:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從國際法觀點論海峽兩岸共同合作開發南海油氣資源
書刊名:軍法專刊
作者:趙國材
出版日期:2010
卷期:56:5
頁次:頁45-69
主題關鍵詞:南海領土主權海域劃界油氣探勘能源需求南海各方共同宣言共同開發South China SeaTerritorial sovereigntyDelimitation of maritime boundariesOil explorationCode of Conduct for the South China SeaJoint development
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(2) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:15
  • 點閱點閱:93
南海是主要國際航道且海床及底土可能蘊藏豐富的生物與非生物資源,因此中國、臺灣、越南、菲 律賓、馬來西亞和汶萊都聲稱對南海擁有領土主權。近年來由於中國對東南亞實施睦鄰友好政策,使此 地區成為世界上經濟發展最蓬勃之地帶,美國於伊拉克撤軍後,其軍力將重返亞太地區,勢必造成南海 情勢之遽變,使原先已相當複雜之南海情勢更雪上加霜。若南海問題未能妥善處理,非但會形成各聲索 國海洋權益的爭奪,且會危及區域安全與和平穩定之發展。如何處理南海問題已成為影響利害關係國之 間攸關未來發展之關鍵。 共同開發方式始於1960年代初期,是作為解決重疊海域爭議區海洋資源問題之一種有效途徑。1970 年代至1980 年代,共同開發的必要性也逐漸為各國所接受。準此,中國一向主張「主權屬我、擱置爭 議、共同開發」,惟南海周邊國家對於共同開發方式意見分歧,有國家反對共同開發,也有認為共同開 發不能只是中國與相關國家之雙邊共同開發,而應與所有爭端國進行多邊共同開發;同時中國主張由爭 端當事國雙邊解決,不願接受將部分非法佔領之島嶼納入共同開發之範圍,或區域外非爭端國所提出以 和平解決國際爭端之方式適用於南海爭端。 睽諸海域爭議區共同開發之國際實踐,實施共同開發之成功與否,其先決條件為爭端當事國必須承 認爭議的存在,並就爭議區的範圍達成共識,否則共同開發就如紙上談兵、難以實現。在南海地區,中 國同越南、菲律賓、馬來西亞、印尼、汶萊等周邊國家要想進行共同探勘開發相當困難,故海峽兩岸應 先達成共同探勘開發之共識,後再與其他國家進行廣泛交流,藉由引進外資技術,對南沙群島海洋資源 進行探勘與開發。
The South China Sea is a major international waterway whose sea-bed and subsoil may be abundant in biological and non-living resources. China,Ta iwan,Vie tnam, the Philippines, Malaysia and Brunei all claim sovereignty over certain islands in the South China Sea. In recent years,Ch ina's good-neighbor policies toward South East Asian countries have helped to make the region one of the most economically vigorous in the world. As the U.S. withdraws from Iraq,its military is beginning to return its focus to the Asia-Pacific region,c omplicating the situation in the South China Sea. If the problem is not properly dealt with,it may cause not only a struggle among all claimants of maritime rights,bu t also destabilize the security and peace in the region. Joint development of the region begin in the early 1960s and has become an effective way to solve the problem of marine resources in disputed area. During the 1970s and 1980s,join t development gradually came to be accepted by each country in the region. Based on this,Ch ina has pursued a policy of "recognizing Chinese sovereignty, shelving disputes,an d seeking common development." Neighboring countries in the South China Sea,h owever, have different opinions about joint development. Some countries are opposed to joint development,w hile others insisted that joint development could not only be in the form of bilateral agreements between China and other claimant States,bu t rather should take the form of multilateral development; at the same time, China advocates a bilateral settlement between relative claimants,refus es to include the illegal occupation of islands in development agreements,and also opposes the participation of non-claimants in the the settlement process. Looking into the international practice of joint development of disputed maritime area,th e key to successful joint development is that claimants must admit the existence of the dispute and reach an agreement about the extent of the disputed area,oth erwise joint development is unlikely to mature. In the South China Sea,i t is difficult to conduct joint development among those disputed countries. As a result,Cr oss-Straits should reach an agreement of joint exploration and exploitation of oil and gas in South China Sea first,then ,inv ite other countries to join in. The participation of the claimants would bring certain benefit to all by introducing foreign technology and capital which would further advance exploration and development of the sea around the Spratly Islands.
期刊論文
1.Tiglao, Rigoberto、McBeth, John(1995)。Territorial Imperative。Far Eastern Economic Review,14-16。  new window
2.Chao, John K.T.(1989)。South China Sea:Boundary Problem Relating to the Nansha and Hsisha Islands。Chinese Yearbook of International Law and Affairs,9,66-152。  new window
3.Dodds, Klaus(2010)。Governing Antarctica: Contemporary Challenges and the Enduring Legacy of the 1959 Antarctic Treaty。Global Policy,1(1)。  new window
4.Park, Choon-Ho(1978)。The South China Sea Disputes: Who Owns the Island and the Natural Resources?。Ocean Development and International Law Journal,5(1),27-59。  new window
5.Svarlien(1960)。The Sector Principle in Law and Practice。Polar Record,10,248-263。  new window
6.Sun, Kuan-Ming(1996)。The Republic of China's Policy toward the South China Sea: A Review。Issues & Studies,32(5),40-54。  new window
7.Sun, Kuan-Ming(1996)。Freeze the Tropical Seas。Marine Policy,23(3),199-208。  new window
8.Waldock, Humphrey(1948)。Disputed Sovereignty in the Falkland Islands Dependencies。British Year Book of International Law,25,337-346。  new window
9.郭淵(2009)。合作:解決南海問題的必由之路。中國邊疆史地研究,19(2),127-135。  延伸查詢new window
10.趙國材(1999)。從現行海洋法分析南沙群島的主權爭端。亞洲評論,春夏號=9,17-48。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Chao, Lee-Shing(2010)。The Scientific Prospects of Deep Sea Exploration in the Philippine Sea and South China Sea。Beijing, China。  new window
2.黃異、魏靜芬(1996)。評析現行南海水浴之法律地位1-9。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.林正義、宋燕輝、行政院研究發展考核委員會(2008)。南海情勢與我國應有的外交國防戰略。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.邵廣昭 等。南沙太平島國家公園可行性評估及先期規劃報告。  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡政文、林文程、行政院研究發展考核委員會(2008)。南海情勢發展對我國國家安全及外交關係影響。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.傅崑成、行政院研究發展考核委員會(2008)。我國南海歷史性水域法律地位之研究。臺北:行政院研考會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Smith, Jr. Esmond D.、Arbor, Jr Ann.(1995)。Mich. China, Technology and the Spratly Islands: the Geopolitical Impact of New Technologies。  new window
圖書
1.蕭建國(2006)。國際海洋邊界石油的共同開發。北京:海洋出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.高之國、張海文(2007)。海洋國策研究文集。海洋出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Valencia, Mark J.(1995)。China and The South China Sea Disputes。London:The International Institute for Strategic Studies。  new window
4.馬溫‧斯‧塞謬爾斯(1996)。南中國海爭端。海南:海南省外事辦公室‧海南南海研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
5.吳士存(2010)。南海爭端的起源與發展。北京:中國經濟出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.傅崑成、水秉和(2007)。中國與南中國海問題。臺北:問津堂。  延伸查詢new window
7.Chemillier-Gendreau, Monique(2000)。Sovereignty over the Paracel and Spratly Islands。The Hague。  new window
8.O'Connell, D. P.、Brian, J.(1992)。Spratly Islands Issue: Strategic Interests and Options。New Port, Rhode Island:Naval War College。  new window
9.Valencia, Mark J.、Van Dyke, Jon M.、Ludwig, Noel A.(1997)。Sharing the Resources of the South China Sea。Honolulu:University of Hawaii Press。  new window
10.Samuels, Marwyn S.(1982)。Contest for the South China Sea。Methuen。  new window
11.Greenfield, Jeanette(1992)。China's Practice in the Law of the Sea。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
12.沈克勤(20090000)。南海諸島主權爭議述評。臺北:臺灣學生書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Baker, John C.、Wiencek, David G.(2002)。Cooperative Monitoring in the South China Sea: Satellite Imagery, Confidence-Building Measures, and the Spratly Islands Dispute。Westport, Conn.。  new window
14.Collins, Gabriel B.、Erickson, Andrew S.、Goldstein, Lyle J.、Murray, William S.(2008)。China's Energy Strategy : The Impact on Beijing's Maritime Policies。Annapolis, Maryland。  new window
15.Hamzah, B. A.(1990)。The Spratlies: What Can be Done to Enhance Confidence。Kuala Lumpur:Institute of Strategic and International Studie。  new window
16.Ji, Guoxing(1992)。The Spratlys Disputes and Prospects for Settlement。Kuala Lumpur:Institute of Strategic and International Studies。  new window
17.Pablo-Baviera, Aileen San(1992)。The South China Sea Disputes: Philippine Perspectives。Philippine-China Development Resource Center。  new window
18.Plischke, Elmer(1949)。Sovereignty and Imperialism in the Polar Regions。Essays in History and International Relations: In Honor of George Hubbard Blakeslee \\ Dwight E. Lee ; McReynold, George E. (eds.)。Worcester, Massachusetts。  new window
19.Watts, Sir Arthur(1992)。International Law and the Antarctic Treaty System。Cambridge。  new window
20.中國科學院南沙綜合科學考察隊(1991)。南沙群島歷史地理研究專集。廣州。  延伸查詢new window
21.中華民國外交部研究設計委員會(1995)。南海問題簡介。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
22.王傳友(2007)。海防安全論。北京。  延伸查詢new window
23.王曙光(2004)。海洋開發戰略研究。北京。  延伸查詢new window
24.任懷峰(2007)。南海共同開發研究。中國與南中國海問題 \\ 傅崑成 ; 水秉和 (編)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
25.何海榕(2007)。對共同開發的法律解讀。中國與南中國海問題 \\ 傅崑成 ; 水秉和 (編)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
26.吳士存、朱華友(2009)。聚焦南海-地緣政治、資源、航道。北京。  延伸查詢new window
27.余勁松(1999)。國際投資法。北京。  延伸查詢new window
28.高之國(2007)。評臺灣從南沙太平島和東沙群島撤軍替防的負面意義和影響。海洋國策研究文集 \\ 高之國 ; 張海文 (主編)。北京。  延伸查詢new window
29.郭文路、黃碩琳(2007)。南海爭端與南海漁業資源區域合作管理研究。北京。  延伸查詢new window
30.曹丕富(2007)。關於歷史性權力與我國海域劃界的研究。海洋國策研究文集 \\ 高之國 ; 張海文 (主編)。北京。  延伸查詢new window
31.趙國材、陳博中(1993)。我國重返聯合國亞洲暨太平洋經濟及社會委員會之可行性。中華民國與聯合國 \\ 蔡瑋 (主編)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
32.劉容子(2004)。美國重新調整國家海洋戰略的重大舉措。海洋開發戰略研究 \\ 王曙光 (主編)。北京。  延伸查詢new window
33.鄭澤民(2009)。21世紀初越南在南海問題上的對華策略分析。聚焦南海-地緣政治、資源、航道 \\ 吳士存 ; 朱華友 (主編)。北京。  延伸查詢new window
34.成晉豫、李明杰(2007)。1998越南海上警察力量法令簡介。海洋國策研究文集 \\ 高之國 ; 張海文 (主編)。北京。  延伸查詢new window
35.朱華友(2009)。加強中美海上合作,共同維護地區安全。聚焦南海-地緣政治、資源、航道 \\ 吳士存 ; 朱華友 (主編)。北京。  延伸查詢new window
36.朱華友、鞠海龍(2009)。南海航行安全對世界經濟的影響。聚焦南海-地緣政治、資源、航道 \\ 吳士存 ; 朱華友 (主編)。北京。  延伸查詢new window
37.成晉豫(2007)。1995年南沙爭端形式綜述。海洋國策研究文集 \\ 高之國 ; 張海文 (主編)。北京。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.中華民國外交部(1995)。外交部聲明。  延伸查詢new window
2.中華民國外交部(2008)。外交部聲明。  延伸查詢new window
3.中華民國外交部(2009)。外交部聲明。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Paik, Jin-Hyun(1995)。East Asia and the Law of the Sea。The Law of the Sea in the Asian Pacific Region: Developments and Prospects。Martinus Nijhoff Publishers。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE