:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小校園綠化空間對都市綠地供給之意義--環境教育的基礎
書刊名:環境教育研究
作者:張珩 引用關係葉育廷
作者(外文):Zhang, HengYe, Ue-ting
出版日期:2010
卷期:8:1
頁次:頁95-121
主題關鍵詞:環境教育都市生態綠地供給校園規劃建蔽率Environmental educationUrban ecologyGreen space supplyCampus planningBuilding coverage ratio
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:15
  • 點閱點閱:75
校園綠地是師生重要的活動場所,亦賦有極大的環境教育價值,對於都市生態亦有不可抹滅的貢獻。台灣都市的生態資源非常有限,因此綠化比大數量又多的國小空間便成為都市中最佳的綠地補償。本研究即以都市生態的角度出發,探討國小綠化空間除基本的環境教育功能以外,對於都市綠地系統所具有的意義。據本研究得知,小學校園實際綠地提供量估計佔整個都市綠地之18.02%,已是都市綠地系統中的重要元素。然而法規體系並未積極地以較低的建蔽率保障校園的生態品質,目前的建蔽率高達50%。本研究結果得知,當小學校地的建蔽率超過29.48%時,校園綠地的實質供給量便已無法達到法規的最低要求。而若在校地上建築50%的校舍時,其實際之綠地面積供給只能達到10.11%。因此,在目前高法定建蔽率的鼓勵下,國小校園的綠地供給量將會大幅降低,除減損其環境教育的價值外,亦將喪失對都市集居區域的生態意義,對於都市生態系統會是莫大的損失。
Green space on an elementary school campus is not only an essential place for school-based and afterschool activities. It also possesses a significant value for environmental education. Furthermore, its meaning to the urban environment should not be ignored. Overdevelopment in the urban regions of Taiwan leads to a worrisome problem in the urban ecosystem. Even though new construction in urban areas includes more green space, it still is limited. Primary schools in the cities possessing a large percentage of green spaces are apposite to heal and stabilize the vulnerable urban ecosystem. Under this circumstance, the aim of this study is to explore the meaning of the primary school campus in terms of urban ecology and the urban green land system. According to this study, the green space on primary school grounds provides 18.02% of the whole green space in the city making it an imperative element of the urban ecosystem. Unfortunately, primary schools are not included in the formal green space system and development within school may expand without regard to this resource. It is impossible for a school to attain a legitimate percentage of green space when the building coverage ratio exceeds 29.48%. Actually the green space can only reach 10.11% if 50%, i.e. the normative building coverage ratio, of the land is in buildings. The primary schools will thus lose the considerable role of urban green system in the densely populated area along with the value of environmental education.
期刊論文
1.王順美(20090200)。綠色學校指標及其評量工具發展歷程之研究。環境教育研究,6(1),119-160。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.江哲銘、陳星皓、潘智謙(2009)。永續校園實質環境評估指標之研究--以台灣國民小學爲例。建築學報,67,1-23。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳勝斌、劉惠元、林明瑞(20080600)。校園生物棲地環境指標之建構研究。台中教育大學學報. 數理科技類,22(1),1-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.張金淑(200607)。永續校園的推動與展望。學校行政,44,66-84。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃素惠、余志鴻(2007)。永續校園環境規畫之探究--以國民小學綠色校園爲例。教育暨外國語文學報,5,12-34。  延伸查詢new window
6.Carol, R. K.、Boulton, P.(1995)。Campus children’s center: Support for children and families.。Children Today,23(4),18- 21。  new window
7.Ferreira, A. J. D.、Lopes, M. A. R.、Morais, J. P. F.(2006)。Environmental management and audit schemes implementation as an educational tool for sustainability。Journal of Cleaner Production,14(9-11),973-982。  new window
8.Huang, D.、Su, Z.(2010)。Degree of urbanization influences the persistence of Dorytomus weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionoidae) in Beijing, China.。Landscape and Urban Planning,96(3),163-171。  new window
9.Koester, R. J.、Eflin, J.、Vann, J.(2006)。Greening of the campus: A whole-systems approach.。Journal of Cleaner Production,14,769-779。  new window
10.Nichols, D. R.(1990)。Tactual environmental interpretation: A multisensory approach.。Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness,84(3),124-125。  new window
11.林明瑞(19960600)。校園美化綠化之環保觀。環境教育季刊,30,52-61。  延伸查詢new window
12.May, Theodore S.(2000)。Elements of success in environmental education through practitioner eyes。The Journal of Environmental Education,31(3),4-11。  new window
13.林明瑞、葉茂森(20050300)。臺灣中部地區國小永續校園內涵之研究:以自然環境的觀點進行探討。環境教育研究,2(2),1-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.王佩蓮(20000400)。國小環境教育檢核表之探討。臺北市立師範學院學報,31,319-346。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.行政院經濟建設委員會(2004)。台灣二十一世紀議程--國家永續發展願景與策略綱領。台北:行政院經濟建設設委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Gilbert, O. L.(1991)。The ecology of urban habitats.。London:Chapman & Hall.。  new window
3.Hough, M.(1995)。Cities and natural process.。London:Routledge。  new window
4.Jedicke, E.(1994)。Biotopschutz in der gemeincle.。Radebeul:Neumann。  new window
5.Sukopp, H.(1998)。Urban Ecology - Scientific and practical aspects.。Urban ecology。Berlin:Springer-Verlag.。  new window
6.Thayer, Robert L.(1994)。Gray world, green heart: Technology, nature, and sustainable landscape。New York:John Wiley & Sons。  new window
7.MacArthur, R. H.、Wilson, E. O.(2001)。The theory of island biogeography.。Princeton:Princeton University Press.。  new window
8.Miller, G. T.、Spoolman, S.(2008)。Environmental science: Problems, concepts, and solutions。Brooks。  new window
9.Molles, M. C.(2009)。Ecology: Concepts and applications。McGraw-Hill Science。  new window
10.內政部建築研究所(2005)。綠建築解說與評估手冊。臺北:內政部建築研究所。  延伸查詢new window
11.郭瓊瑩(2003)。水與綠網絡規劃理論與實務。臺北:詹氏書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Naveh,Z.、Lieberman A.S.(1994)。Landscape ecology--theory and application。New york:spiinger- Verlag。  new window
13.Forman, R. T. T.、Godron, M.(1986)。Landscape Ecology。New York, NY:John Wiley & Sons。  new window
其他
1.台南市政府(2004)。變更台南市主要計畫(第四次通盤檢討)案說明書,台南:台南市政府。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE