臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：臺灣原住民族知識組織架構建構方法之探討
書刊名：教育資料與圖書館學
作者：陳雪華 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chen, Hsueh-hua
出版日期：2010
卷期：48:1
頁次：頁61-86
主題關鍵詞：臺灣原住民族；知識組織架構；原住民知識；領域分析；方法論；Taiwan's aborigines；Knowledge organization structures；Aboriginal knowledge；Domain analysis；Methodology
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:51
近年來,原住民族知識組織架構愈來愈受各界的關注與重視,然而由於過去原住民知識大多皆以口傳為主,顯少有文字記載,故原住民族知識組織架構建構之不完整性是可想而知的。為因應此劃時代之趨勢與需求,本研究旨在提出一套建構「台灣原住民族知識組織架構」之方法與步驟:透過對各種「知識組織系統」類型特色與呈現方式的分析,本研究認為「分類架構」應是目前較適用於呈現原住民族領域知識的知識組織系統;再藉由「領域分析」方法的探討,整合出台灣原住民族領域知識分析之整體流程;並根據現有之原住民族知識組織架構及其建構之相關研究,歸納出建構原住民族知識組織架構時不可忽略的特性。期盼本研究可供原住民族相關單位與學者專家在未來建構時之參考。
In the past several years, the aboriginal knowledge organization structure has received a respectable amount of attention. However, aboriginal knowledge is commonly spread by oral tradition and rarely by the written word. With regards to such practice, the incompleteness of the structure of aboriginal knowledge organization is then quite understandable. The main purpose of this research is to attempt to introduce a series of methods and procedures for the creation of Taiwan’s aboriginal knowledge organization structure in response to the current demands of our society. By analyzing the features and representation of a variety of organization structures, this study reached the conclusion that classification structures are the most suitable knowledge organization system for the representation of aboriginal knowledge. The method of domain analysis was further applied during research to trace the integral process of the analysis of aboriginal knowledge. Key characteristics for the construction of aboriginal knowledge organization structures have also been defined according to existing related studies. It is hoped that this study will be able to serve as reference for the future research of scholars and other aborigine related institutions.
期刊論文
1.Zins, Chaim(2007)。Classification schemes of Information Science: Twenty-eight scholars map the field。Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology，58(5)，645-672。  new window
2.Zins, Chaim(2007)。Conceptual approaches for defining data, information, and knowledge。Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology，58(4)，479-493。  new window
3.Foley, Dennis(2003)。Indigenous Epistemology and Indigenous Standpoint Theory。Social Alternatives，22(1)，44-52。  new window
4.Zins, Chaim(2007)。Conceptions of information science。Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology，58(3)，335-350。  new window
5.Barnhardt, Ray、Kawagley, Angayuqaq Oscar(2005)。Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Alaska Native Ways of Knowing。Anthropology and Education Quarterly，36(1)，8-23。  new window
6.Simpson, Leanne R.(2004)。Anticolonial strategies for the recovery and maintenance of indigenous knowledge。American Indian Quarterly，28(3/4)，373-384。  new window
7.Beghtol, C.(1995)。“Facets” as interdisciplinary undiscovered public knowledge: S. R. Ranganathanin India and L. Guttman in Israel。Journal of Documentation，51，194-224。  new window
8.Hjørland B.(2002)。Domain analysis in information science: Eleven approaches – traditionalas well as innovative。Journal of Documentation，58(4)，422-462。  new window
9.Shahjahan, R. A.(2005)。Mapping the field of anti-colonial discourse to understand issues of indigenousknowledges: Decolonizing praxis。McGill Journal of Education，40(2)，213-240。  new window
10.Zins, C.,、Guttmann, D.(2000)。Structuring web bibliographic resources: An exemplary subjectclassification scheme。Knowledge Organization，27(3)，143-159。  new window
11.Zins, C.,、Guttmann, D.(2003)。Domain analysis of social work: An exemplary of an integratedmethodological approach。Knowledge Organization，30(3/4)，196-212。  new window
12.Zins, C.(2007)。Knowledge map of information science。Journal of the American Society forInformation Science and Technology，58(4)，526-535。  new window
會議論文
1.陳奕璇、阮明淑(2006)。領域分析之方法學研究。台北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.Nielsen, M. L.(2000)。Domain analysis, an important part of thesaurus construction. Methodologiesand approaches。Maryland。  new window
3.Rigney, L. I.(1999)。The first perspective: Culturally safe research practices on or with indigenouspeoples。Alberta,Canada。  new window
4.Rigney, L. I.(2000)。A first perspective of Indigenous Australian participation in science: Framingindigenous research towards indigenous Australian intellectual sovereignty。Adelaide。  new window
研究報告
1.張培倫主持(2008)。建構台灣原住民族知識體系之規劃研究企劃書。宜蘭縣。  延伸查詢new window
2.莊芳榮主持、陳昭珍、葉建華共同主持(2005)。知識分類架構研究計畫。台北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.Kang, K. C., Cohen, S. G., Hess, J. A., Novak, W. E.,、Spencer Peterson, A. S.(1990)。Featured-Oriented Domain Analysis (FODA) feasibility study (CMU/SEI-90-TR-21 ESD-90-TR-222)。Pittsburgh, PA。  new window
圖書
1.Thiongo, N. W.(1986)。Decolonising the mind: The politics of language in African literature。London：James Currey。  new window
2.國家圖書館編目組編訂(2007)。中文圖書分類法：2007年版索引編。台北市：國家圖書館。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳國強(2002)。文化人類學辭典。臺北：恩楷股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.美國資訊科學學會台北分會、農業科學資料服務中心、國立中央圖書館(1994)。索引典理論與實務。臺北：國立中央圖書館。  延伸查詢new window
5.Smith, Linda Tuhiwai(1999)。Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples。Zed Books。  new window
6.Haykin, D. J.(1951)。Subject headings: A practical guide。Washington, DC。  new window
7.Jagerman, E. J.(2006)。Creating, maintaining and applying quality taxonomies.。Zoetermeer。  new window
8.Semali, M(1999)。What is indigenous knowledge?。Voices from the academy。New York。  new window
9.Shiva, V.(1995)。Monocultures of the mind。London。  new window
10.Vickery, B. C.(1960)。Faceted classification。A guide to the construction and use of special schemes。London。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1299（臺灣：1286，外國：13） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1641614 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67461340
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上