臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：基進民主理論的政治思辨
書刊名：政治科學論叢
作者：蔡英文 引用關係
作者(外文)：Tsai, Ying-wen
出版日期：2005
卷期：23
頁次：頁1-26
主題關鍵詞：基進民主；民主的不確定性；敵對；權力之虛位；霸權；主導權；Radical democracy；Poloms；Struggle；Inderteminacy of democracy；The empty space of power；Hegemony；Aesthetics of democratic politics
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:13
  • 點閱點閱:81
　　　　　本文的旨趣在於闡釋當代基進民主論者針對自由憲民主之基設所提出的反思批判論，以及就此判論所形成的民主論述。基進民主論述，本文論述的主題如下：「基進」或「野性」民主不僅承認對立衝突即是民主政治的基本性格，而且更進一步將對立衝突解釋為民主政治之本體。既是如此，這種民鋌理論必然涉及有關對立衝突以及暴力之解釋的議題。若以基進民主內在論證的理論必然涉及有關對立衝突以及暴力之解釋的議題。若以基進民主內在論證的理路來說，暴力用之於抵抗獨裁或任何基式的暴虐統治，或者在創設新體制的「非常態場合」，是可證明為有效與正當的。但是基進民主因排斥憲政治治以及政治文化的論證環節，致使它很容易走向浪漫主義式的暴力美學的理路，而對於「民主之穩定性」的問題缺乏積極性的論證。
　　　　　The aim of this essay is to expound the criticism of Radical democracy against the postulates of Liberal Constitutionalism. Following from that, this essay contitues to interpret the main topics of Radical Democracy with articulating the argumentations the Radial democrats elaborate for them. Concerning the theories of Radical Democracy, this essay argues the following thesis: Radical Democracy not only recognizes the poloms as the ontology of democracy. However, such a democratic theory is necessarily involved with the issues about the interpretations of confliction and violence. In so far as this is concerned, this essay approve that violence can be legitimately used for protesting the dictatorship or any despotism, as well as for creating the liberal constitution. However, since the theories of Radical Democracy explain away the moments of constitutional law, the institutional arrangement, and the positive functions of public cultures, they are inclined to trap themselves in the romantic aesthetics of violence.
期刊論文
1.林淑芬(20030300)。政治行動的可能性條件。政治與社會哲學評論，4，29-72。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Offe, Claus(1998)。'Homogeneity' and Constitutional Democracy: Coping with Identity Conflicts through Group Rights。The Journal of Political Philosophy，6(2)，113-141。  new window
3.蔡英文(20001200)。民主與現代處境--Claude Lefort的民主概念。國立中山大學社會科學季刊，2(4)，1-26。  延伸查詢new window
4.Laclau, Ernesto(2001)。Democracy and the Question of Power。Constellations，8(1)，3-14。  new window
5.Abensour, Miguel(2002)。Savage Democracy and Principle of Anarchy。Philosophy & Social Criticism，28(6)，703-726。  new window
6.Deranty, Jean-Philippe(2003)。Jacques Rancière's Contribution to the Ethics of Recognition。Political Theory，31(1)，136-156。  new window
7.Lefort, Claude(1990)。Renaissance of Democracy。Praxi International，10(2/1)，1-13。  new window
8.Mouffe, C.(1995)。Post-Marxism: Democracy and Identity。Environment and Planning, D: Society and Space，13(3)，259-265。  new window
9.Norris, A. C.、Norris, A.(2002)。Against Antagonism。Constellations，9(4)，554-573。  new window
10.Clarke, Thomas(1999)。Feyerabend, Rorty, Mouffe and Keane: On Realising Democracy。Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy，2(3)，81-118。  new window
11.Rancière, Jacques(1997)。Democracy Means Equality: An Interview。Radical Philosophy，82，29-36。  new window
12.Wolin, Sheldon S.(1996)。The Liberal/ Democratic Divide: On Rawls's Political Liberalism。Political Theory，24(1)，97-142。  new window
圖書
1.Mouffe, Chantal、Laclau, Ernesto(2001)。Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Domocratic Politics。Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Domocratic Politics。London, UK：Verso。  new window
2.Rancière, Jacques、Rose, Julie(1999)。Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy。University of Minnesota Press。  new window
3.Coicaud, Jean、Curtis, D. A.(2002)。Legitimacy and Politics: A Contribution to the Study of Political Right and Political Responsibility。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Lefort, Claude(1988)。Democracy and Political Theory。Minneapolis：University of Minnesota Press。  new window
5.Mouffe, Chantal(1993)。The Return of the Political。Verso。  new window
6.Keane, John(1996)。Reflections on Violence。Reflections on Violence。London, UK。  new window
7.Balibar, Étienne(2002)。Politics and Other Scene。Politics and Other Scene。London, UK。  new window
8.Hanssen, Beatrice(2000)。Critique of Violence: Between Postructuralism and Critical Theory。Critique of Violence: Between Postructuralism and Critical Theory。London, UK。  new window
9.Balibar, Étienne(1998)。Spinoza and Politics。Spinoza and Politics。London, UK。  new window
10.Mouffe, M.(1988)。Radical Democracy: Modern or Postmodern?。Universal Abandon: The Politics of Postmodernism。Minneapolis, MN。  new window
11.Rancière, Jacques(1995)。On the Shores of Politics。London, UK：Verso。  new window
圖書論文
1.Mouffe, C.(1997)。Democratic Identity and Pluralist Politics。Justice and Democracy: Cross-cultural Perspectives。Honolulu, HI：University of Hawaii Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：757（臺灣：701，外國：56） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1563831 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67370856
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上