匯率波動對台灣出口量的影響:以新加坡和泰國為例。未出版之碩士論文,國立台灣大學國際企業學研究所,台北市。
楊雅惠、許嘉棟 (2005)。新臺幣匯率與央行干預行為。臺灣經濟預測與政策,35(2),23-41。new window
蔡孟純(2000)。匯率波動風險對出口量的影響--對不同資料型態的分析。未出版之碩士論文,淡江大學國際貿易學系,新北市。
An, H. &; Huang, W. (2009). The influence of level and volatility of RMB’s real exchange rate on bilateral trade: The empirical study of China-USA and China-Japan trade. Journal of Financial Research, 10, 83-93.
Arize, A. C., Osangand, T., &; Slottje, D. J. (2008). Exchange rate volatility in Latin America and its impact on foreign trade. International Review of Economics and Finance, 17 (1), 33-44.
Aurangzeb, A., Stengos, T., &; Mohammad, A.U. (2005). Short-run and long-run effects of exchange rate volatility on the volume of exports: A case study for Pakistan. International Journal of Business and Economics, 4(3), 209-222.
Baak, S. J., Al-Mahmood, M. A., &; Vitathep, S. (2007). Exchange rate volatility and Exports from East Asian Countries to Japan and the USA. Applied Economics, 39 (8), 947-959.
Baak, S.J. (2008). The bilateral real exchange rates and trade between China and the U.S. China Economic Review, 19, 117-127.
Bahmani-Oskooee, M., Harvey, H., &; Hegerty, S. W. (2013). The effects of exchange-rate volatility on commodity trade between the U.S. and Brazil. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 25, 70-93.
Bahmani-Oskooee, M., Harvey, H., &; Hegerty, S. W. (2014). Exchange rate volatility and Spanish-American commodity trade flows. Economic Systems (in press)
Campa, J. M. (2004). Exchange rates and trade: How important is hysteresis in trade? European Economic Review, 48, 527-548.
Cheung, Y. W., Chinn, M. D., &; Fujii, E. (2009). China’s current account and exchange rate. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 14673. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Cheung, Y. W. &; Sengupta, R. (2013). Impact of exchange rate movements on exports: An analysis of Indian non-financial sector firms. Journal of International Money and Finance, 39, 231-245.
Chit, M. M., Rizov, M., &; Willenbockel, D. (2010). Exchange rate volatility and exports: new empirical evidence from the Emerging East Asian Economies. The World Economy, 33(2), 239-263.
Choudhry, T. (2008). Exchange rate volatility and United Kingdom Trade: Evidence from Canada Japan and New Zealand. Empirical Economics, 35(3), 607-619.
Engle, R. F., &; Granger, C. W .J. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251-276.
Fang, W. S., Lai, Y. H., &; Thompson, H. (2007). Exchange rates, exchange risk, and Asian export revenue. International Review of Economics &; Finance, 16, 237-254.
Garcia-Herrero, A. &; Koivu, T. (2009). China’s exchange rate policy and Asian trade. Bank for International Settlements Working Paper No. 282.
Gotur, P. (1985). Effect of exchange rate volatility on trade: Some further evidence. International Monetary Fund Staff Paper, 32, 17-22.
Hall, S., Hondroyiannis, G., Swamy, P. A. V. B., Tavlas, G., &; Ulan, M. (2010). Exchange-rate volatility and export performance: do emerging market economies resemble industrial countries or other developing countries? Economic Modelling, 27(6), 1514-1521.
Jantarakolica, T. &; Chalermsook, P. (2012), Thai export under exchange rate volatility: A case study of textile and garment products. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40, 751-755.
Kasman, A., &; Kasman, S. (2005). Exchange rate uncertainty in Turkey and its impact on export volume. METU Studies in Development, 32, 41-58.
Kenen, P. B. &; Rodrik, D. (1986). Measuring and analyzing the effects of short-term volatility in real exchange rates. Review of Economics and Statistics, 68, 311-315.
Nishimura, Y. (2010). RMB exchange rate volatility and Sino-Japan Exports. AjiaKeizai, 51 (5), 2-21.
Nishimura, Y. &; Hirayama, K. ( 2013). Does exchange rate volatility deter Japan-China trade? Evidence from pre- and post-exchange rate reform in China. Japan and the World Economy, 25-26, 90-101.
Chamon, M. M., Ostry, M. J. D., &; Ghosh, M. A. R. (2012). Two targets, two instruments: Monetary and exchange rate polices in emerging market economics. IMF Staff Discussion Note, SDN/12/01, Feb. 29.
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., &; Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16 (3), 289–326.
Poon, W. C., Choong, C. K., &; Habibullah, M. S. (2005). Exchange rate volatility and exports for selected East Asian Countries: Evidence from error correction model. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 22 (2), 144–159.
Pozo, S. (1992). Conditional exchange rate volatility and volume of international trade: Evidence from the early 1900’s. The Review of Economics &; Statistics, 74, 325-329.
Sukar, A. H. &; Hassan, S. (2001). US exports and time-varying volatility of real exchange rate. Global Finance Journal, 12, 109-119.
Sercu, P. &; Uppal, R. (2003). Exchange rate volatility and international trade: A general-equilibrium analysis. European Economic Review, 47, 429-44.
Thorbecke, W. &; Smith, G. (2010). How would an appreciation of the renminbi and other East Asian currencies affect China’s exports? Review of International Economics, 18(1), 95-108.
Verheyen, F. (2012). Bilateral exports from euro zone countries to the US-Does exchange rate variability play a role? International Review of Economics and Finance, 24, 97-108.
Verheyen, F. (2013). Exchange rate nonlinearities in EMU exports to the US. Economic Modelling, 32, 66-76
Xing, Y. (2012). Processing trade, exchange rates and China’s bilateral trade balances. Journal of Asian Economics. 23, 540-547.
Zelekha, Y. &; Ohad, B. (2011). The link between exchange rate uncertainty and Israeli exports to the US: 2SLS and cointegration approaches. Research in Economics 65, 100-109.
Zhang, Y., Chang, H., &; Gauger, J. (2006). The threshold effect of exchange rate volatility on trade volume: Evdience from G-7 countries. International Economic Journal, 20(4), 461-476.
Zhang, Z. (1999). Foreign exchange rate reform, the balance of trade and economic growth: An empirical analysis for China. Journal of Economic Development, 24(2), 143-162.
Zhang, Z. (2001). China's exchange rate reform and exports. Economics of Planning, 34, 89-112.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE