臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：改造運動：政治哲學與政治科學
書刊名：東吳政治學報
作者：郭秋永
作者(外文)：Kuo, Chiu-yeoung
出版日期：2009
卷期：27:3
頁次：頁1-64
主題關鍵詞：改造運動；量化研究；質性研究；政治哲學；政治科學；政治學方法論；Perestroika movement；Quantitative research；Qualitative research；Political philosophy；Political science；Political methodology
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:23
  • 點閱點閱:70
改造運動(Perestroika movement)乃是當今美國政治學界中一個方興未艾的知識運動。俄文「Perestroika」一詞，反映出改造運動的兩個核心理想：致力於重建美國政治學，以及將新觀念、新參與者引入政治過程。然而，究竟如何「重建美國政治學」呢？究竟怎樣「引入新觀念和新參與者」呢？ 在改造運動者看來，實現這兩個核心理想的良方妙藥，首在於大力整頓「操弄數學符號而漠視實質內涵」的美國政治研究現況，從而致力於「恢復政治哲學在政治研究中固有的核心地位」。誠然，這樣的嚴重指控與改弦易轍的主張，自然惹起一系列的激辯。 然而，這一系列的辯論重心，大都集中在「美國政治學會」的組織體系、學術期刊的編輯方針、研究生的課程安排等枝節議題，而比較缺乏「操弄數學符號」與「重視實質內涵」之間的理論性探究，或者比較缺少政治科學與政治哲學之間的理論性討論，遑論這兩者之間的整合論述了。有鑑於此，本文試圖在專業組織、專業期刊、以及課程設計等的「制度改造」之外，特別從美國政治學發展史的角度，評述改造運動之「學術改造」的主要含意。
Perestroika movement is a still growing movement in today's American political science community. ”Perestroika”, the Russian name, reflected the two ideals central to the Perestroika movement: the commitment to restructure American political science and the desire to introduce new ideas and new participants into the political process. However, How to ”restructure American political science”? How to ”introduce new ideas and new participants into the political process”? In the viewpoint of Perestroikans, the means of realizing these two central ideals are rectifying the narrow parochialism and methodological bias toward the quantitative, mathematical, statistical, and formal modeling approaches in American political science and restoring political philosophy to a central place in the political studies. Obviously, this viewpoint raised complex issues and a series of debates. But many arguments of these debates have focused our attention on the ”institutional reform”, such as APSA governance, publication in journals, and graduate education, not on the ”intellectual reform”. This article seeks to set Perestroika movement in historical perspectives of American political science and to show the important implication of its ”intellectual reform”.
期刊論文
1.Miller, Eugene F.(1972)。Positivism, Historicism, and Political Inquiry。American Political Science Review，66(3)，796-817。  new window
2.郭秋永(20021200)。邏輯實證論、行為主義及後行為主義：經驗性政治研究的理論基礎。人文及社會科學集刊，14(4)，465-514。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Bond, Jon R.(2007)。“The Scientification of the Study of Politics: Some Observations on Behavioral Evolution in Political Science.”。The Journal of Politics，69(4)，897-907。  new window
4.Dahl, Robert.(1958)。“Political Theory: Truth and Consequences.”。World Politics，11，89-102。  new window
5.Dahl, Robert.(1961)。“The Behavioral Approach in Political Science: Epitaph for a Monument to a Successful Protest.”。The American Political Science Review，55，763-772。  new window
6.Dryzek, John.(2006)。“Revolutions without Enemies: Key Transformations in Political Science.”。The American Political Science Review，100(4)，487-492。  new window
7.Easton, David.(1969)。“The New Revolution in Political Science.”。The American Political Science Review，63(4)，1051-1061。  new window
8.Gerring, John and Joshua Yesnowitz.(2006)。“A Normative Turn in Political Science.”。Polity，38，101-133。  new window
9.Heisler, Martin O.(2005)。“Introduction-Changing Citizenship Theory and Practice: Comparative Perspectives in a Democratic Framework.”。Political Science and Politics，38(4)，667-670。  new window
10.Hochschild, Jennifer.(2003)。“Editor’s Note: Introduction and Observation.”。Perspectives on Politics，1(1)，1-4。  new window
11.Kasza, Gregory.(2001)。“Peretroika: for an Ecumenical Science.”。PS: Political Science and Politics，34(3)，597-599。  new window
12.Miller, Eugene.(1972)。“Rejoinder to ‘Comments’ by David Braybrooke and Alexander Rosenberg, Richard Rudner, and Martin Landau。The American Political Science Review，66，857-873。  new window
13.郭仁孚(1973)。〈美國政治學研究上的行為主義〉。《人與社會》，3，72-88。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Moon, Donald J.(1975)。The Logic of Political Inquiry: A Synthesis of Opposed Perspectives?。Political Science: Scope and Theory。Reading, MA：Addison Wesley。  new window
2.Storing, Herbert. ed.,(1962)。Essays on the Scientific Study of Politics。New York, NY：Holt, Rinehart and Winston。  new window
3.Somit, Albert、Tanenhaus, Joseph(1964)。American Political Science: A Profile of a Discipline。New York, NY：Atherton Press。  new window
4.Brady, Henry、Collier, David(2004)。Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards。Lanham, MD：Rowman and Littlefield。  new window
5.華力進(1980)。行為主義評介。臺北：經世書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.Easton, David(1953)。The Political System。New York, NY：Alfred A. Knopf。  new window
7.Pattie, Charles、Seyd, Patrick、Whiteley, Paul(2004)。Citizenship in Britain: Values, Participation, and Democracy。Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Punch, K. F.(1998)。Introduction to social research: Quantitative & qualitative approaches。Thousand Oaks, CA。  new window
9.Easton, D.(1971)。The political system: An inquiry into the state of political science。New York：Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.。  new window
10.Polsby, Nelson W.(1980)。Community Power and Political Theory: A Further Look at Problems of Evidence and Inference。New Heaven, Connecticut：Yale University Press。  new window
11.Truman, David B.(1951)。The Governmental Process--Political Interest and Public Opinion。New York, NY：Alfred A. Knopf。  new window
12.Creswell, John W.(1994)。Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches。Sage Publications, Inc.。  new window
13.Almond, Gabriel A.(1990)。A Discipline Divided: Schools and Sects in Political Science。London：Newbury Park, CA：Sage Publication。  new window
14.Easton, David、Dennis, J.(1965)。A framework for political analysis。Englewood Cliffs, NJ：Prentice-Hall。  new window
15.Almond, Gabriel A.、Verba, Sidney(1963)。The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations。Princeton, New Jersey：Princeton University Press。  new window
16.Isaak, Alan C.(1985)。Scope and Methods of Political Science。Homewood, Illinois：The Dorsey Press。  new window
17.Kaplan, Abraham(1964)。The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioral Science。Chandler Publishing Company。  new window
18.King, Gary、Keohane, Robert O.、Verba, Sidney(1994)。Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific inference in Qualitative Research。Princeton University Press。  new window
19.Campbell, Angus、Converse, Philip E.、Miller, Warren E.、Stokes, Donald E.(1960)。The American Voter。The University of Chicago Press。  new window
20.Alker, Hayward.(1996)。“Political Methodology, Old and New.”。A New Handbook of Political Science。Oxford。  new window
21.Almond, Gabriel.(1996)。“Political Science: The History of the Discipline.”。A New Handbook of Political Science。New York; Princeton, N.J.。  new window
22.Ceaser, James.(1990)。Liberal Democracy and Political Science。Baltimore。  new window
23.Devine, Fiona.(2002)。“Qualitative Methods.”。Theory and Methods in Political Science (2nd ed.)。New York。  new window
24.Dryzek, John.(2005)。“A Pox on Perestroika, a Hex on Hegemony.”。Perestroika!: The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science。New Haven。  new window
25.Easton, David.(1969)。“The Current Meaning of Behavioralism.”。Contemporary Political Analysis。New York。  new window
26.Easton, David.(1991)。“Political Science in the United States: Past and Present.”。The Development of Political Science: A Comparative Survey。London and New York。  new window
27.Fay, Brian and J. Donald Moon.(1994)。“What Would an Adequate Philosophy of Social Science Look Like?”。Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science。Cambridge。  new window
28.Golembiewski, Robert et al.(1969)。A Methodological Primer for Political Scientists。Chicago。  new window
29.John, Peter.(2002)。“Quantitative Methods.”。Theory and Methods in Political Science (2nd ed.)。New York。  new window
30.Kaufman, Stuart.(2005)。“Rational Choice, Symbolic Politics, and Pluralism in the Study of Violent Conflict.”。Perestroika!: The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science。New Haven。  new window
31.Kerr, Keith.(2008)。“Social Sciences.”。International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences (2nd ed.)。New York。  new window
32.Kirkpatrick, Evron.(1962)。“The Impact of the Behavioral Approach on Traditional Political Science.”。Essays on the Behavioral Study of Politics。Illinois。  new window
33.Kymlicka, Will.(2002)。Contemporary Political Philosophy. 2nd ed。Oxford。  new window
34.Laslett, Peter.(1956)。“Introduction.”。Philosophy, Politics and Society, Series 1。Oxford。  new window
35.Lowi, Theodore.(1985)。“Foreword.”。Disenchanted Realists: Political Science and the American Crisis, 1884-1984。Albany。  new window
36.Lowi, Theodore.(2005)。“Every Poet His Own Aristotle.”。Perestroika!: The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science。New Haven。  new window
37.McCoy, Charles and John Playford.(1967)。“Introduction.”。Apolitical Politics: A Critique of Behavioralism。New York。  new window
38.McNabb, David.(2005)。Research Methods for Political Science: Quantitative and Qualitative Methods。New York。  new window
39.Merriam, Charles.(1925)。New Aaspects of Politics。Chicago。  new window
40.Miller, William.(1995)。“Qualitative Methods.”。Theory and Methods in Political Science。New York。  new window
41.Monoroe, Kristen.(2005)。“Introduction.”。Perestroika!: The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science。New Haven。  new window
42.Moon, J. Donald.(1982)。“Interpretation, Theory, and Human Emancipation.”。Strategies of Political Inquiry。Beverly Hills。  new window
43.Pierce, Roger(2008)。Research Methods in Politics。Sage。  new window
44.Prasad, Pushkala.(2005)。Crafting Qualitative Research: Working in the Postpositivist Traditions。. New York。  new window
45.Read, Melvyn and David Marsh.(2002)。“Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods.”。Theory and Methods in Political Science. (2nd ed.)。New York。  new window
46.Richter, Melvin.(1980)。“Introduction.”。Political Theory and political Education。NJ。  new window
47.Smith, Rogers.(2005)。“Of Means and Meaning: The Challenge of Doing Good Political Science.”。Perestroika!: The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science。New Haven。  new window
48.Somit, Albert and Joseph Tanenhaus.(1967)。The Development of American Political Science。New York。  new window
49.Steinberger, Peter.(2005)。“Reforming the Discipline.”。Perestroika!: The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science。New Haven。  new window
50.Strauss, Leo.(1962)。“Epilogue.”。Essays on the Scientific Study of Politics。New York。  new window
51.Yanow, Dvora.(2005)。“In the House of ‘Science’ There are Many Rooms.”。Perestroika!: The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science。New Haven。  new window
52.Yanow, Dvora and Peregrine Schwartz-Shea.(2006)。“Introduction.”。Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and Interpretive Turn。New York。  new window
圖書論文
1.Brady, Henry E.、Collier, David、Seawright, Jason(2004)。Refocusing the Discussion of Methodology。Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards。Lanham, MD：Rowan and Littlefield Publishers。  new window
2.郭秋永(20090000)。公民意識 : 實證與規範之間的一個整合研究。公民與政治行動 : 實證與規範之間的對話。臺北：中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Mckeown, Timothy J.(2004)。Case Studies and the Limits of the Quantitative Worldview。Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards。New York：Rowman and Littlefield。  new window
4.Munck, Gerardo(2004)。Tools for Qualitative Research。Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards。New York：Rowman and Littlefield。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：819（臺灣：816，外國：3） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1780212 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67575952
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上