The issue of The Chunqiu, such as its nature, its authorship, whether Confucius is its writer or just its compiler, the question whether it carries some implicit meanings ,the question of praise and blame by means of just a word or a few words and other questions, has long been controversial. As regarding the three commentaries on The Chunqiu, the issue is no less controversial. The question of their authorship, the question concerning which commentary was written first and which was last, the history of their transmission, their interpretations accord or not with Chunqiu, whether one of the commentaries, the one attributed to Mr. Zuo, was really a commentary on The Chunqiu as well as other questions are far from being settled. Professor T’ang Chun-I is not an expert on The Chunqiu nor on its commentaries; hence no thorough solutions to the above mentioned questions. However, Professor T’ang on his work entitled On the Chinese Philosophy-On the Dao, has well treated the The Praise and Blame issue and other issues regarding The Chunqiu and its commentaries, especially the issue concerning the criticism on historical events by the three commentaries. The author of the present paper is of the opinion that Professor T’ang’s ideas and interpretations are very interesting and enlightening, hence the present paper. The paper includes three parts: (1) The nature of The Chunqiu (2) The nature and the time sequence of the compilation of the three commentaries as well as the similarities and differences among the three commentaries (3) The criticism on historical events by the three commentaries