:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以景觀生態學廊道理論探討都市道路生態評估因子之研究--以臺中市西區為應用研究案例
書刊名:造園學報
作者:張莉欣劉保廷
作者(外文):Chang, Li-shinLiu, Pao-ting
出版日期:2006
卷期:12:1
頁次:頁1-26
主題關鍵詞:都市道路系統生態廊道都市生態網路干擾地理資訊系統Urban road systemEcological corridorUrban ecological networkDisturbanceGeological information system
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:21
  • 點閱點閱:79
本研究以景觀生態學為理論基礎,利用歸納法相關文獻中篩選出都市道路之生態評估因子,再透過模糊德爾非法、相關性與獨立性檢測進行因子篩選後,確定評估因子項目;再以模擬層級分析法建立因子權重,建構都市道路系統生態性之評估架構,用以檢討都市道路之生態性。最後經由實證研究,確立評估架構的完整性,本研究探討臺中市西區都市道路系統之生態功能,並以GIS進行疊圖,最後針對結果做出分析並建議改善路段與策略。 從本研究篩選得都市道路系統生態功能之評估因子共十二項。都市道路系統生態之評估架構共有三個層級,目標層為都市道路系統生態廊道功能之發揮,其他層級與權重關係為:第一層級以綠網結構(0.6745)較具重要性,其次是道路區段環境特徵(0.3225);第二層級以網路連結(0.4660)最為重要,其次是景觀戰略(0.2085)、植物自然構成(0.1787)、干擾效應(0.1467);第三層級以道路綠帶連續性(0.2167)權值最高,其次是連接綠地面積(0.1348)、道路綠帶寬度(0.1145)等。臺中市西區都市道路生態網路系統應可以綠園道為主,河道為輔向外做一完整性之串聯,並配合道路生態性改善策略,與周邊的綠地有效的連接整合,以形成生態性較佳之綠網結構。
Based on the landscape ecology theories, factors affecting the ecology of urban roads were proposed through literatures in this study. The factors were further screened and confirmed through FDH method, correlation and independency analyses. The weighing of each factors were subsequently established by FAHP method to form an ecology evaluation framework for urban road system. The framework was applied empirically on the West District of Taichung City. Strategies to improve the ecology of ecological network of urban road inner space were suggested in order that the urban roads can function as ecological corridors. Twelve evaluation factors on the ecology of urban road system were proposed which fall into three-level categories of a hierarchy system. The target level is to enable the urban road systems to function as ecological corridors. The first level category includes green network structure (0.6745) and environmental characteristics of road sections (0.3225). The second level category includes four factors, viz. the connectivity of network (0.4660), landscape ecology strategy (0.2085), structure of plant community (0.1787) and disturbance factors (0.1467). The factors fall into the third level of hierarchy system are connected patch area (0.1348), green belt width of road system (0.1145), continuity of road systems (0.2167), etc. In order to improve the landscape ecology of the West District of Taichung City, the ecological network can be developed from the existed greenway system, in conjunction with near-by river corridors to form a more integral green network.
期刊論文
1.王小璘、吳慧儀(20011200)。都市廊道景觀生態功能評估架構之研究--以臺中市東光園道為例。造園學報,7(2),99-119。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.王秀娟(20001100)。以景觀生態學觀點探討臺灣地區市鄉鎮綠地系統之發展。人與地,203/204,59-70。  延伸查詢new window
3.Smith, P. G. R.、Theberge, J. B.(1986)。A Review of Criteria for Evaluating Natural Areas。Environmental Management,10,715-734。  new window
4.Buckley, James J.(1985)。Fuzzy hierarchical analysis。Fuzzy Sets and Systems,17(3),233-247。  new window
5.Ishikawa, Akira、Amagasa, Michio、Shiga, Tetsuo、Tomizawa, Giichi、Tatsuta, Rumi、Mieno, Hiroshi(1993)。The max-min Delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration。Fuzzy Sets and Systems,55(3),241-253。  new window
6.林國銓(1983)。道路兩側生態系之鉛汙染。台灣林業,9,21 - 28。  延伸查詢new window
7.蔡厚男(1997)。綠帶在都市景觀生態網絡規劃策略上之潛力與應用一以台北都市區為例。中國園藝,43 ( 2 ),92 - 102。  延伸查詢new window
8.Knaapen, J. P., Scheffer, M. and Harms, B.(1992)。Estimating Habitat isolation in Landscape Planning。Landscape and Urban Planning,23,1-16。  new window
會議論文
1.王小璘、杜文郁(1998)。都市綠園道生態設計之評估研究--以臺中市經國園道為例。第2屆造園景觀與環境規劃設計研究成果研討會。中華民國戶外遊憩學會。41-62。  延伸查詢new window
2.王小璘、何欣怡(2000)。都市綠園道遊憩活動特性與環境屬性之研究-以台中市經國園道為例。第十二屆建築研究成果發表會論文集,881-884。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳彥良(2002)。以景觀生態學觀點探討都市生態網路之研究--以台中市為例(碩士論文)。東海大學,台中。  延伸查詢new window
2.游振祥(2001)。都市生態廊道系統評估模式建立之研究(碩士論文)。朝陽科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.李柏賢(2000)。從景觀生態觀點探討都市綠地之棲地規劃設計--以台北市野雁保護區為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.胡家玲(1997)。台中市都市綠化樹種規劃之探討,台中。  延伸查詢new window
5.涂芳美(2000)。都市公園生物多樣性之研究-以台北市大安森林公園為例,台中。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Forman, R. T. T.、Sperling, D.、Bissonette, J. A.、Clevenger, A. P.、Cutshall, C. D.、Dale, V. H.、Fahrig, L.、France, R.、Goldman, C. R.、Heanue, K.、Jones, J. A.、Swanson, F. J.、Turrentine, T.、Winter, T. C.(2002)。Road Ecology : science and solutions。Washington, DC:Brighid Willson。  new window
2.Smith, D.S.、Hellmund, P.(1993)。Ecology of greenways: Design and function of linear conservation areas。Minneapolis, London:The University of Minnesota Press.。  new window
3.郭瓊瑩(2003)。水與綠網路規劃:理論與實務。台北:詹氏書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.林憲德(2001)。綠建築解說與評估手冊。台北:內政部建築研究所。  延伸查詢new window
5.Forman, R. T. T.、Godron, M.(1986)。Landscape Ecology。New York, NY:John Wiley & Sons。  new window
6.林憲德(1999)。城鄉生態。台北:詹氏書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.俞孔堅(1998)。景觀:文化、生態與感知。台北:田園城市文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.張兆旭(1993)。FUZZY 淺談。台北:松崗電腦圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
9.Dramstad, W. E., Olson, J. D., and Forman, R. T. T.(1996)。Landscape ecology principles in landscape architecture and land-use planning。Harvard University Graduate School of Design。Washington D. C.:American Society of Landscape Architects and Island Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE