:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:宋人詩餘觀念的形成
書刊名:臺大中文學報
作者:劉少雄 引用關係
作者(外文):Lau, Siu-hung
出版日期:2005
卷期:23
頁次:頁235-275
主題關鍵詞:蘇軾詩餘詞學以詩為詞Su ShiShiyuCi poeticYi-shi-wei-ciWriting ci in the manner of composing poetry
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:15
  • 點閱點閱:73
本文探討宋代的詩餘說,不僅在於考訂出處,還原詩餘一說的本貌,更重要的是想藉此了解宋代詞體觀念的演進。本文的撰述,先是確認「詩餘」一語出現的時間,以明詩餘觀在宋代衍進的狀況;再藉明清以來詩餘說的幾個中心論點,導入主題,歸納分析宋代詩餘說的內容及意冒;然後論證宋代詩餘觀與東坡「以詩為詞」說的關係。據研究得知,宋人不曾以「詩餘」明指一闋闋的詞,但用「詩餘」作為詞之代稱的看法卻已存在。「詩餘」一語的出現,蓋始於南宋初高宗孝宗間,到理宗時已頗流行,多見於書名、篇名、詩句、文句、詞句及門類別,卻未有明確的定義。今天我們只能從各家言談中歸納其所描述的意涵或陳述的概念去了解「詩餘」的梗概。宋人的詩餘說,普遍是由文體源流的觀點切入看詩詞的關係;亦有由創作主體的內在生命、現實寫作情況論詞之所由生。前者視詞為詩之餘波別派,後者視詞為詩人之餘事、詩文之餘緒。宋人以詞為「詩」之餘,有著詩高於詞的心態在,他們為詞體而辯護,尋源溯流,將詞導入詩的正統,肯定詞體詩化的意義,無非是為了強化詞的功能,提升其文學價值。從創作主體的觀點而視詞為文人創作的餘緒、詩文的餘事者,其實亦隱含兩個意義;一則認定詞體的地位終究不如詩文;一則認為以充裕的德性、有餘的才力為詞,自然能促進詞體質性的改變,不為情欲所役,反而更能尊體,使詞能合於道德的內涵、雅正的風貌以及詩的筆調與意境。宋人的相關論說多有引用、評析或讀賞東坡的字句,由此可見東坡及其詞對宋代詞學的影響,而東坡「以詩為詞」的概念無疑就是了解詩餘觀念如何形成的重要線索。
This paper explores three aspects of the history related to the concept of shiyu which was formed in the Song dynasty. First of all, it examines in detail the period during which the term shiyu was gradually used by critics and writers. The paper also analyses the ways in which the concept appeared. It indicates that the term shiyu first appeared in the early South-ern Song dynasty, most probably in the middle period of the 11th century. However, due to the absence of a clear definition, the meaning of shiyu at that time was quite ambiguous. In the second part, therefore, the paper tries to reconstruct its meaning by examining the various kinds of materials in which the term was found. In brief, shiyu, a term epitomizing what later known as ci, is composed of two characters: shi (poetry) and yu (surplus). The paper indicates that the concept of shiyu as it was formed in the Song dynasty primarily denoted the essence of ci and its origin, while people's sole motive to adopt the term shiyu was to improve the status of ci. Accord-ing to this study, the term "shiyu" probably has two connotations: (1) the source of ci is shi (including various kinds of poetry, such as Shi-jing詩經, yue-fu 樂府 and jin-ti-shi 近體詩 ); and (2) the ci poet uses his/her surplus strength to write ci poetry. Finally, the paper takes into account the far-reaching influence exerted by Su Shi. It argues that Su's famous view on ci, namely " yi-shi wei-ci," had largely shaped other people's tendency to regard ci as shi.
期刊論文
1.施蟄存(1982)。說詩餘。文藝理論研究,1982(1),72-78。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉少雄(1991)。草堂詩餘的版本、性質和影響。中國文學研究,5,215-236。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.夏承燾(1966)。詩餘論。文學評論,1966(1),61-68。  延伸查詢new window
4.(明)趙尊嶽。草堂詩餘跋。同聲月刊,1(11),87。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.劉少雄(2005)。宋代詞學中蘇辛詞「豪」之論。臺北。171-200。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉少雄(2001)。超乎雅俗─論東坡詞境的取向。臺中。279-309。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.夏承燾、吳熊和(2000)。讀詞常識。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.彭乘(1965)。墨客揮犀。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
3.金啓華(199005)。唐宋詞集序跋匯編。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
4.王熙元(1973)。歷代詞話敘錄。臺北:臺灣中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.祝尚書(199911)。宋人別集敘錄。北京:上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.張惠民(1993)。宋代詞學資料匯編。廣東。  延伸查詢new window
7.(清)劉永濟(1982)。詞論。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
8.華東師範大學中文系中國古典文學研究室(1986)。詞學論稿。上海:華東師範大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.施蟄存(1988)。詞學名詞釋義。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.黃啓方、國立編譯館(1978)。北宋文學批評資料彙編。臺北:成文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.王力(1976)。古漢語通論。中外出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.夏承燾(1983)。唐宋詞欣賞。台北:文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.勞思光(1998)。中國文化意義新編。香港:中文大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.樓鑰。攻媿集。  延伸查詢new window
15.喬衍琯(1987)。宋代書目考。臺北:文史哲出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.何文煥(1982)。歷代詩話。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
17.龍榆生(1980)。東坡樂府箋。臺北:華正書局。  延伸查詢new window
18.陳振孫(1937)。直齋書錄解題。商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
19.劉克莊。後村先生大全集。  延伸查詢new window
20.曾棗莊、曾濤(1998)。蘇詞彙評。臺北:文史哲出版社。  延伸查詢new window
21.吳昌綬、陶湘(1989)。景刊宋金元明本詞。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
22.王灼、岳珍(2000)。碧雞漫志校正。巴蜀書社。  延伸查詢new window
23.毛晉(1989)。宋六十名家詞。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
24.劉少雄(1995)。南宋姜吳典雅詞派相關詞學論題之探討。臺北:國立臺灣大學出版委員會。  延伸查詢new window
25.永瑢、紀昀(1987)。四庫全書總目。北京:上海:中華書局:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
26.施蟄存(1994)。詞籍序跋萃編。中國社會科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
27.鄭騫(1972)。景午叢編。臺北:臺灣中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
28.龍榆生(1997)。龍榆生詞學論文集。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
29.唐圭璋(1988)。詞話叢編。臺北:新文豐。  延伸查詢new window
30.顏崑陽(1993)。六朝文學觀念叢論。臺北:正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
31.劉慶雲(1990)。詞話十論。長沙:岳麓書社。  延伸查詢new window
32.饒宗頤(1992)。詞集考。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
33.蘇軾、孔凡禮(1990)。蘇軾文集。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
34.元稹(1983)。元稹集。臺北:漢京文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
35.劉少雄(2004)。明清詞學中東坡詞情的論證與體悟。明清文學與思想中之主體意識與社會─文學篇。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
36.方智範、方笑一(1999)。詞林屐步。詞林屐步。南昌。  延伸查詢new window
37.村上哲見(1987)。唐五代北宋詞研究。唐五代北宋詞研究。西安。  延伸查詢new window
38.黃勗吾(1976)。詩詞曲叢談。詩詞曲叢談。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(清)周濟(1978)。全宋詞,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.(南宋)鄭瑤,(南宋)方仁榮。景定嚴州續志。  延伸查詢new window
3.(宋)魏慶之(1975)。詩人玉屑,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.柴望。秋堂詩餘。  延伸查詢new window
5.吳則虞(1982)。清真集,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.(北宋)周邦彥(1970)。片玉詞,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
7.(南宋)黃昇(1997)。花庵詞選,瀋陽。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE