:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣參加南極條約的可能性
書刊名:臺灣海洋法學報
作者:李明峻
作者(外文):Li, Ming-juinn
出版日期:2005
卷期:4:1
頁次:頁73-99
主題關鍵詞:南極條約國際法臺灣國際地位多邊條約Antarctic treatyInternational lawTaiwanInternational statusMultinational conventions
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:18
  • 點閱點閱:86
1961年《南極條約》成立之後,各國因應各種需要而陸續制定其他條約,統稱為南極體制條約。然則對於這樣一個特殊的條約體制,以臺灣目前的法律地位,是否有可能加入南極體制條約?本文旨在從國際社會的實踐與學者的理論,釐清我國參加《南極條約》的可能性,希望未來參與其他多國間條約能有參考價值。 本文研究顯示,雖然臺灣的國際地位特殊,但根據該公約第十三條第一項規定,只要我國根據憲法程序予以批准或加入,再將批准書和加入書交存於美國政府,本條約即於交存書時生效。因此,臺灣在未來並非沒有機會加入。
After the Antarctic Treaty came into force in 1961, many involving countries continued to augment the treaty based on various needs. The whole complex of arrangements made for the purpose of regulating relations among states is generally called the Antarctic Treaty Complex. In our current legal status, is it possible for Taiwan to participate in the Antarctic Treaty Complex? The whole purpose of this study is to probe into this issue through the eyes of scholars and through the practices of international societies in order to clarify the possibility for Taiwan to take part in the Antarctic Treaty Complex, in the hope to make future references for Taiwan in the involvements of other multi-national treaties. The study has revealed that even though Taiwan is in a very unique international status, Taiwan still have chance to participate in the system based on article 13, item 1, which states that as long as the procedure of constitution allows or admits the participation, Taiwan should only submit the document of admittance ad document of application to the US government, and the Antarctic Treaty Complex is in effect immediately therefore Taiwan still has the chance to take part in the Antarctic affairs.
期刊論文
1.許志雄(1991)。「分裂國家」--修憲的解讀。國家政策動態分析,c007,3。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳隆志(199909)。台灣的國際法地位。新世紀智庫論叢,7。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳隆志(199307)。台灣加入聯合國的展望。律師通信,169。  延伸查詢new window
4.王志安(1992)。多数国条約における当事者としての台湾。法学論叢,130(4)。  延伸查詢new window
5.(19441207)。Convention on International Civil Aviation (Chicago)。U. N. T. S.,15。  new window
6.(1990)。Annex: List of Bi-Lateral Agreements。Chinese Yearbook International Law and Affairs,10。  new window
7.(1992)。Agreement on Mutual Cooperation in Civil Aviation, (July 28,1993) Taipei-Moscow Economic and Cultural Coordination Commission-Taipei Economic and Cultural Commission。Chinese Yearbook International Law and Affairs,12。  new window
8.Chiu, Hungdah(1990)。Legal Problems in ROC's Participation in Inter-Governmental Organizations。A.R.C.I.L.I.A.,4。  new window
9.Green, L. C.(195007)。The Recognition of Communist China。The International Law Quarterly,3(3),418-422。  new window
10.Attix, Cheri L.(1995)。Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea: Are Taiwan's Trading Partners Implying Recognition of Taiwanese Statehood?。California Western International Law Journal,25(2),357-357。  new window
11.Carolan, Christopher J.(2000)。The 'Republic of Taiwan': A Legal-Historical Justification for a Taiwanese Declaration of Independence。New York University Law Review,75(2),429-468。  new window
12.Magdelenat, Jean-Louis、Huang, Jiefang(1985)。Les accords de transport aerien dans les successions d'etats : le cas particulier de Hong-Kong。Annals de droit aeroen et spatial,10。  new window
13.小谷鶴次(197207)。分裂国家と国際法の適用。国際法外交雜誌,71(2)。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.簡敏麗(2002)。南極.北極:來到南極與北極,探訪冰天雪地的世界。泛亞國際文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.光復書局編輯部(1987)。世界百科全書。台北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.位夢華、胡領太(1992)。南極屬于誰。海燕出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.神沼克伊(1964)。冰の大陸:南極。東京:玉川大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.王志安(1999)。國際法における承認。東京:東信堂。  延伸查詢new window
6.Charmelot, Jacques(19940307)。Les Droits de l 'Homme au Menu des entretiens du Minister Neerlandais des Affaires Etrangers。Agence France Presse。  new window
7.Dam, Kenneth W.(1977)。The GATT: Law and the International Economic Organization。Chicago:The University of Chicago Press。  new window
8.Copper, John F.(1990)。Taiwan: Nation-State or Province?。Westview Press。  new window
其他
1.Krestof, Nicholas D.(19930118)。Taiwan Winning New Friends, Hopes for Another One in Clinton。  new window
圖書論文
1.許宗力(199903)。兩岸關係的法律定位--現狀與未來發展。憲法與法治國行政。台北:元照出版。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃昭元(200005)。兩國論的憲法分析--憲法解釋的挑戰與突破。兩國論與臺灣國家定位。臺北:學林文化事業有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE