資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.222.210.166)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
「邁向藝術」課程模式應用於國小五年級學童編曲創作知能之研究
書刊名:
藝術教育研究
作者:
林小玉
作者(外文):
Lin, Sheau-yuh
出版日期:
2005
卷期:
10
頁次:
頁87-126
主題關鍵詞:
共識化評量技法
;
音樂
;
音樂創造力
;
編曲
;
邁向藝術
;
Consensual assessment technique
;
Music
;
Music creativity
;
Music arranging
;
Arts PROPEL
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
4
) 博士論文(
2
) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
4
共同引用:0
點閱:63
本研究旨在探究國小五年級學童之編曲知能,藉由融入「邁向藝術」課程方案精神的教學實驗,以研究者亦為課程設計者與教學者之方式,試圖回答五個研究問題。研究對象包括兩類,一為台北市某國小五年級一班學生35人,另為六位不同音樂背景之音樂專家審評人。透過文獻探討法、個案研究法、量表調查法與內容分析法,蒐集並分析各類質、量化資料。「邁向藝術」課程模式應用於國小五年級音樂編曲課程,得以下之研究結果,(l)學生能呈現多樣化的編曲知能,惟組別間之表現有落差;(2)學生之編曲記譜策略多元而有彈性,對音高記譜的掌握優於對節奏記譜的掌握;(3)學生之編曲知能確實能隨著時間的演進有相當的進步,特別是在音樂美感通則的掌握與音樂元素之多元化與細緻化;(4)共識化評量技法應用於學童編曲作品之審評具可行性;(5)不同音樂專業背景之審評人在學童編曲作品之看法上並無必然的關係。
以文找文
The purpose of this study was to investigate music arranging ability of fifth-graders in an elementary school. The nature of Arts PROPEL curriculum was infused into this implementation. The researcher, as curriculum designer and instructor, aimed to answer five research questions. Two categories of subjects were involved, namely, one class of 35 fifth-grade students in Taipei city as well as six music specialist judges of different music backgrounds. Through extensive literature review, case studies, rating scale surveys and content analysis, both qualitative and quantitative data were gathered and analyzed. Results of the application of Arts PROPEL curriculum model for fifth-grade music arranging study were as follows: (1) Fifth-graders' music arranging techniques revealed a certain level of variety while group performances differed; (2) Fifth-graders' approaches in music arrangement notation were versatile and flexible, generally performing better in notating pitches than rhythm; (3) Fifth-graders did make progress in music arranging ability, especially in the aspects of the mastery of general music aesthetic rules as well as the variability and refinement of musical elements; (4) It was feasible to utilize consensual assessment technique in judging fifth-graders' music arranging ability; (5) Music backgrounds did not necessarily correlate between judges' opinions in fifth-graders' music arranging performances.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Wiggins, Jackie(2005)。Fostering Revision and Extension in Student Composing。Music Educators Journal,91(3),35-42。
2.
Barrett, M.(1997)。Invented notations: A view of young children’s musical thinking。Research Studies in Music Education,8,2-14。
3.
Barrett, Margaret(2000)。Windows, Mirrors, and Reflections: A Case Study of Adult Constructions of Children's Musical Thinking。Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education,145,43-61。
4.
Scripp, Larry、Meyaard, Joan、Davidson, Lyle(1988)。Discerning Musical Development: Using Computers to Discover What We Know。Journal of Aesthetic Education,22(1),75-88。
5.
趙永男(1987)。節奏訓練與節奏板的製作與運用。音樂教育季刊,7,29-34。
延伸查詢
6.
Barrett, M.(2001)。Constructing a view of children’s meaning-making as notators: A case-study of a five-year-old’s descriptions and explanations of invented notations。Research Studies in Music Education,16,33-45。
7.
Webster, P. R.(1990)。Creativity as Creative Thinking。Music Educators Journal,76(9),22-28。
8.
Gibson, S. M.(1988)。A comparison of music and multiple arts experiences in the development of creativity in middle school students。Dissertation Abstracts International,49(12A),3543-3544。
9.
邱家麟(1989)。樸質無偽的音色魅力:淺談直笛及其教育功能。師友月刊,266,46-48。
延伸查詢
10.
徐松榮(1989)。兒童樂隊的編曲。音樂教育,13,29-40。
延伸查詢
11.
Auh, Myung-Sook、Walker, Robert(1991)。Compositional Strategies and Musical Creativity when Composing with Staff Notation Versus Graphic Notations among Korean Students。Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education,141,2-9。
12.
Barrett, Margaret(1997)。Invented Notations: A View of Young Children's Musical Thinking。Research Studies in Music Education,8(1),2-14。
13.
Barrett, Margaret(2001)。Constructing a View of Children's Meaning-making as Notators: A Case-study of a Five-year-old's Descriptions and Explanations of Invented Notations。Research Studies in Music Education,16(1),33-45。
14.
Folkestad, Göran、Hargreaves, David J.、Lindstrom, Berner(1998)。Compositional Strategies in Computer-based Music-making。British Journal of Music Education,15(1),83-97。
15.
Gardner, Howard(1989)。Zero-based Arts Education: An Introduction to Arts PROPEL。Studies in Art Education,30(2),71-83。
16.
Hickey, Maud、Hickey, M.(2001)。An Application of Amabile's Consensual Assessment Technique for Rating the Creativity of Children's Musical Compositions。Journal of Research in Music Education,49(3),234-244。
17.
Kratus, John(2001)。Effect of Available Tonality and Pitch Options on Children's Compositional Processes and Products。Journal of Research in Music Education,49(4),294-306。
18.
邱家麟(1989)。樸質無偽的音色魅力─淺談直笛及其教育功能。師友月刊=The Educator Monthly,266,46-58。
延伸查詢
19.
徐松榮(1989)。兒童樂隊的編曲。音樂教育季刊,13,29-40。
延伸查詢
20.
Amchin, R. A.(1995)。Creative musical response: The effects of teacher-student interaction on the improvisation abilities of fourth-and fifth-grade students。Dissertation Abstracts International A,56(08),3044A。
21.
Auh, M.、Walker, R.(1991)。Compositional strategies and musical creativity when composing with staff notation versus graphic notations among Korean students。Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education,141,2-9。
22.
Bangs, R. L.(1993)。An application of Amabile’s model of creativity to music instruction: A comparison of motivational strategies。Dissertation Abstracts International A,53,4243A。
23.
Daignault, L.(1997)。Children’s creative musical thinking within the context of a computer-supported improvisational approach to composition。Dissertation Abstracts International A,57,4681A。
24.
Folkstad, G.、Hargreaves, D. J.、Lindstrom, B.(1998)。Compositional strategies in computer-based music-making。British Journal of Music Education,15(1),83-97。
25.
Hickey, M.(1995)。Qualitative and quantitative relationships between children’s creative musical thinking processes and product。Dissertation Abstracts International A,57(1),145A。
26.
Hickey, M.(2001)。An application of Amabile’s consensual assessment teachnique for rating the creativity of children’s musical compositions。Journal of Research in Music Education,49(3),234-244。
27.
Kratus, J.(2001)。Effect of available tonality and pitch options on children’s compositional processes and products。Journal of Research in Music Education,49(4),294-306。
28.
Gardner, H.(1989)。Zero-based arts education: an introductioin to arts propel。Studies in Art Education,30(2),76。
會議論文
1.
林小玉(2003)。國內外音樂創造力評量觀之演進與比較。2003音樂教育學術研討會。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學。185-205。
延伸查詢
研究報告
1.
Webster, P.(1994)。Measure of Creative thinking in music-II (MCTM-II): Administrative guidelines。Evanston, IL。
學位論文
1.
林雯瑤(1995)。臺灣地區公共圖書館的社會角色與功能之研究(碩士論文)。淡江大學。
延伸查詢
2.
王木榮(1985)。威廉斯創造力測驗修訂研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。
延伸查詢
3.
徐端娌(2003)。「邁向藝術」課程方案應用於國小五年級音樂課之質的研究(碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院,臺北。
延伸查詢
4.
Amchin, R. A.(1996)。Creative Musical Response: The Effects of Teacher-student Interaction on the Improvisation Abilities of Fourth- and Fifth-grade Students,0。
5.
Bangs, Randy L.(1993)。An Application of Amabile's Model of Creativity to Music Instruction: A Comparison of Motivational Strategies,0。
6.
Christensen, C.(1992)。Music Composition, Invented Notation and Reflection: Tools for Music Learning and Assessment,New Brunswick, NJ。
7.
Daignault, L.(1997)。Children's Creative Musical Thinking within the Context of a Computer-supported Improvisational Approach to Composition,0。
8.
Gibson, S.(1989)。A Comparison of Music and Multiple Arts Experiences in the Development of Creativity in Middle School Students,0。
9.
Hickey, M.(1996)。Qualitative and Quantitative Relationships between Children's Creative Musical Thinking Processes and Product,0。
10.
徐端娌(2003)。「邁向藝術」課程方案應用於國小五年級音樂科教學之質的研究,臺北。
延伸查詢
11.
Christensen, C.(1992)。Music composition, invented notation and reflection: Tools for music learning and assessment,New Brunswick。
圖書
1.
Johnson, David W.、Johnson, Roger T.、Holubec, Edythe Johnson(1986)。Circles of Learning: Cooperation in the Classroom。Edina, MN:Interaction Books。
2.
Consortium of National Arts Education Associations(1994)。National standards for arts education。National standards for arts education。Reston, VA。
3.
邱皓政(2002)。量化研究統計分析:SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。臺北:五南。
延伸查詢
4.
吳明隆(1999)。SPSS統計應用實務。台北:松崗。
延伸查詢
5.
Amabile, T. M.、Collins, M. A.、Conti, R.、Phillips, E.、Picariello, M.、Ruscio, J.、Whitney, D.(1996)。Creativity in Context: Updates to the Social Psychology of Creativity。Boulder, Co:Westview Press。
6.
Reimer, B.(2003)。A philosophy of music education: advancing the vision。New Jersey:Pearson Education, Inc.。
7.
Boyle, J. David、Radocy, Rudolf E.(1987)。Measurement and Evaluation of Musical Experiences。New York, NY:Schirmer Books。
8.
Elliott, D. J.(1995)。Music matters: A new philosophy of music education。Oxford University Press。
9.
Yin, Robert K.(2003)。Case Study Research: Design and Methods。Sage Publications。
10.
(1994)。National Standards for Arts Education。National Standards for Arts Education。Virginia。
11.
張統星(1991)。國小音樂科學研究。國小音樂科學研究。臺北市。
延伸查詢
12.
Upitis, Rena(1992)。Can I Play You My Song? The Compositions and Invented Notations of Children。Can I Play You My Song? The Compositions and Invented Notations of Children。Portsmouth, NH。
13.
Winner, Ellen、Davidson, Lyle、Scripp, Larry(1992)。Arts PROPEL: A Handbook for Music。Arts PROPEL: A Handbook for Music。Cambridge, MA。
14.
張統星(1991)。國小音樂科教學研究。國小音樂科教學研究。臺北。
延伸查詢
15.
鍾禮章(2001)。多元評量在九年一貫課程教學上應用之研究。多元評量在九年一貫課程教學上應用之研究。
延伸查詢
16.
Feinberg, S.(1991)。Creative problem-solving and the music listening experience。Creativity in the music classroom。Reston, VA。
17.
Holubec, E.、Johnson, D. W.、Johnson, R. T.(1986)。Circles of Learning: Cooperation in the Classroom。Circles of Learning: Cooperation in the Classroom。Edina, MN。
18.
Upitis, R.(1992)。Can I play you my song? The compositions and invented notations of children。Can I play you my song? The compositions and invented notations of children。Portsmouth, NH。
19.
Webster, P.(2002)。Creative thinking in music: Advancing a model。Creativity and music education。New York。
20.
Winner, E.、Davidson, L.、Scripp, L.(1992)。Arts PROPEL: A handbook for music。Arts PROPEL: A handbook for music。Cambridge。
單篇論文
1.
Webster, P. R.(1994)。Measure of Creative Thinking in Music-II (MCTM-II): Administrative Guidelines,Evanston, Illinois:Northwestern University。,http://pasdprofessionaldevelopment.wikispaces.com/file/view/05WebsterMCTMII.pdf/345408594/05WebsterMCTMII.pdf。
其他
1.
鍾禮章(2001)。多元評量在九年一貫課程教學上應用之研究,0。
延伸查詢
2.
Boyd, M.(2005)。Arrangement,0。
3.
Boyd, M.(2005)。Arrangement。
圖書論文
1.
Webster, P. R.(2002)。Creative Thinking in Music: Advancing a Model。Creativity and Music Education。Edmonton, Alberta:Canadian Music Educators' Association。
2.
Feinberg, Saul(1991)。Creative problem-solving and the music listening experience。Creativity in the music classroom。Reston, VA:MENC。
3.
Mayer, R. E.(1999)。Fifty Years of Creativity Research。Handbook of Creativity。Cambridge University Press。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
國小五年級學童個人歌曲創作過程之研究
2.
國小五年級學童歌曲創作知能之探討
3.
發現音樂--大班兒童音樂創思之研究
4.
高中職學生藝術創造力影響指標之研究:以全國競賽得獎學生為對象
5.
臺美音樂創造力教育的歷史面
1.
高中音樂班幸福感融入理論作曲教學成效之研究
2.
高齡畫家創造力之研究—以Csikszentmihalyi創造力系統模型探析
無相關書籍
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code