:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國中基本學力測驗數學科之性別差異與差別試題功能(DIF)分析
書刊名:教育實踐與研究
作者:盧雪梅 引用關係毛國楠 引用關係
作者(外文):Lu, Sheue-meiMao, Kuo-nan
出版日期:2008
卷期:21:2
頁次:頁95-125
主題關鍵詞:國中基本學力測驗數學性別差異數學性別DIFBasic competence test for junior high school studentsGender differences in mathematicsGender DIF in mathematics
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(11) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:10
  • 共同引用共同引用:22
  • 點閱點閱:54
本研究分析90 至94 年度國民中學學生基本學力測驗數學科之性別差異和差別試題功能(Differential Item Functioning ,簡稱DIF),各次測驗資料係隨機從該次全體考生中抽取之5000 名受試的答題反應。在性別差異分析部分,本研究分析全體受試、低成就組(後10%)和高成就組(前10%)之數學總分的性別效果量、女/男標準差比和女/男人數比三項指標,此外,也分析數與量、代數、幾何、統計與機率四項內容,及程序知識與執行、概念理解和問題解決三類認知歷程的性別效果量。整體數學表現的性別差異分析結果顯示:全體受試和低成就組無顯著的性別差距出現,高成就組的男生表現略高於女生;此外,男生分數的變異程度較女生大,低成就組和高成就組的男生人數比例都高於女生,高成就組又比低成就組更高些。分項表現的性別差異分析結果顯示:全體受試的男生在問題解決的表現略高於女生,其餘分項皆無顯著的性別差距出現;高成就組男生在幾何的表現略高於女生,其餘分項皆無顯著的性別差距出現;低成就組在所有的分項皆無顯著的性別差距出現。在性別DIF 分析部分,本研究採Mantel-Haenszel 法評估DIF,分析結果顯示:基測數學科性別DIF 出現率為2.5%,DIF 題數量雖不多,但性別DIF 與試題特徵似有關聯,具體而言,代數DIF 題傾向對女生有利,幾何和問題解決DIF 題傾向對男生有利。
This research investigated gender differences and differential item functioning (DIF) on Mathematics parts of the Basic Competence Test for Junior High School Students (BCTEST) from its 2001 to 2005 administrations. Data for each administration were a sample of 5000 examinees randomly drawn from its examinee population. In the study of gender differences, we calculated and compared the effect size, female/male standard deviation ratio and female/male ratio for total-group, low-achieving (bottom 10%) and high-achieving groups (top 10%) across test administrations. Results based on overall performances indicated that there were no visible gender differences among total groups and low-achieving groups. However, males performed slightly better than females amongst high-achieving groups. Results based on performance of math contents and processes indicated that there were no visible gender effect sizes among total, low-achieving and high-achieving groups with only a few exceptions. The exceptions were that males performed slightly better on problem solving among total groups and on geometry among high-achieving groups. In the study of gender DIF, Mantel-Haenszel procedure was used. And results showed that the average percentage of items displaying gender DIF across administrations were low, at about 2.5%. There appeared associations of gender DIF with item characteristics, DIF in favor of females on algebraic items, and DIF in favor of males on geometry and problem solving items.
期刊論文
1.Clauser, B. E.、Mazor, K. M.(1998)。Using statistical procedures to identify differentially functioning test items。Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice,17(1),31-44。  new window
2.Friedman, Lynn(1989)。Mathematics and the Gender Gap: A Meta-analysis of Recent Studies on Sex Differences in Mathematical Tasks。Review of Educational Research,59(2),185-213。  new window
3.林奕宏、林世華(20040600)。國小高年級數學科成就測驗中與性別有關的DIF現象。臺東大學教育學報,15(1),67-95。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Fan, X.、Chen, M.、Matsumoto, A. R.(1997)。Gender differences in mathematics achievement: Findings from the national education longitudinal study of 1988。Journal of Experimental Education,65(3),229-242。  new window
5.林碧珍、蔡文煥(20051200)。TIMSS 2003臺灣國小四年級學生的數學成就及其相關因素之探討。科學教育,285,2-38。  延伸查詢new window
6.Mantel, N.、Haenszel, W. M.(1959)。Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from respective studies of disease。Journal of the National Cancer institute,22,719-748。  new window
7.Harris, A. M.、Carlton, S. T.(1993)。Patterns of gender differences on mathematics items on the SAT。Applied Measurement in Education,6,137-151。  new window
8.Ryan, K. E.、Fan. M.(1996)。Examining gender DIF on a multiple-choice test of mathematics: A confirmatory approach。Educational measurement: Issues and practice,15(4),21-27。  new window
9.Hyde, J. S.、Fennema, E. F.、Lamon, S. J.(1990)。Gender differences in mathematics performance: a meta-analysis。Psychological Bulletin,107(2),139-155。  new window
10.余民寧、謝進昌(20060600)。國中基本學力測驗之DIF的實徵分析:以91年度兩次測驗為例。教育學刊,26,241-275。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Roussos, L.、Stout, W.(1996)。Simulation Studies of the Effects of Small Sample Size and Studied Item Parameters on SIBTEST and Mantel-Haenszel Type I Error Performance。Journal of Educational Measurement,33,215-230。  new window
12.曾建銘(2004)。Differential Item Functioning on Basic Mathematics Achievement Test for Middle School in Taiwan。中學教育學報,11,331-354。  new window
13.Ryan, K. E.、Chiu, S.(2001)。An Examination of Item Context Effects, DIF, and Gender DIF。Applied Measurement in Education,14,73-90。  new window
14.Mendes-Barnett, S.、Ercikan, K.(2006)。Examining Sources of Gender DIF in Mathematics Assessments Using a Confirmatory Multidimensional Model Approach。Applied Measurement in Education,19(4),289-304。  new window
15.Doolittle, A. E.、Cleary, T. A.(1987)。Gender-based Differential Item Performance in Mathematics Achievement Items。Journal of Educational Measurement,24(2),157-166。  new window
16.黃財尉、李信宏(1999)。國中數學成就測驗性別DIF之探討:Poly-SIBTEST的應用與分析。中國測驗學會測驗年刊,46(2),45-60。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.盧雪梅(2000)。Mantel-Haenszel DIF程序之第一類錯誤率和DIF嚴重度分類結果研究。中國測驗學會測驗年刊,47(1),57-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Zhang, L.、Manon, J.(2000)。Gender and Achievement-understanding Gender Differences and Similarities in Mathematics Assessment。0。  new window
2.Han, L.、Hoover, H. D.(1994)。Differences in Achievement Test Scores。0。  new window
3.Cleary, T. A.(1991)。Gender Differences in Aptitude and Achievement Test Scores。0。  new window
4.O'Neill, K. A.、Wild, C. L.、McPeek, W. M.(1989)。Gender-related Differential Item Performance on Graduate Admissions Tests。0。  new window
研究報告
1.簡茂發、李虎雄、陳昭地、林保平、曹博盛、楊瑞智、王淑真、鄭再添、張敏雪、唐書志、陳文典、陳義勳、莊玉梅、蕭志明、黃長司、黃萬居、朱玲玲、鄭美雪、曾文雄、吳美麗、李秀玉、卓娟秀、張武昌(1996)。教育部八十五年度國民教育階段學生基本成就學習評量研究研究報告。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.簡茂發、李虎雄、陳昭地、林保平、曹博盛、王淑真、鄭再添、張敏雪、陳文典、陳義勳、蕭志明、莊玉梅、黃長司、黃萬居、朱玲玲、鄭美雪、曾文雄、吳美麗、李秀玉、卓娟秀、張武昌(1995)。教育部八十四年度國民教育階段學生基本成就學習評量研究研究報告。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.簡茂發、李虎雄、江永明、朱玲玲、李秀玉、吳美麗、卓娟秀、林靜雯、唐書志、莊玉梅、曹博盛、曾文雄、陳文典、陳昭地、陳義勳、陳麗巧、黃長司、黃萬居、張武昌、張敏雪、蕭志明、鍾靜(1999)。教育部八十六、八十七年度國民教育階段學生基本成就學習評量研究研究報告。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學科學教育中心。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.鄭蕙如(2006)。國中生數學內容知識與數學認知能力之混合Rasch模式分析研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Maccoby, Eleanor E.、Jacklin, Carol N.(1974)。The Psychology of Sex Differences。Stanford University Press。  new window
2.Cohen, J.(1988)。Statistical power and analysis for the behavioral sciences。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
3.Camilli, G.、Shepard, L. A.(1994)。Methods for identifying biased test items。Thousand Oaks, CA。  new window
4.Mullis, I. V. S.、Martin, M. O.、Gonzalez, E. J.、Chrostowski, S. J.(2004)。TIMSS 2003 International Mathematics Report: Findings from IEA's Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eighth Grades。TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College。  new window
5.Willingham, W. W.、Cole, N. S.、Lewis, C.、Leung, S. W.(1997)。Test Performance。Gender and Fair Assessment。Hillsdale, NJ。  new window
6.曹博盛(2005)。TIMSS 2003臺灣國中二年級學生的數學成就及其相關因素之探討。國際數學與科學教育成就趨勢調查2003。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Willingham, W. W.、Cole, N. S.(1997)。Research on gender differences。Gender andfair assessment。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
2.Dorans, Neil J.、Holland, Paul W.(1993)。DIF detection and description: Mantel-Haenszel and standardization。Differential item functioning。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
3.Holland, P. W.、Thayer, D. T.、Holland, W. P.(1988)。Differential Item Performance and the Mantel-Haenszel Procedure。Test Validity。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE