:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:歐盟執委會的權限擴張與制衡:超國家主義與政府間主義的競合
書刊名:遠景基金會季刊
作者:賴昀辰
作者(外文):Lai, Yun-chen
出版日期:2021
卷期:22:4
頁次:頁101-149
主題關鍵詞:歐盟執委會權力制衡超國家主義政府間主義自由貿易協定EU CommissionChecks and balancesSupranationalismIntergovernmentalismFTA
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:157
  • 點閱點閱:4
期刊論文
1.盧倩儀(20101200)。整合理論與歐盟條約修改之研究--以歐盟憲法條約與里斯本條約為例。政治科學論叢,46,111-157。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.洪德欽(20121200)。歐盟新一代自由貿易協定政策之研究。歐美研究,42(4),673-752。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.盧倩儀(20041100)。審議式超國家主義。問題與研究,43(6),53-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.吳柏寬(20140700)。歐洲議會新氣象,TTIP談判面對新挑戰。經濟前瞻,154,72-74。  延伸查詢new window
5.賴昀辰(20161200)。解析跨大西洋貿易與投資夥伴協議(TTIP):理想與現實的可能矛盾。政治科學論叢,70,121-158。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.洪德欽(20170600)。英國脫歐對歐盟之影響。問題與研究,56(2),145-163。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.朱景鵬、Eissel, Dieter(20131200)。歐盟治理理論發展與模式特色。公共治理季刊,1(4),18-33。  延伸查詢new window
8.Bickerton, Christopher J.、Hodson, Dermot、Puetter, Uwe(2015)。The New Intergovernmentalism: European Integration in the Post-Maastricht Era。Journal of Common Market Studies,53(4),703-722。  new window
9.Genschel, Philipp、Jachtenfuchs, Markus(2018)。From Market Integration to Core State Powers: The Eurozone Crisis, the Refugee Crisis and Integration Theory。Journal of Common Market Studies,56(1),178-196。  new window
10.卓忠宏(20050700)。從歐盟「政府間會議」論歐洲憲法條約及其爭議。國際關係學報,20,57-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.鄭昀欣(20200500)。歐盟新型態經貿協定有關投資議題之特色。經濟前瞻,189,97-101。  延伸查詢new window
12.衛民(20160300)。重探哈斯「新功能主義」及其在歐洲統合演進上的意涵。問題與研究,55(1),69-90。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.馮怡然(2020)。超國家主義與政府間主義融合:歐盟新防務建設舉措及前景。國際安全研究,38(5),81-110。  延伸查詢new window
14.賴昀辰(20210400)。從戰略性夥伴到系統性對手:歐盟對「中」政策正在走向團結嗎?。展望與探索,19(5),12-20。  延伸查詢new window
15.朱景鵬(2015)。歐盟的公民參與和公民倡議--挑戰與困境。人社東華,5。  延伸查詢new window
16.Auer, Stefan、Scicluna, Nicole(2021)。The Impossibility of Constitutionalizing Emergency Europe。Journal of Common Market Studies,59(S1),20-31。  new window
17.Coremans, Evelyn(2017)。From Access to Documents to Consumption of Information: The European Commission Transparency Policy for the TTIP Negotiations。Politics and Governance,5(3),29-39。  new window
18.Corduneanu, Ligia(2014)。CFSP--Vacillating Between Supranationalism And Intergovernmentalism?。CES Working Papers,6(1),55-61。  new window
19.Conrad, Maximilian、Oleart, Alvaro(2019)。Framing TTIP in the Wake of the Greenpeace Leaks: Agonistic and Deliberative Perspectives on Frame Resonance and Communicative Power。Journal of European Integration,42(4),527-545。  new window
20.Christiansen, Thomas(2016)。After the Spitzenkandidaten: Fundamental Change in the EU's Political System?。West European Politics,39(5),992-1010。  new window
21.Caiani, Manuela、Graziano, Paola(2018)。Europeanisation and social movements: The case of the Stop TTIP campaign。European Journal of Political Research,57(4),1031-1055。  new window
22.D'Erman, Valerie J.(2016)。Comparative intergovernmental politics: CETA negotiations between Canada and the EU。Politics and Governance,4(3),90-99。  new window
23.Delimatsis, Panos(2017)。The evolution of the EU external trade policy in services--CETA, TTIP, and TiSA after Brexit。Journal of International Economic Law,20(3),583-625。  new window
24.Fahey, Elaine(2017)。European Citizens Initiative 'STOP TTIP' Can Proceed Says General Court。European Journal of Risk Regulation,8,787-790。  new window
25.Freudlsperger, Christian(2021)。Failing forward in the Common Commercial Policy? Deep trade and the perennial question of EU competence。Journal of European Public Policy,28(10),1650-1668。  new window
26.van Gruisen, Philippe、Huysmans, Martijn(2020)。The Early Warning System and policymaking in the European Union。European Union Politics,21(3),451-473。  new window
27.Hantrais, Linda(2021)。Social perspectives on Brexit, COVID-19 and European (dis)integration。Journal of Common Market Studies,59(S1),69-80。  new window
28.Jančić, Davor(2012)。The Barroso initiative: Window dressing or democracy boost。Utrecht Law Review,8(1),78-81。  new window
29.Jančić, Davor(2016)。TTIP and legislative-executive relations in EU trade policy。West European Politics,40(1),202-221。  new window
30.Rhodes, Martin(2021)。'Failing forward': a critique in light of covid-19。Journal of European Public Policy,28,1537-1554。  new window
31.Laursen, Finn、Roederer-Rynning, Christilla(2017)。Writing the Rules of 21st-Century Trade: The EU and the New Trade Bilateralism。Journal of European Integration,39(7),763-923。  new window
32.Jones, Erik R.、Kelemen, Daniel、Meunier, Sophie(2021)。Failing forward? Crises and patterns of European integration。Journal of European Public Policy,28(10),1519-1536。  new window
33.Jones, Erik R.、Kelemen, Daniel、Meunier, Sophie(2016)。Failing forward? The Euro crisis and the incomplete nature of European integration。Comparative Political Studies,49(7),1010-1034。  new window
34.Roederer-Rynning, Christilla(2017)。Parliamentary Assertion and Deep Integration: The European Parliament in the CETA and TTIP Negotiations。Cambridge Review of International Affairs,30(5/6),507-526。  new window
35.Salgado, Rosa Sanchez、Demidov, Andrey(2018)。Beyond the Brussels bubble? National Civil Society Organisations in the European Union。Journal of Contemporary European Research,14(2),56-67。  new window
36.Schmidt, Vivien A.(2016)。The New EU Governance: New Intergovernmentalism, New Supranationalism, and New Parliamentarism。IAI Working Papers,16(11),1-17。  new window
37.Schuette, Leonard August(2021)。Forging unity: European commission leadership in the Brexit negotiations。Journal of Common Market Studies,59(5),1142-1159。  new window
38.Thym, Daniel(2011)。The Intergovernmental Constitution of the EU's Foreign, Security & Defence Executive。European Constitutional Law Review,7(3),453-480。  new window
39.Van den Putte, Lore、De Ville, Ferdi、Orbie, Jab(2014)。The European parliament's new role in trade policy: Turning power into impact。CEPS Special Reports,89,1-12。  new window
40.洪德欽(20170600)。英國脫歐與英歐貿易關係之未來。政治學報,63,33-61。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Raunio, Tapio(2010)。Destined for irrelevance? Subsidiarity control by national parliaments。  new window
2.Woolcock, Stephen(2010)。The Treaty of Lisbon and the European Union as an Actor in International Trade。  new window
圖書
1.Staab, Andreas(2011)。The European Union Explained: Institutions, Actors, Global Impact。Bloomington, IN:Indiana University Press。  new window
2.黃偉峰(2003)。歐洲聯盟的組織與運作。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.張亞中(19980000)。歐洲統合:政府間主義與超國家主義的互動。臺北:揚智文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Kenealy, Daniel、Peterson, John、Corbett, Richard(2015)。The European Union: How Does It Work?。Oxford University Press。  new window
5.Cini, Michelle、Borragán, Nieves Pérez-Solórzano(2019)。European Union Politics。Oxford University Press。  new window
6.Malmström, Cecilia(2015)。Trade for all: Towards a more responsible trade and investment policy。Publications Office。  new window
其他
1.林柏宏(20190621)。歐盟高層接班人難達共識30日召開危機峰會,https://www.rti.org.tw/news/view/id/2024784。  延伸查詢new window
2.尹子軒(2019)。「第一候選人」制度爭議是歐洲議會政制成長的陣痛,https://theglocalhk.com/%E3%80%90udn%E8%BD%89%E8%A7%92%E5%9C%8B%E9%9A%9B%E7%89%B9%E7%B4%84%E3%80%91%E7%AC%AC%E4%B8%80%E5%80%99%E9%81%B8%E4%BA%BA%E5%88%B6%E5%BA%A6%E7%88%AD%E8%AD%B0%E6%98%AF%E6%AD%90/。  new window
3.Buzogány, Csongor Aron,Stuchlik, Andrej(2011)。Paved with Good Intentions: Ambiguities of Empowering Parliaments after Lisbon。  new window
4.Delimatsis, Panos(2016)。TTIP, CETA, TiSA behind Closed Doors: Transparency in the EU Trade Policy。  new window
5.Brunnstrom, David(20091120)。EU Says It Has Solved the Kissinger Question,https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-president-kissinger-idUSTRE5AJ00B20091120。  new window
6.Deutsch, Jillian,Wheaton, Sarah(20210127)。How Europe fell behind on vaccines,https://www.politico.eu/article/europe-coronavirus-vaccine-struggle-pfizer-biontech-astrazeneca/。  new window
7.Gilbert, Mark(2019)。Alarums and Excursions: Improvising Politics on the European Stage, by L. Van Middelaar, (Newcastle Upon Tyne: Agenda, 2019, ISBN 99781788211727); xviii+301pp., £25.00 hb。  new window
8.UK in a Changing Europe。What is a mixed agreement?,https://ukandeu.ac.uk/the-facts/what-is-a-mixedagreement/。  new window
9.Trusca, Madalina(20140916)。Democracy violation: European Commission rejects citizens' initiative to stop TTIP and CETA,https://haiweb.org/democracy-violation-european-commission-rejects-citizens-initiative-to-stop-ttip-and-ceta/。  new window
10.Leblond, Patrick(20160706)。CETA is moving forward in spite of challenges,https://www.cigionline.org/articles/ceta-moving-forward-spite-challenges/。  new window
11.The Economist(20200905)。The contradiction at the heart of the European Commission,https://www.economist.com/europe/2020/09/03/the-contradiction-at-the-heart-of-the-european-commission。  new window
圖書論文
1.Woolcock, Stephen(2011)。European Union trade policy: The Canada--EU Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) towards a new generation of FTAs?。Europe, Canada and the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement。Routledge。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE