:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:On the Protection of Mariners : A Trajectory in the Cultic Traditions of Southern Fujian from the Early Song to the Early Qing
書刊名:民俗曲藝
作者:柯胡
作者(外文):Clark, Hugh R.
出版日期:2010
卷期:167
頁次:頁65-121
主題關鍵詞:MaritimeXianhui houZhaohui gongMazuSu wangye海上顯惠侯昭惠公媽祖蘇王爺
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:46
本文考察出現在福建閩南的四個海神。其中有三個出現於宋朝:顯惠侯、昭惠公、以及媽祖,在宋代亦稱湄洲神女。第四個則是蘇王爺,出現在幾個世紀後的明清交替期。文章從兩個方面對此進行考察:第一是每個神明所能提供的保護範圍;第二則是各神明之間的相互關係。第一點是文章的重點,本文指出神明的保護功能反映了信仰者的需求。三個宋代海神無疑都不只保護航海者,祂們更攸關沿海居民的收成、疾病等更廣泛的福祉。但祂們又各自有所不同:顯惠侯源自莆田一個內陸鄉村,只保護遠距離貿易商人;昭惠公源自安海的海岸鄉村,主要保護當地漁民;媽祖源自海洋交通線上的小島,由於這些區域參與海上交通帶來的機會,媽祖在十二世紀成爲東南海岸最有勢力的神明。相比之下,顯惠侯和昭惠公卻只局限在孤立的鄉村。最後,幾個世紀後的蘇王爺,成了王爺信仰現象的典型。祂是村落水準的神明,當媽祖顯得太邈遠時,於是祂應沿海居民之需求而起。
This paper explores the cults to four maritime deities that emerged in the Minnan area of southern Fujian. Three deities emerged in the Song dynasty: the Duke of Auspicious Response (Xianhui hou), the Lord of Illumined Response (Zhaohui gong), and the Maternal Ancestress (Mazu), also known and the Divine Woman of Meizhou (Meizhou shennü). The cult of the fourth, Prince Su (Su wangye), emerged several centuries later in the context of the Ming-Qing transition. The paper has two lines of inquiry: first, the range of protections offered by the deities; second, the relationships between the several cults. The first is the primary focus. The paper regards the protections offered to be a reflection of the needs of cult devotees. The three Song deities most certainly were not only turned to for protection of the seas, but reflect the broader interests of coastal villagers such as harvest and disease. But neither were they all alike. The Duke came from an inland village in Putian and only protected long-distance merchants. The Lord came from a village on the coast of Anhai Bay, and focused on protecting local fishermen. Mazu came from a small island that sat athwart the coastal sea lanes. Because this location offered the opportunity to join coastal traders, by the 12(superscript th) century Mazu had become the most important deity; the Duke and the Lord, in contrast, remained the patron deities of isolated villages. Later, Prince Su became emblematic of the Wangye phenomenon. He was the deity of a coastal village whose cult emerged because his devotees felt that Mazu had become too remote to meet their needs.
期刊論文
1.Clark, Hugh R.(1995)。Muslims and Hindus in the Culture and Morphology of Quanzhou from the Tenth to the Thirteenth Century。Journal of World History,6(1),49-74。  new window
2.Clark, Hugh R.、李冬梅(2005)。莆田顯惠侯神靈及其對航員的保護。海交史研究,2,1-10。  延伸查詢new window
3.Clark, Hugh R.(2006)。The Religious Culture in Southern Fujian through the Middle Period (750-1450): Preliminary Reflections on Contact Across a Maritime Frontier。Asia Major,19(1)/19(2),211-240。  new window
4.Ruitenbeek, Klaas(1999)。Mazu, the Patroness of Sailors, in Chinese Pictorial Art。Artibus Asiae,58(3/4),281-329。  new window
5.Schipper, Kristofer(1985)。Seigneurs Royaux: Dieux des Epidemies。Archives de Sciences Socialies des Religions,59(1),31-40。  new window
6.Katz, Paul(1987)。Demons or Deities?: The Wangye of Taiwan。Asian Folklore Studies,46(2),197-215。  new window
7.宋怡明(199702)。The Illusion of Standardizing the Gods: The Cult of the five Emperors in Late Imperial China。Journal of Asian Studies,56(1),113-135。  new window
8.Beckett-Camarata, E. J.、Camarata, M. R.、Barker, R. T.(1998)。Integrating internal and external customer relationships through relationship management: a strategic response to a changing global environment。Journal of Business Research,41,71-81。  new window
9.Sutton, Donald S.(2007)。Introduction to the Special Issue: Ritual, Cultural Standardization, and Orthopraxy in China-reconsidering James L. Watson's ideas。Modern China,33(1),3-21。  new window
學位論文
1.Hinrichs, T. J.(2003)。The Medical Transforming of Governance:Southern Customs in Song Dynasty China (960–1278 C.E.).(博士論文)。Harvard University。  new window
圖書
1.斯波義信(1968)。宋代商業史研究。宋代商業史研究。東京。  延伸查詢new window
2.宋若霖、廖必琦、官北麟(1968)。莆田縣志。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.馬端臨(1962)。文獻通考。  延伸查詢new window
4.林爾嘉(1934)。閩中金石略。上海。  延伸查詢new window
5.徐兢(1968)。宣和奉使高麗圖景。臺北:Taiwan shangwu yinshuguan。  延伸查詢new window
6.蔡尤資、葉海山(2005)。兩岸三公嘉應廟。泉州與臺灣關係文物史跡。廈門。  延伸查詢new window
7.Jiao, Tian-Long(2007)。The Neolithic of Southeast China: Cultural Transformation and Regional Interaction on the Coast。Youngstown, NY:Cambria Press。  new window
8.李國宏(2003)。泉州民間信仰文化論集。北京。  延伸查詢new window
9.李國宏(2005)。祥芝斗美宮。泉州與臺灣關係文物史跡。廈門。  延伸查詢new window
10.松本浩一(1986)。宋代の賜額、賜号についてー主として「宋会要輯要」にみえる史料から。中国史における中央政治と地法社会。東京。  延伸查詢new window
11.森克己(1948)。日宋貿易の研究。東京:國立書院。  延伸查詢new window
12.朱天順(1996)。媽祖と中國の民間信仰。媽祖と中國の民間信仰。Tokyo:Heika shuppansha。  延伸查詢new window
13.Billy, K. L.(2000)。Prosperity, Region, and Institutions in Maritime China: The Southern Fujian Pattern, 946-1368。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
14.須江隆(1998)。福建莆田の方氏と祥應廟。宋代社会のメットワーク。東京:汲古書院。  延伸查詢new window
15.Mair, Victor H.、Steinhardt, Nancy Shatzman、Goldin, Paul Rakita(2005)。Hawaii Reader in Traditional Chinese Culture。Honolulu:University of Hawaii Press。  new window
16.徐曉望(1999)。媽祖的子民:閩臺海洋文化研究。學林出版社。  延伸查詢new window
17.鄭煥章(2005)。泉郡富美宮。泉州與臺灣關係文物史跡。廈門。  延伸查詢new window
18.(1968)。福建金石志。福建統紀。Taipei:Datong shuju。  延伸查詢new window
19.Clark, Hugh R.(2007)。Portrait of a Community: Society, Culture, and the Structures of Kinship in the Mulan River Valley (Fujian) from the Late Tang through the Song。Hong Kong:Chinese University Press。  new window
20.林學增、吳錫璜(1967)。民國同安縣志。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
21.何喬遠、廈門大學古籍整理研究、歷史系古籍整理研究室(1994)。閩書。福州:福建人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
22.黃仲昭、福建省地方志編纂委員會(1991)。八閩通志。福州:福建人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
23.鄭振滿、丁荷生(2003)。福建宗教碑銘彙編:興化府分冊。福州:福建人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
24.劉克莊、王雲五(196709)。後村先生大全集。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
25.昌彼得、王德毅、侯俊德、程元敏(1974)。宋人傳記資料索引。臺北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
26.Dean, Kenneth、鄭振滿(1995)。福建宗教碑銘彙編:興化府分冊。福州:福建人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
27.徐曉望(2006)。福建通史。福建人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
28.李獻璋(1979)。媽祖信仰の研究。泰山文物社。  延伸查詢new window
29.Dean, Kenneth(1993)。Taoist Ritual and Popular Cults of Southeast China。Princeton University Press。  new window
30.李燾(1961)。續資治通鑑長編。臺北:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
31.Hansen, Valerie Lynn(1990)。Changing Gods in Medieval China, 1127-1276。Princeton University Press。  new window
32.林光朝(1776)。文淵閣四庫全書。Taipei。  延伸查詢new window
33.(1688)。白塘隴西李氏宗譜。  延伸查詢new window
34.黃仲元(1783)。文淵閣四庫全書。Taipei。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.林光朝。艾軒集。  延伸查詢new window
2.(宋)黃仲元。四如集。  延伸查詢new window
3.(1990)。福建統紀,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Mio, Yuko(1995)。Deified Ghosts: Popular and Authorised Interpretations of Religious Symbols。Perspectives on Chinese Society: Anthropological Views from Japan。Canterbury:Centre for Social Anthropology and Computing, University of Kent。  new window
2.Ter Haar, Barend J.(1991)。The Genesis and Spread of Temple Cults in Fukien。Development and Decline of Fukien Province in the 17th and 18th Centries。Leiden, Netherlands:E. J. Brill。  new window
3.梁克家。地里類2敘縣。淳熙三山志。  延伸查詢new window
4.Watson, James L.(1985)。Standardizing the Gods: The Promotion of T'ien Hou (Empress of Heaven) Along the South Chinese Coast, 960-1960。Popular Culture in Late Imperial China。Berkeley:University of California Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關期刊論文
 
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
1. 唐代以降國家禮儀發展之變遷--以國家禮典為中心
2. 中西之別:明末清初天主教喪葬禮初探
3. Reviews: 1.DeBernadi, Jean. Rites of Belonging: Memory, Modernity, and Identity in a Malaysian Chinese Community. (笛柏納蒂著《歸屬的禮儀:馬來西亞華人社區的記憶、現代性與認同》) 2.DeBernadi, Jean. The Way that Lives in the Heart: Chinese Popular Religion & Spirit Mediums in Penang, Malaysia (笛柏納蒂著《心存之道:馬來西亞檳城華人民間宗教與靈媒》)
4. The Aporia of Touch: The Gift of Community in Untouchability
5. 佛教禮懺「斷除三障」的修道意函--以敦煌本《大佛名十六卷略出懺悔》為中心
6. 試述敦煌書儀書狀中的禮物與禮單--以官場酬應和敦煌歸義軍的送禮活動為中心
7. 顏色與社會關係--西周金文中之證據與闡釋
8. 李春生與禮密臣的一段軼事--一八九五年日軍和平占領臺北城事件的發微
9. 禮俗.記憶與啟蒙 : 臺灣文獻的文化論述及數位典藏
10. ポライトネス理論から見た日台大学生の不満表明
11. 禮物的不可能性與否定之路:德希達論作為禮物的上帝
12. 中國禮儀之爭脈絡中的孝道:衛方濟與《孝經》翻譯初探
13. 明清時代《朱子家禮》的普及與傳播
14. 從《考工記》再看《漢語大詞典》
15. 評張原,《在文明與鄉野之間--貴州屯堡禮俗生活與歷史感的人類學考察》(北京:民族出版社,2008年)
 
QR Code
QRCODE