整合理論與歐盟條約修改之研究--以歐盟憲法條約與里斯本條約為例_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	整合理論與歐盟條約修改之研究--以歐盟憲法條約與里斯本條約為例
書刊名：	政治科學論叢
作者：	盧倩儀
作者(外文)：	Lu, Chien-yi
出版日期：	2010
卷期：	46
頁次：	頁111-157
主題關鍵詞：	歐盟；憲法條約；里斯本條約；制度主義；自由派政府間主義；The EU；Constitutional Treaty；Lisbon Treaty；Institutionalism；Liberal intergovernmentalism
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(4) 專書(0) 專書論文(1) 排除自我引用:7 共同引用:27 點閱:29

二○○一年以來歐洲聯盟諸多歷史發展軸線中，以制憲為底蘊但以里斯本條約收場的歐盟制度改革發展軸線，不僅整段發展完整屬於二○ ○一年至二○○九年這個歷史片段，同時亦是最為清晰可辨並且最具歐洲區域整合里程碑意義的一條歷史軸線。此一歷史發展軸線該用什麼樣的理論來解釋？本文沿襲國際關係理論及區域整合研究中國家中心（state-centered）理論與制度主義對話的思辯輪廓﹐比較自由派政府間主義與制度主義對二○○一年至二○○九年歐盟制度改革歷史發展之解釋力。文章之理論探討部份首先對於兩大學派之共同點加以描述，接著從「國家是否為單一行為者」、「政府間談判是否獨佔性地決定整合結果」、以及「超國家機構有無獨立自主影響力」三個面向切入，剖析兩大學派不相容之處。文章隨後評估兩大學派對於二○○一年至二○○九年歐盟制度改革經過之解釋力，發現制度主義能夠對這段整合歷史提供較理想的解釋，因為從拉肯到里斯本的歷史發展顯示：會員國並非單一行為者、整合結果也並非單獨由政府間談判排他性地決定、而超國家機構在這十年的制度改革過程中亦明顯發揮了獨立自主的影響力。

以文找文

Among the various historic developments that have taken place in the European Union in the past decade, the Constitution-making endeavors and the subsequent reform of the institutions through the Lisbon Treaty are the most prominent. Not only was the time line of the reform process more or less contained within the decade, but the impact of the reform—both in terms of results and processes—is also far-reaching. This article assesses the strengths and weaknesses of different integration theories in explaining this Treaty reform process. Following conventional debates in international relations and EU studies, state-centered liberal intergovernmentalism is pitted against institutionalism. After singling out three main differences between these two theoretical camps, i.e., state as unitary actor, intergovernmental negotiations determining integration results, and role of supranational institutions, the article examines actual developments in the Treaty reform process against both theories. It finds that on all three points, institutionalism provides a more satisfactory explanation than liberal intergovernmentalism.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Ruggie, John Gerard(197506)。International Responses to Technology:Concepts and Trends。International Organization，29(3)，557-583。
2.	Moravcsik, Andrew.(2006)。What Can We Learn from the Collapse of the European Constitutional Project?。Politische Vierteljahresschrift，47，219-241。
3.	Christiansen, Thomas、Jorgensen, Knud Erik、Wiener, Antje(1999)。The Social Construction of Europe。Journal of European Public Policy，6(4)，528-544。
4.	Wincott, Daniel(1995)。Institutional Interaction and European Integration: Towards an Everyday Critique of Liberal Intergovernmentalism。Journal of Common market Studies，33(4)，597-609。
5.	Flockhart, Trine(2010)。Europeanization or EU-ization? The Transfer of European Norms across Time and Space。Journal of Common Market Studies，48(4)，787-810。
6.	Haas, E. B.(1958)。The Challenge of Regionalism。International Organization，12(4)，440-458。
7.	Wayne, Sandholtz、Zysman, John(1989)。1992: Recasting the European Bargain。International Organization，42(1)，95-128。
8.	蘇宏達(20100600)。從自由政府間主義解析里斯本條約的發展過程。問題與研究，49(2)，1-38。延伸查詢
9.	藍玉春(20090100)。從建構主義探討形塑中的歐洲認同。全球政治評論，25，81-116。延伸查詢
10.	Pierson, Paul(19960400)。The Path To European Integration: A Historical Institutionalist Analysis。Comparative Political Studies，29(2)，123-163。
11.	Hall, Peter A.、Taylor, Rosemary C. R.(1996)。Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms。Political Studies，44(5)，936-957。
12.	Moravcsik, Andrew(1997)。Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics。International Organization，51(4)，513-553。
13.	Moravcsik, Andrew(1993)。Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach。Journal of Common Market Studies，31(4)，473-524。
14.	Grieco, Joseph M.(1988)。Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism。International Organization，42(3)，485-507。
15.	Putnam, Robert David(1988)。Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games。International Organization，42(3)，427-460。
16.	Parsons, G.(2008)。“Revisiting Landmark Contributions to EU Studies.”。European Union Studies Association Review，21(2)，1-2。
17.	Pennings, P. and C. Arnold.(2008)。“Is Constitutional Politics like Politics At Home’? The Case of the EU Constitution.”。Political Studies，56，789-806。
18.	Puchala, D.(1999)。“Institutionalism, Intergovernmentalism and Europeanintegration: A Review Article.”。Journal of Common Market Studies，37(2)，317-331。
19.	Reh, C.(2008)。“The Convention on the Future of Europe and theDevelopment of Integration Theory: A Lasting Imprint?”。Journal of European Public Policy，15(5)，781-794。
20.	Risse, T. and M. Kleine.(2007)。“Assessing the Legitimacy of the EU’s Treaty Revision Metho eds.”。Journal of Common Market Studies，45(1)，69-80。
21.	Schout, A. and A. Jordan.(2005)。“Co-ordinated European Governance: Self- Organizing or Centrally Steered ?”。Public Administration，83(1)，201-220。
22.	Ansell, C.(2000)。“The Networked Polity: Regional Development in Western Europe.”。Governance，13(3)，303-333。
23.	Beach, D.(2007)。“The European Parliament in the 2000 IGC and the Constitutional Treaty Negotiations: From Loser to Winner.”。Journal of European Public Policy，14(8)，1271-1292。
24.	Beach, D. and T. Christiansen.(2007)。“Introduction: Political Agency in the Constitutional Politics of the European Union.”。Journal of European Public Policy，14(8)，1163-1166。
25.	Börzel T.(2010)。“European Governance: Negotiation and Competition in the Shadow of Hierarchy.”。Journal of Common Market Studies，48(2)，191-219。
26.	Caporaso, J.(2003)。“Integrating Institutions—Rationalism, Constructivism, and the Study of the European Union.”。Comparative Political Studies，36(1-2)，7-40。
27.	Crum, B.(2007)。“Can the EU Presidency Make Its Mark on Interstate Bargains? The Italian and Irish Presidencies of the 2003-04 IGC.”。Journal of European Public Policy，14(8)，1208-1226。
28.	Dimitrakopoulos, D. G. and H. Kassim.(2004)。“Deciding the Future of the European Union: Preference Formation and Treaty Reform.”。Comparative European Politics，2，241-260。
29.	European Commission.(2010)。Official Journal of the European UnionC83. Volume 53。
30.	Garrett, G. and G. Tsebelis.(1999)。“More Reasons to Resist the Temptation of Power Indices in the EU。Journal of Theoretical Politics，11(3)，331-338。
31.	Garrett, G. and G. Tsebelis.(2001)。“Even More Reasons to Resist the Temptation of Power Indices in the EU.”。Journal of Theoretical Politics，13(1)，99-105。
32.	Granger, M. P.(2005)。“The Future of Europe: Judicial Interference and Preferences.”。Comparative European Politics，3，155-179。
33.	Hix, S.(2005)。“Neither a Preference-Outlier nor a Unitary Actor:Institutional Reform Preferences of the European Parliament.”。Comparative European Politics，3，131-154.。
34.	Hooghe, L. and G. Marks.(2008)。“Postcript to the ‘The Making of A Polity’.”。European Union Studies Association Review，21(2)，5-8.。
35.	Hug S. and T. König.(2002)。“In View of Ratification: Governmental Preferences and Domestic Constraints at the Amsterdam Intergovernmental Conference.”。International Organization，56(2)，447-476。
36.	Hug S. and T. König.(2007)。“Domestic Structures and Constitution-Building in an International Organization.”。Review of International Organizations，2(2)，105-113。
37.	Hug, S. and T. Schulz.(2007)。“Referendums in the EU’s Constitution Building Process.”。Review of International Organizations，2(2)，177-218。
38.	Kohler-Koch, B.(1996)。“Catching up with Change: The Transformation of Governance in the European Union.”。Journal of European Public Policy，3(3)，359-380。
39.	König T.(2005)。“Measuring and Analyzing Positions on European Constitution-building.”。European Union Politics，6(3)，259-267。
40.	König T. and D. Finke.(2007)。“Reforming the Equilibrium? Veto Players and Policy Change in the European Constitution-building Process.”。Review of International Organizations，2(2)，153-176。
41.	König T. and S. Hug.(2000)。“Ratifying Maastricht. Parliamentary Voteson International Treaties and Theoretical Solution Concepts.”。European Union Politics，1(1)，93-124。
42.	König T. and J. Slapin.(2004)。“Bringing Parliaments Back In. The Sources of Power in the European Treaty Negotiations.”。Journal of Theoretical Politics，16，357-394.。
43.	König T. and J. Slapin.(2006)。“From Unanimity to Consensus—An Analysis of the Negotiations at the EU’s Constitutional Convention.”。World Politics，58，413-445。
44.	Mattli, W. and A. Slaughter.(2008)。“From ‘Europe Before the Court’ to the World Before Courts.”。EUSA Review，21(2)，8-10.。
45.	Moravcsik, A.(1991)。“Negotiating the Single European Act: NationalInterests and Conventional Statecraft in the European Community.”。International Organization，45，19-56.。
46.	Moravcsik, A.(2005)。“The European Constitutional Compromise and the Neofunctionalist Legacy。Journal of European Public Policy，12(2)，349-386。
47.	Moravcsik, A.(2008)。“Good-bye to ‘Federalist’ theory。EUSA Review，21(2)，2-5。
48.	Norheim-Martinsen, P. M.(2010)。Beyond Intergovernmentalism: European Security and Defence Policy and the Governance Approach。Journal of Common Market Studies，48(5)，1351-1365。
49.	Tsebelis, G.(2008)。“Thinking about the Recent Past and the Future of the EU.”。Journal of Common Market Studies，46(2)，265-292。
50.	Tsebelis, G. and S. Proksch.(2007)。“The Art of Political Manipulation in the European Convention.”。Journal of Common Market Studies，45(1)，157-186。
51.	Warleigh-Lack, A. and B. Rosamond.(2010)。“Across the EU Studies—New Regionalism Frontier: Invitation to a Dialogue.”。Journal of Common Market Studies，48(4)，993-1013。
52.	Garrett, G. and G. Tsebelis.(1999)。“Why Resist the Temptation to Apply Power Indices to the European Union?”。Journal of Theoretical Politics，11(3)，291-308.。
53.	König, T. et al.(2008)。The Treaty Reform of the EU: Constitutional Agenda-Setting, Intergovernmental Bargains and the Presidency’s Crisis Management of Ratification Failure.”。Journal of Common Market Studies，46(2)，337-363.。
54.	Schneider, G. and P. Weitsman.(199)。“The Punishment Trap—Integration Referendums as Popularity Contests.”。Comparative Political Studies，28(4)，582–607.。
55.	König, T. et al(2008)。“The Treaty Reform of the EU: Constitutional Agenda-Setting, Intergovernmental Bargains and the Presidency’s Crisis Management of Ratification Failure.”。Journal of Common Market Studies .，46(2)，337-363。

會議論文
1.	De Clerck-Sachsse, J.(2007)。“Talking About a Constitution—the Conventionon the Future of Europe and Civil Society in the European Union.”。Paris。

研究報告
1.	Closa, C.(2003)。Improving EU Constitutional Politics? A Preliminary Assessment of the Convention.。
2.	European Commission.(2009)。Flash Eurobarometer Lisbon Treaty PostReferendum Survey Ireland 2009—Analytical Report。Brussels。
3.	Hoffmann, L.(2002)。The Convention on the Future of Europe—Thoughts on the Convention-Model。Brussels.。
4.	Magnette, P.(2004)。“When does deliberation matter? Constitutional Rhetoric in the Convention on the Future of Europe.”。Oslo。
5.	Norman, P.(2005)。The Accidental Constitution—The Story of the European Convention。Brussels:。
6.	Palmer, J.、Colleagues.(2003)。The Convention on the Future of Europehas Lost Its Way。Brussels:。

圖書
1.	Moravcsik, Andrew.(1998)。Choice for Europe—Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht。Ithaca:：Cornell University Press.。
2.	Beach, D.(2005)。The Dynamics of European Integration - Why and When EU Institutions Matter。Basingstoke：Palgrave Macmillan。
3.	Tsebelis, George(2002)。Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work。New York：Russell Sage Foundation Press。
4.	McCormick, John(2005)。Understanding the European Union: A Concise Introduction。New York：Palgrave Macmillan。
5.	Schelling, Thomas C.(1960)。The Strategy of Conflict。Cambridge, Mass：Cambridge University Press。
6.	Haas, Ernst B.(1958)。The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and Economic Forces。Stanford University Press。
7.	Haas, Ernst Bernard(1964)。Beyond the Nation-State: Functionalism and International Organization。Stanford University Press。
8.	Habermas, Jürgen、Rehg, William(1996)。Between Facts and Norms: Contribution to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy。Cambridge, MA：MIT Press。
9.	Milner, Helen V.(1997)。Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations。Princeton University Press。
10.	Lindberg, Leon N.(1963)。The Political Dynamics of European Economic Integration。Stanford University Press。
11.	Rosamond, Ben(2000)。Theories of European Integration。St. Martin's Press。
12.	Rosamond, B.(2006)。“The Political Sciences of European Integration: Disciplinary History and EU Studies.”。Handbook of European Union Politics。London。
13.	Smith, D.L. and J. L. Ray.(1993)。“The 1992 Project.”。The 1992 Project and the Future of Integration in Europe。New York。
14.	Tsebelis, G.(2006)。“The European Convention and the Rome and BrusselsI GCs: A Veto Players Analysis.”。Policy-making Processes and the European Constitution。London。
15.	張亞中(2007)。〈歐洲聯盟的演進〉。《歐洲聯盟的組織與運作（增訂二版）》。台北。延伸查詢
16.	Aspinwall, M. and J Greenwood.(1998)。“Conceptualizing Collective Action in the European Union: An Introduction.”。Collective Action in the European Union: Interests and the New Politics of Associability。London:。
17.	Baldwin, D. A.(1993)。Neorealism and Neoliberlaism: the Contemporary Debate。New York:。
18.	Checkel, J. T.(2006)。“Constructivism and EU Politics.”。Handbook of European Union Politics。London。
19.	Eilstrup-Sangiovani, M.(2006)。Debates on European Integration。New York:。
20.	Eriksen, E. O.(2004)。“Comment on ‘Deliberative Constitutional Politicsand the EU Value-Based Constitution’。Deliberative Constitutional Politics in the EU。Oslo。
21.	Haas, E. B.(1968)。The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and EconomicForces 1950-1957, 2nd edition.。Stanford, CA:。
22.	Kohler-Koch, B. and R. Eising. eds.(1999)。The Transformation of Governance in Europe。London:。
23.	König T. and S. Hug.(2006)。“Conclusion.”。Policymaking Processes and the European Constitution: A Comparative Study of Member Statesand Accession Countries。London and New York。
24.	Lindberg, L. N.(1994)。“Comment on Moravcsik.”。Economic and Political Integration in Europe: Internal Dynamics and Global Context。Oxford:。
25.	Milton, G. et al.(2005)。The European Constitution—Its Origins, Negotiation and Meaning。London:。
26.	Nye, J. S.(1966)。Pan-Africanism and East African Integration。Cambridge,MA:。
27.	Venables, T. ed.(2003)。Rethinking European Citizenship。Brussels:。
28.	Schimmelfennig, F.(2004)。“Liberal Intergovernmentalism”。European Integration Theory。Oxford。
29.	Schimmelfennig, F.(200)。“Liberal Intergovernmentalism”。European Integration Theory。Oxford:。

圖書論文
1.	盧倩儀(2007)。〈區域整合理論〉。歐洲聯盟的組織與運作, 增訂二版。台北：五南。延伸查詢
2.	Kohler-Koch, Beate(1999)。The Evolution and Transformation of European Governance。The Transformation of Governance in the European Union。Routledge。
3.	Hooghe, L.、Marks, G.(1999)。Making of A Polity. The Struggle over European Integration。Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。
4.	洪德欽(2007)。歐盟憲法之法理分析。歐盟憲法。臺北：中央研究院歐美研究所。延伸查詢

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	新區域間主義下的歐盟印太戰略：以歐盟與東協「開路者」協定為例
2.	歐洲治理危機：「利益」與「認同」的落差
3.	歐盟執委會的權限擴張與制衡：超國家主義與政府間主義的競合
4.	德國與歐盟共同防務整合：自由政府間主義的分析
5.	歐洲議題政治化現象之分析
6.	中國大陸「一帶一路」倡議之效應與歐盟因應之道
7.	歐盟整合理論的新發展：後功能主義對傳統整合理論之挑戰
8.	論香港的社會運動與身分認同發展
9.	規範創新與小國非傳統安全政策：以芬蘭氣候政策為例
10.	英國脫歐所引發之法律衝突問題
11.	里斯本條約架構下的歐盟安全政策合作之嘗試
12.	「歐洲安全」研究的理論基礎：區域安全、國際關係、全球體系
13.	歐盟整合架構下之認同與制度建構之探究：以歐盟移民政策為例
14.	非傳統安全與歐盟小國影響力發揮：以立陶宛打擊非法走私菸草產品為例
15.	英國與里斯本條約的批准：自由政府間主義的分析

1.	兩岸刑事司法合作規範的社會建構--以引渡與遣返為核心
2.	PAM中個體與群體之事實、價值與人際－以南臺灣民眾對「ECFA」之認知、態度與行為為例
3.	歐洲整合發展與演進：權力、利益、認同與制度建構之整合分析
4.	新現實主義下歐盟共同外交及安全政策之發展與前景
5.	兩岸統合可能模式的探討：歐盟模式與不均等聯邦制對兩岸適用之比較
6.	美中臺三角關係發展的國際政治經濟學分析
7.	歐洲聯盟之政治正當性建構
8.	歐盟之先行者―讓•莫內與歐洲統合
9.	全球化浪潮下的民族國家:衝擊與回應

1.	由中山先生地方自治看烏坎公民運動
2.	歐洲聯盟與南方共同市場區域間互動模式分析
3.	里斯本條約下歐盟與非加太國家貿易關係與策略的新方向
4.	整合理論與歐盟條約修改之研究─以《歐盟憲法條約》為例（2000-2005）

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫