:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以答題信心度為基礎之線上診斷評量系統
書刊名:師大學報. 教育類
作者:黃國禎朱蕙君王榕榆
作者(外文):Hwang, Gwo-jenChu, Hui-chunWang, Rung-yu
出版日期:2008
卷期:53:1
頁次:頁1-24
主題關鍵詞:國語文教學補救教學診斷測驗電腦輔助學習網路學習Chinese language instructionRemedial instructionDiagnosis testComputer-assisted learningWeb-based learning
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:194
一般線上評量系統的測驗方式,是由學生回答單選或複選題;由於忽略了學生答題過程的不確定因素,因此在診斷學生的學習困難時,不易作出精確的研判。針對這個問題,已有學者嘗試以答題信心度為基礎,來開發線上評量系統,並獲得不錯的成果。然而,由於目前已提出的評量模式,是由學生主觀認定其信心度,因此在診斷的準確性方面仍有很大的改善空間。在本研究中,我們嘗試加入答題時間參數,來加強其診斷效果,以期更準確地分析學生遭遇的困難。為了驗證這個新評量機制的分析成效,我們以國小學童中文字辨識課程進行實驗;實驗結果證明,本研究提出之「考量時間因素之信心度診斷評量機制」較原有的機制能提供更精確的診斷結果。
In conventional testing systems, students usually take a test by selecting one or more answers for each test item. Nevertheless, the confidence degree of individual student in answering each test item is usually ignored, which might affect the accuracy of diagnosing student learning problems. Researchers have attempted to cope with this problem by developing test systems that allow students to show their degree of confidence regarding the answer to each test item. Such a confidence scoring mechanism has been proved to be effective. However, the existing confidence scoring mechanism is mainly based on the subjective judgments of the students, which may reduce the degree of diagnostic accuracy. In this study, we attempt to develop a new confidence-scoring model by taking the “time spent answering each test item on the Internet” factor into consideration while determining the conference degree for individual students to answer each test item. To evaluate this innovative approach, an experiment has been conducted using a Chinese word- identification course. Experimental results showed that our approach can provide more accurate learning suggestions to students, and hence is more helpful in improving their learning performance than previously proposed approaches.
期刊論文
1.Nichols, P. D.(1994)。A Framework for Developing Cognitively Diagnostic Assessment。Review of Educational Research,64(4),575-603。  new window
2.Hwang, G. J.(2003)。A Concept Map Model for Developing Intelligent Tutoring Systems。Computers & Education,40(3),217-235。  new window
3.陳長春(1992)。加強補救教學的意義。中縣文教,13,17-18。  延伸查詢new window
4.Shortliffe, E. H.、Buchanan, B. G.(1975)。A Model of Inexact Reasoning in Medicine。Mathematical Biosciences,23,351-379。  new window
5.林昌炫(1979)。國中學生作文錯別字分析。中國語文,267,39-50。  延伸查詢new window
6.Hwang, G. H.、Chen, J. M.、Hwang, G. J.、Chu, H. C.(2006)。A Time Scale-oriented Approach for Building Medical Expert Systems。Expert Systems with Applications,31(2),299-308。  new window
7.Hwang, G. J.(2007)。A Gray Forecast Approach for Developing Testing and Diagnostic Systems。IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews,37(1),98-108。  new window
8.Lo, J. J.、Wanga, H. M.、Yeh, S. W.(2004)。Effects of Confidence Scores and Remedial Instruction on Prepositions Learning in Adaptive Hypermedia。Computers & Education,42(1),45-63。  new window
會議論文
1.陳金明(1995)。識字教學與兒童認知發展。臺東縣臺東市。363-373。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳裕益、王佳文(1997)。國小數學診斷測驗之編製。臺南市。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.鄭美芝(2002)。國民小學低年級注音符號能力診斷測驗與補救教學效益之探討(碩士論文)。臺南師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.丘慶鈴(2003)。避免小學生寫錯別字之教學策略(碩士論文)。國立新竹師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.王錦如(2001)。國小學童學習困難的診斷與輔導--運用動態評量模式(碩士論文)。臺中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳姿君(2002)。國中英語閱讀能力診斷測驗編製之研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.胡依斐(1988)。編訂兒童各階段國語發展診斷測驗擬議,0。  延伸查詢new window
6.林秀如(2004)。以資料探勘發掘學習錯誤概念之關聯的預防教學-以英語介係詞為例,0。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳玟秀(2000)。國民中學資源班學生數學科診斷測驗編製之研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
8.李白芬(1995)。國小學童認知風格及其錯字錯誤類型之關係研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
9.曾清文(2004)。國民小學四年級學生數學領域乘法能力診斷測驗之探討,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.王慧君、林吉仁、黃明官、廖宜誠(1996)。統計學。統計學。沒有紀錄:三民書局股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Marshall, S. P.(1995)。Schemas in problem solving。Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Anderson, J. R.(2000)。Cognitive psychology and its implications。New York:Worth Publishers。  new window
4.陳英豪、吳裕益(1995)。測驗與評量。高雄市:復文圖書出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.郭生玉(1997)。心理與教育測驗。精華書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.歐用生(1989)。質的研究。臺北市:師大師苑。  延伸查詢new window
7.行政院教育改革審議委員會(1996)。教育改革總諮議報告書。台北:行政院教育改革審議委員會。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃政傑(1997)。教學原理。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
9.莊明廣(1994)。國民小學五年級學生國語科習寫的錯別字研究。進修(推廣)部學士學位進修班獨立研究專輯,第三輯。0。  延伸查詢new window
10.符顯仁(1983)。中國文字面面觀。中國文字面面觀。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
11.余民寧(2001)。教育測驗與評量。教育測驗與評量。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
12.Britton, B. K.、Tidwell, P.(1995)。Cognitive Structure Testing: A Computer System for Diagnosis of Expert - Novice Differences。Cognitively Diagnostic Assessment。Hillsdale, NJ。  new window
13.Gitomer, D. H.、Steinberg, L. S.、Mislevy, R. J.(1995)。Diagnostic Assessment of Troubleshooting Skill in an Intelligent Tutoring System。Cognitively Diagnostic Assessment。Hillsdale, NJ。  new window
14.Mislevy, R. J.(1995)。Probability-based Inference in Cognitive Diagnosis。Cognitively Diagnostic Assessment。Hillsdale, NJ。  new window
15.Corbett, A. T.、Anderson, J. R.、O'Brien, A. T.(1995)。Student Modeling in the ACT Programming Tutor。Cognitively Diagnostic Assessment。Hillsdale, NJ。  new window
16.Langley, P.、Wogulis, J.、Ohlsson, S.(1990)。Rules and Principles in Cognitive Diagnosis。Diagnostic Monitoring of Skill and Knowledge Acquisition。Hillsdale, NJ。  new window
圖書論文
1.Snow, R. E.、Lohman, D. F.(1989)。Implications of Cognitive Psychology for Educational Measurement。Educational Measurement。New York, NY:Macmillan。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top