臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：學習障礙學生在國中基測數學科上表現與試題差異功能分析
書刊名：特殊教育與復健學報
作者：張萬烽 引用關係／吳裕益 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chang, Wan-feng／Wu, Yuh-yih
出版日期：2012
卷期：26
頁次：頁45-70
主題關鍵詞：考場服務；考試調整；報讀；試題差異功能；學習障礙；Test service；Test accommodation；Read aloud；DIF；Learning disabilities
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:34
  • 點閱點閱:40
本研究旨在探究98學年度國中基本學力測驗數學科申請報讀之學障學生、未申請之學障學生以及一般學生等三個群體在成就表現上之差異，同時探討群體間是否存在試題差異功能（DIF）現象。研究結果顯示一般生在數學科之表現優於其他兩個群體。而在DIF偵測方面，首先在一致性DIF偵測上，發現三個群體間有明顯DIF現象之試題的出現率不高，且並未對某一群體呈現特別有利或不利的情形，另外，不同群體間雖存有非一致性DIF之現象，進一步分析試題內容向度或認知歷程均未顯示對哪一群體產生特別不利或有利的現象。上述結果顯示報讀並未對申請之學障學生在某些題目的作答上產生顯著影響，顯示報讀之考場服務，仍能夠維持考試的公平性，與未申請之學障學生在整體表現上相似，最後本研究提出建議以做為未來研究及測驗實務之參考。
The purpose of this research was to investigate the effects of audio description on the achievement of Mathematics Basic Competency Tests (MBCT). The research participants consisted of the students without disabilities (SWOD), the students with learning disabilities who asked for read aloud (LD-RA), and the students with learning disabilities who did not ask for read aloud (LD-NRA). Through the comparison of their MBCT achievement, it showed that the SWOD performed significantly better than LD-RA and LD-NRA. Furthermore, the analyses of differential item functioning (DIF) showed there was no difference in the proportions of DIF of different groups, and the reasons of the students' difference in DIF items mainly came from the content knowledge they had, instead of the read aloud they asked for. Implications based on the findings were proposed for educators, test developers, and researchers.
期刊論文
1.Cohen, A. S.、Bolt, D. M.(2005)。A Mixture Model Analysis of Differential Item Functioning。Journal of Educational Measurement，42(2)，133-148。  new window
2.Bolt, S. E.、Thurlow, M. L.(2004)。Five of the most frequently allowed testing accommodations in state policy。Remedial and Special Education，25(3)，141-152。  new window
3.Finch, H.、Barton, K.、Meyer, P.(2009)。Differential item functioning analysis for accommodated versus nonaccommodated students。Educational Assessment，14(1)，38-56。  new window
4.Swaminathan, H.、Rogers, H. J.(1990)。Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using Logistic Regression Procedures。Journal of Educational Measurement，27(4)，361-370。  new window
5.蘇旭琳、陳柏熹(20081200)。DIF分析在小樣本情境中的偵測效果--以視障生和普通生在國中基測數學科之DIF為例。測驗學刊，55(4)，761-791。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.余民寧、謝進昌(20060600)。國中基本學力測驗之DIF的實徵分析：以91年度兩次測驗為例。教育學刊，26，241-275。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.盧雪梅、毛國楠(20080900)。國中基本學力測驗數學科之性別差異與差別試題功能(DIF)分析。教育實踐與研究，21(2)，95-125。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.盧雪梅、毛國楠(20081200)。國中基本學力測驗自然科之性別差異和差別試題功能(DIF)分析。測驗學刊，55(4)，725-759。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.盧雪梅(20071200)。國民中學學生基本學力測驗國文科和英語科成就性別差異和性別差別試題功能(DIF)分析。教育研究與發展期刊，3:4，頁79-111。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Fuchs, L. S.、Fuchs, D.、Capizzi, A. M.(2006)。Identifying appropriate test accommodations for students with learning disabilities。Focus on Exceptional Children，37(6)，1-8。  new window
11.Fidalgo, T. M.、Ferreres, D.、MuNiz, J.(2004)。Utility of the Mantel-Haenszel Procedure for Detecting Differential Item Functioning in Small Sample。Educational and Psychological Measurement，64(6)，925-936。  new window
12.Bolt, S. E.、Ysseldyke, J. E.(2006)。Comparing DIF across math and reading/language arts tests for students receiving a readaloud accommodation。Applied Measurement in Education，19(4)，329-355。  new window
13.Bolt, S. E.、Ysseldyke, J.(2008)。Accommodating students with disabilities in large-scale testing: A comparison of differential item functioning (DIF) identified across disability types。Journal of psychoeducational assessment，26(2)，121-138。  new window
14.Cohen, A. S.、Gregg, N.、Deng, M.(2005)。The role of extended time and item content on a highstakes mathematics test。Learning disabilities，20(4)，225-233。  new window
15.Fidalgo, A.、Hashimoto, K.、Bartram, D.、Muniz, J.(2007)。Empirical Bayes versus standard MantelHaenszel statistics for detecting differential item functioning under small-sample conditions。The Journal of Experimental Education，75(4)，293-314。  new window
16.Zenisky, A. L.、Hambleton, R. K.、Frederic, R.(2003)。Dectecing of differential item functioning in largescale state assessments: A study evaluating a two-stage approach。Educational and Psychological Measurement，63(1)，51-64。  new window
17.Zwick, R.、Thayer, D. T.、Lewis, C.(1998)。An empirical Bayes approach to Mantel-Haenszel DIF analysis。Journal of Educational Measurement，36(1)，1-28。  new window
18.Hidalgo, M. D.、Lopez-Pina, J. A.(2004)。Differential item functioning detection and effect size: A comparison between logistic regression and MantelHantel procedures。Educational and psychological measurement，64(6)，903-915。  new window
19.Hollenbeck, K.、Rozek-Tedesco, M.、Tindal, G.、Glasgrow, A.(2000)。An exploratory study of student-paced versus teacher-paced accommodations for large-scale math tests。Journal of Special Education Technology，15(2)，27-36。  new window
20.Kamata, A.、Vaughn, B. K.(2004)。An introduction to differential item functioning analysis。Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal，2(2)，49-62。  new window
21.Koretz, D.、Hamilton, L.(2000)。Assessment of Students with Disabilities In Kentucky: Inclusion, Student Performance, and Validity。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis，22(3)，255-272。  new window
22.Paek, I.、Guo, H.(2011)。Accuracy of DIF and estimates and power in unbalanced designs using the Mantel-Haenszel DIF detection procedure。Applied Psychological Measurement，35(7)，518-535。  new window
23.Penfield, R. D.(2003)。Applying the Breslow-Day test of trend in odds ratio heterogeneity to the analysis of nonuniform DIF。Alberta Journal of Educational Research，49(3)，231-243。  new window
24.Sired, S. G.(2008)。Validity issues in accommodation reading tests。Journal Pendidik dan Pendididkan，23，81-110。  new window
25.Sirecij S. G.、Scarpati, S. E.、Li, S.(2005)。Test ccommodations for students with disabilities: An analysis ofthe interaction hypothesis。Review of Educational Research，75(4)，457-490。  new window
26.Waller, N. G.(1998)。EZDIF: Detection of uniform and nonuniform differential item functioning with the Mantel-Haenszel and logistic regression procedures。Applied Psychological Measurement，22(4)，391。  new window
會議論文
1.Barton, K.、Finch. W. H.(2004)。Using DIF analyses to examine boas and assumptions of unidemensionality across students with and without disabilities and students with accommodations。San Diego, CA。  new window
2.Bolt, S. E.(2004)。Using DIF analyses to examine several commonlyheld beliefs about testing accommodations for students with disabilities。San Diego, CA。  new window
3.Bolt, S.、Bielinski, J.(2003)。Isolating math item characteristics that differentially affect students with reading disabilities。Chicago, IL。  new window
研究報告
1.Thurlow, M. L.、McGrew, K. S.、Tindal, G.、Thompson, S. L.、Ysseldyke, J. E.、Elliott, J. L.(2000)。Assessment accommodations research: Considerations for design and analysis。Minneapolis, MN：University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes。  new window
2.Koretz, D.、Hamilton, L.(1999)。Assessing students with disabilities in Kentucky: The effects of accommodations, format, and subject (CSE.Technical Report No. 498)。  new window
3.Bielinski, J.、Thurlow, M.、Ysseldyke, J.、Freidebach, J.、Freidebach, M.(2001)。Read-aloud accommodations: Effects on multiple-choice reading and math items。Minneapolis, MN。  new window
4.Thompson, S.、Blount, A.、Thurlow, M.(2002)。A summary of research on the effects of test accommodations: 1999 through 2001。Minneapolis, MN。  new window
學位論文
1.王嘉寧(2007)。影響試題差異功能的試題特徵探討：以90-95年國中基本學力測驗地理科試題為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃瓅瑩(2007)。HGLM分析D1F之比 較與應用。臺南大學，臺南市。  延伸查詢new window
3.鄭蕙如(2006)。國中數學內容知識與數學認知能力之混合Rasch模式分析研究。臺灣師範大學，臺北市。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.吳裕益(2007)。心理與教育統計學。臺北：雙葉。  延伸查詢new window
2.Tindal, G.、Fuchs, L.(2000)。A summary of research on test changes: An empirical basis for defining accommodations。Lexington, KY：University of Kentucky, Mid-South Regional Resource Center.。  new window
3.教育部(2009)。特殊教育法。臺北：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
4.余民寧(2009)。試題反應理論（IRT）及其應用。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Abedi, J.、Leon, S.、Kao, J.(2008)。Examining differential item functioning in reading assessments for students with disabilities。Minneapolis, MN。  new window
其他
1.吳裕益(2009)。後設分析，高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：870（臺灣：863，外國：7） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1695817 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67514006
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上