:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:郎尼根邁向宗教交談
書刊名:哲學與文化
作者:武金正
作者(外文):Vu, Kim Chinh
出版日期:2006
卷期:33:11=390
頁次:頁65-84
主題關鍵詞:郎尼根宗教哲學方法論知識論辯證法宗教經驗宗教交談神學歷史LonerganInterreligious dialogueDialecticsMethodologyTheologyReligion philosophyEpistemologyHistoryReligious experience
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:30
本文主要討論的是如何研究和重建郎尼根(Bernard Lonergan, 1940-1984)的思考,使其成為邁向示教交談的途徑。除了朗氏的兩本大作《洞察》( Insight)以及《神學的方法論》(Method in theology)以外,我們將其另兩本著作《第二論文論》與《第三論文集》列為主要參考書做為討論的基礎。眾人周知,朗尼根相當重視經驗也視「知識論」(epistemology)優先於「形上學」(metaphysics),他建構知識論和方法在於四個步驟,即:經驗(experiencing)、瞭解(understanding)、判斷(judging)和抉擇(deciding)。然而,在後期的思考-特別是在《第三論文集》中,鈆氏另外再加上「兩端開放」的重要性,此遂成為宗教交談之不可或缺的兩項因素,即是:一方面肯定在人體驗之前已經存在的文化、歷史、社會之多元性,此乃是所有人學習多元經 驗、接受前人傳承的基礎-包括宗教信仰;這是從下而上所建立的知識與理解的路徑。另一方面是人理解之後的層面,其是對人「超越的緣由」、「抉擇本真之趨向的來源」加以肯定;對基督宗教而言,此乃是確信它來自神為其給予之愛的禮物。 在方法論上,郎尼根討論黑格爾(Georg W.F. Hegel, 1770-1831)的辯證法(dialektische methode)並批判其輕忽經驗上的真理。於是,郎氏加上「皈依」作為進入辯證法的行動,使得宗教經驗(religious experience)能得到淨化,此即為宗教交談的準備,是格外有意義的。如此,郎氏認為人類的歷史也成為治療和創造的歷史。總之,在該脈絡中的想法,宗教交談成為人努力在聖神的領導下尋找真理和愛德的途徑。然而,如格落實該宗教交談的理想呢?在此哈伯瑪斯(Jurgen habermas, 1929-)的溝通理論是使其實現的契機。
This article searches for a way how the thought of Bernard Lonergan could be served as an effective orientation towards interreligious dialogue. Besides referring to his tow classical works “Insight” and “Method in theology”, we build the discussion upon two important publications that are “Second Collection” and “Third Collection”. In general B. Lonergan givers preferential concerning to epistemology. He operates the thoughts in the Insight through four moments or steps: experiencing, understanding, judging and deciding; and in the Thid Collection and in other later publications, he adds two more important steps as “two opening ends” of the epistemological process, which are particularly relevant for interreligious dialogue. On the one side, it is a pluralistic and lively foundation of any pre-experience and on the other side, after the four classical steps, there is an opening chance of self-transcendence to the Absolute. In the method he discusses the Hegel’s dialectics and shows that Hegel is pan-logistic and lacks of concern to the experimental Truth. He inserts “conversion” into movements of dialectics, so that its process become purified way of religious experience. It is important for preparation of interrreligious dialogue. Thus, human history becomes healing and creating history. In this way, interreligious dialogue could serve as human effort which is under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, the divine Spirit of Truth and Love.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE