資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.141.199.122)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
The Comparative Effects of Student Question-Posing and Question-Answering Strategies on Promoting College Students' Academic Achievement, Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategies Use
書刊名:
教育與心理研究
作者:
于富雲
/
劉祐興
作者(外文):
Yu, Fu-yun
/
Liu, Yu-hsin
出版日期:
2008
卷期:
31:3
頁次:
頁25-52
主題關鍵詞:
後設認知策略
;
認知策略
;
練習
;
學生出題
;
Cognitive strategies
;
Metacognitive strategies
;
Question-answering
;
Student question-posing
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
3
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
2
共同引用:0
點閱:41
本研究探討「學生出題」策略與「題目練習」對學生學業成就、認知策略與後設認知策略的影響。研究採取準實驗法,由同一位老師教導的兩班土木工程學系學生(共69位),以不同策略進行六禮拜的課程,之後比較兩班級的學業成就,並比較不同策略學習前、後對認知策略及後設認知策略的影響。研究結果顯示,相較於傳統「題目練習」策略,「學生出題」策略較能引發學生於聽課歷程中運用不同之認知與後設認知策略,但不同策略並未造成學業成就上的差異。根據本研究發現及相關理論根基,建議教師可於課堂中嘗試使用學生出題策略,以輔助學生認知與後設認知策略之發展。
以文找文
The study examined the comparative effects of student multiple-choice questionposing and question-answering strategies on promoting students’ academic achievement, cognitive and metacognitive strategies use in a lecture-mode instructional setting. In total, 69 civil engineering undergraduates enrolled in two sessions of a required course participated in the study. Statistical analysis found that student multiple-choice questionposing strategy is a more productive strategy for inducing and engaging students in mobilizing cognitive and metacognitive strategies as compared to the traditional questionanswering arrangement. In terms of students’ academic performance, student multiplechoice question-posing is as effective a strategy as question-answering. Based on the present study, it is suggested that instructors who were accustomed to in-class practice sessions might consider a student question-posing approach for an amiable change to promote students’ cognitive and metacognitive strategies use without worrying about its less favorable impact on students’ performance.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Bangert-Drowns, R. L.、Hurley, M. M.、Wilkinson, B.(2004)。The Effects of School-based Writing-to-learn Interventions on Academic Achievement: A Metaanalysis。Review of Educational Research,74(1),29-58。
2.
King, A.(1991)。Improving Lecture Comprehension: Effects of a Metacognitive Strategy。Applied Cognitive Psychology,5(4),331-346。
3.
King, Alison(1992)。Facilitating Elaborative Learning Through Guided Student-Generated Questioning。Educational Psychologist,27(1),111-126。
4.
Leung, S. K.、Silver, E. A.(1997)。The role of task format, mathematics knowledge, and creative thinking on the arithmetic problem posing of prospective elementary school teachers。Mathematics Education Research Journal,9(1),5-24。
5.
Abramovich, S.、Cho, E. K.(2006)。Technology as a medium for elementary preteachers' problem-posing experience in mathematics。Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching,25(4),309-323。
6.
Rosenshine, B.、Meister, C.、Chapman, S.(1996)。Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies。Review of Educational Research,66(2),181-221。
7.
Yu, F. Y.、Liu, Y. H.(2005)。Potential values of incorporating multiple-choice question-construction for physics experimentation instruction。International Journal of Science Education,27(11),1319-1335。
8.
Davey, B.、McBride, S.(1986)。Generating Self-questions after Reading: A Comprehension Assist for Elementary Students。Journal of Educational Research,80(1),43-46。
9.
Barlow, A. T.、Cates, J. M.(2006)。The Impact of Problem Posing on Elementary Teachers' Beliefs about Mathematics and Mathematics Teaching。School Science and Mathematics,106(2),64-73。
10.
Whitin, P. E.(2004)。Promoting problem-posing explorations。Teaching Children Mathematics,11(4),180-186。
11.
Silver, Edward A.(1994)。On mathematical problem posing。For the Learning of Mathematics,14(1),19-28。
12.
Davey, B.、McBride, S.(1986)。Effects of question-generation training on reading comprehension。Journal of Educational Psychology,78(4),256-262。
13.
Biddulph, F.、Symington, D.、Osborne, R.(1986)。The place of children's questions in primary science education。Research in Science and Technological Education,4(1),77-88。
14.
Dori, Y. J.、Herscovitz, O.(1999)。Question-posing capability as an alternative evaluation method: Analysis of an environmental case study。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,36(4),411-430。
15.
Koch, A.、Eckstein, S. G.(1991)。Improvement of reading comprehension of physics texts by students' question formulation。International Journal of Science Education,13(4),473-486。
16.
King, Alison(1994)。Guiding Knowledge Construction in the Classroom: Effects of Teaching Children How To Question and How To Explain。American Educational Research Journal,31(2),338-368。
17.
Wittrock, M. C.(1978)。The cognitive movement in instruction。Educational Psychologist,13(1),15-29。
18.
Flavell, John H.(1979)。Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry。American Psychologist,34(10),906-911。
19.
Wong, B. Y. L.(1985)。Self-questioning instructional research: A review。Review of Educational Research,55(2),227-268。
20.
Palincsar, A. S.、Brown, A. L.(1984)。Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities。Cognition and Instruction,1(2),117-175。
21.
Pressley, M.、Ghatala, E. S.、Woloshyn, V.、Pirie, J.(1990)。Sometimes Adults Miss the Main Ideas and Do Not Realize It: Confidence in Responses to Short-answer and Multiple Choice Comprehension Questions。Reading Research Quarterly,25,232-249。
22.
Pressley, M.、Borkowski, J. G.、O'Sullivan, J. T.(1984)。Memory StrategyInstruction Is Made of This: Metamemory and Durable Strategy Use。Educational Psychologist,19(2),94-107。
23.
Chin, C.、Kayalvizhi, G.(2002)。Posing Problems for Open Investigations: What Questions Do Pupils Ask?。Research in Science and Technological Education,20(2),269-287。
24.
Bean, J.(1985)。Interaction Effects Based on Class Level in an Exploratory Model of College Student Dropout Syndrome。American Educational Research Journal,22(1),35-64。
25.
English, L. D.(1998)。Children's Problem Posing within Formal and Informal Context。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,29(1),83-106。
會議論文
1.
Weiner, C. J.(1978)。The Effect of Training in Questioning and Student Question Generation on Reading Achievement。0。
研究報告
1.
Livingston, J. A.(2003)。Metacognition: An Overview。0。
2.
Cherng, B. L.(2000)。Studies of Junior and Senior High School Students' Selfregulated Learning。Taipei。
3.
Pintrich, P. R.、Smith, D.、Garcia, T.、McKeachie, W. J.(1989)。A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ)。Ann Arbor, MI。
學位論文
1.
Perez, J. A.(1985)。Effects of Studentgenerated Problems on Problem Solving Performance,0。
圖書
1.
Brown, S. I.、Walter, M. I.(1983)。The Art of Problem Posing。Philadelphia, PA:Franklin Institute Press。
2.
Brown, S. I.、Walter, M.(2005)。The Art of Problem Posing。Hilisdale, NJ:Lawrence Eribaum。
3.
Reigeluth, C. M.(1983)。Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。
4.
Gagne, Robert M.、Briggs, Leslie J.、Wager, Walter W.(1992)。Principles of Instructional Design。Fort Worth, TX:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers。
5.
Gagné, Robert Mills(1985)。The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction。Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc.。
6.
Whiten, D. J.(2004)。Exploring the Strategy of Problem Posing。Professional Development Guidebook for Perspectives on the Teaching of Mathematics: Companion to the Sixty-sixth Yearbook。Reston, VA。
其他
1.
Yu, F. Y.(2008)。Student-generated Questions in Physics Labs: Possibilities and Students Preference,0。
圖書論文
1.
Brown, A. L.(1987)。Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms。Metacognition, Motivation, and Understanding。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
不同成就小六生社會科選擇題出題表現之比較研究
2.
學生擬題教學對情意學習成效及學業成就影響之後設分析
3.
大學生網路出題表現之內容分析與創意指標建立
無相關博士論文
無相關書籍
無相關著作
1.
復原力的概念分析與評估工具之建構
2.
享受生活片刻的能力:用心學習、品味能力及圓滿人生之關係
3.
依附父母的組型分析:潛在剖面分析的發現
4.
國民中學教師心理契約、情緒勞務與組織公民行為之關聯性研究
5.
國小中高年級學生自律學習與數學學業成就關係之縱貫性分析
6.
認知模式創意問題解決之電腦輔助教學課程:年級與智能之學習差異
7.
高級中等學校校長正向領導量表之發展與運用
8.
不當督導與工作滿意度的關係:組織公平與政治知覺的中介調節效果分析
9.
組內相關係數與樣本數對於脈絡效果估計的影響:貝氏估計與最大概似估計法的比較
10.
Research on the Usability and Satisfaction of Online CSCD Platform for Design Students
11.
Arts Students' Self-Efficacy and Mindset between Their Professions and English Learning: Can't I Be as Good in the Arts as in English?
12.
建構高等教育機構行政人員內部關係品質模型與實務之研究:以領導成員交換與內部關係投資為干擾變數
13.
以心理詞彙資料庫探討英語為外國語學習者英語詞彙辨識之詞長效應
14.
The Prediction and Mediation Effect of Motivational Strength: From Ought-to L2 Self to Ideal L2 Self
15.
大一巔峰型新生學校生活適應、心理資本及心理健康之關係
QR Code